| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Kaj Sotala
|
Citation |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Roman V. Yampolskiy
|
Citation |
5
|
1 |
This document is page 121 from a book (titled 'The Great Divide' in the header, likely 'How America Lost Its Secrets' by Edward Jay Epstein based on context and file metadata) included in a House Oversight production. The text discusses the erosion of privacy through government subpoenas to private companies like Facebook and Apple, citing the 2011 investigation of Dominique Strauss-Kahn by Cyrus Vance Jr. and data mining by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau as examples. While part of the Epstein document production (indicated by file name and Bates stamp), this specific page focuses on general privacy issues and the Strauss-Kahn case rather than Jeffrey Epstein directly.
This document is an excerpt from an 'Author's Note' in a book, stamped as evidence for House Oversight. The author describes living in Palm Beach near Jeffrey Epstein, noting his imposing house monogrammed 'JE' and his reputation as a sex offender who abused underage girls. The text details the author's intent to investigate Epstein alongside Tim Malloy to answer questions about his wealth and lenient prison sentence.
A printout of a blog post or article introduction (Bates stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018573) in which the author reflects on a 2009 piece written about masculinity and gender roles. The text discusses the reaction to the original piece from feminist and anti-feminist communities, the author's investigation into the "pickup artist subculture," and their book "Confessions of a Pickup Artist Chaser." It concludes with a discussion on S&M feminists, citing Gayle Rubin, and their understanding of power dynamics.
This document page appears to be a printout of an essay or blog post discussing the intersection of feminism and BDSM. The author argues against the concept of 'inherent female submission' as a problematic framework, asserting that submission can be a sign of strength and does not affect professional capability (e.g., being a CEO). The text emphasizes the absolute necessity of consent ('Rape is still rape') regardless of kink dynamics. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was collected as evidence, likely in an investigation involving correspondence or reading materials of individuals associated with the Epstein case.
This document is an affidavit from an attorney who joined Scott Rothstein's law firm (RRA) in 2009 while representing victims of Jeffrey Epstein. The author denies involvement in Rothstein's Ponzi scheme and refutes Epstein's allegations that the lawsuits were used for fraud or that depositions of 'high profile friends' were improper. The text asserts that Epstein paid for the legal representation of his employees and associates (including Ghislaine Maxwell and pilots) to ensure they refused to testify.
This document is a first-person narrative, likely written by a well-connected publicist (contextually likely Peggy Siegal), describing the production of the movie 'Wall Street 2'. It details the author's involvement in consulting on the script regarding New York's financial high society, visiting the set at the Central Park Zoo, and their close personal relationship with actor Michael Douglas. The document outlines the casting, the inspirations for the movie's villains (hedge fund managers), and specific filming locations in New York.
This document appears to be a page (188) from a book manuscript or investigative report regarding Edward Snowden's defection to Russia. The text analyzes the damage control efforts by the NSA and GCHQ following the breach, Snowden's life in Moscow, and questions his motives for taking specific documents that were never released to journalists. The author mentions making arrangements to travel to Moscow in October 2015 to investigate the circumstances of Snowden's arrival in Russia. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' stamp.
Request for readers to email the author with a better definition of free will.
Critique of Ken Starr's connections to Epstein and Blackwater.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity