October 28, 2021
Government response clarifying that testimony must be in person if required.
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Redacted Government Officials | person | 0 | View Entity |
| Unknown Witness | person | 55 | View Entity |
EFTA00038832.pdf
This document is an email chain from October 2021 regarding the 'Us v maxwell' case. A potential witness inquires about a summons they received, specifically asking if they can provide a deposition via Zoom. A government representative responds that if testimony is required, it must be in person, though it is not yet certain if the witness will be called.
Events with shared participants
A legal proceeding, likely a deposition, where a direct examination of a witness occurred. The filename '~0929104.TXT' suggests the date.
2004-09-29 • Likely Coconut Grove, FL
Direct examination of a witness by Mr. Tein, indexed to begin on page 4 of the full transcript.
Date unknown
A deposition is conducted where a witness is questioned by Mr. Tein.
Date unknown • Undetermined
A photograph marked '18-001' is presented to the witness. The witness identifies themselves and a redacted friend in the photo.
Date unknown • During deposition
Process servers served the witness with a subpoena for the deposition. The witness's friend (pictured in photograph 18-001) was present on that day.
Date unknown • Undetermined
Witness pickup and transport to 1SA
2019-08-20 • 1SA (1 St. Andrew's Plaza)
Proposed call regarding a new development in the Epstein Estate case.
2020-11-09 • Teleconference
Circulation of a memo regarding MDC Brooklyn and MCC New York
2019-08-16 • New York
Proposed call/meeting to discuss the OPR Epstein Report (scheduled for 'Monday morning' following Jan 29)
2021-02-01 • Phone/Remote
Witness inquiry regarding summons and possibility of remote testimony.
2021-10-26 • N/A
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event