The Honorable Alison J. Nathan
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
United States District Court
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
organization
United States District Court, Southern District of New York
|
Professional judge court |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Annie Farmer
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Christian R. Everdell
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Professional |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Meeting | A request is made for an in camera conference to address confidentiality concerns. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | Discussion of a protective order for discovery materials in a criminal case against Ms. Maxwell. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | Inquiry into Juror 50's potential bias due to childhood sexual abuse and his statements to a repo... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Sentencing | Sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell, for which Annie Farmer's victim impact statement is provided. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2022-03-02 | Legal filing | A document was filed with the court requesting a continuance. | N/A | View |
| 2022-01-25 | Court filing | Davis Wright Tremaine LLP, on behalf of ABC News and NBCUniversal News Group, filed a letter to t... | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2021-12-09 | Legal filing | Document 532 was filed in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | N/A | View |
| 2021-07-02 | Document filing | Cohen & Gresser LLP submitted a letter to the United States District Court. | New York, NY | View |
| 2021-02-01 | Court filing | The Government filed this letter in response to a court order. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2021-01-08 | Legal filing | Filing of a request for a 30-day extension of time to file a notice of appeal. | N/A | View |
| 2020-12-15 | Legal filing | Submission of a statement in opposition to Ghislaine Maxwell's renewed motion for bail. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2020-11-30 | Legal request | A request was made to the Court to file redacted versions of letters related to a bail applicatio... | N/A | View |
| 2020-10-14 | Legal filing | A letter was filed with the court arguing against the government's request to delay disclosure of... | S.D.N.Y. (implied) | View |
| 2020-08-21 | Court filing | The U.S. Government filed a letter with the court regarding redactions and sealing of documents i... | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2020-08-13 | Court filing | The U.S. Government filed a letter in opposition to the defendant's requests. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2020-08-10 | Legal filing | A motion was filed with the court on behalf of Ms. Maxwell requesting changes to her detention co... | N/A | View |
| 2020-07-29 | Legal filing | Filing of a legal document (Page 3 of 5) in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN. | S.D.N.Y. | View |
DOJ-OGR-00008226.jpg
This legal document, dated December 5, 2021, is a filing to Judge Alison J. Nathan arguing against the admissibility of interior photographs of Mr. Epstein's apartment. The author contends the photos, taken in 2019, cannot be proven to accurately represent the apartment's state during the charged conspiracy, which ended in 2004. The document highlights that the government's case for the photos' relevance relies solely on the testimony of a witness, "Jane," who described the apartment's interior based on her memory from an alleged visit in the mid-1990s.
Argument against classifying pleadings as 'judicial docum...
This document is a legal argument asserting that pleadings filed by Juror 50 do not qualify as 'judicial documents' and therefore are not subject to public access, citing legal precedents from the Second Circuit. It also notes that Ms. Maxwell plans to move to strike these pleadings.
Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Government submission arguing that no redactions are necessary for Juror 50's motion and it should be publicly filed.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
A joint letter from the parties in the case proposing a schedule for sentencing and the resolution of severed perjury counts, following a directive from the Court.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
A letter arguing against the government's request for a hearing regarding a juror's statements, asserting that the court can and should order a new trial based on existing information.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
The Government is informing the Court that a juror in the Ghislaine Maxwell case has given press interviews revealing he was a victim of sexual abuse and may not have disclosed this on the juror questionnaire, which merits the Court's attention.
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 569
Closing page of a legal filing, listing date, page number, contact info, and cc list.
Jury Instructions / Jury Note
Legal argument regarding jury confusion on Counts Two and Four, specifically concerning jurisdiction and conduct in New Mexico.
Jury Instructions / Constructive Amendment Argument
Legal argument requesting specific jury instructions to prevent conviction based on New Mexico events rather than New York events as charged in the indictment.
Constructive Amendment / Variance
This document argues that without further instruction, the jury might convict Ms. Maxwell based on a constructive amendment or prejudicial variance from the indictment, which would violate her constitutional rights. It cites legal precedents to support this claim.
Jury confusion regarding jurisdiction and conduct in New ...
This document is a legal argument to the judge, contending that the jury is confused about whether conduct in New Mexico can be used to convict Ms. Maxwell under New York law for Counts Two and Four.
Supplemental Jury Instruction
The defense argues that the court's response to a jury note was substantively incorrect and prejudicial to Ms. Maxwell, citing legal precedents that confusing or misleading instructions can be grounds for reversal.
Legal argument regarding jury instructions for Count Four...
The document argues that a conviction on Count Four against Ms. Maxwell must be based on intent to violate New York law, specifically regarding travel from Florida to New York, and that any conduct in New Mexico must be excluded from the jury's consideration.
Legal argument regarding jury instructions for Count Four...
The document argues that a conviction on Count Four against Ms. Maxwell must be based on intent to violate New York law, specifically regarding travel from Florida to New York, and that any conduct in New Mexico must be excluded from the jury's consideration.
Constructive Amendment / Variance
Legal argument regarding jury instructions and the S2 Indictment against Ms. Maxwell.
Supplemental Jury Instruction / Curative Instruction
Legal argument regarding jury instructions, specifically objecting to the Court's response to a jury note as prejudicial to Ms. Maxwell.
Jury Instructions / Constructive Amendment regarding Coun...
Argument that convicting Maxwell based on New Mexico events would be a constructive amendment of the indictment which specified New York.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
The Government submits a letter to inform the court that both the prosecution and the defense have agreed to the public release of a specific list of Government exhibits admitted during the trial.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) -...
The Government submitted a letter to Judge Nathan to point out a significant ambiguity in Jury Instruction No. 19. They propose replacing the pronoun "she" with "the individual" to clarify whether it refers to the defendant or the transported individual.
Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Proposal regarding logistics for public access to closing argument visuals/slides.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Proposal regarding logistics for public access to closing arguments, specifically the release of public versions of slides.
Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
The Government opposes the addition of Sand instruction 7-12 regarding the impeachment of witnesses by felony convictions.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
The Government is writing to address the scope of questions the defense may ask law enforcement witnesses, specifically objecting to questions regarding the failure to utilize specific investigative techniques.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Legal argument regarding witness impeachment, inconsistent statements, and the '3500 material' (Jencks Act material).
Admissibility of extrinsic evidence to prove a witness's ...
A legal argument asserting that extrinsic evidence is permissible to prove a witness's (Jane's) prior statement because she denied its substance during testimony, despite acknowledging the '3500 material' reflected it. The document also notes that counsel missed a deadline to identify all such statements.
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE
This is the signature page of a legal document filed in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Ghislaine Maxwell's legal team.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity