Event Details
Date Unknown
Description
Chief Judge McMahon made an explicit finding, contrary to Judge Netburn's, regarding the circumstances of the case.
Participants (1)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chief Judge McMahon | person | 15 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00003041.jpg
This legal document is a page from a court filing, likely a motion from the defendant, Maxwell. The text argues against the Government's position by citing legal precedents like Palmieri and Martindell and contrasting the differing rulings of two judicial officers, Judge Netburn and Chief Judge McMahon, on the matter of sealing orders and grand jury secrecy. The core issue revolves around whether exceptional circumstances exist to justify the Government's actions, with Maxwell siding with Judge Netburn's finding that the Government's arguments were 'unpersuasive'.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
Chief Judge McMahon granted the Government’s application and issued a memorandum and order.
2019-04-09 • Court
Chief Judge McMahon held a conference to inquire about the Government's request for materials and to ask about contacts between the USAO-SDNY and Boies Schiller regarding an investigation.
2019-04-09
Chief Judge McMahon granted the Government's application, finding Maxwell's reliance on a protective order unreasonable and that extraordinary circumstances existed.
Date unknown • Court
Chief Judge McMahon permitted the Government to share a specific court order with Boies Schiller, but prohibited further dissemination.
Date unknown • Court
Chief Judge McMahon held the first of two ex parte and sealed hearings to inquire about the Government's application and why Boies Schiller had not sought relief from a protective order.
2019-03-26
Ex parte proceeding where government allegedly misled Chief Judge McMahon to obtain a subpoena.
Date unknown • Court
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event