ALISON J. NATHAN

Person

Mentions

2353

Relationships

101

Events

478

Documents

1160

Relationship Network

Network Depth

Loading... nodes

Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.

101 total relationships

Sort by:

Connected Entity	Relationship Type	Strength (mentions)	Documents	Actions
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL	Judge defendant	54 Very Strong	90	View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL	Defendant judge	24 Very Strong	33	View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL	Judicial	21 Very Strong	66	View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL	Defendant judge	19 Very Strong	19	View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL	Legal representative	12 Very Strong	40	View
organization The government	Professional	10 Very Strong	6	View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL	Professional	10 Very Strong	46	View
person the defendant	Judicial	10 Very Strong	6	View
person Christian R. Everdell	Professional	10 Very Strong	7	View
person Bobbi C. Sternheim	Professional	10 Very Strong	11	View
person defendant	Judicial	9 Strong	5	View
person Paula Speer	Professional	8 Strong	4	View
person AUDREY STRAUSS	Professional	8 Strong	4	View
organization U.S. government	Legal representative	8 Strong	4	View
person MAURENE COMEY	Prosecutor judge	7	3	View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL	Judicial authority	7	3	View
person MAXWELL	Judicial	7	2	View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL	Judicial assignment	7	3	View
person Jeffrey S. Pagliuca	Legal representative	7	3	View
person United States Government	Professional	7	3	View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL	Judge defendant	7	3	View
person the defendant	Judge defendant	6	2	View
person Juror 50	None	6	2	View
organization The government	Legal representative	6	2	View
person defendant	Professional	6	1	View

Date	Event Type	Description	Location	Actions
2021-06-25	Legal filing	The Court issued an Order (Dkt. No. 303) ordering documents to be unsealed.	UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR...	View
2021-06-25	N/A	Court order signed and filed.	New York, New York	View
2021-06-16	N/A	Judge Nathan orders the Government to publicly docket the redacted version of the letter.	New York, New York	View
2021-06-04	Issuance of a court order	A court order was signed and issued by Judge Alison J. Nathan.	New York, New York	View
2021-06-02	Court filing	The court order establishing disclosure deadlines was filed.	New York, New York	View
2021-05-14	N/A	Judge Nathan issues Order denying Maxwell's request to override BOP security protocols but urging...	New York, New York	View
2021-05-14	N/A	Court Order issued denying Maxwell's request regarding security checks but urging MDC to reduce s...	New York, New York	View
2021-05-11	N/A	Court Order requiring parties to submit a joint letter regarding the overall pretrial schedule.	SDNY	View
2021-05-03	N/A	Judge Nathan 'So Ordered' the request with a condition allowing MDC to object by May 4.	SDNY Court	View
2021-04-29	N/A	Judge Alison J. Nathan issued an order granting in part defense counsel's requests regarding the ...	United States District Cour...	View
2021-04-27	N/A	Court denied Defendant's request for subpoena to Boies Schiller Flexner LLP.	USDC SDNY	View
2021-04-27	N/A	Court denied Maxwell's request for authorization to serve subpoena to BSF	Court	View
2021-04-23	N/A	Rescheduled Arraignment on S2 Superseding Indictment	Daniel Patrick Moynihan Cou...	View
2021-04-23	N/A	Filing of a sealed order signed by Judge Nathan in case 20-cr-330 US v Ghislaine Maxwell	US Court (implied)	View
2021-04-22	N/A	Filing of defense letter responding to government's position on suppression motions.	Southern District of New York	View
2021-04-21	N/A	Court Order issued deferring resolution of suppression motions until after the non-perjury trial.	New York, New York	View
2021-04-19	N/A	Court Order issued requiring Government to clarify intent regarding suppressed evidence.	New York, New York	View
2021-04-16	N/A	Opinion and Order of the Honorable Alison J. Nathan	United States District Court	View
2021-04-16	N/A	Court Opinion denied Defendant's motions to dismiss S1 superseding indictment and granted motion ...	SDNY	View
2021-04-16	N/A	Opinion & Order filed electronically.	USDC SDNY	View
2021-04-02	N/A	Order granting Motion for Sigrid S. McCawley to Appear Pro Hac Vice	SDNY	View
2021-03-31	N/A	Filing of letter to Judge Nathan regarding superseding indictment.	New York, NY	View
2021-03-29	N/A	Filing of Court Order (Document 189)	USDC SDNY	View
2021-03-26	Court order	Judge Alison J. Nathan issued an order stating there is no reason to maintain redactions on a let...	SDNY	View
2021-03-26	N/A	Order filed by Judge Nathan regarding the removal of redactions.	Southern District of New York	View

DOJ-OGR-00008704.jpg

This document is a draft verdict sheet from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It lists the first three counts regarding conspiracy and enticement of minors for illegal sexual activity, providing spaces for the jury to mark 'Guilty' or 'Not Guilty'.

Legal document (draft verdict sheet)

2025-11-20

Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00008702.jpg

This document is a draft verdict sheet from the criminal trial of Ghislaine Maxwell in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, dated December 18, 2021. It lists three counts against Maxwell related to the conspiracy, enticement, and transportation of minors for illegal sexual activity. The sheet provides spaces for a jury to indicate a verdict of 'Guilty' or 'Not Guilty' for each count.

Legal document

2025-11-20

Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00020348.jpg

A letter from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter raises concerns about Maxwell's conditions of confinement at the MDC, specifically sleep deprivation caused by guards checking her with flashlights every 15 minutes. It also reports a recent incident where Maxwell developed a 'black eye' of unknown origin, leading to threats of punishment (SHU) by MDC staff if she did not explain the injury.

Legal correspondence/letter to judge

2025-11-20

Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00020346.jpg

This is page 2 of a court order by Judge Alison J. Nathan dated May 14, 2021, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The order denies Maxwell's request to override BOP security check protocols, stating the request is unsubstantiated, but urges the MDC to consider reducing sleep disruption and admonishes them to ensure protocols are neutral and necessary. The document references previous letters from defense counsel regarding detention conditions.

Court order / legal ruling

2025-11-20

Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00011666.jpg

This document is the cover page for the court transcript of the jury trial in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell, held on November 29, 2021. The trial took place in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, presided over by Judge Alison J. Nathan. The document lists the appearances of the legal counsel for both the prosecution and the defense, as well as other individuals present.

Legal document

2025-11-20

Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00011622.jpg

This document is the cover page for a court hearing transcript from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, dated November 23, 2021. The case is United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell, with Hon. Alison J. Nathan presiding as the District Judge. The page lists the appearances of the legal counsel for both the prosecution, led by U.S. Attorney Damian Williams, and the defense, including attorneys from the firm Haddon Morgan and Foreman.

Legal document

2025-11-20

Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00002880.jpg

This document is a legal letter to Judge Alison J. Nathan arguing against a subpoena issued by the Defendant (Ghislaine Maxwell) to the law firm BSF. The author argues that requests for materials related to the Epstein Victim's Compensation Program (EVCP) and communications between BSF and the U.S. Attorney are irrelevant to the charges, protected by work-product privilege, and constitute a 'fishing expedition' intended to support a false narrative of collusion. The document specifically details Requests 1, 3-5, 8, and 12.

Legal correspondence / court filing (letter to judge)

2025-11-20

Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00002879.jpg

This document is page 3 of a legal filing arguing that a subpoena issued by a defendant should be quashed. The filing contends that the subpoena fails to meet the specificity requirements of Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 17(c), as established in the case United States v. Nixon, because it is an overly broad "fishing expedition" seeking "all communications" with various individuals from the law firm Boies, Schiller, Flexner, LLP.

Legal document

2025-11-20

Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00002816.jpg

This legal document, dated March 22, 2021, is a filing in a criminal case arguing against the Defendant's (Ghislaine Maxwell) discovery requests. The filing contends that requests for communications about co-conspirator Jean Luc Brunel, fee agreements with victims Annie and Maria Farmer, Annie Farmer's complete teenage journal, and materials from the Epstein Victim's Compensation Program are irrelevant and improper 'fishing expeditions' for impeachment material. The document cites case law to assert that the Defendant has failed to demonstrate the relevance and admissibility of the requested evidence.

Legal document

2025-11-20

Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00002815.jpg

This document is a page from a legal filing arguing against a defendant's subpoena requests, asserting they fail to meet the Nixon standard for admissibility and relevance. The text specifically challenges requests for materials from the Epstein Victim's Compensation Program and communications between the firm BSF and the U.S. Attorney, characterizing them as fishing expeditions or irrelevant work product.

Legal filing / letter regarding subpoena

2025-11-20

Analysis Source

Total Received

$0.00

0 transactions

Total Paid

$0.00

0 transactions

Net Flow

$0.00

0 total transactions

No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.

As Sender

As Recipient

Total

Response Deadline

From: ALISON J. NATHAN

To: the government

Order to respond to Defendant's letter by 5:00 p.m. on Oct 15, 2021.

Order

2021-10-15

Communication Source

Order on Redactions

From: ALISON J. NATHAN

To: Parties

Judge adopts proposed redactions for specific motions.

Order

2021-02-04

Communication Source

Order referenced as Dkt. No. 89

From: ALISON J. NATHAN

To: Parties in the case

A previous court order from December 7, 2020, which the Defendant's filing was in accordance with.

Court order

2020-12-07

Communication Source

Endorsement on Letter Motion

From: ALISON J. NATHAN

To: Defendant (Maxwell)

The Court sees no basis for sealing this letter. Defendant must justify sealing by Dec 2, 2020, or file publicly.

Court order

2020-11-25

Communication Source

Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN

From: Defense counsel (implied)

To: ALISON J. NATHAN

Legal arguments regarding 'The Material' and subpoena service issues.

Letter

2020-08-17

Communication Source

Discussion 0

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search