Paul Cassell
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Bradley Edwards
|
Co counsel |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Virginia Giuffre
|
Client |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Virginia Roberts
|
Client |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
ALAN DERSHOWITZ
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Bradley Edwards
|
Business associate |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Adversarial |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Alan Dershowitz
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Bruce Reinhart
|
Adversarial |
6
|
1 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jane Does
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Joan tuc
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Alan Dershowitz
|
Adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Advisory Committee
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Bruce Reinhart
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
MIT
|
Proposer reviewer |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Brad
|
Co counsel |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Alan Dershowitz
|
Adversarial ideological opponents |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Timothy McVeigh
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Michael Bilton
|
Information sharing |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
JANE DOE NO. 2
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Paul Blake
|
Professional correspondence |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Edwards
|
Co counsel |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
BRAD EDWARDS
|
Co counsel |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
[Redacted Recipient]
|
Professional cooperation |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Edwards
|
Co counsel |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | New court filing submitted asking for Jane Doe #3 and another woman to join a pending case. | West Palm Beach, Fla. | View |
| N/A | N/A | Filing of Florida Defamation Action (Case No. CACE 15-000072). | Broward County Circuit Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Edwards and Cassell request to add Virginia Giuffre (Jane Doe No. 3) to the case. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Settlement of defamation case between Edwards/Cassell and Dershowitz | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | The Advisory Committee took up proposed rule changes regarding the CVRA. | Unknown | View |
| 2019-09-03 | Court hearing | Paul Cassell addresses the court during a hearing. | Courtroom | View |
| 2019-09-03 | N/A | Court Hearing (Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB) | Southern District of New Yo... | View |
| 2019-07-21 | N/A | Approximate date for filing the brief mentioned (email states 'We file in about one week' from Ju... | Court (implied) | View |
| 2019-01-01 | N/A | Lawsuit filed by Jane Doe No. 3 against Dershowitz and others. | Court | View |
| 2019-01-01 | N/A | Court proceedings regarding Jeffrey Epstein's release conditions. | District Court (likely SDNY) | View |
| 2018-01-01 | Meeting | Meetings took place between attorneys for accusing witnesses and SDNY prosecutors concerning or r... | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2018-01-01 | N/A | Defamation case between Dershowitz and lawyers Edwards/Cassell settled. | Court | View |
| 2016-08-30 | N/A | Ruling on the Cassell Motion to Quash issued by the Southern District of New York | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2016-04-22 | N/A | Scheduled deposition of Ghislaine Maxwell. | Unknown | View |
| 2016-04-21 | N/A | Court Hearing regarding Pro Hac Vice motions and discovery disputes. | SDNY Courtroom | View |
| 2016-04-10 | N/A | Publication of article regarding settlement between Dershowitz and Edwards/Cassell. | N/A | View |
| 2016-04-08 | N/A | Settlement of lawsuits between Dershowitz, Edwards, and Cassell. | N/A | View |
| 2016-04-08 | N/A | Settlement of defamation claims between Edwards/Cassell and Dershowitz. | Broward County, Florida | View |
| 2016-04-01 | N/A | Settlement of defamation claims between Dershowitz and attorneys Edwards/Cassell. | Legal proceeding | View |
| 2016-01-01 | Meeting | Meetings took place where certain attorneys for accusing witnesses met with SDNY prosecutors to a... | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2015-10-17 | N/A | Deposition of Paul Cassell (noted as 'Pual' in text) (Exhibit 4) | Unknown | View |
| 2015-10-16 | N/A | Deposition of Paul Cassell (Exhibit 3) | Unknown | View |
| 2015-10-15 | N/A | Alan Dershowitz's deposition at a Broward County courthouse where he alleged a criminal extortion... | Broward County, Florida | View |
| 2015-10-01 | N/A | Timeframe focused on Alan Dershowitz and legal battles in Florida. | Florida | View |
| 2015-10-01 | N/A | Alan Dershowitz appears at a Florida courthouse regarding defamation suits involving Bradley Edwa... | Florida courthouse | View |
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022147.jpg
This document appears to be a scanned excerpt from a book (Chapter 65, page 250) included in House Oversight Committee evidence. It recounts an episode of 'Law & Order: SVU' featuring a character named Jordan who is modeled after Jeffrey Epstein, describing a plot where the character claims to be the victim of a minor. The text then transitions to October 2015, describing Alan Dershowitz appearing in a Florida courthouse regarding defamation lawsuits involving attorneys Bradley Edwards and Paul Cassell.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022140.jpg
This document consists of pages 242-243 from the book 'Filthy Rich' by James Patterson, stamped as evidence by the House Oversight Committee. It details the legal conflict between Virginia Roberts (and her lawyers Edwards and Cassell) and Alan Dershowitz, who vehemently denies Roberts' sexual abuse allegations, calling them an extortion plot and threatening her lawyers with disbarment. The text also references Prince Andrew (Duke of York) issuing a denial regarding allegations of sexual contact with minors, and mentions Epstein using 'Trump's resort' for recruitment.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022139.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a book detailing legal proceedings and allegations surrounding Jeffrey Epstein. It discusses claims made by Virginia Roberts (Jane Doe 3) against Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, Prince Andrew, and Alan Dershowitz, and includes a denial statement from Buckingham Palace regarding the allegations against Prince Andrew.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022057.jpg
This document appears to be a scanned page from a book (Chapter 65) included in House Oversight Committee records. It discusses an episode of 'Law & Order: SVU' featuring a character named Jordan modeled after Jeffrey Epstein, detailing specific scenes that mirror Epstein's lifestyle. The text transitions to discussing legal events in October 2015 involving Alan Dershowitz, specifically mentioning defamation litigation with attorneys Brad Edwards and Paul Cassell in a Florida courthouse.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022050.jpg
This document is an excerpt from pages 242-243 of the book 'Filthy Rich' by James Patterson, processed as a House Oversight Committee exhibit. It details the contentious legal battle between Virginia Roberts' legal team (Paul Cassell and Bradley Edwards) and Alan Dershowitz, featuring Dershowitz's aggressive denial of sexual abuse allegations and his threat to have the opposing lawyers disbarred. The text also references a specific legal declaration filed by Roberts on January 15, 2015, regarding Epstein's non-prosecution agreement, and mentions denials issued by the Duke of York (Prince Andrew).
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016534.jpg
This document is a page from the Minnesota Law Review discussing the enforcement of public corruption laws, highlighting the federal government's aggressive role compared to state efforts. It details the Justice Department's Public Integrity Section and the FBI's prioritization of corruption cases, noting that federal enforcement often targets broad interpretations of misconduct like "honest services" fraud. The footnotes provide citations related to the Crime Victims' Rights Act and various case laws concerning prosecutorial discretion and victim rights.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016517.jpg
This document is a page from the Minnesota Law Review (Vol 103), likely submitted as evidence to the House Oversight Committee by attorney David Schoen. The text analyzes legal underenforcement and systemic bias, specifically regarding police misconduct, sexual assault, and crimes against marginalized groups (sex workers, undocumented immigrants, LGBT individuals). It argues that professional relationships between prosecutors and police create conflicts of interest that prevent fair adjudication, citing various legal standards and academic works.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012032.jpg
This document is a news article from Politico dated December 31, 2014, reporting on a new court filing in which a woman identified as Jane Doe #3, an alleged sex slave of Jeffrey Epstein, accused prominent friends of Epstein, including Alan Dershowitz, Prince Andrew, Ghislaine Maxwell, and Jean Luc Brunel, of participating in debauchery. The article details Epstein's prior conviction and plea deal, and states that the new filing seeks to allow Jane Doe #3 and another woman to join a pending victims' rights case against federal prosecutors.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017971.jpg
This document is an excerpt from a Miami Herald article detailing allegations against Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, Prince Andrew, and Alan Dershowitz, primarily from Virginia Roberts' affidavit. It covers alleged sexual encounters, denials from those accused, legal actions including defamation lawsuits and settlements, and a brief mention of Epstein's sentencing hearing. The article highlights the controversy surrounding the allegations and the legal aftermath.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017957.jpg
This document is page 23 of a court filing (Case 1:19-cv-03377) detailing allegations against Alan Dershowitz. It asserts that Dershowitz had sex with Ms. Ransome and acted as her lawyer at Jeffrey Epstein's arrangement. The text also details a dispute regarding a 2016 settlement between Dershowitz and attorneys Edwards and Cassell, specifically refuting Dershowitz's public claims that the settlement exonerated him of allegations made by Virginia Roberts Giuffre.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017938.jpg
This document is page 4 of a court filing from April 2019 outlining the legal history between Virginia Roberts (Giuffre), her attorneys (Edwards and Cassell), and Alan Dershowitz. It details a 2014 motion where Roberts alleged she was trafficked by Epstein and forced to have sex with Dershowitz, followed by Dershowitz's public attacks on her lawyers, a subsequent defamation lawsuit, and a confidential settlement reached in 2016. It also references the beginning of the Miami Herald's investigative series in November 2018.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017822.jpg
This document is a court exhibit containing a Miami Herald article detailing allegations against Alan Dershowitz by Sarah Ransome and Virginia Roberts regarding Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking ring. It discusses a defamation settlement where Dershowitz paid $900,000 to Roberts' lawyers, despite his claims of vindication and an exonerating investigation by Louis Freeh. The text also references sealed emails and court motions to make these documents public.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017708.jpg
This document is a page from a 2007 Utah Law Review article (likely authored by Paul Cassell) discussing the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) and criticizing the NACDL's stance on cross-examining victims. It argues against giving defendants the right to cross-examine victims regarding their status, citing potential trauma and lack of legal precedent. The document bears the name "David Schoen" (Epstein's former attorney) and a "HOUSE_OVERSIGHT" Bates stamp, indicating it was likely submitted as evidence or discovery material during a congressional investigation into the Epstein case, possibly regarding the non-prosecution agreement and violations of victims' rights.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017691.jpg
This document is a page from a 2007 Utah Law Review article included in a House Oversight file associated with attorney David Schoen. The text analyzes the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA), arguing that legislative history and judicial precedent (specifically United States v. Kenna) guarantee victims the right to speak orally at sentencing, rather than just submitting written statements. It cites Senators Kyl and Feinstein extensively regarding the congressional intent behind the Act.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017682.jpg
This document is a page from a 2007 Utah Law Review article (likely by Paul Cassell) discussing the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) and proposed amendments to Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure (Rule 21 and Rule 23). The text argues that victims should have a say in decisions regarding venue transfers and waivers of jury trials. The document originates from the files of David Schoen (Epstein's attorney) as part of a House Oversight investigation, indicated by the footer stamps.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017678.jpg
This document is a page from a 2007 Utah Law Review article (likely by Paul Cassell) discussing the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) and proposed amendments to Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure 18 and 20 regarding venue transfer and victim notification. It details the Advisory Committee's acceptance of changes to Rule 18 but rejection of changes to Rule 20 based on prosecutorial discretion. The document bears a 'David Schoen' footer and a House Oversight Bates stamp, suggesting it was part of a document production related to the congressional investigation into the handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case, specifically regarding victims' rights violations.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017654.jpg
This document is a page from a 2007 Utah Law Review article (likely by Paul Cassell) discussing Rule 11 and advocating for the inclusion of victims' views during plea negotiations. The text argues that prosecutors should be required to notify victims and consider their views on plea deals, noting that the Advisory Committee did not recommend this change at the time. The document bears the name David Schoen and a House Oversight Bates stamp, suggesting it was part of an evidentiary submission regarding the handling of victims' rights, possibly in relation to the Epstein non-prosecution agreement investigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017649.jpg
This document is page 14 of a 78-page excerpt from a 2007 Utah Law Review article, likely authored by Paul Cassell, discussing the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). It argues for amending Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure (specifically Rule 1 and Rule 11) to align with the CVRA, quoting Senators Feinstein and Kyl on the Act's intent to reform the legal culture surrounding victims' rights. The document bears a footer for attorney David Schoen and a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp, suggesting it was part of the congressional investigation into the handling of the Epstein case (where the CVRA was a central legal issue).
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017642.jpg
This document is a page from a 2007 Utah Law Review article, likely authored by Paul Cassell, discussing the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) and proposed amendments to the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure to integrate victim rights. It details the author's submission of twenty-eight changes to the Advisory Committee in 2005 and the subsequent limited adoption of these changes by a subcommittee chaired by Judge James Jones. The document bears the name of attorney David Schoen and a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017639.jpg
This document is a page from a 2007 Utah Law Review article (likely authored by Paul Cassell) analyzing the history of federal victims' rights legislation. It details the failure of the 1990 Victims' Rights and Restitution Act, attributing its ineffectiveness to poor codification (Title 42 vs Title 18) and its omission from West Publishing's legal guides, citing the Oklahoma City bombing case as a key example. The document bears a House Oversight Bates stamp and the name of David Schoen, Jeffrey Epstein's attorney, suggesting it was part of a legal production regarding the CVRA, a statute central to the controversy surrounding Epstein's non-prosecution agreement.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018043.jpg
A Miami Herald article included as a court exhibit discussing allegations against Alan Dershowitz by Sarah Ransome and Virginia Roberts. It details a defamation settlement where Dershowitz reportedly paid $900,000 to Roberts' lawyers, Edwards and Cassell, and mentions mentions Ransome's claims involving high-profile figures like the Clintons and Donald Trump.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018024.jpg
This document is a printout of a Law.com interview with Alan Dershowitz, filed as a court exhibit on April 16, 2019. In the interview, Dershowitz vigorously denies sexual allegations made by 'Jane Doe No. 3' (Virginia Giuffre), characterizing his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein as strictly professional and academic. He admits to visiting Epstein's properties in New Mexico, Palm Beach, and the Caribbean island but claims this was 'lawyer profiling' used to target him to void Epstein's plea agreement. He also attacks the credibility of the accuser and the motivations of the opposing counsel, Paul Cassell.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018023.jpg
This document is a reprint of a 2015 article from The American Lawyer featuring an interview with Alan Dershowitz. In the interview, Dershowitz defends his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, explaining he was introduced by Lady de Rothschild and that Epstein was a major donor to Harvard ($50 million). The text outlines the legal context, including the 2008 plea deal and lawsuits filed by lawyers Bradley Edwards and Paul Cassell alleging Dershowitz's involvement in sexual misconduct.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023000.jpg
This article from The Virgin Islands Daily News (originally by Miami Herald) reports on Alan Dershowitz's efforts to limit press access to a 2019 court hearing regarding the unsealing of documents in the Epstein/Maxwell sex trafficking case. It details the history of the defamation suit brought by Virginia Roberts Giuffre against Ghislaine Maxwell, the 2017 settlement, and the involvement of high-profile figures like Alexander Acosta and Sarah Ferguson. The article highlights the legal battle between privacy for the accused and the public's right to know, framed by the 'Perversion of Justice' investigation.
Request to publish court's remarks as a published opinion
Paul Cassell addresses the court, praising its handling of victim statements and urging the judge to publish their remarks as a formal opinion to promote transparency in the criminal justice system, citing the precedent of U.S. v. Heaton.
RE: Victims responding to Epstein
Cassell informs the recipient he is drafting a response to Epstein's claim regarding rescission. He argues the NPA only covers the Southern District of Florida and offers to let the recipient review the draft to avoid interfering with their office's efforts.
RE: Victims asserting right to reasonable protection and ...
Acknowledges receipt and confirms that the clients' concerns regarding protection and fair treatment will be conveyed to the Court.
RE: Victims asserting right to reasonable protection and ...
Cassell asserts his clients' rights under CVRA, requesting Epstein be detained for their safety and opposing any 'private jail' arrangement.
N/A (Quoted text)
Initial acknowledgment: 'looks like various pieces are falling together.'
RE: from Michael Bilton - latest from Daily Mail online
Confirming receipt of information, sharing a Gawker article about flight logs, Clinton, and Dershowitz.
Re: Jeffrey Epstein case
Confirming he is passing info to Joan to add to contacts list.
Re: from Michael Bilton - latest from Daily Mail online
Checking if Cassell received zip files concerning VR's travel alongside Prince Andrew's engagements.
Re: Jeffrey Epstein case
Thanking Paul and clarifying request to be on media contact list regarding Judge Marra's ruling.
RE: questions for Dershowitz
List of 8 specific questions intended for Alan Dershowitz regarding his relationship with Epstein and knowledge of abuse.
RE: Draft Protective Order - slight tweak
Proposing language changes to allow attorneys to see the document quickly because 'Epstein is trying to ignore the agreement.' Proposes that counsel must provide the Order to Petitioners before showing them the agreement.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity