Unnamed Judge
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Mr. Everdell
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
MR. PAGLIUCA
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Unnamed Counsel
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Court hearing | A court hearing where the judge discusses the process for deciding on Mr. Epstein's bail, acknowl... | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Author formally charged with criminally defaming a judge. | Unknown | View |
| 2023-06-29 | Court hearing | A legal argument is presented by counsel (Mr. Everdell) to a judge regarding the appropriate sent... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2023-06-29 | Legal ruling | A judge overrules a defendant's objection to a sentencing enhancement for undue influence in a co... | Court (implied) | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court hearing | A judge addresses a dispute between counsel regarding the scope of questioning during a witness's... | Courtroom in the Southern D... | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court trial | A judge extended daily jury deliberations by one hour due to an 'astronomical spike' in COVID-19 ... | New York City | View |
| 2022-07-22 | Sentencing hearing | A judge imposes a sentence on Ms. Maxwell, including five years of supervised release, a $750,000... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2019-07-18 | Court ruling | The judge will give their decision on the defendant's bail. | Courtroom 17B | View |
| 2008-01-01 | Legal action | A judge permitted victim Wild to receive access to the NPA pursuant to a protective order. | N/A | View |
DOJ-OGR-00017942.jpg
This court transcript from August 10, 2022, captures a judge's remarks during a hearing. The judge explains the reasoning for sustaining an objection related to a prior "Daubert" ruling on the scope of testimony about child grooming. The judge highlights a significant misunderstanding between opposing counsel, Mr. Pagliuca and another unnamed lawyer, but concludes that the violation of the ruling was not intentional.
DOJ-OGR-00021564.jpg
This document is a court transcript from June 29, 2023, capturing a discussion during a sentencing hearing. Counsel Mr. Everdell argues that the jury, not the court, should have determined whether the 2003 or 2004 sentencing guidelines apply, as this is a factual determination tied to when the offense ended and is protected by the Ex Post Facto Clause. The judge is hearing this argument after noting the probation department's recommendation for a 240-month sentence, a downward variance from the calculated range.
DOJ-OGR-00014721.jpg
This document is a court transcript from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on August 10, 2022. A judge explains the decision to extend daily jury deliberations by one hour due to a significant spike in COVID-19 cases from the omicron variant in New York City. The judge's concern is that jurors or trial participants might need to quarantine, which would risk the completion of the trial.
DOJ-OGR-00011616.jpg
This legal document is a transcript from a sentencing hearing on July 22, 2022, where a judge sentences Ms. Maxwell. The judge imposes five years of supervised release, a $750,000 fine, and a mandatory special assessment, justifying the fine by noting Ms. Maxwell's ability to pay due to a $10 million bequest she received from Epstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017172.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a book manuscript or personal essay (likely by Alan Dershowitz, based on the reference to his book 'The Case for Israel'). The text discusses the author's philosophy on free speech, his defense of unpopular clients ('sons of bitches'), and his personal experiences with defamation and legal challenges. It includes a word count header and a House Oversight Bates stamp.
Opportunity for additional arguments
The judge indicates they have read the written arguments and offers Mr. Everdell an opportunity to add anything new before asking questions.
Argument on sentencing guidelines and the Ex Post Facto C...
Mr. Everdell argues that the determination of which sentencing guidelines (2003 or 2004) apply should have been made by a jury, not the court, because the issue involves a factual determination about when the offense ended and implicates the Ex Post Facto Clause.
Extension of jury deliberations due to COVID-19
The judge explains that jury deliberations are being extended by an hour each day due to a spike in COVID-19 cases in New York City, which poses a risk to completing the trial. Mr. Everdell responds to the judge.
Ruling on an objection and clarification of a Daubert issue
The judge explains the basis for a prior ruling excluding testimony and sustains a current objection. The judge addresses a clear misunderstanding between two counsels (one being Mr. Pagliuca) about an agreed-upon line of questioning but states they do not believe the ruling was intentionally violated.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity