Miami, Florida
LocationRelationship Network
EFTA00013858.pdf
A letter dated September 1, 2009, from attorney Roy Black to Assistant U.S. Attorney Jeffrey Sloman regarding Jeffrey Epstein. Black informs Sloman that Epstein has completed his incarceration, is serving one year of community control, and is applying to transfer his supervision from Florida to the Virgin Islands (his primary residence) via the ICAOS process. Black emphasizes compliance with the non-prosecution agreement and notes the transfer is pre-approved by the Virgin Islands.
EFTA00013801.pdf
This document is a legal rebuttal from Kirkland & Ellis LLP regarding the government's handling of the Jeffrey Epstein investigation and the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). The defense argues that the DOJ's review was not independent, alleges prosecutorial misconduct regarding victim notification and the selection of victim representatives (citing a conflict of interest involving an AUSA's boyfriend), and disputes the government's characterization of the sexual conduct. The document also details the defense's objections to the government's threat to terminate the agreement if Epstein did not comply with unilaterally modified terms by June 2, 2008.
EFTA00013766.pdf
This document contains an email chain between late 2007 involving Federal Prosecutors (US Attorney's Office) and State Prosecutors (Palm Beach County ASA) regarding the 'Epstein settlement agreement.' The correspondence highlights the coordination between state and federal offices to ensure Jeffrey Epstein's state plea and sentencing occurred before January 4, 2008, specifically to satisfy the terms of a federal non-prosecution agreement. The emails reveal logistical challenges with Judge McSorley's scheduling preferences but confirm that the settlement was a 'definite go.'
EFTA00013756.pdf
This document contains an email chain from November 2007 sent by Joyce Williams, assistant to Judge Edward B. Davis at Akerman Senterfitt. The emails inform the recipients (addressed as Messrs. Lewis and a redacted name) that Judge Davis has selected attorneys Aaron Podhurst and Robert Josefsberg to handle the 'Epstein' matter and that they have agreed to do so.
EFTA00013745.pdf
A letter from U.S. Attorney R. Alexander Acosta to Jeffrey Epstein's attorney, Lilly Ann Sanchez, dated October 9, 2007. Acosta rejects a proposal regarding the resolution of victim claims under the Non-Prosecution Agreement and instead proposes using Judge Davis to select attorneys for the victims and potentially serve as a mediator for out-of-court settlements paid for by Epstein. Acosta also mentions attempting to coordinate with other defense team members Jay Lefkowitz and Guy Lewis.
EFTA00013623.pdf
This document is a letter from U.S. Attorney R. Alexander Acosta to retired Judge Edward B. Davis, confirming Davis's appointment as a Special Master. The letter outlines the terms of Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), specifically identifying that the U.S. government has identified 34 victims. It details Epstein's agreement to pay for an attorney representative for these victims and waive liability contests in specific civil suits, provided the victims proceed under 18 U.S.C. § 2255.
EFTA00013610.pdf
This document is an email chain from September 21, 2007, regarding the finalization of Jeffrey Epstein's plea deal. Attorney Lilly Ann Sanchez writes to a redacted government official (who is on vacation) urging them to resolve an outstanding issue so they can sign the deal 'as soon as today.' She expresses concern that 'Alex' (likely Alexander Acosta) has not read all defense submissions and notes that the recipient is the only one left in the chain of command capable of resolving the matter.
EFTA00013595.pdf
This document contains correspondence from attorney Brad Edwards to the U.S. Attorney's Office in July 2008 regarding the Jeffrey Epstein case. Edwards disputes the government's proposed stipulation of facts, specifically regarding when victims were notified of Epstein's non-prosecution agreement (NPA), and asserts that he and his clients were kept in the dark about the NPA while urging federal charges. The attached July 3rd letter formally requests federal prosecution, characterizing Epstein as a prolific predator who abused over 100 girls, arguing that the state plea deal was grossly inadequate.
EFTA00013570.pdf
This document is a legal response filed on August 1, 2008, by victims of Jeffrey Epstein (Jane Doe #1 and #2) against the United States Government. The victims allege violations of the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA), specifically that the government entered into a secret Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) with Epstein in September 2007 without conferring with them and actively misled them into believing a federal investigation was ongoing. The filing requests the court to order the production of the NPA and an FBI interview report, and to schedule a hearing to determine remedies for the violation of the victims' rights.
EFTA00013533.pdf
This document contains a letter from attorney Lilly Ann Sanchez to the US Attorney's Office (Southern District of Florida) dated December 7, 2007. It attaches Jeffrey Epstein's signed Affirmation of his Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) and a Notice of Hearing for a plea conference scheduled for January 4, 2008. Notably, Sanchez explicitly requests that the US Attorney's Office delay sending any victim notification letters until further discussion.
EFTA00013497.pdf
An email chain from September 21, 2007, involving attorney Lilly Ann Sanchez attempting to finalize a plea deal for Jeffrey Epstein. Sanchez emails a vacationing official claiming they are ready to sign, but internal emails between (presumably) prosecutors or DOJ officials express confusion and dismissal, stating Sanchez has 'not been in any negotiations' and referring to her as 'yet another cook.'
EFTA00010386.pdf
This document is a chain of email correspondence between Miami attorney Joe Nascimento and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding a female client who was served a grand jury subpoena in the Epstein investigation on July 6, 2019. The correspondence outlines the scheduling of several proffer sessions and interviews between 2019 and 2021, primarily taking place at the Hilton in West Palm Beach and later via WebEx or in New York. The emails confirm the client's cooperation with the investigation, particularly noting a check-in following Ghislaine Maxwell's arrest in July 2020 where prosecutors confirmed the client's status as a witness had not changed.
EFTA00010249.pdf
This document is an email forwarding a Law360 article dated April 24, 2019, detailing a legal victory for Jeffrey Epstein. A Florida appeals court ruled that Jean-Luc Brunel's modeling agency, MC2, failed to properly serve Epstein with a lawsuit because they served his business address rather than his primary residence on Little St. James. The article also references the wider context of Epstein's legal history, including the 2007 plea deal involving Alexander Acosta and allegations connecting Brunel to Epstein's trafficking ring.
EFTA00009834.pdf
This document contains a series of email exchanges between defense attorney Joe Nascimento and prosecutors from the Southern District of New York (SDNY) regarding a client connected to the Jeffrey Epstein case. The emails discuss scheduling meetings, proffers, and interviews, as well as confirming representation after the passing of the client's previous attorney, Alan Ross.
EFTA00009116.pdf
This document is a transcript of a deposition or interview with R. Alexander Acosta, conducted by the Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) regarding the handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case by the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida. The transcript covers discussions about the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), victim notification issues, internal Department of Justice communications, and interactions with Epstein's defense team, including Ken Starr and Jay Lefkowitz. Acosta defends his office's decisions, emphasizing the goal of securing sex offender registration and restitution, while addressing criticisms regarding the perceived leniency and lack of transparency with victims.
EFTA00005714.pdf
This FBI document details the coordination and execution of an interview with a victim of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell residing in Australia in March 2011. FBI agents from Miami traveled to Sydney to interview the victim at the U.S. Consulate, followed by a second interview at the victim's residence in Glenning Valley, NSW, where they obtained relevant photographs.
EFTA00005711.pdf
This document is a formal notification from the US Legal Attache to the Australian Federal Police regarding the investigation into Jeffrey Epstein. It details that a US citizen victim, currently residing in Glenning Valley, NSW, has agreed to be interviewed by FBI Miami agents at the US Consulate in Sydney on March 17, 2011. The document outlines allegations that Epstein paid underage girls for sex, provided this specific victim with an apartment, and instructed her to have sex with associates in the US and overseas.
EFTA00005707.pdf
This document is an FBI Electronic Communication dated March 14, 2011, authorizing two agents from the Miami Division (Palm Beach County RA) to travel to Sydney, Australia, between March 14 and March 21, 2011. The purpose of the trip was to interview a United States citizen (name redacted) in relation to the investigation into Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell for child prostitution (Case ID 31E-MM-108062). The document outlines strict administrative protocols for international travel, including obtaining country clearance from the Department of State and coordinating with the Legal Attaché in Canberra.
EFTA00001946.pdf
A photograph of a letter dated November 1, 2007, from Faith A. Friedman of the Law Offices of Gerald B. Lefcourt to attorneys Roy Black and Jack Goldberger regarding Jeffrey Epstein. The letter discusses depositions and is accompanied by three black binders labeled 'DEPO MATERIAL' or 'DEPO MATERIALS' with names redacted. The document indicates coordination between Epstein's legal defense team regarding deposition materials.
DOJ-OGR-00015052.jpg
This document is a Notice of Appearance filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York for case 1:20-CR-00330-PAE (USA vs. Ghislaine Maxwell). Attorney David Oscar Markus of Markus/Moss PLLC is formally entering his appearance as counsel for the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell, certifying that he is admitted to practice Pro Hac Vice. The document is dated July 22, 2025.
DOJ-OGR-00001422.jpg
This document is an appendix from a legal filing in Case 21-770, dated May 17, 2021. It lists several court orders and filings from April and May 2021 related to Ghislaine Maxwell's detention conditions at the Metropolitan Detention Center. The document is respectfully submitted and signed by her attorneys, Leah S. Saffian and David Oscar Markus.
DOJ-OGR-00001408.jpg
This document is the cover page for Ghislaine Maxwell's renewed motion for pretrial release, filed on May 17, 2021, in the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (Case Nos. 21-770 & 21-58). It lists the legal parties involved—the United States of America as Appellee and Maxwell as Appellant—and identifies her legal representation as Leah S. Saffian and David Oscar Markus.
DOJ-OGR-00001386.jpg
This document is the concluding page of a legal filing from April 19, 2021, submitted by attorney David Oscar Markus of the law firm MARKUS/MOSS PLLC. The filing argues that a female client's case should be remanded to the trial court for a hearing because her conditions of confinement are making it impossible to prepare for trial. The document provides the law firm's contact information in Miami, Florida.
DOJ-OGR-00001373.jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal filing dated April 19, 2021, in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. It is a reply brief submitted by attorney David Oscar Markus on behalf of appellant Ghislaine Maxwell in support of her motion for pretrial release. The document references the lower court case in the Southern District of New York (20-CR-330).
DOJ-OGR-00000944.jpg
This document is the signature page and certificate of service for a legal filing submitted by attorney David Oscar Markus of Markus/Moss PLLC on April 1, 2021. It references a separate case, United States v. Dashawn Robertson (District of New Mexico), likely as a citation or appendix item. The page bears a DOJ-OGR bates stamp.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity