Event Details
January 01, 2007
Description
Florida Investigation
Participants (3)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| GOVERNMENT | organization | 2805 | View Entity |
| FBI | organization | 5131 | View Entity |
| Jeffrey Epstein | person | 18341 | View Entity |
Source Documents (3)
DOJ-OGR-00002914.jpg
This legal document, filed on April 9, 2021, details the Government's investigative actions concerning "Minor Victim-4" and the "defendant." It outlines a series of interviews with Minor Victim-4, conducted via video and in-person between summer 2020 and January 2021, alongside further investigative steps. The document asserts that a superseding indictment (S2 Indictment) was timely presented to a grand jury in late March, refuting the defense's claims of intentional delay or that the indictment acknowledges the strength of pretrial motions.
DOJ-OGR-00020815.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing (Case 22-1426) dated February 28, 2023, rejecting Ghislaine Maxwell's argument that her prosecution violates the Double Jeopardy Clause. The court argues that because Maxwell herself was not previously prosecuted or punished in the Florida investigation, and because Epstein's previous plea deal does not confer immunity to his co-conspirators, the charges against her stand. The text cites various legal precedents to support the Government's position that co-conspirators are not automatically protected by another's non-prosecution agreement.
DOJ-OGR-00001813.jpg
This document is Page 2 of a Government filing in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN), filed on October 30, 2020. It addresses delays in electronic discovery production due to vendor volume and refutes defense accusations regarding the definition of the 'Prosecution Team' and the withholding of exculpatory material. A significant footnote (Footnote 2) argues that the 'genesis' of Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement with the Southern District of Florida is irrelevant because the current defendant (Maxwell) was not a party to it, was not named in it, and the agreement covered a different time period.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
A past visit by the witness to Epstein's house is referenced in a question.
Date unknown • Epstein's house
A 17-year-old girl was approached by a friend with an offer to meet Jeffrey Epstein to provide a massage for $200.00.
Date unknown • Canopy Beach Resort in Rivera Beach
An appointment was scheduled for 11:00 am at Epstein's house involving 'Haley' and another redacted person. A trash pull was also conducted at the residence on this day.
2005-04-05 • Epstein's residence, El Brillo Way, Palm Beach
An unnamed girl gave Jeffrey a massage. During the first time, 'He didn't climax at all'. On two subsequent times, 'he masturbated, but no touching' of the girl occurred.
Date unknown • Jeffrey's house
Jeffrey Epstein was arrested at his home at 1:45 a.m. and charged with soliciting a prostitute. He was released on a $3,000 bond.
2006-07-01 • El Brillo Way, Palm Beach, FL
The witness visited Jeffrey Epstein's house. The witness states this was the only time they ever went there.
Date unknown • Epstein's house
Jeffrey took the witness shopping at Victoria's Secret. He picked out the clothes and entered the fitting room with her.
Date unknown • Victoria's Secret
An email discussion between Jeffrey Epstein's associates about crafting a public relations narrative to defend his 2008 non-prosecution agreement. The discussion includes a draft defense written by Ken Starr and strategic suggestions from Michael Wolff and Matthew Hiltzik.
2018-12-15
A grand jury indicted Jeffrey Epstein on one felony charge of solicitation of prostitution following an 11-month police investigation.
2006-07-01
A lawsuit seeking more than $50 million was filed against Jeffrey Epstein, alleging sexual exploitation of a teenaged girl.
2008-01-24
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event