Event Details
September 27, 2017
Description
Article print date; ongoing legal arguments regarding reopening the Epstein case.
Participants (3)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Marra | person | 42 | View Entity |
| Edwards | person | 211 | View Entity |
| Cassell | person | 146 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015030.jpg
This document is page 3 of 4 of a printed web article from the Palm Beach Post, dated September 27, 2017. It details legal arguments by attorneys Edwards and Cassell, who are urging Judge Marra to rule that federal prosecutors violated the Crime Victims' Rights Act in the Jeffrey Epstein case. The document discusses potential remedies, including restitution and legal fees, while Cassell emphasizes that the effort is about justice rather than money. The page also includes unrelated local news sidebars about the Wellington council and a cold-case arrest.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
Publication of Utah Law Review article regarding victims' rights and Rule 2 amendments.
2007-01-01 • Utah
Settlement of case brought by Edwards and Cassell
Date unknown • Unknown
Deposition of Cassell
Date unknown • Unknown
Publication of BYU Law Review article
2005-01-01 • Unknown
Villafaña informed Edwards about Epstein's state plea but did not mention the NPA.
Date unknown
Edwards filed a CVRA petition after learning of the state plea.
Date unknown
Villafaña contacts Reiter and Edwards regarding Epstein's plea.
2008-06-27
Edwards contacted Villafaña on Wild's behalf. Villafaña informed him the case was under investigation but did not mention the NPA.
2008-01-01
Edwards submitted a court filing stating what Villafaña had told him about Epstein's plea.
2016-01-01
Edwards submitted an affidavit prepared for the CVRA litigation.
2017-01-01
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event