Jurors
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
The Court
|
Professional |
7
|
2 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Unnamed Speaker (Judge)
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Court/Judge
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Judge
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Professional judge jurors |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Comey
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Government/Defense
|
Judicial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Unnamed Speaker (presumably the judge)
|
Official |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
spouse, domestic partner, family, colleagues, co-workers
|
Friend |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
witnesses
|
Evaluation |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
witnesses
|
Judicial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
accusers
|
Judicial evaluation |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
defendant
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Judge
|
Authority instruction |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Judge (PAE)
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
fellow jurors
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Professional protective |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Judicial authority |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Lawyers
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
The case agent
|
Restricted |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Judge
|
Authority instructor |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-29 | N/A | Trial Window | Courtroom | View |
| 2021-11-29 | N/A | Parties exercised peremptory strikes; twelve jurors and six alternates were seated. | Court | View |
| 2021-11-29 | N/A | Exercise of peremptory strikes / Return of prospective jurors | SDNY | View |
| 2021-11-29 | N/A | Opening statements and peremptory challenges for United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. | 40 Foley, courtroom 318, Ne... | View |
| 2021-11-29 | Trial | Commencement of a trial expected to last about six weeks, held Monday to Friday from 9:30 a.m. to... | N/A | View |
| 2021-11-29 | N/A | Opening statements in United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell | 40 Foley, Courtroom 318, Ne... | View |
| 2021-11-29 | N/A | Start of trial/Opening statements for United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell | 40 Foley, courtroom 318, Ne... | View |
| 2021-11-29 | N/A | Opening statements for United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell | 40 Foley, Courtroom 318, Ne... | View |
| 2021-11-29 | N/A | Opening of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Peremptory challenges, preliminary instructi... | 40 Foley, Courtroom 318, Ne... | View |
| 2021-11-29 | N/A | Opening of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell trial (implied date based on 'will open in the morn... | 40 Foley, courtroom 318, Ne... | View |
| 2021-11-29 | N/A | Opening of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell trial (implied 'morning' after Nov 28) | 40 Foley, courtroom 318, Ne... | View |
| 2021-11-18 | N/A | Jury selection/Voir Dire proceedings (TR 11/18/2021) | Court | View |
| 2021-11-18 | N/A | Conclusion of voir dire where fifty-eight jurors were qualified. | Court | View |
| 2021-11-17 | N/A | Jury selection/Voir Dire proceedings (TR 11/17/2021) | Court | View |
| 2021-11-16 | N/A | Trial proceedings/Jury Selection | Courtroom | View |
| 2021-11-16 | N/A | Scheduled first day of oral voir dire | New York | View |
| 2021-11-16 | Court proceeding | A court transcript from this date is cited as evidence of how the Court handled questioning of ot... | N/A | View |
| 2021-11-16 | N/A | Jury selection/Voir Dire proceedings (TR 11/16/2021) | Court | View |
| 2021-11-16 | N/A | Voir Dire (Scheduled) | Court | View |
| 2021-11-16 | N/A | Voir Dire (Jury Selection) | District Court | View |
| 2021-11-16 | Court proceeding | A court transcript from this date is cited as evidence of the court asking follow-up questions to... | N/A | View |
| 2021-10-22 | N/A | Filing of Document 366 containing jury instructions. | Federal Court | View |
| 2021-10-22 | N/A | Filing of Document 365 (Juror Questionnaire Instructions) | Court | View |
| 2020-12-18 | N/A | Trial of Ghislaine Maxwell | Court | View |
| 2008-10-22 | N/A | Review of Defense Exhibit LV3A | Courtroom | View |
DOJ-OGR-00008694.jpg
This document is a jury instruction, designated as Instruction No. 54, from a legal case (1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on December 18, 2021. It explicitly directs the jury not to draw any inferences or speculate about why individuals other than the defendant are not also on trial. The instruction clarifies that such considerations are irrelevant to the jury's duty of deciding the case based on the evidence presented.
DOJ-OGR-00017458.jpg
This is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a procedural discussion between the judge, Mr. Everdell, and Ms. Comey. They agree on a method for presenting exhibits to the jury using paper copies to protect the anonymity of witnesses who may testify under pseudonyms. The exhibits in question are to be offered under seal by the defense.
DOJ-OGR-00011688.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a trial on August 10, 2022, where a judge instructs the jury. The judge stresses that their decision must be based solely on evidence presented in court, provides rules for taking and securing notes, and establishes a protocol for jurors to report any misconduct by fellow jurors through a court staff member named Ms. Williams.
DOJ-OGR-00011686.jpg
This document is page 21 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 10, 2022. It contains instructions from the Judge to the jury regarding their conduct, specifically forbidding them from discussing the case with one another or outside parties until deliberations begin. The text explicitly lists various communication technologies and social media platforms (Facebook, Reddit, Twitter, etc.) that jurors are prohibited from using to discuss the trial.
DOJ-OGR-00011680.jpg
This document is page 15 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 10, 2022. It records the swearing-in of a jury consisting of 12 members and six alternates by a court clerk named Ms. Williams. The Judge (The Court) then begins providing preliminary instructions regarding the trial proceedings, specifically explaining the process of opening statements by the government and the defense.
DOJ-OGR-00011679.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It details a logistical delay in open court involving defense attorney Ms. Sternheim, prosecutor Ms. Comey, and the Judge regarding three jurors who are missing or delayed at the security line. The Judge discusses moving jurors between the first and fifth floors to manage the situation.
DOJ-OGR-00011668.jpg
This document is a court transcript page from a case filed on August 10, 2022. An unnamed speaker, likely the judge, details the logistical plan for the final phase of jury selection, explaining how 58 remaining jurors will be questioned for bias via a live feed and how counsel will then exercise peremptory strikes on a smaller pool of 40 jurors.
DOJ-OGR-00011653.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330) filed on August 10, 2022. Defense attorney Mr. Everdell argues that the government's proposed jury instructions are confusing and contrasts them with the defense's position. The argument centers on jurisdiction and the age of consent, specifically regarding 'Accuser 2' and acts committed in New Mexico that were allegedly legal under New Mexico law at the time, versus how they are treated under New York conspiracy law.
DOJ-OGR-00011634.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022. It details a discussion between the Judge and attorney Mr. Pagliuca regarding the logistics of maintaining witness anonymity in the courtroom. Specifically, they discuss preventing the public from seeing identifying information on counsel's screens while ensuring the government and jurors have access to necessary documents.
DOJ-OGR-00011633.jpg
A page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed 08/10/22) detailing a procedural argument between attorney Mr. Pagliuca and the Judge. The discussion centers on how to present documents designated for 'refreshing recollection' without exposing identifying information to the public via courtroom screens. The Judge suggests using paper to ensure anonymity, while Mr. Pagliuca argues this is impractical due to the 'thousands of pages' involved.
Schedule
We would like to end today at 5 p.m., deliberate from
Clarification on Count Four conviction requirements
The jury sent a note indicating a mistaken impression that they could convict Ms. Maxwell based on her intent for Jane to engage in sexual activity in New Mexico, even if that activity did not violate New York Penal Law, which was a requirement of the charge.
Jury matters
Request 1(b) calls for communications between jurors.
Jury matters
Request 1(b) calls for communications between jurors.
Clarification on charges regarding flights
Jurors asking if the defendant can be found guilty solely based on aiding and abetting a flight back from New Mexico.
Clarification on Count Four
Asked about the 'second element' of 'count four' and whether sexual activity needed to occur in New York.
Scheduling
"No, thank you." Asterisk, "Jurors have made plans for tomorrow."
Question 48 and 48a
Questions regarding details of victim's sexual abuse.
Basis for a guilty verdict
The jurors sent a note asking if a defendant could be found guilty solely for aiding and abetting the flight from New Mexico, separate from the flight to New Mexico.
Basis for conviction on Count Four
A note (Court Exhibit #15) sent by the jury during deliberations indicated they were considering convicting Ms. Maxwell on Count Four based solely on conduct that occurred in New Mexico.
Reporting juror misconduct
Jurors are instructed to immediately inform the judge, through Ms. Williams, if they become aware of another juror violating the court's instructions.
Reporting juror misconduct
Jurors are instructed to immediately inform the judge, through Ms. Williams, if they become aware of another juror violating the court's instructions.
Jury selection screening questions
The speaker plans to address the assembled jurors via video feed to ask two screening questions regarding their exposure to case information and their ability to be impartial.
Rules and principles for juror conduct
The court instructs the jury not to talk to each other or anyone else about the case, and not to use any form of electronic communication (cell phones, social media, email, etc.) regarding the case until the trial has concluded and they have been discharged.
Rules and principles for juror conduct
The court instructs the jury not to talk to each other or anyone else about the case, and not to use any form of electronic communication (cell phones, social media, email, etc.) regarding the case until the trial has concluded and they have been discharged.
Verdict Polling
The Court asks individual jurors if the read verdict is their verdict; jurors respond 'Yes'.
Jury Polling
The Court asks individual jurors if the read verdict is their verdict; jurors respond affirmatively.
Voir Dire / Jury Selection
Questioning regarding exposure to media about Epstein/Defendant and ability to be impartial.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity