Christian R. Everdell
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Client |
64
Very Strong
|
183 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
18
Very Strong
|
25 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
83 | |
|
person
MARK S. COHEN
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
ALISON J. NATHAN
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Professional |
9
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
MARK S. COHEN
|
Business associate |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Client |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
Alison Moe
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
ANDREW ROHRBACH
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Mark S. Cohen
|
Business associate |
6
|
1 | |
|
organization
Cohen & Gresser LLP
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
organization
Cohen & Gresser LLP
|
Professional employment |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Bobbi C. Sternheim
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Lara Pomerantz
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
ALISON J. NATHAN
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Opposing counsel |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Pomerantz
|
Professional adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
The Honorable Alison J. Nathan
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Bobbi C. Sternheim
|
Co counsel |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
David Oscar Markus
|
Professional co counsel |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Pomerantz
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mark Stewart Cohen
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
David Oscar Markus
|
Co counsel |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Court proceedings | The document states the attorney's appearance is for the purposes of an upcoming arraignment, ini... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2025-08-04 | Legal proceeding | A court order was issued granting the motion for attorneys Christian R. Everdell and Mark S. Cohe... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2025-08-01 | Legal filing | Filing of a Notice of Motion to Withdraw by Christian R. Everdell, Mark S. Cohen, and Cohen & Gre... | New York, New York | View |
| 2025-08-01 | Legal proceeding | A proposed order was filed granting the motion for attorneys Christian R. Everdell and Mark S. Co... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2025-08-01 | N/A | Filing of declaration supporting motion to withdraw as counsel. | New York, New York | View |
| 2022-08-22 | N/A | Sentencing Hearing in United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-06-28 | Sentencing | Sentencing hearing for the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2022-06-15 | Legal document service | Christian R. Everdell served a memorandum via ECF upon four individuals. | N/A | View |
| 2022-06-15 | Legal filing | Document 662 was filed in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | N/A | View |
| 2022-06-15 | Legal filing | Attorneys for Ghislaine Maxwell submitted a document to the court arguing for a sentence below th... | U.S. Court (Case 1:20-cr-00... | View |
| 2022-06-15 | N/A | Filing of Sentencing Memorandum on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2022-03-11 | N/A | Filing of Reply Memorandum | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2022-03-11 | Court filing | Filing of "GHISLAINE MAXWELL’S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF HER MOTION FOR A NEW TRIAL". | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2022-03-11 | Legal filing | Filing of 'GHISLAINE MAXWELL’S MOTION FOR A NEW TRIAL' with the court. | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2022-03-11 | N/A | Filing of Document 647 requesting to vacate conviction and enter judgment of acquittal. | New York, New York | View |
| 2022-03-11 | Legal filing | Filing of Document 642 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | N/A | View |
| 2022-02-24 | Legal filing | Document 616 was officially filed with the court in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | N/A | View |
| 2022-02-24 | Legal filing | Ghislaine Maxwell's attorneys filed a reply in support of her motion for a new trial. | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2022-02-24 | Legal filing | Document 612 was filed in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | Court associated with Case ... | View |
| 2022-02-24 | Legal filing | A motion for a new trial was filed on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell. | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2022-02-24 | Legal filing | Document 613-1 was filed in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | N/A | View |
| 2022-02-11 | N/A | Filing of legal motion seeking to vacate conviction and enter judgment of acquittal | New York, New York | View |
| 2022-02-11 | Legal filing | Filing of an Omnibus Memorandum in Support of Her Post-Trial Motions by Ghislaine Maxwell's attor... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2022-02-11 | Legal document service | A memorandum was served via ECF (Electronic Case Filing). | N/A | View |
| 2022-02-09 | Legal filing submission | A legal document was dated and submitted, requesting a new trial or an evidentiary hearing to exa... | N/A | View |
DOJ-OGR-00001186.jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal filing in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, dated June 23, 2020. It is a 'Reply Memorandum of Ghislaine Maxwell in Support of Her Renewed Motion for Bail' for the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The document lists the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell, and her legal counsel from three different law firms.
DOJ-OGR-00001141.jpg
This document is the final signature page (page 39 of the brief, page 45 of the PDF filing) of a legal motion filed on December 4, 2020, in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). The text concludes an argument requesting the Court order Maxwell's release on bail based on proposed conditions. It lists the defense counsel team from three different law firms: Cohen & Gresser LLP, Haddon, Morgan & Foreman P.C., and the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim.
DOJ-OGR-00001097.jpg
This document is the cover page of a legal filing in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell, case number 20 Cr. 330 (AJN), in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. Filed on June 23, 2021, it is a memorandum submitted by Maxwell's legal team in support of her renewed motion for bail. The document lists her attorneys from three different law firms.
DOJ-OGR-00000908.jpg
This legal document is a Notice of Appearance filed on April 1, 2021, by attorney David Oscar Markus of the firm Markus/Moss PLLC. He is formally notifying the court that he will be serving as additional counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell in the case of United States of America v. Maxwell (Docket No. 21-770/21-58), acting as co-counsel alongside Christian R. Everdell of Cohen & Gresser LLP.
DOJ-OGR-00000905.jpg
This document is a notice from the court regarding Case 21-770, dated April 1, 2021. It informs counsel Christian R. Everdell that a filing was defective because a motion to be relieved is required for substitution of counsel. The document sets a deadline of April 5, 2021, to cure the defect to avoid the document being stricken or the appeal dismissed.
DOJ-OGR-00000899.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from Case 21-770 covering February 23, 2021, to March 18, 2021. It details Ghislaine Maxwell's third motion for bond, the Government's opposition to it, and various scheduling orders regarding pretrial motions. A significant order on March 18, 2021, addresses the redaction and sealing of documents, specifically denying the Government's request to completely seal 'Exhibit 11' because portions of the transcript are already public record in the *Giuffre v. Maxwell* civil case.
DOJ-OGR-00000896.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from January 2021 detailing procedural events in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. Key events include the granting of laptop access for discovery review, a subsequent request by the Bureau of Prisons to vacate that order, and the filing of multiple defense motions to dismiss charges or separate trials. The document lists attorneys Christian Everdell, Mark Cohen, and Jeffrey Pagliuca acting on Maxwell's behalf before Judge Alison J. Nathan.
DOJ-OGR-00000895.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from late 2020 and early 2021 detailing proceedings in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It records Judge Alison J. Nathan's denial of Maxwell's bail application due to flight risk, citing specific charges including conspiracy to entice minors for illegal sex acts and perjury. The docket tracks correspondence between the prosecution (USA) and defense (Everdell), sealed documents, and Maxwell's subsequent filing of a Notice of Appeal after a request for an extension of time was denied.
DOJ-OGR-00000893.jpg
This document is a page from the court docket for Case 21-770 (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), listing entries from December 10 to December 18, 2020. It records the filing of transcripts from a July 2020 conference, an order by Judge Alison J. Nathan approving redactions for Maxwell's sealed bail application based on privacy interests and judicial efficiency, and the submission of Maxwell's renewed bail motion with numerous exhibits. Additionally, it notes the appearance of attorney Andrew Rohrbach for the government and the government's subsequent opposition to the bail application.
DOJ-OGR-00000892.jpg
This document is a log of court filings from Case 21-770, dated March 24, 2021, detailing events from early December 2020 concerning the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell. The entries consist of letters from Maxwell's legal team and subsequent orders from Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding procedural matters such as briefing schedules, sealing documents, a renewed motion for bail, and Maxwell's conditions of confinement at the Metropolitan Detention Center. A key event is the Court's denial of Maxwell's request to summon the prison warden to testify about her confinement, instead ordering the Government to continue providing written updates.
DOJ-OGR-00000889.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet for the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, detailing legal filings from September to November 2020. It chronicles a series of letters, motions, and orders between the prosecution (USA, represented by AUSAs Comey, Moe, and Pomerantz) and the defense (Ghislaine Maxwell, represented by attorneys including Sternheim, Everdell, and Pagliuca), all overseen by Judge Alison J. Nathan. The filings primarily concern procedural matters such as requests to delay disclosure of evidence, modify protective orders, and confirm the government's disclosure obligations.
DOJ-OGR-00000887.jpg
This document is a page from the court docket in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering a period in August 2020. It details a judicial order denying a broad defense request regarding witness privacy and discovery materials, followed by a log of subsequent legal filings (motions, affidavits, and endorsements) between the defense team (Everdell, Pagliuca) and the prosecution (Rossmiller) regarding discovery disclosure and protective orders.
DOJ-OGR-00000886.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket sheet in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, detailing legal filings and orders from late July 2020. It includes entries regarding motions for a protective order, responses from both the defense and prosecution, and a Memorandum Opinion & Order by Judge Alison J. Nathan resolving disputes over the protective order's language concerning victim identification and the use of discovery materials.
DOJ-OGR-00000885.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet for Case 21-770 (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) covering proceedings from July 13, 2020, to July 27, 2020. Key events include Maxwell's arraignment where she pleaded Not Guilty, the denial of her bail, the setting of a trial date for July 12, 2021, and various orders regarding discovery scheduling and extrajudicial statements. The document records the presence of defense attorneys Mark Cohen, Jeffrey Pagliuca, and Christian Everdell, as well as government prosecutors Alison Moe, Alex Rossmiller, and Maurene Comey.
DOJ-OGR-00000883.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket containing orders and notices related to the case of Ghislaine Maxwell. It details COVID-19 protocols for courthouse entry, remote proceeding logistics, victim notification rights, and Speedy Trial Act exclusions. It also lists a memo endorsement scheduling briefing deadlines and notices of attorney appearances for Maxwell's defense team.
DOJ-OGR-00000879.jpg
This document is a criminal docket sheet from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York for the case USA v. Maxwell (1:20-cr-00330-AJN), filed on June 29, 2020. It identifies Ghislaine Maxwell as the defendant and lists her legal counsel, including five attorneys from various law firms in New York and Denver. The case was assigned to Judge Alison J. Nathan.
DOJ-OGR-00000877.jpg
This document is an electronic filing notice from the U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, dated March 24, 2021. It informs recipients that the appeal record for the case USA v. Maxwell (1:20-cr-00330-AJN), concerning Ghislaine Maxwell's Notice of Appeal, has been electronically transmitted to the U.S. Court of Appeals. The notice also includes important information regarding PACER access fees and the policy for obtaining free electronic copies of court documents for legal professionals.
DOJ-OGR-00000861.jpg
This document is a docket summary from the legal case against Ghislaine Maxwell, detailing court filings and orders from late February to mid-March 2021. Key events include Maxwell's third motion for bond, subsequent responses and replies, and a motion for a time extension which was granted. The document culminates in a detailed order from Judge Alison J. Nathan on March 18, 2021, addressing disputes over the redaction and sealing of pretrial motions and exhibits, setting deadlines for the parties to confer and propose joint redactions.
DOJ-OGR-00000858.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from Case 21-770, detailing legal activities related to Ghislaine Maxwell between January 12 and January 25, 2021. The entries record the transmission of an appeal, a dispute over Maxwell's access to a laptop for discovery review involving the Bureau of Prisons, and the filing of numerous pretrial motions by her legal team to dismiss various charges. The document highlights the procedural back-and-forth between the defense, the court, and the Bureau of Prisons in the pretrial phase of the case.
DOJ-OGR-00000857.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from the case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 21-770), covering late December 2020 to mid-January 2021. It details the denial of Maxwell's renewed motion for bail due to flight risk, referencing charges related to the enticement and transportation of minors for illegal sex acts. The document tracks subsequent procedural filings, including sealed documents and Maxwell's eventual filing of a Notice of Appeal on January 11, 2021.
DOJ-OGR-00000856.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from December 2020 detailing proceedings in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It records the filing of opposition and reply memoranda regarding Maxwell's renewed motion for bail, as well as Judge Alison J. Nathan's orders approving redactions to protect third-party privacy and ultimately denying the motion for release on bail on December 28, 2020. The text heavily cites legal precedents regarding judicial transparency versus privacy interests (Lugosch, Amodeo).
DOJ-OGR-00000855.jpg
This document is a log of court filings from Case 21-770, detailing events between December 10 and December 18, 2020, concerning defendant Ghislaine Maxwell. The entries primarily revolve around the filing of a court transcript, Maxwell's renewed application for bail, and the court's orders regarding the redaction of documents related to the bail application. The court, presided over by Judge Alison J. Nathan, approved Maxwell's proposed redactions to protect the privacy of individuals mentioned, balancing it against the public's right to access.
DOJ-OGR-00000854.jpg
This document is a court docket summary from March 2021, detailing a series of filings and orders in the case of Ghislaine Maxwell from late 2020. The entries cover procedural matters such as setting a briefing schedule for a renewed bail motion, requests to seal documents, and extensive correspondence regarding Maxwell's conditions of confinement at the Metropolitan Detention Center. A judge denies Maxwell's request to summon the warden but orders the government to provide regular written updates on her status.
DOJ-OGR-00000849.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket (Case 21-770) detailing legal proceedings in United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell between July and August 2020. It includes a judicial order rejecting a defense request regarding protective orders to safeguard witness privacy, followed by a log of subsequent letter motions and responses regarding discovery disclosure filed by defense attorneys Christian Everdell and Jeffrey Pagliuca, and government attorney Alex Rossmiller. The document tracks the procedural back-and-forth regarding the handling of sensitive discovery materials and protective orders.
DOJ-OGR-00000848.jpg
This document is a docket sheet page from the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering filings from July 27 to July 30, 2020. It details a dispute over a protective order, specifically regarding Maxwell's ability to publicly name alleged victims who have previously spoken publicly about her or Jeffrey Epstein. Judge Alison J. Nathan issued an order siding with the Government, restricting Maxwell from publicly referencing alleged victims and witnesses to protect their privacy during the criminal proceedings.
Opposition to motion
Maurene Comey informed Christian R. Everdell that the Government does not oppose the motion for Cohen & Gresser to be relieved as counsel.
Submission of reply memoranda and exhibits
The letter states an intention to submit all reply memoranda and exhibits by email to the Court and the government.
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN
Email address ceverdell@cohengresser.com provided for Christian R. Everdell, lead attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell.
Representation of Maxwell
Confirmed Maxwell retained Markus Moss for unsealing motion and Markus is prepared for deadlines.
Service of a memorandum
Christian R. Everdell certifies that he served a memorandum via the Electronic Case Filing (ECF) system to four individuals at the U.S. Department of Justice.
Response to Court's order
Defense submitting proposed questions for the hearing related to Maxwell's Motion for a New Trial.
Service of a memorandum
Christian R. Everdell certifies that he served a memorandum via the Electronic Case Filing (ECF) system to four individuals at the U.S. Department of Justice.
Extension of Time
Request for extension
Sealing Motion for New Trial
Letter regarding sealing the motion for a new trial
Redaction
Letter regarding redaction
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Request for additional jury instructions regarding Counts Two and Four based on a jury note.
N/A
Letter referenced in Table of Contents
Video Monitors
Joint letter regarding video monitors
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Request for extension on filing joint proposed jury charge and verdict sheet.
Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Request for extension to file joint proposed jury charge and verdict sheet.
Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Submission of unsealed copies of Exhibits D, E, F, and G related to Ms. Maxwell's motion to suppress, pursuant to a court order.
Cover Letter for Omnibus Reply Memorandum
Support of Defendant's Supplemental Pretrial Motions
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Notification regarding the filing of an Omnibus Reply Memorandum under seal due to confidential discovery information.
Hard Drives
Letter regarding hard drives.
Hard Drives
Correspondence regarding hard drives.
Proposed Pretrial Schedule
Defense submission regarding the schedule for pretrial proceedings.
Grand Jury Motion
Letter regarding Grand Jury Motion.
Notice of Motion and Affirmation
A certification that a copy of the 'Notice of Motion and Affirmation' was served via First Class Mail to David Oscar Markus and Ghislaine Maxwell.
Motion to withdraw as appellate counsel
Motion requesting to relieve Christian R. Everdell and Cohen & Gresser LLP as counsel because Maxwell has retained David Oscar Markus.
Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Request for defense counsel to bring electronics and specific legacy media playback equipment (VCR, cassette player, etc.) to the courthouse for an evidence view involving the defendant.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity