Christian R. Everdell
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Client |
64
Very Strong
|
183 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
18
Very Strong
|
25 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
83 | |
|
person
MARK S. COHEN
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
ALISON J. NATHAN
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Professional |
9
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
MARK S. COHEN
|
Business associate |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Client |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
Alison Moe
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
ANDREW ROHRBACH
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Mark S. Cohen
|
Business associate |
6
|
1 | |
|
organization
Cohen & Gresser LLP
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
organization
Cohen & Gresser LLP
|
Professional employment |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Bobbi C. Sternheim
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Lara Pomerantz
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
ALISON J. NATHAN
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Opposing counsel |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Pomerantz
|
Professional adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
The Honorable Alison J. Nathan
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Bobbi C. Sternheim
|
Co counsel |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
David Oscar Markus
|
Professional co counsel |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Pomerantz
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mark Stewart Cohen
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
David Oscar Markus
|
Co counsel |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Court proceedings | The document states the attorney's appearance is for the purposes of an upcoming arraignment, ini... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2025-08-04 | Legal proceeding | A court order was issued granting the motion for attorneys Christian R. Everdell and Mark S. Cohe... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2025-08-01 | Legal filing | Filing of a Notice of Motion to Withdraw by Christian R. Everdell, Mark S. Cohen, and Cohen & Gre... | New York, New York | View |
| 2025-08-01 | Legal proceeding | A proposed order was filed granting the motion for attorneys Christian R. Everdell and Mark S. Co... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2025-08-01 | N/A | Filing of declaration supporting motion to withdraw as counsel. | New York, New York | View |
| 2022-08-22 | N/A | Sentencing Hearing in United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-06-28 | Sentencing | Sentencing hearing for the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2022-06-15 | Legal document service | Christian R. Everdell served a memorandum via ECF upon four individuals. | N/A | View |
| 2022-06-15 | Legal filing | Document 662 was filed in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | N/A | View |
| 2022-06-15 | Legal filing | Attorneys for Ghislaine Maxwell submitted a document to the court arguing for a sentence below th... | U.S. Court (Case 1:20-cr-00... | View |
| 2022-06-15 | N/A | Filing of Sentencing Memorandum on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2022-03-11 | N/A | Filing of Reply Memorandum | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2022-03-11 | Court filing | Filing of "GHISLAINE MAXWELL’S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF HER MOTION FOR A NEW TRIAL". | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2022-03-11 | Legal filing | Filing of 'GHISLAINE MAXWELL’S MOTION FOR A NEW TRIAL' with the court. | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2022-03-11 | N/A | Filing of Document 647 requesting to vacate conviction and enter judgment of acquittal. | New York, New York | View |
| 2022-03-11 | Legal filing | Filing of Document 642 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | N/A | View |
| 2022-02-24 | Legal filing | Document 616 was officially filed with the court in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | N/A | View |
| 2022-02-24 | Legal filing | Ghislaine Maxwell's attorneys filed a reply in support of her motion for a new trial. | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2022-02-24 | Legal filing | Document 612 was filed in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | Court associated with Case ... | View |
| 2022-02-24 | Legal filing | A motion for a new trial was filed on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell. | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2022-02-24 | Legal filing | Document 613-1 was filed in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | N/A | View |
| 2022-02-11 | N/A | Filing of legal motion seeking to vacate conviction and enter judgment of acquittal | New York, New York | View |
| 2022-02-11 | Legal filing | Filing of an Omnibus Memorandum in Support of Her Post-Trial Motions by Ghislaine Maxwell's attor... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2022-02-11 | Legal document service | A memorandum was served via ECF (Electronic Case Filing). | N/A | View |
| 2022-02-09 | Legal filing submission | A legal document was dated and submitted, requesting a new trial or an evidentiary hearing to exa... | N/A | View |
DOJ-OGR-00020631.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket in the case of Ghislaine Maxwell, dated February 22, 2023, but detailing events from July 2020. It includes an order from Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding public and press access to hearings, followed by a list of filings such as attorney appearances and motions. The key event is a minute entry for Maxwell's arraignment on July 14, 2020, where she pleaded not guilty via video conference, was denied bail, and had a trial date set for July 12, 2021.
DOJ-OGR-00020630.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket report for the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, detailing legal proceedings and filings between July 7, 2020, and July 9, 2020. It includes orders from Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding scheduling and Speedy Trial Act exclusions, notices of appearance for defense attorneys, a motion for pro hac vice admission, the filing of a superseding indictment, and logistical details for a remote arraignment and bail hearing.
DOJ-OGR-00020566.jpg
This document is a page from the court docket for United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering entries from January 26, 2022, to February 4, 2022. It details procedural motions regarding the sealing of documents for a new trial motion, media requests for access (Daily News, ABC, NBC, NYT), and redactions of witness names. Judge Alison J. Nathan issued orders balancing public access with the integrity of potential inquiries and granted a defense request for an extension of time for post-verdict motions.
DOJ-OGR-00020553.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket log for Case 22-1426, dated July 8, 2022. It details a series of legal filings that occurred primarily on November 22, 2021, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The entries consist of orders signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan and various letter motions from both the prosecution (USA) and the defense concerning evidence (birth certificates, Exhibit 52), witnesses (Witness-3, Accuser-3), subpoenas, and proposed redactions to court documents.
DOJ-OGR-00020551.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket in Case 22-1426, dated July 8, 2022, detailing several filings from November 19, 2021, related to the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The entries consist of letters and orders from Judge Alison J. Nathan concerning evidentiary matters, including the admissibility of Government Exhibit 52 and the anticipated testimony of a witness referred to as 'Accuser-3' and 'Witness-3'. The court orders address motions to exclude evidence and outline the process for redacting sensitive information, with a key focus on testimony about Maxwell's relationship with Mr. Epstein and her alleged role in facilitating sexual activity.
DOJ-OGR-00020532.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket related to the case of Ghislaine Maxwell, listing entries from August 23, 2021, to August 30, 2021. It details various orders and letters, including the scheduling of a jury trial for November 29, 2021, and the resolution of issues regarding attorney-client video teleconferences.
DOJ-OGR-00020530.jpg
This document is a docket sheet from July to August 2021 detailing legal maneuvers in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. Significant entries involve a dispute over an Op-Ed written by attorney David Oscar Markus, leading to a court order enforcing Local Criminal Rule 23.1 regarding extrajudicial statements to protect the integrity of the trial. Additionally, the defense filed motions referencing the 'Cosby Opinion' and sought to suppress evidence obtained from a subpoena to the law firm Boies Schiller.
DOJ-OGR-00020528.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet covering the period from May 25, 2021, to June 15, 2021, detailing legal proceedings in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It includes orders setting trial disclosure schedules (including victim identities and Jencks Act material), a denial of a subpoena motion, and a mandate from the US Court of Appeals affirming the denial of Maxwell's bail and addressing complaints about sleep deprivation in custody. The document also references correspondence between defense attorneys (Everdell, Sternheim) and Judge Nathan regarding pretrial motions and confinement conditions at the MDC.
DOJ-OGR-00020511.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from March 2021 detailing proceedings in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. Key events include the denial of Maxwell's third motion for bail on March 22, 2021, and various orders regarding the redaction and sealing of documents, specifically referencing Exhibit 11 and transcripts from the civil case 'Giuffre v. Maxwell'. The docket also records a subpoena request directed at a law firm representing alleged victims, with the court requiring notice be given to those victims.
DOJ-OGR-00020510.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, covering filings between February 4, 2021, and March 1, 2021. It details various legal maneuvers, including Maxwell's third motion for bond, motions for a bill of particulars, and disputes regarding her confinement conditions at the MDC. The docket also records correspondence between the defense (Cohen, Sternheim, Everdell) and the prosecution (Comey, Moe, Pomerantz) addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan, as well as the sealing of multiple documents.
DOJ-OGR-00020507.jpg
This document is a legal docket sheet from Case 22-1426, detailing court filings and orders related to Ghislaine Maxwell between December 31, 2020, and January 25, 2021. The entries show her attorney, Christian R. Everdell, filing motions for extensions and laptop access, Judge Alison J. Nathan ruling on these motions, and the filing of a notice of appeal. A key point of contention arises when the Bureau of Prisons requests the court to vacate an order that granted Maxwell laptop access for discovery review.
DOJ-OGR-00020504.jpg
This court docket sheet from Case 22-1426 details several filings and orders related to Ghislaine Maxwell between December 7 and December 14, 2020. The entries concern Maxwell's renewed motion for bail, which the court allowed to be filed with redactions, and her ongoing complaints about her conditions of confinement at the MDC. The court denied her request to have the warden testify but ordered the government to provide regular updates on her status and access to legal counsel.
DOJ-OGR-00020503.jpg
This legal document, a page from the court docket in Case 22-1426, details several filings and orders from December 2020 concerning defendant Ghislaine Maxwell. Judge Alison J. Nathan issues an order approving redactions to letters, denying an in-camera conference, and setting a detailed briefing schedule for Maxwell's renewed motion for bail. The document also logs letters filed on Maxwell's behalf by Christian R. Everdell, as well as a letter from Sophia Papapetru and John Wallace regarding Maxwell's conditions of confinement.
DOJ-OGR-00020499.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket (Case 22-1426, referring to earlier 2020 district court proceedings) detailing legal filings in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell between August 10 and August 24, 2020. The entries track a series of motions regarding discovery disclosure, protective orders, and sealing requests, involving defense attorneys (Everdell, Pagliuca, Menninger) and government prosecutors (Rossmiller, Comey, Pomerantz). Judge Alison J. Nathan issued orders setting deadlines for responses and replies regarding these disputes.
DOJ-OGR-00020495.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket covering proceedings between July 7 and July 9, 2020, regarding United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It records the official appearances of Maxwell's defense team (Cohen, Everdell, Menninger, Pagliuca), the filing of a superseding indictment, and orders regarding speedy trial exclusions and victim rights. It also schedules a remote arraignment and bail hearing for July 14, 2020, providing public access dial-in numbers.
DOJ-OGR-00020489.jpg
This document is a criminal docket sheet from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York for the case USA v. Maxwell, case number 1:20-cr-00330-AJN. It identifies the movant, Jordana H. Feldman, and the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell, along with their respective legal counsel and the assigned judge, Alison J. Nathan. The document provides key case dates, including the filing date of June 29, 2020, and the termination date of June 29, 2022.
DOJ-OGR-00020469.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering filings between February 25 and March 2, 2022. It details the scheduling of a hearing for March 8, 2022, to question 'Juror 50' regarding potential misconduct or questionnaire discrepancies. Key entries reveal that Juror 50's attorney, Todd Spodek, informed the court that the juror intends to invoke the Fifth Amendment against self-incrimination, leading the Government to seek approval to compel testimony via immunity.
DOJ-OGR-00020462.jpg
This document is a court docket log covering the proceedings of the jury trial against Ghislaine Maxwell from December 21, 2021, to January 5, 2022. It records daily minute entries for the trial, the guilty verdict on multiple counts, subsequent orders regarding sentencing schedules and medical requests, and various letters filed by legal counsel.
DOJ-OGR-00020452.jpg
This document is a court docket summary from Case 22-1426, dated July 8, 2022, detailing numerous filings that occurred on November 22, 2021, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The entries consist of orders from Judge Alison J. Nathan and a series of letter motions from both the prosecution (USA) and the defense. The filings cover procedural matters such as proposed redactions, motions to quash subpoenas, admissibility of witness testimony (Witness-3), and evidence related to specific exhibits and accusers (Accuser-3).
DOJ-OGR-00020450.jpg
This document is a log of court filings from November 19, 2021, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, presided over by Judge Alison J. Nathan. The entries detail orders and a memorandum opinion concerning evidentiary motions, specifically the admissibility of Government Exhibit 52 and the testimony of a witness referred to as 'Accuser-3' and 'Witness-3'. The court is ruling on what testimony from this witness regarding her relationship with Maxwell and Mr. Epstein will be permissible, setting deadlines for the parties to propose redactions to court documents.
DOJ-OGR-00020436.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket (Case 22-1426) listing entries from late October 2021 regarding the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The entries detail various orders and letters concerning jury selection, questionnaires, voir dire procedures, and scheduling for motions in limine and jury charges. It documents communications between the defense (Maxwell's counsel) and the prosecution (USA) addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan.
DOJ-OGR-00020431.jpg
This document contains a series of court docket entries from August 2021 related to the case of Ghislaine Maxwell. It includes orders from Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding unsealing documents, scheduling a jury trial for November 29, 2021, and addressing attorney-client communication issues at the MDC. It also logs various letters exchanged between the defense counsel and the prosecution.
DOJ-OGR-00020429.jpg
This document is a court docket summary from July and August 2021 for the case of Ghislaine Maxwell, presided over by Judge Alison J. Nathan. It details a series of filings, including letters from Maxwell's counsel and motions from the U.S. government. A significant event is the court's order addressing an op-ed written by attorney David Markus, which led to him being ordered to comply with local rules regarding extrajudicial statements that could prejudice a trial.
DOJ-OGR-00020427.jpg
This document is a page from the court docket for the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, covering entries from May 25, 2021, to June 15, 2021. It details procedural events including the denial of bail appeal by the USCA, scheduling orders for disclosures and motions in limine set by Judge Alison J. Nathan, and correspondence regarding the defendant's confinement conditions. The document logs filings by both the prosecution (USA) and the defense.
Opposition to motion
Maurene Comey informed Christian R. Everdell that the Government does not oppose the motion for Cohen & Gresser to be relieved as counsel.
Submission of reply memoranda and exhibits
The letter states an intention to submit all reply memoranda and exhibits by email to the Court and the government.
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN
Email address ceverdell@cohengresser.com provided for Christian R. Everdell, lead attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell.
Representation of Maxwell
Confirmed Maxwell retained Markus Moss for unsealing motion and Markus is prepared for deadlines.
Service of a memorandum
Christian R. Everdell certifies that he served a memorandum via the Electronic Case Filing (ECF) system to four individuals at the U.S. Department of Justice.
Response to Court's order
Defense submitting proposed questions for the hearing related to Maxwell's Motion for a New Trial.
Service of a memorandum
Christian R. Everdell certifies that he served a memorandum via the Electronic Case Filing (ECF) system to four individuals at the U.S. Department of Justice.
Extension of Time
Request for extension
Sealing Motion for New Trial
Letter regarding sealing the motion for a new trial
Redaction
Letter regarding redaction
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Request for additional jury instructions regarding Counts Two and Four based on a jury note.
N/A
Letter referenced in Table of Contents
Video Monitors
Joint letter regarding video monitors
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Request for extension on filing joint proposed jury charge and verdict sheet.
Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Request for extension to file joint proposed jury charge and verdict sheet.
Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Submission of unsealed copies of Exhibits D, E, F, and G related to Ms. Maxwell's motion to suppress, pursuant to a court order.
Cover Letter for Omnibus Reply Memorandum
Support of Defendant's Supplemental Pretrial Motions
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Notification regarding the filing of an Omnibus Reply Memorandum under seal due to confidential discovery information.
Hard Drives
Letter regarding hard drives.
Hard Drives
Correspondence regarding hard drives.
Proposed Pretrial Schedule
Defense submission regarding the schedule for pretrial proceedings.
Grand Jury Motion
Letter regarding Grand Jury Motion.
Notice of Motion and Affirmation
A certification that a copy of the 'Notice of Motion and Affirmation' was served via First Class Mail to David Oscar Markus and Ghislaine Maxwell.
Motion to withdraw as appellate counsel
Motion requesting to relieve Christian R. Everdell and Cohen & Gresser LLP as counsel because Maxwell has retained David Oscar Markus.
Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Request for defense counsel to bring electronics and specific legacy media playback equipment (VCR, cassette player, etc.) to the courthouse for an evidence view involving the defendant.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity