Event Details
May 01, 0012
Description
A discussion regarding Juror No. 1.
Participants (3)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ms. Brune | person | 82 | View Entity |
| the witness | person | 200 | View Entity |
| Ms. Trzaskoma | person | 103 | View Entity |
Source Documents (2)
DOJ-OGR-00010096.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on March 22, 2022. In it, a judge questions a witness about their law firm's obligation to disclose information, referencing a July 21 letter. The questioning also covers the court's decision to replace Juror No. 11 during deliberations and whether the witness considered raising a separate issue concerning Juror No. 1, which had been previously discussed with a Ms. Brune and Ms. Trzaskoma.
DOJ-OGR-00009417.jpg
This court transcript details the questioning of a witness by the judge regarding a potential issue with Juror No. 1. The judge asks why the witness did not raise this issue, which they had discussed with Ms. Brune and Ms. Trzaskoma on May 12, at the time when another juror, Juror No. 11, was replaced due to a health emergency. The witness responds that it did not occur to them to raise the issue at that time.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
Investigation requested by Ms. Trzaskoma.
0012-05-01 • Unknown
Cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn regarding a deposition document from October 21, 2009.
Date unknown • Courtroom
A discussion was held regarding Catherine Conrad's potential status as a suspended lawyer, prompted by Ms. Trzaskoma. The group reviewed voir dire responses and decided against further research.
Date unknown
Direct examination of Ms. Brune regarding her knowledge and actions during the voir dire process.
Date unknown • Court (implied)
A discussion in court with the jury not present, where a witness is excused and procedural matters regarding inconsistent statements are discussed between the judge and attorneys.
2022-08-10
The court excuses a witness for a break.
2022-08-10
A session of a grand jury where a witness is questioned by Ms. Villafana and a grand juror about evidence gathering, specifically subpoenas issued to Amazon.com, Federal Express, and theaters.
Date unknown
Cross-examination of a witness regarding a study on 'Coercive Control Beyond Intimate Partner Violence' and the identification of its 22 professional participants.
2025-01-15 • Courtroom (implied by 'THE COURT' and 'Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE')
Voir dire, the process of jury selection, is discussed.
Date unknown • Court (implied)
The writing of a legal brief by Edelstein and Ms. Brune.
Date unknown
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event