YouTube

Organization
Mentions
178
Relationships
0
Events
0
Documents
75
Also known as:
Fox 4 Now/Youtube YouTube.com YouTube Inc.

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.
No relationships found for this entity.
No events found for this entity.

EFTA00037882.pdf

An email sent on August 19, 2019, to an NYPD/FBI task force detective alerting them to potential obstruction of justice. The sender highlights two YouTube drone videos filmed by 'Rusty Shackleford' on Epstein's island: one from July showing a computer on a table, and one from early August (before the August 13th FBI raid) showing the computer missing, suggesting evidence was removed by a third party.

Email
2025-12-25

EFTA00032400.pdf

This document is a 'Law360 Appellate' email newsletter dated April 22, 2019. It provides summaries of recent legal cases across various US Circuit Courts (DC, Federal, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th, 9th, 11th) and the Supreme Court, covering topics such as the Census citizenship question, Title VII discrimination, and patent disputes. It also lists legal job openings and mentions various law firms and companies in sidebars. The law firm 'Epstein Becker Green' appears in a list of firms, which is likely the only connection to the name Epstein, unrelated to Jeffrey Epstein.

Email newsletter (law360 appellate)
2025-12-25

EFTA00026700.pdf

This document is an email dated October 13, 2021, containing a link to a YouTube video from the TODAY show titled 'Former Teen Model Describes Jeffrey Epstein's Sex Abuse'. The sender and recipient fields are redacted, as is the specific video ID in the URL. The document bears the Bates number EFTA00026700.

Email
2025-12-25

EFTA00023039.pdf

An email dated July 27, 2019, from an undisclosed sender to undisclosed recipients. The email shares a YouTube link and claims the audio discloses details about organized crime, corruption, and Jeffrey Epstein's alleged connection to the British government. The subject line references Deutsche, Mafia, and Paedophilia.

Email
2025-12-25

EFTA00022633.pdf

This document is an email chain from August 2019 between USANYS officials and John Taylor, host of the 'Traffick Report Show'. Taylor provides evidence to the SDNY regarding an ambulance marked 'LSJ AMBULANCE' found on Little Saint James, alleging it was unregistered, lacked medical certification, and may have been smuggled into the USVI. Taylor also references drone footage from 'Rusty Shackleford' showing activity on the island prior to the SDNY raid and questions whether evidence was destroyed.

Email chain
2025-12-25

EFTA00020501.pdf

An FBI Intake report dated August 25, 2020, documenting an online tip received on August 24, 2020. A tipster from North Port, Florida, submitted a link to a YouTube video featuring a person claiming to be an employee of Jeffrey Epstein giving testimony regarding human trafficking. The report includes technical details of the submission but redacts the tipster's personal identity.

Fbi intake report
2025-12-25

EFTA00018654.pdf

This document is a 'Law360 White Collar' email newsletter from December 5, 2018. It details various legal news stories, including Jeffrey Epstein settling a dispute with an attorney representing his victims to avoid trial testimony. Other stories cover Michael Flynn's cooperation with the Mueller investigation, the Panama Papers indictments, and various fraud and securities cases.

Email newsletter (white collar law360)
2025-12-25

EFTA00014622.pdf

This document is an email thread from July 2019 between attorney Daniel Rose and an Assistant US Attorney from the Southern District of New York. The discussion concerns the safety and wellness of a crime victim (Ms. [Redacted]) represented by Rose. Rose reports escalating harassment from the media and notes a specific incident where an unknown individual sent a video of Jeffrey Epstein to the victim's YouTube account.

Email thread
2025-12-25

EFTA00013635.pdf

This New York Magazine article from 2006 explores the lives of various billionaires, including Ron Burkle, the founders of Google and Yahoo, and Jeffrey Epstein. It details Epstein's 'womanizing' lifestyle, his private jet travel with women, and allegations regarding minors at his Palm Beach home. The article also covers Ron Burkle's political connections to Bill Clinton, his private jet '770BB', and his high-profile divorce.

New york magazine article (web printout)
2025-12-25

EFTA00011096.pdf

This document is a legal memorandum filed on October 13, 2021, by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team in the Southern District of New York. The defense argues for individual sequestered voir dire (jury selection questioning) and permission for attorneys to conduct limited questioning of jurors, citing 'tsunami' levels of negative pretrial publicity and the inflammatory nature of the sexual abuse charges. The motion lists numerous documentaries, podcasts, and books as evidence of prejudicial media coverage that allegedly demonizes Maxwell and links her inextricably to Jeffrey Epstein's crimes.

Legal memorandum (motion for voir dire)
2025-12-25

DOJ-OGR-00008628.jpg

This document is Page 90 of 167 from a court filing in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on December 18, 2021. It contains 'Instruction No. 3', which strictly prohibits jurors from communicating about the case via any electronic means or social media (listing specific platforms like Facebook and Twitter) and bans outside research. The instruction emphasizes that deliberations must occur only within the jury room and verdicts must be based solely on evidence presented in court.

Court filing (jury instructions)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00008548.jpg

This document is page 10 of 167 from a court filing dated December 18, 2021, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It contains Jury Instruction No. 3, which strictly prohibits jurors from using social media, the internet, or electronic devices to communicate about the case or conduct outside research during deliberations. The instruction emphasizes that the verdict must be based solely on evidence presented in the courtroom.

Court filing (jury instructions)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00001686.jpg

This legal document, dated July 29, 2020, is a letter from Ghislaine Maxwell's defense counsel to Judge Alison J. Nathan. The defense argues against the government's proposed restrictive protective order, asserting their right to publicly reference alleged victims who have already identified themselves in media, other lawsuits, and public forums related to both Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein. They contrast their broader proposed language with the government's version, which they claim would unfairly limit them to referencing only one person who spoke at Maxwell's bail hearing.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00022031.jpg

This legal document, filed on April 9, 2020, is a motion seeking to compel the government to produce discovery related to the death of Jeffrey Epstein. The motion argues that multiple federal agencies, including the DOJ, FBI, and U.S. Marshals Service, have conducted investigations, and the defense is entitled to reports and documents from these inquiries. The document cites various news reports and a previous court order from November 2019 to support its claim that the government has failed to meet its disclosure obligations.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00009744.jpg

This document is page 52 of a legal filing (Document 642) from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), dated March 11, 2022. It argues that 'Juror No. 50' provided false answers during voir dire regarding social media usage to hide biases and ensure selection, noting he later used Twitter to contact victim Annie Farmer and appeared in an ITV documentary. The text contrasts this behavior with Juror No. 55, whose falsehoods were exposed through follow-up questioning.

Legal filing / court motion (united states v. ghislaine maxwell)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00014586.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, containing a judge's instructions to a jury. The judge clarifies that only witness answers and admitted exhibits constitute evidence, not lawyers' questions or the judge's own rulings. The document also contains "Instruction No. 3," which strictly prohibits jurors from communicating about the case with anyone using any electronic devices or social media platforms during their deliberations.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00005374.jpg

This is the final signature page (page 17 of 17) of a legal filing in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The page contains proposed jury instructions (Paragraph 67) regarding the prohibition of electronic communications and social media usage by jurors during the trial. It is signed by the prosecution team (US Attorney's Office) and the defense counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell, dated October 11, 2021.

Legal filing / court document (signature page)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00008714.jpg

This document is a legal instruction (Instruction No. 3) for a jury in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on December 19, 2021. It strictly prohibits jurors from communicating about the case with anyone or conducting outside research using any electronic devices, the internet, or social media platforms like Facebook and Twitter. The instruction emphasizes that jurors must base their verdict solely on evidence presented in the courtroom and may only discuss the case with fellow jurors in the jury room during deliberations.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00011686.jpg

This document is page 21 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 10, 2022. It contains instructions from the Judge to the jury regarding their conduct, specifically forbidding them from discussing the case with one another or outside parties until deliberations begin. The text explicitly lists various communication technologies and social media platforms (Facebook, Reddit, Twitter, etc.) that jurors are prohibited from using to discuss the trial.

Court transcript / jury instructions
2025-11-20

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019728.jpg

This document is a proof page (p. 240) from the book 'How America Lost Its Secrets' (authored by Edward Jay Epstein, indicated by the filename prefix 'Epst'). The text discusses Edward Snowden's time in Hong Kong, his interview with the South China Morning Post, and hypothesizes about the reaction of Chinese intelligence services to his possession of NSA documents. It bears a House Oversight Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a congressional document production.

Book page / publishing proof
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019560.jpg

This document is page 72 from the book 'How America Lost Its Secrets' (authored by Edward Jay Epstein, though not explicitly named in the text body). It details the timeline of Edward Snowden's initial contact with journalists Glenn Greenwald and Laura Poitras in late 2012 and early 2013. The text describes Snowden's work at Dell, his alias 'Citizen Four,' and the preparations for leaking NSA documents via The Guardian. Note: While contained in a House Oversight file possibly related to an 'Epstein' search, the content strictly concerns the Edward Snowden leaks.

Book page / excerpt (from 'how america lost its secrets' by edward jay epstein)
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031488.jpg

This document is a fragment of an email correspondence from Kathy King, Director of Media & Public Relations at the law firm Steptoe & Johnson LLP. The text discusses media strategy, specifically preferring that reporters watch a video via a YouTube player rather than downloading a file. The document includes a specific confidentiality footer stating the communication is the 'property of JEE' (likely Jeffrey Epstein) and directs inquiries to the email address 'jeevacation@gmail.com'.

Email correspondence fragment
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031487.jpg

This document is an email chain from August 5, 2016, involving personnel from the law firm Steptoe & Johnson (including Reid Weingarten) and associates of AFSV (Alliance for Shared Values), such as Y. Alp Aslandogan. The discussion concerns the technical logistics and security strategy for distributing a large audio/video file (likely an interview or press material) to reporters. There is a debate between using an FTP site versus a private YouTube link, with Will Bohlen expressing concern about the content being 'sliced up' if made too accessible.

Email chain
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031478.jpg

An email thread from August 5, 2016, involving associates at Steptoe & Johnson LLP and other individuals (including Y. Alp Aslandogan and Remzi Kulen). The discussion concerns the logistics and strategy of releasing an audio/video recording to reporters, debating the security of using an FTP site versus a secured YouTube link to prevent the media from editing ('slicing up') the content. Mention is made of eventually posting content via 'AFSV's channels'.

Email thread
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026057.jpg

This email chain from early 2017 details correspondence between Robert Kuhn and Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias 'jeevacation'). Kuhn is pitching a 13-episode PBS series titled 'The Science of Sleep and Dreams' under his 'Closer To Truth' brand, sending Epstein a proposal and budget. The conversation includes scheduling a meeting in New York, discussing scientific theories by Giulio Tononi, and Kuhn sharing links to his political commentary on Sino-US relations.

Email thread
2025-11-19
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
0
As Recipient
0
Total
0
No communications found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity