Date Unknown
A witness named Edelstein is being questioned about a conversation with Ms. Trzaskoma regarding the identity of Juror No. 1.
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Edelstein | person | 115 | View Entity |
| Unnamed Questioner | person | 53 | View Entity |
DOJ-OGR-00009390.jpg
This document is a page from a legal transcript where a witness, Edelstein, recounts a conversation with Ms. Trzaskoma. The discussion focused on whether Juror No. 1 was the same individual as a suspended lawyer named Catherine M. Conrad. Edelstein testifies that while Ms. Trzaskoma initially considered the possibility, she concluded they were not the same person after reviewing the juror's voir dire responses, which were inconsistent with being a lawyer.
Events with shared participants
A witness is questioned about their past interactions with detectives.
2017-07-26
Direct examination of witness Rodgers regarding entries in a flight log.
2022-08-10
A direct examination of a witness regarding the business records of Shoppers Travel, specifically invoice information related to Epstein between January 1999 and December 2006.
Date unknown
Cross-examination of witness Meder in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE.
2022-08-10
Direct examination of witness Alessi regarding handwriting and markings on Exhibit 52.
Date unknown • Court proceeding
Cross-examination of witness Carolyn regarding her 2007 discussion with the FBI.
2022-08-10
Direct examination of juror/witness Conrad regarding her conduct during voir dire.
2012-02-15 • Courtroom
Direct examination of a witness named Rocchio as part of a court case (1:20-cr-00330-PAE).
2022-08-10
A witness named Edelstein is questioned about a decision made with Susan Brune to omit information from a legal brief.
Date unknown
Edelstein and Susan Brune decided to omit information about a juror note and a suspended lawyer from a legal brief they were preparing.
Date unknown
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event