Jane Does
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Bradley J. Edwards
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Paul G. Cassell
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Bradley Edwards
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Epstein's assistants
|
Telephonic communication |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
witness
|
Investigator subject |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Paul Cassell
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Victim perpetrator |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
the witness
|
Testimony subject |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Alleged abuser victim |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
grand jury
|
Subject of review |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Alleged abuser victim |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Alexander Acosta
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-02-01 | N/A | Court ruled in favor of victims, stating prosecutors violated CVRA. | Florida federal court | View |
| 2019-01-01 | N/A | Judge Marra granted summary judgment to victims, ruling prosecutors violated the CVRA. | U.S. District Court | View |
| 2009-06-01 | N/A | Psychiatric evaluation of six plaintiffs (Jane Does) | Unspecified | View |
| 2008-01-01 | N/A | Jane Does sued the government alleging CVRA violations. | U.S. District Court | View |
| 2008-01-01 | N/A | Epstein pled guilty to state charges involving solicitation of prostitution; victims sued regardi... | Florida | View |
034-01.pdf
This document is a sworn declaration by Dr. Gilbert W. Kliman, a forensic psychiatrist, filed on June 8, 2009, in the case of Does v. Jeffrey Epstein. Dr. Kliman argues against the defense's motion to publicly disclose the identities of six Jane Doe plaintiffs, stating that such exposure would cause severe psychological harm, including revictimization, stigmatization, and retraumatization. He details how Epstein manipulated the victims by posing as a mentor and outlines the plaintiffs' diagnoses of PTSD and depression, concluding that anonymity is clinically necessary to prevent further injury.
EFTA00030231.pdf
This document is an email dated June 26, 2019, forwarding a Law360 article titled 'Gov't Says Epstein Victims Can't Scrap Nonprosecution Deal.' The article details the federal government's response to a lawsuit by Epstein's victims (Doe v. U.S.), where prosecutors argued that while the Crime Victims Rights Act (CVRA) was violated by Alexander Acosta in 2008, the nonprosecution agreement cannot be undone. The government proposed a meeting and a public hearing for victims to be heard, a remedy the victims' lawyer Brad Edwards criticized as insufficient.
EFTA00027770.pdf
This document is an email from May 2019 forwarding a Law360 article titled 'Epstein Victims Demand Apology From Prosecutors'. The article details how two victims (Jane Does) requested a Florida federal court to nullify the 2008 non-prosecution agreement signed by then-U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta, arguing it violated the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). The victims sought nullification of the deal, a reopening of the criminal case, an apology, and a hearing with Acosta and Epstein present.
EFTA00026678.pdf
This document is an email chain from July 2019 between attorney Paul Cassell (representing victims of Jeffrey Epstein) and a redacted government official (likely a federal prosecutor). Cassell invokes the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) to request that Epstein be detained for the safety of the victims and to oppose any 'private jail' arrangement for Epstein's release. The recipient confirms they will convey these concerns to the Court.
EFTA00013974.pdf
An email thread from July 2008 discussing the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) lawsuit in relation to the Epstein case. A government official confirms that a confidential plea agreement with Epstein has been signed, filed under seal in state court, and partially performed. The email highlights tension regarding victim notification, noting that notifying one Jane Doe resulted in claims of prosecutorial misconduct by Epstein's lawyers, while another victim was not identified until after the signing.
EFTA00013666.pdf
This document is a letter dated July 17, 2008, from the U.S. Department of Justice (Southern District of Florida) to Jeffrey Epstein's attorney, Michael R. Tein. The U.S. Attorney's Office disputes the defense's claim that the federal criminal action is 'pending,' stating that under the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), the investigation is suspended and motions to quash subpoenas should have been withdrawn. The letter warns that if Epstein claims the federal action is pending to stay civil proceedings, the DOJ will resume the motion to quash and analyze seized computer equipment.
DOJ-OGR-00004695.jpg
This document is a page from a transcript of Grand Jury testimony (labeled MM20-GJ TESTIMONY) filed on May 25, 2021, in the Ghislaine Maxwell case. The visible text involves a prosecutor asking a witness (likely an investigator) about independent corroboration of statements made by 'Jane Does' regarding Jeffrey Epstein. The witness confirms they obtained telephone records to corroborate the statement of a specific redacted individual, proving telephonic contact with another redacted party.
DOJ-OGR-00004681.jpg
This document is a confidential grand jury testimony transcript filed on May 25, 2021. In it, a witness explains that administrative subpoenas were issued to telecommunication companies to acquire cell phone records. These records are intended to show 'telephonic contact' between Mr. Epstein's assistants and multiple 'Jane Does,' which constitute 'Overt Acts' listed in an indictment being presented to the grand jury.
DOJ-OGR-00004680.jpg
This document is a page from a confidential grand jury testimony transcript filed on May 25, 2021. A witness is questioned by a grand juror and Ms. Villafana about airport codes (ISM, PBIA, PBI) related to a subject's travel to the Palm Beach County area. The questioning also references a specific telephone call made on April 23, 2004, between two redacted individuals, as part of the 'Overt Acts' being discussed.
DOJ-OGR-00004676.jpg
This document is a page from a confidential Grand Jury testimony transcript filed on May 25, 2021. A Special Agent is testifying about 'Jane Does' who attended high schools in Palm Beach County during their contact with Jeffrey Epstein. The testimony confirms some victims left school before beginning their relationship with Epstein, and a document titled 'Merged Flight Manifests' is introduced into evidence.
DOJ-OGR-00004671.jpg
This document is a page from a Grand Jury transcript filed in May 2021. A Grand Juror points out a discrepancy in a date of birth and activity range for a redacted individual, noting the activity range listed as 1988-2003 seemed problematic given the birth date. The witness clarifies it was a typo and the start date should be 1998. The witness mentions they have prepared a summary chart regarding various 'Jane Does' and will be discussing them.
DOJ-OGR-00004670.jpg
This document is a page from a confidential Grand Jury testimony transcript filed in May 2021. It details a witness explaining a 'Revised Indictment Summary Chart' to the jury, specifically discussing a cross-reference list that maps 'new Jane Doe numbers' to previous identification numbers. The specific identities or numbers of the victims discussed are redacted.
DOJ-OGR-00005575.jpg
This legal document is a page from a government filing arguing in favor of a limited sealing request to protect the identities of minor victims. The government asserts that this request is minimally burdensome and legally sound, citing precedents where victim privacy outweighs public access, especially for evidence not yet shared in open court. It directly refutes the defense's claim that the request violates Second Circuit law by distinguishing the cases the defense relies upon.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015028.jpg
This document is a printout of a Palm Beach Post news article dated August 26, 2017, discussing the legal efforts to reopen the federal investigation into Jeffrey Epstein nearly 10 years after his 2008 plea deal. The article details how attorneys Bradley Edwards and Paul Cassell, representing two victims, are arguing that the federal government violated the Crime Victims' Rights Act by not informing victims of the non-prosecution agreement. The document bears a House Oversight Committee stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013477.jpg
This court document, filed on June 28, 2010, updates the court on the status of Doe v. Epstein. It reports that since mediation on April 5, 2010, Jeffrey Epstein has resolved/settled numerous lawsuits, including cases involving C.L., C.M.A., and multiple Jane Does, leaving only the current federal case and two state court cases unresolved, all represented by Brad Edwards. The document also notes the extensive scope of the upcoming trial, citing over 170 potential witnesses and 140 exhibits.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014088.jpg
This document is the conclusion page of a legal filing (Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM) dated March 24, 2015, submitted by attorneys Bradley J. Edwards and Paul G. Cassell on behalf of Jane Does No. 1-4. The text argues that the Court should deny Alan Dershowitz's motion to intervene, citing his conflicting positions regarding the possession and collection of records. The document includes contact information for the attorneys and bears a House Oversight Bates stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014106.jpg
This document is page 23 of a legal filing (Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM) containing the Defendant's responses to specific document requests. The requests specifically seek evidence regarding allegations that Jane Doe #3 had sex with President Bill Clinton on Jeffrey Epstein's Little Saint James Island. The Defendant agrees to produce non-privileged documents regarding the Clinton allegations but objects to producing copies of their passports.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016432.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a House Oversight Committee file (016432) containing an excerpt, likely from a news article (possibly Miami Herald), describing Jeffrey Epstein's crimes. It features an aerial photo of his Palm Beach mansion and text outlining his history of luring teenage girls into a 'cult-like sex pyramid scheme' disguised as massage work, long before the #MeToo movement.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030297.jpg
This document is an email from an individual, likely Ghislaine Maxwell, expressing severe distress over legal developments in the United States. The author is worried that new discovery motions by lawyers for 'Jane Does' in civil suits against 'Jeffrey' (Epstein) will draw her into the litigation. She instructs an associate named 'Philip' to immediately contact Jeffrey's lawyer to assess her risk and strategize a response, while also lamenting the non-stop questions about her relationships with 'clinton' and 'Andrew'.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | Jane Does | $0.00 | Alleged payments for sex to minors aged 13 and 14. | View |
Overt Acts
The subpoenaed records are expected to show telephonic contact between Mr. Epstein's assistants and the Jane Does, which are considered 'Overt Acts' related to an indictment.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity