Paul Cassell
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Bradley Edwards
|
Co counsel |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Virginia Giuffre
|
Client |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Virginia Roberts
|
Client |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
ALAN DERSHOWITZ
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Bradley Edwards
|
Business associate |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Adversarial |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Alan Dershowitz
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Bruce Reinhart
|
Adversarial |
6
|
1 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jane Does
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Joan tuc
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Alan Dershowitz
|
Adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Advisory Committee
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Bruce Reinhart
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
MIT
|
Proposer reviewer |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Brad
|
Co counsel |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Alan Dershowitz
|
Adversarial ideological opponents |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Timothy McVeigh
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Michael Bilton
|
Information sharing |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
JANE DOE NO. 2
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Paul Blake
|
Professional correspondence |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Edwards
|
Co counsel |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
BRAD EDWARDS
|
Co counsel |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
[Redacted Recipient]
|
Professional cooperation |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Edwards
|
Co counsel |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | New court filing submitted asking for Jane Doe #3 and another woman to join a pending case. | West Palm Beach, Fla. | View |
| N/A | N/A | Filing of Florida Defamation Action (Case No. CACE 15-000072). | Broward County Circuit Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Edwards and Cassell request to add Virginia Giuffre (Jane Doe No. 3) to the case. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Settlement of defamation case between Edwards/Cassell and Dershowitz | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | The Advisory Committee took up proposed rule changes regarding the CVRA. | Unknown | View |
| 2019-09-03 | Court hearing | Paul Cassell addresses the court during a hearing. | Courtroom | View |
| 2019-09-03 | N/A | Court Hearing (Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB) | Southern District of New Yo... | View |
| 2019-07-21 | N/A | Approximate date for filing the brief mentioned (email states 'We file in about one week' from Ju... | Court (implied) | View |
| 2019-01-01 | N/A | Lawsuit filed by Jane Doe No. 3 against Dershowitz and others. | Court | View |
| 2019-01-01 | N/A | Court proceedings regarding Jeffrey Epstein's release conditions. | District Court (likely SDNY) | View |
| 2018-01-01 | Meeting | Meetings took place between attorneys for accusing witnesses and SDNY prosecutors concerning or r... | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2018-01-01 | N/A | Defamation case between Dershowitz and lawyers Edwards/Cassell settled. | Court | View |
| 2016-08-30 | N/A | Ruling on the Cassell Motion to Quash issued by the Southern District of New York | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2016-04-22 | N/A | Scheduled deposition of Ghislaine Maxwell. | Unknown | View |
| 2016-04-21 | N/A | Court Hearing regarding Pro Hac Vice motions and discovery disputes. | SDNY Courtroom | View |
| 2016-04-10 | N/A | Publication of article regarding settlement between Dershowitz and Edwards/Cassell. | N/A | View |
| 2016-04-08 | N/A | Settlement of lawsuits between Dershowitz, Edwards, and Cassell. | N/A | View |
| 2016-04-08 | N/A | Settlement of defamation claims between Edwards/Cassell and Dershowitz. | Broward County, Florida | View |
| 2016-04-01 | N/A | Settlement of defamation claims between Dershowitz and attorneys Edwards/Cassell. | Legal proceeding | View |
| 2016-01-01 | Meeting | Meetings took place where certain attorneys for accusing witnesses met with SDNY prosecutors to a... | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2015-10-17 | N/A | Deposition of Paul Cassell (noted as 'Pual' in text) (Exhibit 4) | Unknown | View |
| 2015-10-16 | N/A | Deposition of Paul Cassell (Exhibit 3) | Unknown | View |
| 2015-10-15 | N/A | Alan Dershowitz's deposition at a Broward County courthouse where he alleged a criminal extortion... | Broward County, Florida | View |
| 2015-10-01 | N/A | Timeframe focused on Alan Dershowitz and legal battles in Florida. | Florida | View |
| 2015-10-01 | N/A | Alan Dershowitz appears at a Florida courthouse regarding defamation suits involving Bradley Edwa... | Florida courthouse | View |
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015640.jpg
This document is a 'Counsel List' (Page 20 of 20) from a court filing in the case of 'Edwards, Bradley vs. Dershowitz' (Case No. CACE 15-000072). It provides contact information for attorneys representing the parties involved, including addresses, emails, and phone numbers for law firms such as Boies Schiller & Flexner, Cole Scott & Kissane, and Wiley Rein. The document contains apparent clerical errors, as it lists nearly all attorneys—including the plaintiff Bradley Edwards and his counsel—under the label 'Attorneys for Alan M.Dershowitz, Esquire'.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015637.jpg
This document is page 17 of a court filing in the case of Edwards vs. Dershowitz, specifically a response to Dershowitz's motion to seal records. It quotes Alan Dershowitz attacking attorneys Edwards and Cassell and their client Virginia Giuffre during a CNN interview, accusing them of being unethical and motivated by money. The filing concludes by requesting the court deny Dershowitz's motion to seal documents regarding Giuffre's allegations.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015636.jpg
This document is page 16 of a legal response filed by Edwards and Cassell in a defamation case against Alan Dershowitz. It cites a January 3, 2015, BBC Radio 4 interview where Dershowitz publicly claims he wants all evidence released and aggressively attempts to discredit his accuser. In the transcript, Dershowitz denies allegations against himself, Bill Clinton, and Prince Andrew, asserting that Secret Service records will prove Clinton was never on Epstein's island.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015635.jpg
This page is from a legal response by Edwards and Cassell against Dershowitz (Case CACE 15-000072). It documents Dershowitz's public media statements in January 2015 (on the Today Show and in the Miami Herald) where he categorically denies allegations, claims an 'academic relationship' with Epstein, and accuses the opposing lawyers and Ms. Giuffre of lying and fabrication. He specifically threatens that the lawyers will be disbarred and will 'rue the day' they filed the motion.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015634.jpg
This document is page 14 of a legal response filed by Edwards and Cassell in the case Edwards v. Dershowitz. The text argues that Dershowitz selectively uses parts of Virginia Giuffre's affidavit while attempting to seal the rest, preventing a fair assessment of his claims that her statements are 'preposterous.' The document includes a transcript of a BBC interview from January 2015 where Dershowitz categorically denies the allegations, claims he does not know Giuffre, and threatens the opposing lawyers with defamation suits and disbarment proceedings.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015632.jpg
This document is a page from a legal response in the case of Edwards vs. Dershowitz, likely part of a House Oversight review. It contains a transcript of Alan Dershowitz's deposition where he vehemently denies ever meeting or touching Virginia Giuffre (Roberts) and denies witnessing Jeffrey Epstein abuse anyone. An attorney, Ms. McCawley, interrupts to object when Dershowitz mentions David Boies and potential settlement discussions.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015631.jpg
This document is page 11 of a legal response in the case of Edwards vs. Dershowitz (Case No. CACE 15-000072). Attorneys Edwards and Cassell argue against sealing court records, claiming that Alan Dershowitz selectively reveals confidential information to misrepresent facts while trying to prevent them from correcting the record. The text specifically cites a deposition where Dershowitz allegedly brought up an affidavit by Virginia Giuffre regarding him watching her perform oral sex on Jeffrey Epstein, and subsequently misrepresented settlement discussions involving attorney David Boies.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015630.jpg
This document is page 10 of a legal response in the defamation case *Edwards v. Dershowitz* (CACE 15-000072). The filing argues against Dershowitz's motion for confidentiality, citing previous orders by Judge Marra in a federal CVRA case. The text explicitly mentions allegations of sexual abuse by Dershowitz against Ms. Giuffre and asserts that previous court orders allow for these factual details to be presented if properly supported.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015628.jpg
This document is page 8 of a legal response in the case of Edwards v. Dershowitz (Case No. CACE 15-000072). It details a motion filed on December 30, 2014, by Virginia Giuffre (Jane Doe No. 3) and Jane Doe No. 4 to join the case as victims under the CVRA, explicitly alleging that Jeffrey Epstein trafficked Giuffre to Alan Dershowitz and Prince Andrew for sexual purposes while she was a minor. The text also notes Dershowitz's subsequent aggressive media response, in which he called Giuffre a 'serial liar' and the opposing attorneys 'sleazy' and 'unprofessional.'
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015627.jpg
This document is page 7 of a response in the case Edwards v. Dershowitz (CACE 15-000072). It details discovery disputes between victims' counsel (Edwards and Cassell) and the Government regarding the production of documents and the attempt to add Virginia Giuffre (Jane Doe No. 3) to the case in 2014. The text highlights the Government's delay tactics and eventual refusal to stipulate the addition of new victims.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015625.jpg
This document is page 5 of a legal response filed by Bradley Edwards and Paul Cassell in a lawsuit against Alan Dershowitz. The text argues that Dershowitz cannot seal court records containing allegations that he sexually abused Jane Doe #3, particularly because he previously quoted those same allegations in his own counterclaim. It further alleges that Dershowitz, as Epstein's lawyer, negotiated a Non-Prosecution Agreement specifically to secure immunity for himself and other coconspirators regarding crimes committed in Florida.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015624.jpg
This document is page 4 of a legal response by Edwards and Cassell in a case against Alan Dershowitz, arguing that sexual abuse allegations are inherent to the lawsuit and not peripheral. The text references legal precedents regarding confidentiality and cites Dershowitz's own counterclaim, which quotes specific allegations that Epstein forced a minor (Jane Doe #3) to have sexual relations with Dershowitz in various locations.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015623.jpg
This document is page 3 of a legal response filed by Bradley Edwards and Paul Cassell against Alan Dershowitz's Motion to Determine Confidentiality of Court Records. The text outlines legal exceptions for confidentiality under Florida Judicial Administration rules, arguing that none apply because the case is a defamation action where disclosure is inherent to the proceedings. The filing cites precedents such as Barron v. Florida Freedom Newspapers and Carnegie v. Tedder to support the argument that defamatory material cannot be sealed.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015622.jpg
This is page 2 of a legal response filed by Edwards and Cassell in the case Edwards vs. Dershowitz (Case No. CACE 15-000072). The document argues against Dershowitz's motion to seal court records, pointing out the hypocrisy of his public statements calling for transparency while legally attempting to seal documents. It cites Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.420 and the case Barron v. Florida Freedom Newspapers, Inc. to establish the heavy burden of proof required to deny public access to court records.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015601.jpg
This document is a background section of a legal motion filed by attorneys Paul Cassell and Brad Edwards in a defamation case. It argues that the Defendant (contextually Alan Dershowitz) is abusing subpoena power to harass a non-party victim, Jane Doe No. 3 (Virginia Giuffre), following a defamation campaign where the Defendant called the attorneys 'unethical' on the Today Show. The motion seeks to quash the subpoena to protect Jane Doe No. 3 from further intimidation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015588.jpg
This document is an email from Paul Cassell to Paul Blake dated January 3, 2015, containing a list of specific questions directed at Alan Dershowitz. The questions probe Dershowitz's knowledge of Jeffrey Epstein's sexual abuse of minors, his visits to Epstein's West Palm Beach mansion, his interactions with Ghislaine Maxwell, and whether he lobbied the DOJ against the victims' credibility. The document references the non-prosecution agreement and Epstein's status as a registered sex offender.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015582.jpg
An email exchange between attorney Paul Cassell and Michael Bilton (likely a journalist) from January 2015. Bilton confirms sending files analyzing Virginia Roberts' (VR) travel coinciding with Prince Andrew's engagements. Cassell acknowledges receipt and shares a Gawker article discussing flight logs linking Clinton and Dershowitz to the case, expressing hope that the truth will come out.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015580.jpg
This document is an email thread from January 23, 2015, between Donna Paine, a freelance TV producer for ITN News, and attorneys Paul Cassell and Brad Edwards. Paine is requesting to be added to a media contact list in anticipation of a ruling by Judge Marra regarding the Jeffrey Epstein case and specific allegations made by Jane Doe #3 against Prince Andrew. Cassell confirms he will have his assistant, Joan, add Paine to their contacts list.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015028.jpg
This document is a printout of a Palm Beach Post news article dated August 26, 2017, discussing the legal efforts to reopen the federal investigation into Jeffrey Epstein nearly 10 years after his 2008 plea deal. The article details how attorneys Bradley Edwards and Paul Cassell, representing two victims, are arguing that the federal government violated the Crime Victims' Rights Act by not informing victims of the non-prosecution agreement. The document bears a House Oversight Committee stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013468.jpg
This document is an affidavit by attorney Bradley James Edwards detailing his representation of victims of Jeffrey Epstein in 2008. Edwards outlines his interactions with Assistant U.S. Attorney Marie Villafaña, alleging that the prosecution failed to inform him of a secret non-prosecution agreement and withheld evidence despite admitting to having proof of Epstein molesting at least 40 minors. The affidavit highlights the timeline of the plea deal and the subsequent revelation that federal prosecution would be blocked.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013411.jpg
A May 2010 article from the Palm Beach Daily News reports on a Manhattan federal court hearing where Judge Lawrence M. McKenna took custody of a tape-recorded conversation between reporter George Rush and Jeffrey Epstein. Attorneys for Epstein's victims, Brad Edwards and Paul Cassell, sought the release of the tape to prove Epstein's lack of remorse in civil cases, while Rush's attorneys argued against its release citing reporter's privilege. The judge reserved ruling on whether the 22-minute recording would be released.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013408.jpg
A March 2011 article from the Palm Beach Daily News reporting that attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein's victims filed court papers seeking to invalidate his non-prosecution agreement. The attorneys argue the U.S. Attorney's Office violated the Crime Victims' Rights Act by concealing the deal and sending false notifications to victims.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013406.jpg
This document is a printout of a 'Main Justice' news article from March 22, 2011, detailing a legal motion filed by attorneys Brad Edwards and Paul Cassell. The attorneys allege that the U.S. Attorney's Office in Miami violated the Crime Victims' Rights Act by secretly signing a non-prosecution agreement with Jeffrey Epstein in September 2007 while sending false letters to victims in 2008 claiming the investigation was still ongoing. The article includes a response from U.S. Attorney's Office Special Counsel Alicia Valle, who maintains that no federal charges were filed and declines further comment due to pending litigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013363.jpg
This document is an affidavit by attorney Bradley James Edwards detailing his representation of three victims (L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe) against Jeffrey Epstein in 2008. Edwards describes his interactions with AUSA Marie Villafaña, alleging that the U.S. Attorney's Office withheld critical information regarding a plea agreement that blocked federal prosecution, despite admitting they had evidence of Epstein molesting at least 40 minors. The affidavit outlines the timeline of the plea deal revelation in June and July 2008.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013494.tif
This affidavit by attorney Bradley James Edwards details his representation of victims of Jeffrey Epstein in 2008, including the filing of state and federal lawsuits. It highlights his interactions with Assistant U.S. Attorney Marie Villafaña regarding Epstein's plea agreement and concerns that information about the federal prosecution implications of the state plea was not fully disclosed to his clients.
Request to publish court's remarks as a published opinion
Paul Cassell addresses the court, praising its handling of victim statements and urging the judge to publish their remarks as a formal opinion to promote transparency in the criminal justice system, citing the precedent of U.S. v. Heaton.
RE: Victims responding to Epstein
Cassell informs the recipient he is drafting a response to Epstein's claim regarding rescission. He argues the NPA only covers the Southern District of Florida and offers to let the recipient review the draft to avoid interfering with their office's efforts.
RE: Victims asserting right to reasonable protection and ...
Acknowledges receipt and confirms that the clients' concerns regarding protection and fair treatment will be conveyed to the Court.
RE: Victims asserting right to reasonable protection and ...
Cassell asserts his clients' rights under CVRA, requesting Epstein be detained for their safety and opposing any 'private jail' arrangement.
N/A (Quoted text)
Initial acknowledgment: 'looks like various pieces are falling together.'
RE: from Michael Bilton - latest from Daily Mail online
Confirming receipt of information, sharing a Gawker article about flight logs, Clinton, and Dershowitz.
Re: Jeffrey Epstein case
Thanking Paul and clarifying request to be on media contact list regarding Judge Marra's ruling.
Re: from Michael Bilton - latest from Daily Mail online
Checking if Cassell received zip files concerning VR's travel alongside Prince Andrew's engagements.
Re: Jeffrey Epstein case
Confirming he is passing info to Joan to add to contacts list.
RE: questions for Dershowitz
List of 8 specific questions intended for Alan Dershowitz regarding his relationship with Epstein and knowledge of abuse.
RE: Draft Protective Order - slight tweak
Proposing language changes to allow attorneys to see the document quickly because 'Epstein is trying to ignore the agreement.' Proposes that counsel must provide the Order to Petitioners before showing them the agreement.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity