Scarola
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Mr. Epstein
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jonee' Edwards
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Client |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Redacted Female Subject
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Meeting | Meetings between Carolyn and the Government. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Meeting with female subject, either in person in West Palm or via Webex/Zoom. | West Palm or Virtual | View |
| 2020-02-01 | N/A | Government provided Scarola with agent contact info. | Unknown | View |
| 2020-01-01 | Meeting | A meeting where Scarola told the Government he had shown Carolyn a picture of an Epstein associat... | N/A | View |
| 2015-10-15 | N/A | Deposition of Alan Dershowitz | Unknown | View |
EFTA00027348.pdf
An email from an Assistant U.S. Attorney in the Southern District of New York dated July 7, 2020. The email discusses a breakthrough in securing a meeting with a female individual (name redacted) who had previously been difficult to engage. The meeting is being coordinated through an intermediary and 'Scarola' (likely attorney Jack Scarola), with the parties located in West Palm, Florida.
EFTA00014028.pdf
This document contains an email thread from December 29, 2008, between the FBI and the US Attorney's Office (USAFLS), and a forwarded email from an Assistant U.S. Attorney to several lawyers representing victims (Josefsberg, Edwards, Ezell, etc.). The primary subject is the confidentiality of victim locations regarding Jeffrey Epstein's GPS monitoring 'exclusionary zones.' The Assistant U.S. Attorney confirms, via Captain Sleeth of the Palm Beach Sheriff's Office, that victim addresses added to the GPS system will remain confidential and will not be shared with Epstein.
EFTA00014026.pdf
This document is an email chain from December 2008 involving an Assistant U.S. Attorney and several defense attorneys (Josefsberg, Ezell, Edwards, etc.) regarding Jeffrey Epstein's work release conditions. The discussion focuses on the 'exclusionary zones' programmed into Epstein's GPS monitoring system to protect victims. The AUSA confirms, via Captain Sleeth of the Palm Beach Sheriff's Office, that while Epstein's GPS will alert if he nears a prohibited location, the specific addresses and identities of the victims will remain confidential and unknown to Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00008380.jpg
This legal document, filed on December 15, 2021, discusses the defendant's attempt to introduce statements from Robert Glassman to impeach a witness named Jane. The document details Jane's evolving testimony about a trip to New York with Epstein and the defendant to see 'The Lion King,' noting that her corrected recollections were communicated to the Government by her lawyer. The prosecution argues that Glassman's testimony on these same points is unnecessary and that questions about Jane's conversations with him were met with sustained objections.
DOJ-OGR-00008379.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing, argues against the defendant's proposal to call Brad Edwards, counsel for a witness named Kate, to testify. The filing asserts that Edwards' testimony about providing a U-Visa application for Kate is irrelevant for impeachment because it is consistent with Kate's own testimony and does not constitute 'powerful evidence of motive of bias' as the defense claims.
DOJ-OGR-00008378.jpg
This document is a legal filing (page 5 of 9) from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), dated December 15, 2021. It argues against the defense's attempt to call attorney Scarola to the stand to testify about his client Carolyn's cooperation with the government and the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program (EVCP), citing attorney-client privilege and Federal Rule of Evidence 403 (prejudice/confusion). The text asserts that Carolyn was unaware of when the EVCP began accepting claims when she decided to cooperate, negating the defense's theory of financial bias.
DOJ-OGR-00008377.jpg
This legal document, filed on December 15, 2021, is a motion from the prosecution arguing against allowing testimony from an individual named Scarola. The prosecution contends that Scarola's proposed testimony regarding another witness, Carolyn, is irrelevant and non-impeaching, as the information has already been obtained from Carolyn directly. The document also details over $3.2 million in compensation Carolyn received from claims related to Epstein and Sarah Kellen, and discusses a 2020 meeting where Scarola showed Carolyn a picture of an Epstein associate.
DOJ-OGR-00008368.jpg
This legal document, part of a court case and addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan, argues that any potential attorney-client privilege regarding statements about a person named Carolyn was waived. The argument posits that because Mr. Scarola disclosed this information to the government, the confidentiality required for privilege was broken. The document cites multiple legal precedents to support the claim that this voluntary disclosure to a third party (the government) results in the forfeiture of the privilege, which is relevant for assessing Carolyn's credibility as she testifies against Ms. Maxwell.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031430.jpg
This document is a printout of a news article (likely from the Miami Herald) discussing legal maneuvers to reopen the criminal investigation into Jeffrey Epstein and throw out his 2008 plea agreement. It covers the involvement of victims' attorneys requesting a review by a new jurisdiction (Pak's office), a DOJ probe into Labor Secretary Alexander Acosta's conduct during the original case, and an upcoming hearing in New York regarding the unsealing of documents requested by the Miami Herald. The document is stamped with a House Oversight Committee Bates number.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031400.jpg
This document is a printout of a Miami Herald article by Emily Michot regarding the 'Perversion of Justice' investigation into Jeffrey Epstein's plea deal. It details Judge Marra's ruling that federal prosecutors violated the Crime Victims' Rights Act by misleading victims and sealing the non-prosecution agreement negotiated by Alex Acosta. The text highlights that Epstein worked with others to procure minors and that victims' attorneys are petitioning the DOJ to reopen the investigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022150.jpg
This document appears to be pages 252 and 253 from a book or report containing Chapter 66. It features an excerpt from the deposition of Alan Dershowitz dated October 15, 2015, where he is questioned about a CNN interview with Hala Gorani regarding his memory. The previous page (252) contains fragmented text discussing allegations involving Brad Edwards pressuring Virginia [Roberts Giuffre], sexual abuse allegations in New York and Palm Beach, and a lawsuit targeting Leslie Wexner for one billion dollars.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022149.jpg
This document is a scanned page (labeled 252) from a book by James Patterson, included in a House Oversight production. It details Alan Dershowitz's defense strategy against sexual abuse allegations by Virginia Roberts, specifically his claim that lawyer Brad Edwards coerced Roberts into naming him to blackmail Leslie Wexner for $1 billion. The right side of the image contains a partial transcript of a deposition of Dershowitz dated October 15, 2015, where he discusses his memory.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022993.jpg
This document, likely a news report or legal summary produced for the House Oversight Committee, details testimony from Epstein's house manager Juan Alessi regarding visits by Prince Andrew and Donald Trump. It contrasts their behaviors, noting Andrew received massages while Trump only ate dinner in the kitchen and declined massages. The text also discusses legal actions led by attorneys Scarola and Edwards regarding Epstein's non-prosecution agreement (the 'sweetheart deal') and a separate financial dispute involving Trump's golf club.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022991.jpg
This document is a page from a news report (archived by the House Oversight Committee) discussing the connections between Donald Trump, Jeffrey Epstein, and Alex Acosta. It highlights a 2002 quote from Trump praising Epstein and noting his interest in 'younger' women, which attorney Spencer Kuvin finds suspicious given Epstein's later convictions. The text also details Alex Acosta's defense of the lenient plea deal he arranged for Epstein while serving as U.S. Attorney, a topic raised during Acosta's confirmation hearings for Labor Secretary.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015632.jpg
This document is a page from a legal response in the case of Edwards vs. Dershowitz, likely part of a House Oversight review. It contains a transcript of Alan Dershowitz's deposition where he vehemently denies ever meeting or touching Virginia Giuffre (Roberts) and denies witnessing Jeffrey Epstein abuse anyone. An attorney, Ms. McCawley, interrupts to object when Dershowitz mentions David Boies and potential settlement discussions.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013441.jpg
This document is a printout of the end of a Palm Beach Daily News article. It features a quote from an individual named Scarola, stating that Epstein's embarrassment regarding his own conduct is his own problem. The URL indicates the article covers a judge denying a gag order in a lawsuit involving Epstein and Edwards.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029862.jpg
This document is a House Oversight record containing a news article from The Palm Beach Post regarding ongoing litigation between Edwards and Jeffrey Epstein. It discusses a malicious prosecution case, allegations linking Edwards to the Rothstein Ponzi scheme, and Edwards' attempts to depose high-profile figures like Donald Trump, Bill Clinton, and David Copperfield. The article also references Epstein's non-prosecution agreement with the U.S. Attorney's office and his guilty plea in Palm Beach County.
No Subject
Scarola copied counsel for other victims on an email, which the document argues says nothing about Carolyn.
Contact Information
Government gave Scarola contact information for an agent.
Legal Deposition
Questions regarding Dershowitz's memory and media appearances.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity