Sultan
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Prince Turki
|
Co defendants |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Mohamed Waheed Hassan
|
Business associate |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Kathy Ruemmler
|
Meeting |
6
|
2 | |
|
organization
al Qaeda
|
Alleged financier |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Osama bin Laden
|
Meeting alleged funding support |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
JEE
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
al Qaeda
|
Alleged support |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
ABI
|
Corporate professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
al Qaeda
|
Alleged funding connection |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
|
Government official |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Burnett Plaintiffs
|
Litigation |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Meeting between Prince Sultan, Prince Turki, and Osama bin Laden following Iraq's invasion of Kuw... | Unknown (likely Saudi Arabia) | View |
| N/A | N/A | Meeting at Jeffrey Epstein's residence. | Epstein's Place | View |
| 2017-03-29 | N/A | Dessert with 'sultan'. | Unknown | View |
| 2017-02-15 | N/A | Kathy Ruemmler met with 'Sultan'. | Unknown | View |
| 2013-01-18 | N/A | Meeting between Mohamed Waheed Hassan, Sultan, and Thorbjorn Jagland. | Epstein's place | View |
| 2013-01-01 | N/A | Meeting between Mohamed Waheed Hassan, Jagland, and Sultan. | Epstein's residence ('your ... | View |
| 2005-01-01 | N/A | Legal Opinion Issued | S.D.N.Y. | View |
| 2005-01-01 | N/A | Publication/Filing of this court opinion (349 F.Supp.2d 765). | S.D.N.Y. | View |
| 2004-10-12 | N/A | Court heard oral argument from Defendants regarding motions to dismiss for lack of personal juris... | Court (S.D.N.Y.) | View |
| 2004-09-14 | N/A | Court heard oral argument on motions to dismiss. | Court | View |
| 2002-09-04 | N/A | Lawsuit filed | S.D.N.Y. | View |
| 2001-09-11 | N/A | Terrorist attacks; subsequently Prince Sultan allegedly advocated against granting the US use of ... | USA / Saudi Arabia | View |
| 1995-01-01 | N/A | Establishment of the Supreme Council of Islamic Affairs. | Saudi Arabia | View |
EFTA00001907.pdf
This image shows an open briefcase containing various documents, including a TOEFL preparation book and two sheets of 'Jeffrey E. Epstein' personalized stationery covered in handwritten notes. The notes appear to be a flowchart or list of connections involving individuals such as Giffen, J.Y. Lee, Sultan, Teige, and Zuckerman, with references to locations like NY (New York) and HK (Hong Kong).
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026632.jpg
This document is an email printout dated November 1, 2016, forwarded by Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias 'Jeffrey E.' and email 'jeevacation@gmail.com') to himself. The email subject is 'contacts' and contains a raw, unstructured list of names including prominent scientists (Susskind, Dawkins, Gellman), tech figures (Thiel, Hoffman, Sergey), and political figures (Clinton, Kerry, Schumer, Ehud Barak, Prince Andrew). It also contains a line of apparent medical/personal notes regarding cholesterol medication (Crestor), prostate issues, and diet.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026631.jpg
This document is an email sent by Jeffrey Epstein to himself on October 30, 2016, with the subject line 'contacts'. The body of the email contains a list of high-profile names, including prominent scientists (Susskind, Minsky/Edelman context, Gould), tech figures (Hoffman, Sinofsky, Sergey), and politicians (Clinton, Richardson, Mandelson, Ehud, Andrew). It also includes a section seemingly related to health or medication (Crestor, prostatitis, protein, exercise) and obscure codes or abbreviations (LSJ, BBJ).
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017920.jpg
This document is page 17 of a legal opinion titled 'In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001' (392 F.Supp.2d 539), bearing the Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017920. The text discusses the court's lack of subject matter jurisdiction over Saudi Prince Naif and Prince Salman regarding their official acts under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA), while analyzing whether personal jurisdiction exists for alleged private acts or conspiracy with al Qaeda. It details Prince Naif's role as Minister of Interior, his 1994 actions against Osama bin Laden, and the legal standards for establishing jurisdiction under New York's long-arm statute and conspiracy theories.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017916.jpg
This document is a page from a 2005 court opinion (*In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001*) discussing the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA) status of Saudi defendants. It details the court's denial of a motion to supplement the record against Prince Salman and Prince Naif regarding a 1998 article linking Saudi charities to al Qaida, citing lack of authentication. It also establishes the 'Saudi High Commission' (SHC) as an organ of the Saudi government, noting Prince Salman's role as its President. The document bears a House Oversight stamp, suggesting it was part of a congressional production.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017902.jpg
This document is page 837 of a 2005 legal opinion (349 F.Supp.2d 765) from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York regarding 'In Re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001.' The page details the court's rulings on motions to dismiss filed by various Saudi defendants, including the SAAR Network, Adel A.J. Batterjee, the Saudi Binladin Group (SBG), and members of the Saudi royal family (Prince Sultan, Prince Turki). While some motions were granted for lack of jurisdiction, others (such as those for SAAR Network and Batterjee) were denied, allowing claims to proceed. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' footer, indicating it was likely part of a production to the House Oversight Committee.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017878.jpg
This document is page 813 of a court opinion (349 F.Supp.2d 765) regarding 'In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001.' The text details the court's decision to grant motions to dismiss claims against Saudi Princes Sultan and Turki due to a lack of personal jurisdiction and insufficient factual evidence linking their charitable donations to the purposeful support of al Qaeda or terrorism in the United States. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' footer, indicating it was part of a document production to the House Oversight Committee.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017877.jpg
This document describes a legal ruling (Page 812, 349 Federal Supplement 2d) regarding the 9/11 litigation (In re Terrorist Attacks). It details the court's analysis of 'jurisdictional discovery' regarding Prince Sultan of Saudi Arabia. Plaintiffs allege Prince Sultan used profits from US assets to fund terrorism and that he knew his donations were funneling money to al Qaeda. The court discusses whether these allegations are sufficient to establish personal jurisdiction over him in the US. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' stamp, indicating it was part of a Congressional investigation document production.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017868.jpg
This document is page 803 of a legal opinion (349 F.Supp.2d 765) from the Southern District of New York (2005) regarding litigation surrounding the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks. It details the Federal Plaintiffs' allegations that the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia aided terrorists through various charities (MWL, IIRO, WAMY, etc.) and the Kingdom's defense based on sovereign immunity and findings from the 9/11 Commission Report stating no evidence was found of Saudi institutional funding. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a document production to the House Oversight Committee.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017866.jpg
This document is page 801 from a 2005 legal opinion regarding the 'In Re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001' litigation (349 F.Supp.2d 765). The text discusses the 'discretionary function' exception under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA) and the court's finding that this exception bars claims against Saudi Royals Prince Sultan and Prince Turki, who were accused of donating to charities linked to al Qaeda. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' stamp, indicating it was likely part of a Congressional document production.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017865.jpg
This document is a page from a federal court opinion discussing motions to dismiss in a case involving allegations of material support for terrorism. It analyzes legal precedents such as *Halberstam* and *Boim* to determine if Prince Turki and Prince Sultan can be held liable for supporting charities allegedly linked to al Qaeda, noting distinctions regarding when organizations were officially designated as terrorists. The court examines whether plaintiffs have pleaded sufficient facts to show the defendants knew the charities were fronts for illegal activities.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017863.jpg
This is a page from a Federal Supplement court opinion (page 798) analyzing legal standards for 'aiding and abetting' and 'civil conspiracy.' It cites key precedents including 'Halberstam v. Welch' (burglary/murder liability) and 'Boim v. Quranic Literacy Inst.' (terrorism financing). The text discusses how a defendant can be liable for the acts of another if they provide substantial assistance or are generally aware of their role in the illegal activity. While the document is stamped 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT,' suggesting it was part of a congressional investigation (possibly related to Epstein banking/finance inquiries where these specific legal standards are often applied to banks), the text itself focuses on 9/11 litigation ('Burnett II') and Prince Sultan/Turki's defenses.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017862.jpg
This document is page 797 of a legal opinion titled 'In Re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001' (349 F.Supp.2d 765). It details legal arguments regarding subject matter jurisdiction and the 'torts exception' to sovereign immunity, specifically addressing allegations against Saudi Princes Sultan and Turki for allegedly funding al Qaeda and Osama bin Laden through Islamic charities. While the user prompt mentions Epstein, Jeffrey Epstein is not mentioned on this specific page; the document is focused entirely on 9/11 litigation and liability under New York law.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017860.jpg
This document is page 795 of a legal opinion (349 F.Supp.2d 765) from the S.D.N.Y. regarding 'In Re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001.' It discusses the legal arguments surrounding the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA) and whether the court has jurisdiction over Saudi Arabia ('The Kingdom'), Prince Sultan, and Prince Turki. The text details allegations that these defendants provided material support to charities that funded al Qaeda and willfully ignored the threat of Osama bin Laden. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' stamp, indicating it was part of a document production for a congressional investigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017858.jpg
This document is page 793 of a legal opinion (349 F.Supp.2d 765) from the S.D.N.Y. regarding the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks litigation. It discusses the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA) and rules that alleged money laundering or charitable contributions by the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Prince Sultan, and Prince Turki do not constitute 'commercial activity' that would strip them of sovereign immunity. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' stamp, indicating it was part of a document production for a congressional investigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017854.jpg
This page is from a 2005 court opinion (In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001) regarding the immunity of Saudi officials and entities under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA). The court rules that Prince Sultan and Prince Turki are immune from suit for official acts. It also discusses the National Commercial Bank's (NCB) claim to immunity as a government instrumentality of Saudi Arabia, analyzing share ownership by the Public Investment Fund (PIF) and transactions involving the bin Mahfouz family.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017853.jpg
This document is page 788 from a legal opinion in the Federal Supplement (349 F.Supp.2d) discussing the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA). It addresses whether immunity extends to Prince Sultan and Prince Turki of Saudi Arabia for actions taken in their official capacities. The text references a complaint filed on September 10, 2003, where plaintiffs argued Prince Turki was not entitled to immunity because he was serving as the Ambassador to the UK at the time. The document bears a House Oversight Bates stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017848.jpg
This document is a page from a court opinion (349 F.Supp.2d 765) regarding the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks litigation. It discusses the legal standards for jurisdictional discovery when sovereign immunity is asserted and begins detailing allegations against Prince Sultan of Saudi Arabia.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017846.jpg
This document is page 781 of a legal opinion (349 F.Supp.2d 765) from the Southern District of New York concerning 'In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001.' It details procedural history, specifically oral arguments heard in October 2004 regarding motions to dismiss filed by various Saudi banking, corporate, and individual defendants (including the Binladin Group and Al Rajhi Bank) based on lack of jurisdiction or failure to state a claim. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' footer, suggesting it was part of a congressional inquiry, though no direct textual link to Jeffrey Epstein appears on this specific page.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027221.jpg
This document is a forensic extraction of an iMessage conversation from March 29, 2017, between 'jee' (using the email jeeitunes@gmail.com) and a redacted individual. The conversation discusses high-level geopolitical matters, including Narendra Modi's trip to Washington D.C., Israel's strategy, and 'Buy India' initiatives involving US manufacturing and potential security 'back doors.' 'Jee' explicitly states their expertise is 'money not politics' while transmitting intelligence to the recipient.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023442.jpg
An email chain from September 19, 2014, between Jeffrey Epstein and Kathy Ruemmler. Epstein lists numerous high-profile individuals currently 'in town' (likely NYC) for a Climate Summit, including Peter Thiel, Larry Summers, Bill Clinton, and Leon Black. Ruemmler and Epstein discuss a decision involving 'high risk/reward' and speaking to a 'boss' or 'him,' with Ruemmler noting that 'most girls do not have to worry about this crap.'
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023419.jpg
An email thread from September 19, 2014, between Jeffrey Epstein and Kathy Ruemmler. They discuss the conviction of an associate of Harry Reid ('Reid's guy') on 7 counts, and Ruemmler notes she is traveling to New York for UNGA week where 'the boss' (likely Obama) will be present. Epstein lists a significant number of high-profile individuals he is meeting that week, including Peter Thiel, Larry Summers, Gordon Brown, Leon Black, and Woody Allen, and invites Ruemmler to join.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023349.jpg
This document contains a series of emails from April 2015, likely sent by Jeffrey Epstein to Melanie Spinella, detailing aggressive restructuring of his financial office and estate. The sender criticizes an administrator named 'Brad,' discusses the disposition of major assets including Phaidon, a boat, and a plane, and claims to have uncovered $8 million in missed deductions. The text also references high-profile associates like 'Mort' (likely Zuckerman) and 'Sultan,' while demanding strict control over banking and legal matters involving firms like Paul Weiss.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023273.jpg
This document contains email correspondence, likely from Jeffrey Epstein to Melanie Spinella (and meant for Leon Black), dated April 2015. The text details the restructuring of a 'family office,' criticism of an employee named Brad, and the management of various assets including Phaidon, aircraft, and art. Epstein claims to have found significant missing funds ($8 million) and saved $500k, while asserting control over the accounting and hiring processes.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029214.jpg
An email thread from September 19, 2014, between Jeffrey Epstein and Kathy Ruemmler during the UN General Assembly week in New York. Epstein lists a significant number of high-profile individuals (Thiel, Summers, Clinton, etc.) he is seemingly in contact with or aware of, inviting Ruemmler to meet them. The conversation also touches on Ruemmler's schedule, her need to speak to 'the boss,' and a discussion regarding professional, emotional, and financial risk/reward.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Paid | Sultan | Foundations/Chari... | $0.00 | Allegations that Prince Sultan donated money to... | View |
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity