Farmer Jaffe
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013-05-13 | N/A | Filing of a lawsuit by Farmer Jaffe against Donald Trump, as reported in a Palm Beach Post article. | Palm Beach (inferred from n... | View |
017-20.pdf
This affidavit by attorney Bradley Edwards details difficulties in discovery for a civil case against Jeffrey Epstein (Case 10-81111). It alleges that key witnesses Ghislaine Maxwell and Jean Luc Brunel evaded depositions by falsely claiming to be out of the country. Crucially, it lists specific individuals for whom Epstein paid legal fees to prevent them from testifying against him, explicitly labeling Sarah Kellen as a 'procurer of girls' and Nadia Marcinkova as a 'live-in sex slave', while also identifying his personal pilots and household staff.
015-01.pdf
Affidavit by attorney Bradley Edwards in Case 10-81111 detailing obstruction tactics by Jeffrey Epstein and his associates. The document asserts that Jean Luc Brunel visited Epstein 67 times in jail and that both Brunel and Ghislaine Maxwell evaded depositions by falsely claiming to be out of the country. It explicitly lists Epstein's inner circle (including pilots and household staff like Sarah Kellen and Nadia Marcinkova) and notes that Epstein paid for their legal counsel to control their testimony.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013473.jpg
This document is a legal declaration by an attorney representing victims of Jeffrey Epstein. It details the legal strategy regarding RICO and federal claims, specifically the importance of flight logs in establishing a federal nexus via interstate commerce for sexual abuse cases. It also mentions the attorney's departure from the RRA law firm following the exposure of Scott Rothstein's Ponzi scheme and the subsequent settlement of Epstein cases in July 2010.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013463.jpg
This document is an affidavit by attorney Bradley James Edwards regarding the civil case of Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein in the Southern District of Florida. It details Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), his repeated invocation of the 5th Amendment during depositions to avoid self-incrimination regarding sex crimes against minors, and the depositions of his co-conspirators who were employed to procure underage girls. The document highlights that Jane Doe refused to limit her damages to $150,000 as stipulated in the NPA and asserts that Epstein's co-conspirators helped protect him from law enforcement detection.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013499.tif
This document details legal proceedings and events related to Jeffrey Epstein and Scott Rothstein. It describes Jane Doe's RICO and federal claims against Epstein, emphasizing the role of flight logs as evidence of interstate commerce to establish a 'federal nexus' for sexual assaults. It also mentions the affiant's involvement in the Rothstein Ponzi scheme as a victim and their role in reaching settlements in Epstein-related lawsuits.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013489.tif
This affidavit, authored by Bradley James Edwards, details his role as lead attorney for 'Jane Doe' in a civil case against Jeffrey Epstein. It outlines Epstein's non-prosecution agreement (NPA) with the federal government, his invocation of the Fifth Amendment in response to allegations, and his attempts to discredit Jane Doe's testimony. The document also mentions the existence of Epstein's co-conspirators who allegedly facilitated his crimes and were deposed.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033575.jpg
This document is an email from attorney Tonja Haddad Coleman to Jeffrey Epstein, Darren Indyke, and Debbie Fein, sent on May 13, 2013. The email's purpose is to inform the recipients that 'Farmer Jaffe is suing Donald Trump!' and includes a link to a Palm Beach Post article on the matter. The document contains a confidentiality notice and a bates stamp from a House Oversight committee.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity