📧 Communication

letter

Communication Details

From
To
The Honorable Alison J. Nathan The Honorable Alison J. Nathan
Date
January 13, 2022
Subject
Argument against classifying pleadings as 'judicial documents' subject to public access.
Message Content

This document is a legal argument asserting that pleadings filed by Juror 50 do not qualify as 'judicial documents' and therefore are not subject to public access, citing legal precedents from the Second Circuit. It also notes that Ms. Maxwell plans to move to strike these pleadings.

📄 Source Document

DOJ-OGR-00008999.jpg
DOJ Collection
View Document
Document Summary

This document is page 3 of a legal memorandum dated January 13, 2022, addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan. The author argues that pleadings filed by 'Juror 50' do not meet the legal standard for 'judicial documents' and therefore should not be subject to public access. The argument relies on precedent from Second Circuit cases, including United States v. Amodeo and Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, and notes that Ms. Maxwell intends to move to strike the pleadings, which would further support their exclusion from public view.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein communication