| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
A BETTER COPY CENTER
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
DAG's Office representatives
|
Joint investigation tour |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
OIA
|
Inter agency cooperation |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
victims
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
CACI Inc.
|
Client |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Document copying | Original documents were copied for a case. This label is for 'Box #1' of the copied materials. | A BETTER COPY CENTER | View |
| N/A | N/A | Signing of Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Florida State Grand Jury indicted Epstein on a single felony count of solicitation of prostitution. | Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Signing of Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) | Southern District of Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Signing of Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) between USAO and Epstein. | Unknown | View |
| 2021-03-23 | N/A | CACI submits proposal for scanning services related to US v. Maxwell Epstein case. | N/A | View |
| 2021-03-09 | N/A | Filing deadline for the bail opposition (implied as 'Tuesday' in the email dated Sunday March 7). | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2019-07-12 | N/A | Indictment notification regarding US v. Jeffrey Epstein | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2017-01-31 | N/A | Announcement of Royal Dutch Shell PLC's proposed sale of UK North Sea assets. | UK | View |
| 2006-01-01 | N/A | Handling of the Jeffrey Epstein matter by the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of... | Southern District of Florida | View |
These documents consist of FBI internal communications and payment requests concerning the investigation into Jeffrey Epstein between 2006 and 2008. The records detail the opening of forfeiture sub-files, expenses for title searches and corporate records, and coordination with AUSA Antonia Barnes. Crucially, a memo dated September 18, 2008, explicitly states that the FBI would not pursue federal prosecution because Epstein was complying with his State of Florida plea deal and had 'provided information to the FBI as agreed upon,' leading to the closure of the forfeiture sub-file.
An email chain from April 2021 involving FBI agents discussing logistical support for Ghislaine Maxwell's evidence review at the 500 Pearl Street courthouse. The correspondence details the need for agents to monitor Maxwell, manage her custody transfers from US Marshals, and secure proffer rooms for her defense team to review evidence.
This document is an email chain from June 2019 involving FBI personnel (including 'Sean' and 'Julio') discussing the logistics of the Epstein investigation. Specifically, the USAO SDNY requested permission to send the massive physical case file, which originated from the Miami Field Office (MM), to a third-party vendor for scanning and digitization. The email lists several precedent cases (e.g., U.S. v. Ng Lap Seng, U.S. v. Tortora) where outside vendors were used for sensitive documents to justify the request.
This document is an email chain from June 2019 between FBI/DOJ officials discussing the logistical handling of the Epstein investigation case file. The USAO SDNY requested permission to use a third-party vendor to scan the physical files into a digital format for indexing, citing several precedent cases (e.g., U.S. v. Ng Lap Seng) where this was done securely. The sender asks the Miami office if they have any objections to releasing the file to the vendor.
This document is an email dated August 14, 2019, from a Supervisory Staff Attorney at the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) in New York. It informs recipients that representatives from the Deputy Attorney General's Office and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) will be touring the facility, specifically the Special Housing Unit (SHU), Jeffrey Epstein's cell (noted as a 'crime scene'), and the suicide watch area. The email includes an attachment referencing a tour on August 15th.
A Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General form (Warnings and Assurances to Employee) dated August 29, 2019. An unidentified employee signed a waiver to voluntarily provide information regarding the 'Epstein In-Custody Death Investigation and any employee misconduct' at the USAO SDNY.
This document is a Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General (OIG) waiver form (Form III-226/2) dated August 20, 2019. It records the warnings and assurances given to a non-custodial employee who voluntarily agreed to provide information regarding the 'Epstein In-custody death Investigation and any employee misconduct.' The interview took place at the USAO SDNY at 12:58 PM.
This document is an email chain from July 2021 between the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) and a CBP Task Force Officer regarding travel records for Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein. The CBP officer clarifies that outbound travel records between 1990 and 2000 were not recorded in the CBP database at that time, limiting the historical data available. The correspondence also notes that Maxwell has records under two name variations (with and without a space in her surname) and discusses cross-referencing these with an attached spreadsheet.
This document contains a chain of emails from August 2020 between the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) and the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) regarding the logistics of delivering legal discovery materials to inmate Ghislaine Maxwell. The emails discuss protocols for hard drive delivery, including password protection, authorization memos, and the use of FedEx. There is also a strategic discussion about cumulative loading of discovery onto single disks to prevent the inmate from accumulating too many hard drives in her cell.
This document is an email containing a 'Prisoner Production for Court Request' form regarding Jeffrey Epstein (USMS # 76318-054). It requests Epstein's presence for a detention hearing in Case# 19 Cr. 490 (RMB) before Judge Berman in Court Room 17B on July 18, 2019, at 11:30 a.m.
This document is an internal email request from the USAO SDNY to produce prisoner Jeffrey Epstein (USMS # 76318-054) for a court appearance. The request schedules a status hearing before Judge Berman in Court Room 17B on July 31, 2019, at 11:00 am regarding Case # 19 Cr. 490 (RMB).
An email chain from July 12, 2019, discussing the indictment of Jeffrey Epstein (Case 19-CR-00490). A Victim Witness Coordinator from the USAO SDNY informs a recipient that the case has been indicted and that all victim notifications will be handled by the SDNY office. A forwarding comment notes 'They (she) knows' and mentions sending the information to 'all three just in case'.
This document is an email chain from July 9, 2019, from the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York regarding a 'Prisoner Production for Court Request.' The email requests the production of defendant Jeffrey Epstein (USMS # 76318-054) for a detention hearing scheduled for July 15, 2019, at 10:00 AM before Judge Berman in Courtroom 17B regarding Case # 19 Cr. 490 (RMB).
A confidential document from the law firm Debevoise & Plimpton listing matters in which the firm appeared before the USAO-SDNY. The document is heavily redacted, with nearly all case captions blacked out. The only visible entry is 'Wexner: Epstein investigation' on page 3, accompanied by a note stating 'Russell cleared to participate'.
This document is a Standard Form 30 Amendment of Solicitation/Modification of Contract between the U.S. Attorneys Office for the Southern District of New York and CACI, INC. - COMMERCIAL, dated July 11, 2019. The modification adds funds and task requests for 'PDF file management services' specifically for the case 'U.S. v. Epstein' (Case 19-CR-00490). The document instructs the contractor to organize 66 folders of documents and place them on an FTP site for the USAO.
This is a Deferred Prosecution Agreement for Michael Thomas, a prison guard charged in connection with the falsification of records at the Metropolitan Correctional Center on August 9-10, 2019 (the night of Jeffrey Epstein's death). Thomas admits to willfully creating false 'count and round slips' for the Special Housing Unit. In exchange for 100 hours of community service, cooperation with the DOJ-OIG/FBI, and six months of good behavior, the government agrees to dismiss the indictment.
An email dated July 20, 2020, with redacted sender and recipients, addressed to 'Chiefs'. The email discusses an inquiry received from the New Mexico U.S. Attorney's Office regarding the possible forfeiture of Jeffrey Epstein's property in New Mexico and requests a call to discuss the matter.
This document is a 'Hammad Memo' dated August 14, 2019, from the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) requesting permission to interview three inmates housed in the Special Housing Unit (SHU) at the MCC. The investigation concerns the death of Jeffrey Epstein and potential criminal negligence/falsification of records by MCC staff on the night of August 9-10, 2019. The memo argues that interviewing these represented inmates is legally permissible because they are witnesses to the Epstein event, which is separate from the criminal cases for which they have counsel.
This document is an email chain between an Assistant US Attorney in the Southern District of New York and a CBP Task Force Officer. The correspondence, dating from July to September 2021, discusses the retrieval of CBP travel records for an investigation. Specifically, the US Attorney asks if certain dates align with the travel of Jeffrey Epstein or Ghislaine Maxwell, and requests records for an unidentified French female from the 1990s. The CBP officer notes a data limitation where only inbound arrivals were recorded during the requested timeframe, not outbound departures.
This document is an email chain from November 12, 2019, between the FBI (NY office) and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding the processing of electronic evidence seized from Jeffrey Epstein. The discussion focuses on transferring processed emails to the USAO on a 1TB drive, the status of evidence from Epstein's NY residence (specifically 5-6 iMacs and 5 laptops), and the processing of a DVR system from 'the Island' (Little St. James) by FBI HQ. The USAO specifically inquires if the island materials are still being checked for 'CP images' (Child Pornography).
This document is an email chain from March 2021 discussing a proposal from CACI Inc. for scanning services related to the 'US v. Maxwell Epstein' case for the USAO SDNY. The correspondence indicates that CACI is being set up as a contingency plan in case an arrangement in 'Florida' fails, with the understanding that the CACI contract would be canceled if Florida 'comes through'. The initial email includes the formal submission of the proposal from CACI's Contracts Administration.
This document is an email chain from March 23, 2021, regarding a proposal from contractor CACI Inc. for scanning services related to the 'US v. Maxwell Epstein' case in the Southern District of New York (SDNY). The correspondence indicates that the CACI proposal is being set up as a contingency plan ('backup') in case an alternative arrangement in 'Florida' fails. The email includes attachments for the proposal and pricing submission.
This document is a Florida Criminal Punishment Code Scoresheet for Jeffrey E. Epstein, dated June 30, 2008, prepared by 'Belohlavek' of the State Attorney's Office in Palm Beach County. It details two specific offenses: a primary offense of 'Procuring Person Under 18 for Prostitution' (F.S. 794.03) and an additional offense of 'Felony Solicitation of Prostitution' (F.S. 796.07(2)(f)), resulting in a subtotal of 57.7 sentencing points. The document bears a DOJ Bates stamp and indicates it was part of a 2017 public records request.
This document is a page from a 2023 legal filing reviewing the historical handling of the Epstein case. It highlights that the investigation was national in scope, involving coordination between the Southern District of Florida and New York, and notes that the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) was specifically modified to broaden immunity for co-conspirators beyond just Florida. Crucially, it mentions investigators knew Epstein used hidden cameras in his NY home to record sexual encounters and that AUSA Villafana sought to investigate Epstein's assistants in New York.
This document details how prosecutor Villafaña and other federal agents handled communications with Jeffrey Epstein's victims regarding a non-prosecution agreement (NPA). Fearing that knowledge of potential monetary damages could compromise witness credibility, Villafaña deliberately withheld specific details about the NPA from victims during interviews in 2007 and 2008. The text contrasts the official explanation given to victims with the reality of the agreement, as later attested to by victim Courtney Wild.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity