Andrew FINKELMAN
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
French Ministry of Justice
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
organization
U.S. Department of Justice
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
organization
Department of Justice (D.O.J)
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
French
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Department of Justice (D.O.J.)
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Philippe JAEGLÉ
|
Professional diplomatic |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
|
Liaison |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Philippe JAEGLÉ
|
Professional diplomatic |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
|
Professional liaison |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-12-11 | Legal communication | The French Ministry of Justice sent a letter to the U.S. Department of Justice explaining its nat... | Paris, France | View |
| 2020-12-11 | Legal correspondence | The French Ministry of Justice sent a letter to the US Department of Justice to clarify French ex... | Paris | View |
| 2020-12-11 | Legal correspondence | The French Ministry of Justice sent a letter to the U.S. Department of Justice to clarify its leg... | Paris, France | View |
| 2020-12-11 | Legal communication | The French Ministry of Justice sent a letter to the US Department of Justice explaining its legal... | Paris, France | View |
EFTA00018723.pdf
This document is a formal letter dated March 9, 2021, from the French Ministry of Justice to the US Department of Justice, transmitted via Liaison Magistrate Andrew Finkelman. It clarifies French extradition law (specifically Articles 696-2 and 694-4 of the Code of Criminal Procedure), stating definitively that France does not extradite its own nationals and that this constitutes an 'insurmountable obstacle' regardless of whether the nationality was lost after the offense occurred. This is likely in reference to the potential extradition of Jean-Luc Brunel or a similar figure involved in the Epstein case holding French citizenship.
DOJ-OGR-00001253.jpg
This document is a formal letter from the French Ministry of Justice to the U.S. Department of Justice, dated March 9, 2021. It clarifies French legal provisions (Articles 696 et sq., 696-2, and 694-4 of the Code of Criminal Procedure) regarding the removal of individuals. The letter emphasizes that removal is not granted for individuals who possess French citizenship at the time of the offense, making their French nationality an "insuperable obstacle" to removal.
DOJ-OGR-00001181.jpg
This letter, dated December 11, 2020, is a formal communication from the French Ministry of Justice to the U.S. Department of Justice. It explains that under French law, France is absolutely prohibited from extraditing any individual who was a French national at the time an alleged crime was committed, regardless of dual nationality. The letter further states that when extradition is denied on these grounds, France is obligated by the principle of 'aut tradere, aut judicare' to prosecute the individual in its own courts.
DOJ-OGR-00002202.jpg
This letter from the French Ministry of Justice, dated December 11, 2020, is addressed to the U.S. Department of Justice via its Liaison Magistrate in Paris. It formally explains that French law absolutely prohibits the extradition of any individual who was a French national at the time an alleged crime was committed. The letter contrasts this with the practices of Anglo-Saxon countries like the U.S. and clarifies that when extradition is denied on these grounds, French courts are empowered to prosecute the individual under the principle of 'aut tradere, aut judicar' (either extradite or prosecute).
DOJ-OGR-00002202(1).jpg
This letter, dated December 11, 2020, is from the French Ministry of Justice to the U.S. Department of Justice. It clarifies that French law, specifically Article 696-2 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, absolutely prohibits the extradition of any individual who was a French national at the time an alleged crime was committed. The letter contrasts this with the legal practices of Anglo-Saxon countries like the United States, which may extradite their own nationals.
DOJ-OGR-00002200.jpg
This is a formal letter dated December 11, 2020, from the French Ministry of Justice to the U.S. Department of Justice. The letter explains that French law absolutely prohibits the extradition of individuals who were French nationals at the time of the alleged offense, regardless of dual nationality. It clarifies that when France refuses an extradition request on these grounds, it is obligated under the principle of 'aut tradere, aut judicare' (either extradite or prosecute) to bring legal proceedings against the person in its own courts.
DOJ-OGR-00002200(1).jpg
This document is a formal letter from the French Ministry of Justice to the US Department of Justice, dated December 11, 2020, filed in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). The letter clarifies French penal code, stating that France absolutely refuses to extradite its own citizens (including dual nationals), but under the principle of 'aut dedere aut judicare' (extradite or prosecute), France retains jurisdiction to try its citizens for crimes committed abroad. This is legally significant to the Maxwell case as she held French citizenship.
DOJ-OGR-00020101.jpg
This letter from the French Ministry of Justice, dated December 11, 2020, is addressed to the U.S. Department of Justice. It explains that French law strictly prohibits the extradition of individuals who were French nationals at the time of the alleged crime, including those with dual nationality. The letter contrasts this with the legal systems of Anglo-Saxon countries like the United States and states that when France refuses extradition on grounds of nationality, it applies the principle of 'aut tradere, aut judicar' (either extradite or prosecute).
DOJ-OGR-00020099.jpg
This document is a formal letter from the French Ministry of Justice to the US Department of Justice, dated December 11, 2020. It explicitly clarifies French law regarding extradition, stating that France is absolutely prohibited from extraditing its own nationals, including dual citizens (likely referencing Jean-Luc Brunel or Ghislaine Maxwell in the context of the Epstein investigation). It further explains that while extradition is refused, France retains jurisdiction to prosecute these individuals domestically under the principle of 'aut tradere, aut judicare' (extradite or prosecute).
DOJ-OGR-00002757.jpg
This is a formal letter dated March 9, 2021, from the French Ministry of Justice to the US Department of Justice (filed in the US v. Maxwell case). The letter, signed by Philippe Jaeglé, explains French extradition laws (Articles 696 et seq.), specifically clarifying that France does not extradite its own nationals (Article 694-4). It asserts that if a requested person held French nationality at the time of the offense, it constitutes an 'insurmountable obstacle' to extradition.
Information on French removal proceedings and nationality
A formal letter informing the recipients about French legal provisions concerning the removal of individuals, specifically highlighting that French citizenship at the time of an offense is an obstacle to removal.
Information on French removal proceedings and nationality
A formal letter informing the recipients about French legal provisions concerning the removal of individuals, specifically highlighting that French citizenship at the time of an offense is an obstacle to removal.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity