Paul Cassell
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Bradley Edwards
|
Co counsel |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Virginia Giuffre
|
Client |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Virginia Roberts
|
Client |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
ALAN DERSHOWITZ
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Bradley Edwards
|
Business associate |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Adversarial |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Alan Dershowitz
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Bruce Reinhart
|
Adversarial |
6
|
1 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jane Does
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Joan tuc
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Alan Dershowitz
|
Adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Advisory Committee
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Bruce Reinhart
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
MIT
|
Proposer reviewer |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Brad
|
Co counsel |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Alan Dershowitz
|
Adversarial ideological opponents |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Timothy McVeigh
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Michael Bilton
|
Information sharing |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
JANE DOE NO. 2
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Paul Blake
|
Professional correspondence |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Edwards
|
Co counsel |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
BRAD EDWARDS
|
Co counsel |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
[Redacted Recipient]
|
Professional cooperation |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Edwards
|
Co counsel |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | New court filing submitted asking for Jane Doe #3 and another woman to join a pending case. | West Palm Beach, Fla. | View |
| N/A | N/A | Filing of Florida Defamation Action (Case No. CACE 15-000072). | Broward County Circuit Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Edwards and Cassell request to add Virginia Giuffre (Jane Doe No. 3) to the case. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Settlement of defamation case between Edwards/Cassell and Dershowitz | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | The Advisory Committee took up proposed rule changes regarding the CVRA. | Unknown | View |
| 2019-09-03 | Court hearing | Paul Cassell addresses the court during a hearing. | Courtroom | View |
| 2019-09-03 | N/A | Court Hearing (Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB) | Southern District of New Yo... | View |
| 2019-07-21 | N/A | Approximate date for filing the brief mentioned (email states 'We file in about one week' from Ju... | Court (implied) | View |
| 2019-01-01 | N/A | Lawsuit filed by Jane Doe No. 3 against Dershowitz and others. | Court | View |
| 2019-01-01 | N/A | Court proceedings regarding Jeffrey Epstein's release conditions. | District Court (likely SDNY) | View |
| 2018-01-01 | Meeting | Meetings took place between attorneys for accusing witnesses and SDNY prosecutors concerning or r... | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2018-01-01 | N/A | Defamation case between Dershowitz and lawyers Edwards/Cassell settled. | Court | View |
| 2016-08-30 | N/A | Ruling on the Cassell Motion to Quash issued by the Southern District of New York | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2016-04-22 | N/A | Scheduled deposition of Ghislaine Maxwell. | Unknown | View |
| 2016-04-21 | N/A | Court Hearing regarding Pro Hac Vice motions and discovery disputes. | SDNY Courtroom | View |
| 2016-04-10 | N/A | Publication of article regarding settlement between Dershowitz and Edwards/Cassell. | N/A | View |
| 2016-04-08 | N/A | Settlement of lawsuits between Dershowitz, Edwards, and Cassell. | N/A | View |
| 2016-04-08 | N/A | Settlement of defamation claims between Edwards/Cassell and Dershowitz. | Broward County, Florida | View |
| 2016-04-01 | N/A | Settlement of defamation claims between Dershowitz and attorneys Edwards/Cassell. | Legal proceeding | View |
| 2016-01-01 | Meeting | Meetings took place where certain attorneys for accusing witnesses met with SDNY prosecutors to a... | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2015-10-17 | N/A | Deposition of Paul Cassell (noted as 'Pual' in text) (Exhibit 4) | Unknown | View |
| 2015-10-16 | N/A | Deposition of Paul Cassell (Exhibit 3) | Unknown | View |
| 2015-10-15 | N/A | Alan Dershowitz's deposition at a Broward County courthouse where he alleged a criminal extortion... | Broward County, Florida | View |
| 2015-10-01 | N/A | Timeframe focused on Alan Dershowitz and legal battles in Florida. | Florida | View |
| 2015-10-01 | N/A | Alan Dershowitz appears at a Florida courthouse regarding defamation suits involving Bradley Edwa... | Florida courthouse | View |
024.pdf
This document is a legal notice filed by Ghislaine Maxwell's attorneys on December 16, 2016, in the Southern District of Florida regarding a subpoena served on Bradley J. Edwards. Maxwell argues that rulings made by the Southern District of New York on a similar subpoena served on Paul Cassell (another attorney for Virginia Giuffre) should be binding (res judicata) on the Edwards subpoena. The filing includes a table comparing the requests in both subpoenas and the corresponding rulings from the SDNY court, asking the Florida court to issue a consistent order requiring production of certain documents and granting the motion to quash for others.
013.pdf
This document is a reply filed by Bradley J. Edwards in support of his motion to quash a subpoena served on him by Ghislaine Maxwell in the case of Giuffre v. Maxwell. Edwards argues that the subpoena imposes an undue burden on him as a non-party and opposing counsel, seeking information that is already in Maxwell's possession, privileged, irrelevant, or available from other sources. The brief details the history of related litigation, including the CVRA case and a defamation suit against Alan Dershowitz, to support the argument that the subpoena is harassing and unnecessary.
010-06.pdf
This document is Plaintiff Virginia Giuffre's second amended supplemental response to discovery requests from Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell, dated April 29, 2016. It details Giuffre's legal representation history from 2009 to 2016, listing specific attorneys and cases including actions against Jeffrey Epstein, the US Government, and Alan Dershowitz. The document also contains objections to requests for financial records regarding payments from Epstein or media organizations, asserting attorney-client privilege and irrelevance.
001-03.pdf
This document is a subpoena issued by the US District Court (SDNY) on behalf of Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell to attorney Bradley J. Edwards in May 2016. It demands the production of various documents, including those related to previous litigation involving Jeffrey Epstein and Alan Dershowitz, communications with journalist Sharon Churcher, and records regarding the organization 'Victims Refuse Silence, Inc.' A check for $45.00 payable to Edwards is included, likely as a witness fee.
EFTA00030511.pdf
An email dated July 30, 2019, circulating a South Florida Sun Sentinel article. The article discusses the legal conflict regarding Epstein's 2007 non-prosecution agreement in Florida, noting that while some victims want new charges in Florida following his New York arrest, prosecutors argue others wish to avoid reopening the case to protect their privacy. Lawyers for victims Jane Doe 1 and 2 argue that the privacy concerns of some should not prevent the prosecution of Epstein and his co-conspirators.
EFTA00026678.pdf
This document is an email chain from July 2019 between attorney Paul Cassell (representing victims of Jeffrey Epstein) and a redacted government official (likely a federal prosecutor). Cassell invokes the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) to request that Epstein be detained for the safety of the victims and to oppose any 'private jail' arrangement for Epstein's release. The recipient confirms they will convey these concerns to the Court.
EFTA00015560.pdf
In this July 14, 2019 email, attorney Paul Cassell contacts a redacted recipient (likely a prosecutor) regarding the legal representation of Jane Doe 1 and 2. Cassell discusses a forthcoming brief responding to Jeffrey Epstein's claims about the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), specifically arguing that the NPA is limited to the Southern District of Florida. He offers to share the draft with the recipient's office prior to filing to ensure coordination and avoid interference.
EFTA00014133.pdf
An email exchange between Paul Cassell (representing victims) and the US Attorney's Office (USAFLS) regarding the wording of a protective order. The order concerns the disclosure of the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) to the victims. Cassell urges speed, citing government representations that 'Epstein is trying to ignore the agreement,' and negotiates the timing of when victims must sign acknowledgments of the protective order.
EFTA00014067.pdf
Email correspondence from August 15, 2008, between attorney Brad Edwards and the US Attorney's Office (USAFLS). They are negotiating the terms of a protective order required to disclose the non-prosecution agreement to Edwards' clients, identified as Jane Does 1 and 2. Edwards objects to a specific clause requiring his clients to formally acknowledge receipt, arguing it causes unnecessary delay.
EFTA00013595.pdf
This document contains correspondence from attorney Brad Edwards to the U.S. Attorney's Office in July 2008 regarding the Jeffrey Epstein case. Edwards disputes the government's proposed stipulation of facts, specifically regarding when victims were notified of Epstein's non-prosecution agreement (NPA), and asserts that he and his clients were kept in the dark about the NPA while urging federal charges. The attached July 3rd letter formally requests federal prosecution, characterizing Epstein as a prolific predator who abused over 100 girls, arguing that the state plea deal was grossly inadequate.
EFTA00011418.pdf
This document is a discovery request letter from Ghislaine Maxwell's defense counsel, Cohen & Gresser LLP, to the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York, dated October 13, 2020. The defense requests a wide range of materials including exculpatory Brady evidence, information on Minor Victims 1-3, communications regarding Jeffrey Epstein's 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement, and records of coordination between the government and civil attorneys representing Epstein's accusers. The letter also requests specific FBI files, unredacted reports, and evidence related to the credibility and potential financial motives of government witnesses.
DOJ-OGR-00000687.jpg
This document is a transcript from a court hearing on September 3, 2019, where Paul Cassell, a law professor and former federal judge, addresses the court. He commends the judge's handling of victim impact statements and strongly urges the judge to publish their remarks as a formal opinion to promote transparency and set a legal precedent, referencing a case he wrote about, U.S. v. Heaton.
DOJ-OGR-00000686.jpg
This page is a transcript from a court hearing dated September 3, 2019, in the case United States v. Epstein. It concludes a victim impact statement expressing frustration over Epstein's suicide escaping justice, but gratitude for the handling of the current case compared to the past. Attorney Mr. Edwards then addresses the court, referencing a 2008 case filed under the Crime Victims Rights Act and introducing his co-counsel, former judge Paul Cassell.
DOJ-OGR-00002725.jpg
This legal document, filed on February 4, 2021, is a request for the production of documents related to defense motions in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It seeks all communications concerning the 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) with Jeffrey Epstein, including those between various government agencies and Epstein's lawyers. The request also demands communications from meetings in 2016 and 2018 where attorneys for Epstein's victims urged the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY) to launch a criminal investigation into both Epstein and Maxwell.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031430.jpg
This document is a printout of a news article (likely from the Miami Herald) discussing legal maneuvers to reopen the criminal investigation into Jeffrey Epstein and throw out his 2008 plea agreement. It covers the involvement of victims' attorneys requesting a review by a new jurisdiction (Pak's office), a DOJ probe into Labor Secretary Alexander Acosta's conduct during the original case, and an upcoming hearing in New York regarding the unsealing of documents requested by the Miami Herald. The document is stamped with a House Oversight Committee Bates number.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031400.jpg
This document is a printout of a Miami Herald article by Emily Michot regarding the 'Perversion of Justice' investigation into Jeffrey Epstein's plea deal. It details Judge Marra's ruling that federal prosecutors violated the Crime Victims' Rights Act by misleading victims and sealing the non-prosecution agreement negotiated by Alex Acosta. The text highlights that Epstein worked with others to procure minors and that victims' attorneys are petitioning the DOJ to reopen the investigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022170.jpg
These pages, likely from the book 'Filthy Rich' and marked as House Oversight evidence, detail Alan Dershowitz's defense of his legal work for Jeffrey Epstein and his conflict with attorneys Bradley Edwards and Paul Cassell. The text describes a protest against Dershowitz at Johns Hopkins University and his assertion that he is proud of the 'good deal' he secured for Epstein. It concludes with the details of an April 8, 2016 settlement where Edwards and Cassell withdrew sexual misconduct accusations against Dershowitz, and Dershowitz withdrew his claims of unethical conduct against them.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022166.jpg
This document contains pages 268-269 from the book 'Filthy Rich' (marked as a House Oversight exhibit), discussing the legal battles surrounding the Epstein case. The text analyzes Alan Dershowitz's defense strategy, which alleged that attorneys Bradley Edwards and Paul Cassell were involved in a blackmail plot against Leslie Wexner and had connections to Scott Rothstein's Ponzi scheme. The author speculates on the psychological leverage used in the case, suggesting Edwards may have pressured Virginia Roberts to implicate Dershowitz to break Epstein's non-prosecution agreement.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022165.jpg
This document is an excerpt from James Patterson's book (likely 'Filthy Rich') detailing the legal maneuvering between lawyer Bradley Edwards and Alan Dershowitz. It describes how Edwards briefly worked for Scott Rothstein's fraudulent firm in 2009, a fact Dershowitz later used to argue that accusations against him by Virginia Roberts were part of an extortion plot hatched by Edwards to overturn Epstein's non-prosecution agreement. The text notes that Edwards was cleared of knowledge regarding Rothstein's Ponzi scheme.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022163.jpg
This document appears to be an excerpt from a book (likely by James Patterson) containing a transcript of a deposition or interview. The speaker (contextually Alan Dershowitz) vehemently denies sexual contact with Virginia Roberts and attacks the credibility of lawyers Bradley Edwards and Paul Cassell, linking Edwards to convicted Ponzi schemer Scott Rothstein. The second page provides a profile of Scott Rothstein in 2009, detailing his lavish lifestyle and political connections.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022162.jpg
This document contains pages 264-265 from the book 'Filthy Rich' (or a deposition transcript contained within it), bearing a House Oversight stamp. The text captures a deposition, likely of Alan Dershowitz, where he vehemently denies Virginia Roberts's allegations that he had sexual contact with her or witnessed Jeffrey Epstein receiving oral sex. The speaker defends his public media campaign against lawyers Bradley Edwards and Paul Cassell, claiming he was simply telling the truth to refute false allegations.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022156.jpg
This document consists of two pages (258-259) from the book 'Filthy Rich' (likely by James Patterson), reproduced in a House Oversight file. It contains a transcript of a Q&A, likely a deposition. The text discusses a potential witness who is friends with Virginia Roberts and allegations that lawyers Edwards and Paul Cassell acted unethically or pressured someone. The deponent describes making phone calls from New York to a man to request a conversation with his wife, Rebecca.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022155.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a book (likely James Patterson's 'Filthy Rich') or a transcript exhibit marked with House Oversight Bates stamping. It contains deposition testimony where a deponent alleges that Virginia Roberts' lawyers (Bradley Edwards and Paul Cassell) acted unethically by pressuring Roberts to include the deponent's name in legal pleadings. The deponent cites a conversation with 'Rebecca,' a friend of Roberts, who claimed Roberts never intended to mention the deponent until pressured.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022152.jpg
This document appears to be pages 254 and 255 from a book titled "Filthy Rich," containing a transcript of a deposition or legal testimony. The speaker is being questioned about allegations of suborning perjury against lawyers Brad Edwards and Paul Cassell regarding Virginia Roberts, and discusses a phone conversation with a woman named Rebecca whose last name is in the speaker's notes.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022148.jpg
Pages 250-251 of the book 'Filthy Rich' (Chapter 65), marked as a House Oversight exhibit. The text juxtaposes a fictional 'Law & Order: SVU' plot—where a character named Jordan claims he was raped by a 12-year-old girl to avoid prosecution—with the real-life legal battles surrounding the Epstein case. Specifically, it details an October 15, 2015, deposition where Alan Dershowitz alleged a 'criminal extortion plot' involving Brad Edwards and Paul Cassell's clients during defamation litigation in Broward County, Florida.
Request to publish court's remarks as a published opinion
Paul Cassell addresses the court, praising its handling of victim statements and urging the judge to publish their remarks as a formal opinion to promote transparency in the criminal justice system, citing the precedent of U.S. v. Heaton.
RE: Victims responding to Epstein
Cassell informs the recipient he is drafting a response to Epstein's claim regarding rescission. He argues the NPA only covers the Southern District of Florida and offers to let the recipient review the draft to avoid interfering with their office's efforts.
RE: Victims asserting right to reasonable protection and ...
Acknowledges receipt and confirms that the clients' concerns regarding protection and fair treatment will be conveyed to the Court.
RE: Victims asserting right to reasonable protection and ...
Cassell asserts his clients' rights under CVRA, requesting Epstein be detained for their safety and opposing any 'private jail' arrangement.
N/A (Quoted text)
Initial acknowledgment: 'looks like various pieces are falling together.'
RE: from Michael Bilton - latest from Daily Mail online
Confirming receipt of information, sharing a Gawker article about flight logs, Clinton, and Dershowitz.
Re: Jeffrey Epstein case
Confirming he is passing info to Joan to add to contacts list.
Re: from Michael Bilton - latest from Daily Mail online
Checking if Cassell received zip files concerning VR's travel alongside Prince Andrew's engagements.
Re: Jeffrey Epstein case
Thanking Paul and clarifying request to be on media contact list regarding Judge Marra's ruling.
RE: questions for Dershowitz
List of 8 specific questions intended for Alan Dershowitz regarding his relationship with Epstein and knowledge of abuse.
RE: Draft Protective Order - slight tweak
Proposing language changes to allow attorneys to see the document quickly because 'Epstein is trying to ignore the agreement.' Proposes that counsel must provide the Order to Petitioners before showing them the agreement.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity