attorney
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
the defendant
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
defendant
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Rocchio
|
Courtroom interaction |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Supervisor/Ethics Advisor
|
Consultation |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
5
|
5 | |
|
person
juror
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Juror (Suspended Lawyer)
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Client |
4
|
4 | |
|
person
Rocchio
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
MARK EPSTEIN
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Claimant
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
BOP/MCC Official (Redacted)
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Direct examination of expert witness Loftus regarding the stages of memory (acquisition, retentio... | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Direct examination of witness Rocchio regarding forensic psychology credentials and definitions o... | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Direct examination of witness Rocchio regarding grooming, trauma verification, and scientific lit... | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Review of Government's Exhibit 662 (Pilot Logbook). | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | The 'Carlyn mess' | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Cross-examination of witness Rocchio | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Cross-examination of witness McHugh regarding financial authorizations. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Direct examination of witness Rocchio regarding the psychology of delayed disclosure in childhood... | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Cross-examination of witness Meder regarding photographic evidence on CDs. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Direct examination of witness Rocchio regarding forensic psychology methodology. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Direct examination of witness Aznaran regarding border security protocols. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Cross-examination of witness Rocchio regarding expert witness hiring practices and independence. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Direct examination of witness Sud regarding QuickBooks data entry procedures. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Direct examination testimony of witness Aznaran regarding TECS database functionality. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | Trial | A legal trial is taking place, during which these instructions are given. | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Direct examination testimony of witness Loftus regarding memory and interviewing techniques. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Direct examination of witness Rocchio regarding clinical assessment of child sexual abuse victims. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Court hearing where an attorney is arguing regarding juror selection strategy and potential ineff... | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | Legal action | A Claimant accepts an offer of compensation and signs a full Release, waiving all past and future... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Direct examination of witness Rocchio in court. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Direct examination of witness Alessi regarding recognition of document pages. | Courtroom | View |
| 2025-01-15 | N/A | Court testimony (Direct Examination) of witness Rocchio in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | Courtroom (Likely SDNY) | View |
| 2025-01-15 | N/A | Court testimony (Direct Examination) of witness Rocchio regarding grooming definitions and empiri... | Southern District of New Yo... | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Court testimony in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). Witness Loftus is... | Southern District Court | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Filing of court document 755 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | Southern District of New Yo... | View |
EFTA00035648.pdf
This document is an email chain from July 27, 2019, regarding the status of inmate Jeffrey Epstein (#76318-054). The emails confirm that Epstein was not on suicide watch but was under 'Psych Observation' at the time. A staff member reports assessing Epstein before a legal visit, noting he appeared stable but complained of dehydration due to limited bathroom breaks during 12-hour attorney meetings, and expressed anxiety about returning to the SHU due to noise from other inmates preventing him from sleeping.
EFTA00034040.pdf
This document is an email chain from July 27, 2019, between prison staff regarding the status of inmate Jeffrey Epstein (#76318-054). The emails confirm he was not on suicide watch at that time but was under 'Psych Observation.' A staff member reports assessing Epstein, noting he appeared stable but complained of dehydration due to limited bathroom breaks during long legal visits and anxiety about returning to the SHU due to noise preventing him from sleeping.
EFTA00019831.pdf
This document is an unexecuted template of a Proffer Agreement ('Queen for a Day' letter) from the Office of the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, dated January 14, 2019. The agreement outlines the terms under which a client provides information to the government, specifying that it is not a cooperation agreement and establishing limited use immunity for statements made during the meeting, with exceptions for impeachment, rebuttal, and derivative leads.
DOJ-OGR-00008546.jpg
This document is a legal filing from December 18, 2021, containing introductory instructions from a court to a jury. The core message of 'Instruction No. 1: Role of the Court' is to establish the court's absolute authority on matters of law, directing the jury that they have a sworn duty to accept and apply the law exactly as the judge presents it, regardless of their own opinions or any conflicting legal arguments made by attorneys during the trial.
DOJ-OGR-00008462.jpg
This document is a page of introductory jury instructions from a court case (1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on December 17, 2021. The judge explicitly outlines the jury's duty to accept the law exactly as the court presents it, setting aside personal opinions or conflicting legal arguments from attorneys. The jury is instructed to consider all instructions together and is permitted to take a copy of them into the jury room for deliberation.
DOJ-OGR-00002387.jpg
This page is part of a legal document, likely a protective order, filed on March 4, 2016. It outlines the specific procedures for designating discovery materials and deposition testimony as 'CONFIDENTIAL' or 'CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION', including the requirement for attorney review and the basis for such a designation to prevent privacy harm.
DOJ-OGR-00017206.jpg
This document is a transcript of a judge's charge to a jury, filed on August 10, 2022. The judge instructs the jury that they must follow the law as provided by the court, and that their exclusive role is to determine the facts by weighing evidence and witness credibility. The judge explicitly clarifies that statements made by lawyers during the trial are not to be considered evidence.
DOJ-OGR-00014585.jpg
This document is a jury charge from a legal proceeding, specifically Instruction No. 2 regarding the role of the jury. The judge instructs the jury that they are the exclusive judges of the facts and must base their verdict solely on the evidence presented, while also being bound to follow the law exactly as the judge provides it. The document clarifies that statements, arguments, and questions from lawyers do not constitute evidence.
DOJ-OGR-00025201.jpg
An internal DOJ/BOP email dated July 23, 2019, reporting that the 'Inmate Companion' observing Epstein (who is identified as being on Suicide Watch) called to relay that Epstein wished to speak with his attorney. The sender and recipient of the email are redacted.
Legal Call
Unmonitored legal calls granted to the extent resources allow.
Legal Strategy
Communications regarding the impact of criminal testimony on the civil case.
Direct Examination regarding Grooming
Q&A regarding the definition of grooming, tactics used by offenders, and specific strategies such as isolation, gift giving, and affection.
Cross-examination
Questioning regarding the timeline of ranch construction and living arrangements.
Trial schedule and request for adjournment
This document is a filing from the U.S. Government stating its position on the trial schedule. It indicates readiness to proceed but willingness to accept a short, but not a six-month, adjournment.
United States v. Nicholas Tartaglione, S4 16 Cr. 832 (KMK)
Update regarding missing video footage from MCC for July 22-23, 2019.
Victim Impact Statements
Attorney thanking the court and US Attorney's office, introducing client Courtney Wild to speak.
Grand Jury Subpoena / Reimbursement
Subpoena demanding financial records and letter regarding reimbursement procedures.
Grand Jury Subpoena
Cover letter describing procedures for requesting reimbursement for subpoenaed records.
Re: Preservation request
Confirming request to staff to preserve video; noting MCC staff do not have body cameras.
Preservation request
Formal request to preserve video surveillance from July 22 11pm to July 23 4am regarding the 'Epstein incident'.
Legal Call
Refused evening legal call at 19:15
No Subject
Taken to see attorney at 12:40pm; returned from legal at 19:15 (7:15pm)
Argument for defendant's pre-trial detention based on sei...
A legal filing arguing that the defendant should be detained pending trial because the seizure of over $70,000 in cash and numerous diamonds from their Manhattan residence indicates they have the means and capability to flee the jurisdiction.
United States v. Jeffrey Epstein, 19 Cr. 490 (RMB)
The U.S. Government requests the exclusion of speedy trial time between July 15, 2019, and July 18, 2019, in the case against Jeffrey Epstein. The letter states that defense counsel consents to the request.
United States v. Jeffrey Epstein, 19 Cr. 490 (RMB)
The U.S. Government requests the exclusion of speedy trial time from July 15, 2019, to July 18, 2019. The letter states that the defense counsel for Jeffrey Epstein consents to this request.
Legal Advice
Witness spoke with an attorney but did not hire one at that time.
Declining to intervene
The Deputy Attorney General's Office sent a letter to Epstein's counsel declining to intervene in the matter.
Request for review
Epstein's counsel sent a letter to the Deputy Attorney General's Office requesting a review of the case.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity