Grove Press
OrganizationRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Narrator
|
Client |
5
|
1 |
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017189.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a draft manuscript (likely by Alan Dershowitz, given the context of age 31 and Grove Press) discussing First Amendment law and obscenity cases. The text analyzes the legal implications of *Stanley v. Georgia* and *Roth v. United States* regarding private possession versus public distribution of obscene material. It concludes with a personal narrative about the author achieving a legal victory for Grove Press and subsequently arguing the appeal before the Supreme Court at age 31.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017187.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a manuscript or book written by Alan Dershowitz, stamped with a House Oversight production number. It recounts a legal argument Dershowitz made before Judge Julian and Judge Aldrich regarding First Amendment protections for films, specifically involving Grove Press and the distinction between enclosed theaters and public displays of obscenity. The text includes both transcript-style dialogue and first-person narrative commentary by Dershowitz.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017186.jpg
This document appears to be a page (p. 99) from a manuscript or memoir draft written by Alan Dershowitz, dated April 2, 2012. It recounts a historical courtroom exchange between Dershowitz, Judge Aldrich, and Judge Julian regarding First Amendment protections for the film 'I Am Curious Yellow' and the definition of obscenity. The text focuses on legal arguments concerning whether profit motives invalidate First Amendment protections. The document bears a House Oversight Bates stamp, suggesting it was part of a document production related to investigations involving Dershowitz.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017183.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a manuscript or memoir (dated 2012) recounting the narrator's (likely Alan Dershowitz) early legal career in the late 1960s. It details his First Amendment defense of the Swedish film 'I Am Curious Yellow,' which was seized by US Customs and owned by Grove Press. The text outlines his legal strategy to challenge obscenity laws using the 'Stanley v. Georgia' precedent, comparing it to his work with Justice Goldberg.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity