DOJ-OGR-00020346.jpg

612 KB

Extraction Summary

4
People
3
Organizations
2
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
5
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court order / legal ruling
File Size: 612 KB
Summary

This is page 2 of a court order by Judge Alison J. Nathan dated May 14, 2021, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The order denies Maxwell's request to override BOP security check protocols, stating the request is unsubstantiated, but urges the MDC to consider reducing sleep disruption and admonishes them to ensure protocols are neutral and necessary. The document references previous letters from defense counsel regarding detention conditions.

People (4)

Name Role Context
Ghislaine Maxwell Defendant / Inmate
Subject of the detention protocols regarding sleep checks and eye masks.
Alison J. Nathan United States District Judge
Judge issuing the order.
Warden Official at MDC
Recipient of the order.
General Counsel Legal Counsel for MDC
Recipient of the order.

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
MDC
Metropolitan Detention Center, where Maxwell is detained.
BOP
Bureau of Prisons, sets security determinations.
The Government
Prosecution/US Attorney's office representing the state.

Timeline (1 events)

2021-05-14
Court Order issued denying Maxwell's request regarding security checks but urging MDC to reduce sleep disruption.
New York, New York

Locations (2)

Location Context
Location where the order was signed.
MDC
Detention facility.

Relationships (1)

Alison J. Nathan Judge/Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell
Judge Nathan issues order regarding Maxwell's detention conditions.

Key Quotes (5)

"The MDC has determined that these factors necessitate more frequent safety and security checks."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00020346.jpg
Quote #1
"Maxwell, like other inmates, may use other non-contraband items to cover her eyes."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00020346.jpg
Quote #2
"request is denied as factually unsubstantiated and legally unsupported."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00020346.jpg
Quote #3
"the Court urges the MDC to consider whether sleep disruption for pre-trial detainees can be reduced."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00020346.jpg
Quote #4
"The Court also admonishes the MDC and the Government to continue to ensure that Maxwell is subjected to only those security protocols that BOP determines are necessary..."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00020346.jpg
Quote #5

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,621 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 282 Filed 05/14/21 Page 2 of 2
can arise in high-profile cases. The MDC has determined that these factors necessitate more
frequent safety and security checks. The Government also indicates that the prohibition on eye
masks is a generally applicable policy, but that Maxwell, like other inmates, may use other non-
contraband items to cover her eyes.
To the extent that Maxwell’s April 29, 2021 letter asks the Court to override BOP’s
determination as to the frequency of appropriate safety and security check procedures, that
request is denied as factually unsubstantiated and legally unsupported. Certainly nothing in the
record plausibly establishes that current protocols interfere with Maxwell’s ability to prepare for
her trial and communicate with her lawyers. Defense counsel’s May 7, 2021 letter, Dkt. No.
272, describes generalized grievances but makes no additional specific and supported application
for relief. Nevertheless, the Court urges the MDC to consider whether sleep disruption for pre-
trial detainees can be reduced. The Court also admonishes the MDC and the Government to
continue to ensure that Maxwell is subjected to only those security protocols that BOP
determines are necessary for her safety and security, based upon neutral and applicable factors,
and consistent with the treatment of similarly situated pre-trial detainees.
The Government shall provide a copy of this Order to the Warden and General Counsel
for the MDC.
SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 14, 2021
New York, New York
[Signature]
ALISON J. NATHAN
United States District Judge
2
DOJ-OGR-00020346

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document