Relationship Details

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022, featuring the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer by Ms. Menninger. The testimony centers on verifying a specific page of a journal (Exhibit 604/AF-1) that the witness provided to the government as evidence.

This document is a page from the cross-examination transcript of witness A. Farmer (Annie Farmer) in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The defense attorney, Ms. Menninger, questions Farmer about journals she kept during a trip to Thailand and her senior year, as well as her use of these journals during 2020 media appearances. The defense then moves to introduce 'Defendant's Exhibit AF1,' claiming it contains a page omitted from the government's corresponding exhibit.

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell) dated August 10, 2022. It records the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer (Annie Farmer) by defense attorney Ms. Menninger, specifically regarding the admission of a journal entry (Exhibit AF1, Bates AFarmer10472) written by Farmer before a trip to New York. The government, represented by Ms. Pomerantz, agrees that no redactions are necessary for this specific page.

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330) filed on August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer (Annie Farmer). Defense attorney Ms. Menninger introduces defense exhibit 'AF1'—identified as a page from a journal—which the government prosecutor, Ms. Pomerantz, does not object to. The Court admits the exhibit temporarily under seal while the attorneys discuss potential redactions.

This document is a page from the cross-examination transcript of witness A. Farmer (Annie Farmer) in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The defense attorney, Ms. Menninger, questions the witness about the lack of journal entries regarding a trip to New Mexico and suggests her memory is reconstructed based on internet research about the release date of the movie 'Primal Fear'. The witness maintains that the movie confirmed her existing memory of the timeline. The page concludes with the introduction of exhibit AF-8.

This document is page 84 of a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, USA v. Maxwell) featuring the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer by Ms. Menninger. The testimony concerns a visit Farmer made to Mr. Epstein's home in late 1995 or early 1996, specifically discussing the layout of a room with a desk (presumed office) and potential renovations occurring at the time. The timeline is corroborated by a journal entry dated January 7th, shortly after the witness returned from the trip.

This is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, US v. Maxwell) dated August 10, 2022. Defense attorney Ms. Menninger is cross-examining witness A. Farmer regarding a specific piece of evidence, Exhibit 604 (a journal), confirming that the witness provided a picture of the back of the journal to the government. The prosecution (Ms. Pomerantz) confirms possession of the copy.

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named A. Farmer. The questioning focuses on a massage performed by someone named Ghislaine, with the witness stating her entire breast was exposed and refuting the suggestion that the massage was not explicitly sexual. Attorneys Ms. Pomerantz and Ms. Menninger are present, with the former making objections and the latter conducting the examination.

This document is page 107 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on August 10, 2022. It features the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer by Ms. Menninger regarding a journal entry written on January 25, 1996. The questioning focuses on Farmer's conflicting descriptions of Jeffrey Epstein's behavior in a movie theater at that time, noting she described it simultaneously as 'weird,' 'normal,' and 'not a big deal.'

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) featuring the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer (Annie Farmer). The testimony concerns the authentication of a signature on an application submitted on June 26, 2020. The defense attorney (Menninger) moves to admit pages of the document, and the prosecution (Pomerantz) agrees subject to a review for redactions to protect third-party privacy, which the Court grants.

This document is a page from the court transcript of the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer (likely Annie Farmer) in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330). Defense attorney Ms. Menninger questions the witness about a claim form she signed, emphasizing the penalties of perjury and the consequences of filing a fraudulent claim. The questioning also touches on whether the witness remembers being asked where sexual abuse occurred on said form.

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. It details the cross-examination of witness 'A. Farmer' (Annie Farmer) by Ms. Menninger. The questioning focuses on confirming previous testimony regarding a 'full body massage' during which the witness had 'nothing on.' The attorney also introduces an exhibit marked as 'AF8'.

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) filed on August 10, 2022. It features the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer by Ms. Menninger regarding a journal entry from January 7, 1996. The testimony confirms the witness returned from a week-long trip to New York on that date.

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It features the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer by Ms. Menninger regarding a journal entry written on January 25, 1996. The questioning focuses on the witness's contemporaneous perception of Jeffrey Epstein's behavior in a movie theater, specifically contrasting her journal descriptions of it being 'normal' or 'not a big deal' versus 'weird'.

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022, recording a sidebar conference during the redirect of witness A. Farmer. The Judge and defense attorney Ms. Menninger discuss a legal ruling concerning whether the defense 'opened the door' to certain testimony regarding the characterization of 'handholding' versus 'sexual abuse' on a victim's compensation form. Menninger argues she was prevented from asking about the witness's prior statements to law enforcement where the witness allegedly claimed she did not remember the touches being sexualized.

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022, featuring the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer (Annie Farmer). The defense attorney, Ms. Menninger, questions Farmer about an incident of sexual abuse in a movie theater and introduces exhibit AF-14. The testimony confirms that Farmer signed a release form in October 2020 and received $1.5 million from the Victims Compensation Program.