Christian R. Everdell
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Client |
64
Very Strong
|
183 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
18
Very Strong
|
25 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
83 | |
|
person
MARK S. COHEN
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
ALISON J. NATHAN
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Professional |
9
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
MARK S. COHEN
|
Business associate |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Client |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
Alison Moe
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
ANDREW ROHRBACH
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Mark S. Cohen
|
Business associate |
6
|
1 | |
|
organization
Cohen & Gresser LLP
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
organization
Cohen & Gresser LLP
|
Professional employment |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Bobbi C. Sternheim
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Lara Pomerantz
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
ALISON J. NATHAN
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Opposing counsel |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Pomerantz
|
Professional adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
The Honorable Alison J. Nathan
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Bobbi C. Sternheim
|
Co counsel |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
David Oscar Markus
|
Professional co counsel |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Pomerantz
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mark Stewart Cohen
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
David Oscar Markus
|
Co counsel |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-07-14 | Court hearing | Teleconference for the Arraignment and Bail Hearing in the case of United States of America v. Gh... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2020-07-10 | Legal filing | Filing of a memorandum on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell in opposition to the government's motion fo... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2020-07-10 | N/A | Signing of Waiver of Right to be Present | Unknown (Document signed re... | View |
| 2020-07-10 | N/A | Filing of Waiver of Right to be Present | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2020-07-10 | Legal filing | Filing of a Notice of Appearance by counsel for the defendant. | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2020-07-10 | N/A | Filing of Waiver of Physical Presence | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2020-07-10 | Court filing | NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE filed for Christian R. Everdell on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell. | N/A | View |
| 2020-07-10 | Court filing | NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE filed by Christian R. Everdell for Ghislaine Maxwell. | N/A | View |
| 2020-07-10 | Court filing | NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE filed for Christian R. Everdell to represent Ghislaine Maxwell. | N/A | View |
| 2020-07-10 | Court filing | NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE filed for Christian R. Everdell. | N/A | View |
| 2020-07-10 | N/A | Signing of waiver by Defense Counsel on behalf of Defendant. | Southern District of New Yo... | View |
| 2020-07-10 | Court filing | WAIVER of Personal Appearance at Arraignment and Entry of Plea of Not Guilty filed by Ghislaine M... | N/A | View |
| 2020-07-10 | N/A | Notices of Attorney Appearance filed by Mark Stewart Cohen and Christian R. Everdell. | Court Filing | View |
| 2020-07-08 | N/A | Notices of Attorney Appearance filed for Maxwell's defense team (Cohen, Everdell, Menninger). | US District Court | View |
| 2020-07-08 | N/A | Notice of Attorney Appearance filed by Christian R. Everdell. | S.D.N.Y. | View |
| 2020-07-08 | Legal filing | Filing of a Notice of Appearance by attorney Christian R. Everdell on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell. | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2020-07-08 | N/A | Attorney Appearances filed for Cohen, Everdell, and Menninger. | Docket | View |
| 2020-07-06 | N/A | Defense counsel spoke with Ghislaine Maxwell for the first time at the Metropolitan Detention Cen... | Metropolitan Detention Center | View |
| 2020-06-23 | Court filing | Filing of the 'REPLY MEMORANDUM OF GHISLAINE MAXWELL IN SUPPORT OF HER RENEWED MOTION FOR BAIL'. | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
DOJ-OGR-00002331.jpg
This is the conclusion page of a legal motion filed by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team on January 25, 2021, arguing for the dismissal of her indictment. The defense claims a Sixth Amendment violation due to the systematic underrepresentation of Black and Hispanic jurors in the selection pool and alleges the government rushed her arrest for publicity reasons to coincide with the anniversary of the Epstein indictment.
DOJ-OGR-00002321.jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal memorandum filed on January 25, 2021, in the Southern District of New York (Case 20 Cr. 330). It is a filing by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team supporting a motion to dismiss a superseding indictment based on alleged Sixth Amendment violations. The page lists the defense attorneys from three different law firms representing Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00002321(1).jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal memorandum filed on January 25, 2021, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. The filing is made by the attorneys for defendant Ghislaine Maxwell in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The memorandum supports a motion to dismiss the superseding indictment against Maxwell, arguing it was obtained in violation of the Sixth Amendment.
DOJ-OGR-00002317.jpg
This document is the conclusion of a legal filing dated January 25, 2021, submitted by the attorneys for Ghislaine Maxwell. The attorneys argue that the indictment lacks the necessary specificity for Maxwell to prepare an adequate defense for Counts One through Four, violating her Fifth and Sixth Amendment rights. They request that the court either dismiss these counts or compel the government to provide a Bill of Particulars and further discovery.
DOJ-OGR-00002317(1).jpg
This legal document, dated January 25, 2021, is a memorandum filed in support of a motion for a Bill of Particulars and Pretrial Disclosures in the case against Ms. Maxwell. It argues that the indictment lacks specificity regarding alleged 'grooming' acts, violating her constitutional rights, and requests either the dismissal of certain counts or that the government provide more detailed information for her defense. The document is signed by several attorneys representing Ghislaine Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00002311(1).jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal memorandum filed on January 25, 2021, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York for the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The memorandum, submitted by Maxwell's legal team, supports a motion to dismiss four counts of the superseding indictment against her, arguing a lack of specificity. The document identifies Maxwell as the defendant and lists her attorneys from three different law firms.
DOJ-OGR-00002310.jpg
This document is the signature page of a legal filing in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, dated January 25, 2021. It lists the legal counsel representing Ghislaine Maxwell, including attorneys from three different law firms: HADDON, MORGAN & FOREMAN P.C. in Denver, and COHEN & GRESSER LLP and the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim in New York. The document is signed by Jeffrey S. Pagliuca on behalf of the legal team.
DOJ-OGR-00002310(1).jpg
This document is the signature page (page 2 of 2) of a court filing, Document 123, in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, filed on January 25, 2021. It lists the legal counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell, including attorneys Jeffrey S. Pagliuca, Laura A. Menninger, Mark S. Cohen, Christian R. Everdell, and Bobbi C. Sternheim, along with their respective law firms and contact information in Denver and New York.
DOJ-OGR-00002307.jpg
This document is the signature page of a legal filing from January 25, 2021, in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN. It lists the names, law firms, and contact information for the legal counsel representing Ghislaine Maxwell. The attorneys listed are Jeffrey S. Pagliuca, Laura A. Menninger, Mark S. Cohen, Christian R. Everdell, and Bobbi C. Sternheim.
DOJ-OGR-00002307(1).jpg
This document is the signature page for a legal filing (Document 122) in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, dated January 25, 2021. It identifies the legal team representing Ghislaine Maxwell, including attorneys from three separate law firms: HADDON, MORGAN & FOREMAN P.C. in Denver, and COHEN & GRESSER LLP and the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim in New York.
DOJ-OGR-00002300.jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal filing in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on January 25, 2021, in the Southern District of New York. It is a memorandum in support of Maxwell's motion to dismiss either Count One or Count Three of the superseding indictment on the grounds that they are multiplicitous. The document identifies Ghislaine Maxwell as the defendant and lists her legal counsel from three different law firms.
DOJ-OGR-00002300(1).jpg
This is the cover page for a legal memorandum filed on January 25, 2021, in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). The document is a motion filed by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team to dismiss either Count One or Count Three of the superseding indictment on the grounds that they are multiplicitous. The page lists the defendant's legal representation from three different law firms.
DOJ-OGR-00002299.jpg
This document is the signature page from a court filing (Document 121 in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN), dated January 25, 2021. It lists the legal counsel representing Ghislaine Maxwell, including attorneys from three law firms: HADDON, MORGAN & FOREMAN P.C. in Denver, CO, and COHEN & GRESSER LLP and the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim, both in New York, NY.
DOJ-OGR-00002299(1).jpg
This document is the signature page (page 2 of 2) for a legal filing submitted on January 25, 2021, in the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). It lists the legal defense team representing Ghislaine Maxwell, including attorneys from Haddon, Morgan & Foreman P.C., Cohen & Gresser LLP, and the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim. The document includes contact information for the attorneys and bears the Bates stamp DOJ-OGR-00002299.
DOJ-OGR-00002296(1).jpg
This document is the signature page for a legal filing (Document 120) in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, filed on January 25, 2021. It lists the names and contact information for the attorneys from three different law firms representing Ghislaine Maxwell in this case.
DOJ-OGR-00002279(1).jpg
This document is the title page of a legal memorandum filed on January 25, 2021, in the Southern District of New York (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). It represents Ghislaine Maxwell's motion for a severance and separate trial regarding Counts Five and Six of the superseding indictment. The document lists the legal defense teams representing Maxwell, including attorneys from Haddon, Morgan & Foreman P.C., Cohen & Gresser LLP, and the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim.
DOJ-OGR-00002278.jpg
This document is the signature page (page 2 of 2) of a legal filing (Document 119) from case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, filed on January 25, 2021. It lists the legal defense team representing Ghislaine Maxwell, including attorneys from Haddon, Morgan & Foreman P.C., Cohen & Gresser LLP, and the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim.
DOJ-OGR-00002276(1).jpg
This is page 2 of a legal letter filed on January 25, 2021, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (Ghislaine Maxwell case). Attorneys Mark S. Cohen and Christian R. Everdell of Cohen & Gresser LLP inform Judge Alison J. Nathan that they will submit motions containing 'Confidential Information' via email for review rather than filing them immediately on the public docket, to allow the government to review proposed redactions pursuant to a Protective Order.
DOJ-OGR-00002275(1).jpg
A legal letter dated January 25, 2021, from the law firm Cohen & Gresser LLP to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter lists 12 specific pretrial motions being filed by the defense, including motions to dismiss various counts of the indictment, suppress evidence, and separate trials. Two of the motions (items 3 and 11) contain redactions regarding the target of a government subpoena.
DOJ-OGR-00002271.jpg
Defense attorney Christian Everdell writes to Judge Alison Nathan requesting a court order compelling the BOP/MDC to allow Ghislaine Maxwell access to a laptop on weekends and holidays to review 'millions of documents' for her defense. The letter argues there are no security impediments to this request. Judge Nathan grants the unobjected-to request and orders the BOP to provide said access on January 15, 2021.
DOJ-OGR-00002270(1).jpg
This document is a letter from attorney Christian R. Everdell to Judge Alison J. Nathan, dated January 14, 2021, requesting a court order to allow Ghislaine Maxwell access to a government-provided laptop on weekends and holidays to review discovery materials. The letter notes that the current prison computer lacks necessary software, the volume of discovery is massive ahead of the July 12, 2021 trial, and the government does not object to this request. It also highlights that Maxwell previously had daily access during a quarantine period in late 2020.
DOJ-OGR-00002269.jpg
This document is the second page of a legal letter filed on January 14, 2021, by attorney Christian Everdell to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The defense argues that there are no impediments to MDC staff providing Maxwell with a laptop on weekends and holidays and requests a court order forcing the BOP to grant this access to facilitate the review of 'millions of documents' for her defense.
DOJ-OGR-00002268.jpg
A letter from defense attorney Christian Everdell to Judge Alison Nathan requesting a court order for the Bureau of Prisons to grant Ghislaine Maxwell weekend and holiday access to a discovery laptop. The defense argues that the standard prison computer lacks necessary software to review voluminous evidence before the July 2021 trial, noting that the government does not object to the request. The letter highlights that Maxwell previously had full access during a COVID quarantine period in late 2020.
DOJ-OGR-00002268(1).jpg
A legal letter from attorney Christian R. Everdell to Judge Alison J. Nathan requesting a court order for the Bureau of Prisons to grant Ghislaine Maxwell weekend and holiday access to a discovery review laptop. The letter argues that current prison computers lack necessary software to review millions of documents before the July 12, 2021 trial, and notes that the government does not object to this request.
DOJ-OGR-00002262.jpg
This legal document is a letter dated January 8, 2021, from attorney Christian R. Everdell to Judge Alison J. Nathan. Everdell requests a 30-day extension to file a notice of appeal regarding the denial of his client, Ms. Maxwell's, renewed motion for bail, arguing it would promote judicial efficiency. Judge Nathan denied the request in a handwritten note dated January 11, 2021, stating that sufficient cause for the extension had not been provided.
Opposition to motion
Maurene Comey informed Christian R. Everdell that the Government does not oppose the motion for Cohen & Gresser to be relieved as counsel.
Submission of reply memoranda and exhibits
The letter states an intention to submit all reply memoranda and exhibits by email to the Court and the government.
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN
Email address ceverdell@cohengresser.com provided for Christian R. Everdell, lead attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell.
Representation of Maxwell
Confirmed Maxwell retained Markus Moss for unsealing motion and Markus is prepared for deadlines.
Service of a memorandum
Christian R. Everdell certifies that he served a memorandum via the Electronic Case Filing (ECF) system to four individuals at the U.S. Department of Justice.
Response to Court's order
Defense submitting proposed questions for the hearing related to Maxwell's Motion for a New Trial.
Service of a memorandum
Christian R. Everdell certifies that he served a memorandum via the Electronic Case Filing (ECF) system to four individuals at the U.S. Department of Justice.
Extension of Time
Request for extension
Sealing Motion for New Trial
Letter regarding sealing the motion for a new trial
Redaction
Letter regarding redaction
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Request for additional jury instructions regarding Counts Two and Four based on a jury note.
N/A
Letter referenced in Table of Contents
Video Monitors
Joint letter regarding video monitors
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Request for extension on filing joint proposed jury charge and verdict sheet.
Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Request for extension to file joint proposed jury charge and verdict sheet.
Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Submission of unsealed copies of Exhibits D, E, F, and G related to Ms. Maxwell's motion to suppress, pursuant to a court order.
Cover Letter for Omnibus Reply Memorandum
Support of Defendant's Supplemental Pretrial Motions
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Notification regarding the filing of an Omnibus Reply Memorandum under seal due to confidential discovery information.
Hard Drives
Letter regarding hard drives.
Hard Drives
Correspondence regarding hard drives.
Proposed Pretrial Schedule
Defense submission regarding the schedule for pretrial proceedings.
Grand Jury Motion
Letter regarding Grand Jury Motion.
Notice of Motion and Affirmation
A certification that a copy of the 'Notice of Motion and Affirmation' was served via First Class Mail to David Oscar Markus and Ghislaine Maxwell.
Motion to withdraw as appellate counsel
Motion requesting to relieve Christian R. Everdell and Cohen & Gresser LLP as counsel because Maxwell has retained David Oscar Markus.
Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Request for defense counsel to bring electronics and specific legacy media playback equipment (VCR, cassette player, etc.) to the courthouse for an evidence view involving the defendant.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity