Christian R. Everdell
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Client |
64
Very Strong
|
183 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
18
Very Strong
|
25 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
83 | |
|
person
MARK S. COHEN
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
ALISON J. NATHAN
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Professional |
9
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
MARK S. COHEN
|
Business associate |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Client |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
Alison Moe
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
ANDREW ROHRBACH
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Mark S. Cohen
|
Business associate |
6
|
1 | |
|
organization
Cohen & Gresser LLP
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
organization
Cohen & Gresser LLP
|
Professional employment |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Bobbi C. Sternheim
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Lara Pomerantz
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
ALISON J. NATHAN
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Opposing counsel |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Pomerantz
|
Professional adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
The Honorable Alison J. Nathan
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Bobbi C. Sternheim
|
Co counsel |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
David Oscar Markus
|
Professional co counsel |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Pomerantz
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mark Stewart Cohen
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
David Oscar Markus
|
Co counsel |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-29 | Legal filing | Document 394 was filed with the court in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | Court | View |
| 2021-10-29 | Legal filing | Filing of 'GHISLAINE MAXWELL’S MOTION TO SUPPRESS IDENTIFICATION' with the court. | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2021-10-29 | Legal filing | Document 394 was filed in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | N/A | View |
| 2021-10-29 | Legal filing | Document 386 was filed in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | N/A | View |
| 2021-10-27 | Court filing | Document 378 was filed in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | N/A | View |
| 2021-10-18 | N/A | Filing of Document 357 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE | Court Filing (Southern Dist... | View |
| 2021-10-18 | N/A | Document signed/dated by attorneys | N/A | View |
| 2021-10-18 | N/A | Submission of the legal motion. | Court (implied) | View |
| 2021-10-13 | Legal filing | Filing of a Memorandum of Law in Support of Ghislaine Maxwell's Motion for Individual Sequestered... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2021-10-13 | Legal filing | The defense attorneys for Ghislaine Maxwell filed a Notice of Motion with the U.S. District Court... | SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK | View |
| 2021-10-13 | N/A | Filing of legal document requesting individual sequestered voir dire | Court (US District Court, i... | View |
| 2021-07-02 | Court filing | Letter filed by Ghislaine Maxwell's counsel, Christian R. Everdell, attaching exhibits for a moti... | S.D.N.Y. | View |
| 2021-07-02 | Court filing | Letter filed by Ghislaine Maxwell's counsel, Christian R. Everdell, regarding the Cosby Opinion. | S.D.N.Y. | View |
| 2021-07-02 | Document filing | Cohen & Gresser LLP submitted a letter to the United States District Court. | New York, NY | View |
| 2021-07-02 | Filing | LETTER filed by Ghislaine Maxwell regarding the Cosby Opinion. | N/A | View |
| 2021-07-02 | Filing | LETTER filed by Ghislaine Maxwell attaching unsealed exhibits for a motion to suppress evidence. | N/A | View |
| 2021-07-02 | N/A | Filing of unsealed exhibits (D, E, F, and G) to the public docket. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2021-06-23 | Legal filing | Filing of a 'MEMORANDUM OF GHISLAINE MAXWELL IN SUPPORT OF HER RENEWED MOTION FOR BAIL'. | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2021-05-28 | N/A | Filing of Omnibus Reply Memorandum in Support of Ms. Maxwell’s Supplemental Pretrial Motions Rela... | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2021-04-27 | N/A | Court Order Granting Motion to Withdraw Counsel | New York, NY | View |
| 2021-04-27 | N/A | Court Order granting motion for Christian R. Everdell to withdraw as counsel | New York, NY | View |
| 2021-04-15 | Legal filing | Christian R. Everdell of Cohen & Gresser LLP filed a request to be relieved as counsel for Ghisla... | New York, NY | View |
| 2021-04-15 | N/A | Filing of Motion Information Statement to withdraw as counsel. | United States Court of Appe... | View |
| 2021-04-15 | N/A | Filing of Certificate of Service for Notice of Motion to Withdraw As Appellate Counsel and Affirm... | Court of Appeals, 2nd Circuit | View |
| 2021-04-15 | Legal document service | Christian R. Everdell caused a copy of the 'Notice of Motion and Affirmation' to be served by Fir... | N/A | View |
EFTA00024708.pdf
This document contains a court order from Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of USA v. Maxwell, dated May 14, 2021, and an associated email chain circulating the order. The order denies Maxwell's request to alter detention protocols regarding flashlight checks every 15 minutes, ruling that the checks are necessary for safety in a high-profile case and do not violate her rights. The email chain shows the order being forwarded by a Staff Attorney at MDC Brooklyn.
EFTA00024023.pdf
A formal letter from defense attorney Christian R. Everdell to Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter lists twelve reply memoranda the defense intends to file in support of various motions, including motions to dismiss the indictment and suppress evidence. It also outlines the procedural handling of these documents, specifically regarding redactions of confidential information and filing under seal.
EFTA00023329.pdf
Defense counsel Christian Everdell writes to Judge Alison Nathan opposing the government's request to delay the disclosure of evidence (photographs and documents) regarding alleged victims of Jeffrey Epstein. The defense argues these materials are exculpatory under Brady because they relate to post-1997 allegations where witnesses do not implicate Maxwell, thereby supporting her defense against perjury charges that she was unaware of Epstein's abuse. The letter also argues the government has failed to show 'good cause' under Rule 16 to delay this discovery.
EFTA00023047.pdf
This document is a 'Notice of Motion' filed on January 25, 2021, by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team in the Southern District of New York. The motion seeks to suppress all evidence obtained from a government subpoena to the law firm Boies Schiller and to dismiss Counts Five and Six of the indictment, citing the Due Process Clause. The document lists the legal counsel representing Maxwell.
EFTA00022514.pdf
This document is a letter motion filed by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense attorney, Christian Everdell, on April 30, 2021, requesting Judge Alison Nathan to order the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) to accept two hard drives containing discovery materials for Maxwell's review. The defense argues the current format of 2.2 million pages is difficult to navigate, and they have reorganized the files to be more user-friendly. Judge Nathan granted the order on May 3, 2021, with a stipulation allowing MDC counsel to submit objections by May 4, 2021.
EFTA00021944.pdf
This document is a motion filed by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team on October 18, 2021, requesting the court to preclude the introduction of Government Exhibits 251, 288, 294, 313, and 606. The defense argues these items—including specific photographs, sex toys ('Twin Torpedos') seized in 2005, and a 'Household Manual'—are irrelevant, lack proper evidentiary foundation, or are unfairly prejudicial under Federal Rules of Evidence 401 and 403. The motion contends that these items do not prove any material fact regarding the charges against Maxwell and serve only to confuse issues or introduce character flaws of Jeffrey Epstein.
EFTA00021732.pdf
This document contains a chain of emails from January 15, 2021, involving defense attorney Bobbi Sternheim regarding the refusal of MDC staff to comply with a court order granting Ghislaine Maxwell access to a laptop for discovery review. Despite Judge Nathan's order issued that same day, an Officer Regan allegedly told Maxwell he 'didn't care' and refused access. Sternheim threatens to notify the Judge of this violation and potential contempt of court.
EFTA00021729.pdf
This document is an email from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim dated January 15, 2021, communicating a court order to an unidentified recipient (likely prison officials). The email contains the text of a Memo Endorsement signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan, which orders the Bureau of Prisons to grant Ghislaine Maxwell access to her laptop on weekends and holidays for reviewing discovery materials.
EFTA00021019.pdf
This document is a Notice of Motion filed on January 25, 2021, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (20 Cr. 330). The defense team, consisting of attorneys from three separate law firms, formally requests a severance and separate trial for Counts Five and Six of the Superseding Indictment. The filing includes the attorneys' contact information and signatures.
EFTA00020322.pdf
This document is a chain of emails between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense counsel, Laura Menninger, and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding the logistics of reviewing physical and electronic evidence. The discussion focuses on arranging a secure location (500 Pearl Street) for Maxwell and her team to review 'highly confidential' materials, including thousands of images seized from Jeffrey Epstein's devices and residences, as well as physical evidence stored in an FBI warehouse. The defense raises concerns about access to laptops, the ability to compare physical and electronic evidence, and the specific handling of sensitive materials.
EFTA00019291.pdf
This document is a Reply Memorandum filed by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team on December 18, 2020, in support of her renewed motion for bail. The defense argues that the government lacks significant documentary evidence, relies solely on witness testimony from decades ago, and that Maxwell has strong ties to the U.S. through her spouse (whose name is redacted) and friends who have pledged assets. The document also addresses flight risk concerns, arguing that extradition from France or the UK is possible or unlikely to be needed due to waivers, and cites a COVID-19 surge at the detention center as further justification for release.
EFTA00018709.pdf
This document is a legal memorandum submitted on February 23, 2021, supporting Ghislaine Maxwell's third motion for release on bail in the SDNY. Maxwell proposes two new conditions to assure her appearance: formally renouncing her French and British citizenships to prevent flight to those countries, and placing all assets (except legal fees and living expenses) into a new account monitored by retired Judge William S. Duffey, Jr. The defense argues these unprecedented conditions, combined with her strong ties to the US, negate flight risk and claims she is being unfairly treated as a substitute for Jeffrey Epstein.
EFTA00018572.pdf
Defense counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell requests the Court to order the government to disclose the identities of three alleged victims referenced in the indictment to allow for effective investigation of allegations from 25 years ago. Additionally, the defense requests that Maxwell be moved to the general population at the MDC and given increased computer access to review discovery, arguing her current isolation and surveillance are punitive reactions to Jeffrey Epstein's suicide in BOP custody.
EFTA00018515.pdf
This document is a legal memorandum filed by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team arguing against the government's motion for detention and requesting release on bail. The defense argues that the COVID-19 pandemic poses a severe health risk and impedes defense preparation, and asserts that Maxwell is not a flight risk, citing her presence in the U.S. since Epstein's arrest. They propose a $5 million bond secured by UK property and strict conditions including home confinement and GPS monitoring.
EFTA00017823.pdf
This document is a letter motion dated November 25, 2020, from Ghislaine Maxwell's defense counsel (Cohen & Gresser LLP) to Judge Alison J. Nathan. The defense requests an in camera conference and permission to file a renewed bail motion under seal to protect the identities of family and friends acting as sureties, citing severe harassment and death threats (including social media examples). The letter mentions a financial report by Macalvins Limited. Judge Nathan endorsed the letter on the same day, stating she saw no basis for sealing the letter itself and ordered the defense to justify the sealing request by December 2, 2020.
EFTA00016206.pdf
This document is a motion in limine filed by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team on October 18, 2021, seeking to exclude evidence offered by the government under Rule 404(b) due to lack of proper notice. The defense argues the government failed to identify specific evidence or articulate a non-propensity purpose for its admission. The motion references disputed evidence including emails between Maxwell and 'influential men' regarding dates, testimony from a former Epstein employee (2005-06) regarding 'sexualized massages,' and various exhibits including flight logs (GX-661 & 662) and financial statements.
EFTA00015804.pdf
This document is an email chain between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding the logistics of reviewing discovery evidence in March and April 2021. The discussions concern protocols for viewing 'highly confidential' materials, including nude images and physical evidence (such as massage tables and plaster busts) seized from Jeffrey Epstein's properties. The parties negotiate the location of the review (FBI Bronx warehouse vs. 500 Pearl Street courthouse), the presence of the defendant, and the use of electronic devices by defense counsel during the review.
EFTA00015303.pdf
This document is a legal memorandum filed on January 25, 2021, by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team in the Southern District of New York. The motion seeks to suppress evidence obtained via a grand jury subpoena issued to a third party (name redacted) and to dismiss Counts Five and Six of the indictment. The defense argues that the subpoena violated the Fourth Amendment due to overbreadth and lack of a warrant, violated the 'Martindell' doctrine regarding the sanctity of protective orders in civil litigation, and infringed upon Maxwell's Fifth Amendment rights against self-incrimination regarding her 2016 civil deposition testimony.
EFTA00011418.pdf
This document is a discovery request letter from Ghislaine Maxwell's defense counsel, Cohen & Gresser LLP, to the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York, dated October 13, 2020. The defense requests a wide range of materials including exculpatory Brady evidence, information on Minor Victims 1-3, communications regarding Jeffrey Epstein's 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement, and records of coordination between the government and civil attorneys representing Epstein's accusers. The letter also requests specific FBI files, unredacted reports, and evidence related to the credibility and potential financial motives of government witnesses.
EFTA00011192.pdf
This document is a legal opinion provided by David Perry QC regarding the extradition law of England and Wales in the context of Ghislaine Maxwell's bail proceedings in the United States. It outlines the extradition process between the UK and US, potential bars to extradition, human rights considerations, and the implications of Ms. Maxwell waiving her right to extradition. The document concludes that if Ms. Maxwell were to abscond to the UK, it is highly unlikely she would be granted bail or successfully resist extradition.
EFTA00011115.pdf
This document is a legal memorandum filed on October 13, 2021, by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team in the Southern District of New York. The defense argues that due to 'tsunami' of negative pretrial publicity surrounding Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein (including books, podcasts, and documentaries), standard jury selection is insufficient. They request the Court allow individual sequestered voir dire and limited attorney-conducted questioning to identify and remove biased jurors.
EFTA00011096.pdf
This document is a legal memorandum filed on October 13, 2021, by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team in the Southern District of New York. The defense argues for individual sequestered voir dire (jury selection questioning) and permission for attorneys to conduct limited questioning of jurors, citing 'tsunami' levels of negative pretrial publicity and the inflammatory nature of the sexual abuse charges. The motion lists numerous documentaries, podcasts, and books as evidence of prejudicial media coverage that allegedly demonizes Maxwell and links her inextricably to Jeffrey Epstein's crimes.
EFTA00010414.pdf
This document is a legal letter from Ghislaine Maxwell's defense counsel to Judge Alison Nathan, dated July 2, 2021. The defense cites a recent Pennsylvania Supreme Court decision overturning Bill Cosby's conviction due to a violation of a non-prosecution promise, arguing that this precedent supports dismissing charges against Maxwell based on the Epstein Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). The letter contends that the government is violating due process by reneging on the specific immunity granted to Maxwell in the NPA.
EFTA00009832.pdf
This document is an electronic Notice of Docket Activity from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit, dated April 15, 2021. It confirms the filing of a Certificate of Service regarding a motion by attorney Christian R. Everdell to withdraw as appellate counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell in case 21-58. The notice lists recipients including Cohen Gresser LLP and redacted Assistant U.S. Attorneys.
DOJ-OGR-00018338.jpg
This document is the cover page for a court transcript from the jury trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, held on December 6, 2021, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. It identifies the case number (20 CR 330), the presiding judge (Hon. Alison J. Nathan), and lists the legal counsel for both the prosecution (United States of America) and the defense. The document also notes other individuals present, including representatives from the FBI and NYPD.
Opposition to motion
Maurene Comey informed Christian R. Everdell that the Government does not oppose the motion for Cohen & Gresser to be relieved as counsel.
Submission of reply memoranda and exhibits
The letter states an intention to submit all reply memoranda and exhibits by email to the Court and the government.
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN
Email address ceverdell@cohengresser.com provided for Christian R. Everdell, lead attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell.
Representation of Maxwell
Confirmed Maxwell retained Markus Moss for unsealing motion and Markus is prepared for deadlines.
Service of a memorandum
Christian R. Everdell certifies that he served a memorandum via the Electronic Case Filing (ECF) system to four individuals at the U.S. Department of Justice.
Response to Court's order
Defense submitting proposed questions for the hearing related to Maxwell's Motion for a New Trial.
Service of a memorandum
Christian R. Everdell certifies that he served a memorandum via the Electronic Case Filing (ECF) system to four individuals at the U.S. Department of Justice.
Extension of Time
Request for extension
Sealing Motion for New Trial
Letter regarding sealing the motion for a new trial
Redaction
Letter regarding redaction
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Request for additional jury instructions regarding Counts Two and Four based on a jury note.
N/A
Letter referenced in Table of Contents
Video Monitors
Joint letter regarding video monitors
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Request for extension on filing joint proposed jury charge and verdict sheet.
Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Request for extension to file joint proposed jury charge and verdict sheet.
Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Submission of unsealed copies of Exhibits D, E, F, and G related to Ms. Maxwell's motion to suppress, pursuant to a court order.
Cover Letter for Omnibus Reply Memorandum
Support of Defendant's Supplemental Pretrial Motions
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Notification regarding the filing of an Omnibus Reply Memorandum under seal due to confidential discovery information.
Hard Drives
Letter regarding hard drives.
Hard Drives
Correspondence regarding hard drives.
Proposed Pretrial Schedule
Defense submission regarding the schedule for pretrial proceedings.
Grand Jury Motion
Letter regarding Grand Jury Motion.
Notice of Motion and Affirmation
A certification that a copy of the 'Notice of Motion and Affirmation' was served via First Class Mail to David Oscar Markus and Ghislaine Maxwell.
Motion to withdraw as appellate counsel
Motion requesting to relieve Christian R. Everdell and Cohen & Gresser LLP as counsel because Maxwell has retained David Oscar Markus.
Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Request for defense counsel to bring electronics and specific legacy media playback equipment (VCR, cassette player, etc.) to the courthouse for an evidence view involving the defendant.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity