January 01, 2009
In Curry v. Lynch, an argument was rejected that a juror had implied bias because he owned a printing business that did business with defense counsel.
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Curry | person | 6 | View Entity |
| Lynch | person | 4 | View Entity |
DOJ-OGR-00009146.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing, argues against a finding of implied bias for 'Juror 50'. It outlines the Second Circuit's established 'narrow' view on the matter, citing multiple precedents where the court refused to presume bias based on occupational relationships or personal experiences without a showing of actual prejudice. The document asserts that the current circumstances involving Juror 50 do not meet the high threshold for mandatory disqualification set by the Second Circuit.
Events with shared participants
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event