| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Mr. Comey
|
Business associate |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Comey
|
Collaborated |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
Barack Obama
|
Political appointee |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Barack Obama
|
Political appointment |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | CIA Director John Brennan and Mr. Comey briefed Congress, leading to leaks about the Trump-Russia... | Washington, D.C. | View |
| N/A | N/A | CIA Director John Brennan and Mr. Comey briefed Congress, leading to leaks. | Washington (implied) | View |
| 2016-01-01 | N/A | Congressional Briefing | Washington D.C. | View |
| 2015-11-01 | N/A | Statement by CIA Director | Unknown | View |
| 2015-11-01 | N/A | Statement by CIA Director John Brennan | Unknown | View |
| 2013-01-01 | N/A | Formation/Installation of Obama's new national security team | Washington | View |
This page is an excerpt from a legal filing dated April 1, 2021, arguing for Ghislaine Maxwell's release on bail. The defense contends that wealthy male defendants with foreign ties (listing specific examples like Madoff and Weinstein) were granted bail to prepare for trial, and Maxwell deserves the same treatment. It cites legal precedents stating that pretrial detention is an 'extraordinary remedy' reserved for limited cases.
This document is page 19 of a legal filing (Doc 616) from February 24, 2022, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330). The text argues that Juror No. 50 deliberately lied on jury selection questionnaires (specifically Questions 25 and 48) regarding his history as a victim of childhood sexual abuse to avoid disqualification. The document cites various legal precedents (Greer, McDonough) to discuss the legal standards for juror bias and the necessity of a new trial.
This document is a page from a legal filing dated February 24, 2022, which analyzes legal precedent concerning juror bias, specifically from the case of McDonough. It presents quotes from concurring opinions by Justice Blackmun and Justice Brennan, arguing that an intentionally false answer from a juror is not a necessary condition for a new trial and that juror bias can be inferred from circumstances. The document highlights the judicial reasoning that a trial court retains the option to hold a post-trial hearing to determine bias, regardless of a juror's honesty during voir dire.
This document is page 23 (filed page 30) of a legal filing in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), dated February 24, 2022. The text presents legal arguments regarding juror misconduct during voir dire, citing precedents to argue that a false answer by a juror—whether intentional or inadvertent—that hides bias constitutes structural error requiring a new trial. It references key cases such as United States v. Barnes, United States v. Stewart, and McDonough.
This document appears to be a page from a House Oversight Committee report (likely Republican-authored) criticizing the origins of the FBI's 'Crossfire Hurricane' investigation. It argues that the investigation into the Trump campaign was based on flimsy evidence, specifically attacking the credibility of the George Papadopoulos entrapment theory and the Steele Dossier, while contrasting this with alleged financial ties between the Clintons and Russian interests. The text details specific dates in August 2016 regarding letters sent to FBI Director Comey by Democrats pushing the collusion narrative.
This document appears to be a page from a House Oversight Committee report criticizing the FBI's 'Crossfire Hurricane' investigation into the Trump campaign's alleged ties to Russia. It argues that the investigation was based on flimsy evidence (specifically concerning George Papadopoulos and the Steele Dossier) and was driven by political bias, highlighting leaks to the media by officials and letters from Senator Harry Reid in late 2016. The text does not mention Jeffrey Epstein or Ghislaine Maxwell; it is focused entirely on the 2016 election and the Russia investigation.
This document appears to be a page from a House Oversight Committee report (indicated by the footer) analyzing the FBI's 'Crossfire Hurricane' investigation into the Trump campaign and Russia. It argues that the investigation was politically biased, noting that Papadopoulos did not mention emails connecting the campaign to the DNC hack. The text details a timeline of leaks and letters in late 2016 involving Harry Reid, James Comey, and the media, suggesting these were efforts to publicize the collusion narrative before the election. Note: While the prompt requested Epstein-related data, this specific page deals exclusively with the 2016 Election and Russia investigation.
This document appears to be a page from a geopolitical briefing or analysis paper produced for the House Oversight Committee (stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029817). It discusses the diplomatic climate regarding Iran's nuclear program around early 2013, referencing President Obama's new security team (Kerry, Hagel, Brennan) and the potential for a 'shop, ship, and shut' deal structure involving the P5+1. The text speculates on the existence of secret back-channel talks similar to those that occurred in Vienna in 2009.
This document appears to be a page from a geopolitical analysis or article discussing United States-Iran relations, specifically focusing on nuclear negotiations. It outlines the composition of President Obama's second-term national security team (Kerry, Hagel, Brennan) and discusses potential strategies for a preliminary deal involving sanctions relief in exchange for limits on enrichment. The text also references historical back-channel talks in 2009 and speculates on current secret diplomacy.
This document appears to be a printout of a news article or press release compilation regarding the FDA approval and market analysis of the Regeneron/Sanofi cholesterol drug, Praluent. It details financial projections, physician surveys, and quotes from executives at Regeneron, Sanofi, and CVS Caremark regarding pricing and accessibility. While the document bears a House Oversight stamp and mentions Donald Trump in a disconnected headline, the content focuses entirely on the pharmaceutical industry.
This document is a digital communication log from the House Oversight Committee containing an exchange on August 25, 2018, between 'e:jeeitunes@gmail.com' (an alias for Jeffrey Epstein) and a redacted individual. The conversation discusses an unnamed male figure ('He') whom they describe as 'drunk with power' and a 'moron,' while simultaneously dismissing 'lefrac' and 'Roth' as '3rd rate.' The exchange suggests the redacted individual is someone the subject 'fears.'
This document appears to be page 222 of a larger report or book (possibly titled 'Chapter Thirty') bearing a House Oversight footer. It discusses the November 13, 2015, Paris terrorist attacks orchestrated by Abdelhamid Abaaoud on behalf of ISIS. The text focuses on the failure of intelligence agencies (NSA) to intercept communications regarding the plot and includes a quote from CIA Director John Brennan criticizing unauthorized disclosures for hindering counter-terrorism efforts.
This article discusses the new cholesterol drug, Praluent, from Regeneron and Sanofi, focusing on its high price, which is 46% higher than analyst forecasts. It details the FDA's approval for a broader patient group than expected, the potential for wide prescription by doctors despite the label, and the expected resistance from insurance companies who will likely restrict its use. The article also includes commentary from executives at Regeneron and Sanofi, as well as analysts and cardiologists, on the drug's market potential and place alongside existing treatments like statins.
This document, an excerpt from a House Oversight report, argues against the narrative of Trump-Russia collusion, citing a lack of evidence and suggesting political bias in the FBI's 'Crossfire' investigation. It details pre-election efforts by figures like Harry Reid and media outlets to publicize the collusion story through letters to the FBI and reporting on the Steele dossier. The document is about the 2016 US presidential election and is not related to Jeffrey Epstein.
This document, from a House Oversight source, argues that the FBI's 'Crossfire Hurricane' investigation into the 2016 Trump campaign was politically motivated and an abuse of power. It cites public letters from Harry Reid and other Democrats, as well as actions by Christopher Steele, as part of a pre-election effort to publicize the Trump-Russia narrative. The document contains no information related to Jeffrey Epstein.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity