Jurors
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
The Court
|
Professional |
7
|
2 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Unnamed Speaker (Judge)
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Court/Judge
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Judge
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Professional judge jurors |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Comey
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Government/Defense
|
Judicial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Unnamed Speaker (presumably the judge)
|
Official |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
spouse, domestic partner, family, colleagues, co-workers
|
Friend |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
witnesses
|
Evaluation |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
witnesses
|
Judicial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
accusers
|
Judicial evaluation |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
defendant
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Judge
|
Authority instruction |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Judge (PAE)
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
fellow jurors
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Professional protective |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Judicial authority |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Lawyers
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
The case agent
|
Restricted |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Judge
|
Authority instructor |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Ghislaine Maxwell trial proceedings, including peremptory challenges, preliminary instructions, a... | Main courtroom: 40 Foley, c... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Trial attendance required from 9:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. | The Courthouse | View |
| N/A | N/A | Jury Selection / Trial | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Deliberations | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Juror disclosure of abuse history | Jury Room | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | The Jury Selection Process | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Direct examination and cross-examination of witnesses | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Jury Impanelment and Swearing In | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Jury Selection Process | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Review of evidentiary exhibits (1J, 1K, 1M) during trial testimony. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Ghislaine Maxwell Trial (#GhislaineMaxwellTrial) | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Preliminary Jury Instructions | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Impaneling and swearing in of the jury | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Direct examination of witness Rodgers regarding Government Exhibit 662 (a logbook). | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Impaneling of the Jury | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | O.J. Simpson Criminal Trial | Unknown (context implies USA) | View |
| N/A | Juryroom deliberation | The process of jurors deliberating, which the author argues would be inhibited by granting the de... | juryroom | View |
| N/A | Trial | A court trial where witness Brune was present every day and observed the jury. | courtroom | View |
| N/A | Voir dire | The jury selection process during which other jurors disclosed experiences with sexual abuse, sex... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Trial | The trial for which jurors were being selected, where the central issue was the credibility of ac... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | The document discusses the legal process of voir dire, specifically how the court can limit attor... | this district | View |
| N/A | Legal trial | The trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, where a juror reported that some jurors initially doubted the acc... | United States | View |
| N/A | Trial | A trial where the witness, Brune, was present every day and observed the jury, including Ms. Conrad. | courtroom | View |
| N/A | Trial | The legal proceeding (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) for which jurors are being selected. | courtroom | View |
| N/A | Jury service | A potential juror's prior experience serving on a jury for a civil or criminal case. | N/A | View |
DOJ-OGR-00018259.jpg
This document is a partial transcript from a court proceeding on August 10, 2022, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It details interactions between the Court, attorney Ms. Comey, and witness Mr. Parkinson, primarily focusing on instructions to jurors regarding the viewing and handling of several Government Exhibits (GX252, GX253, GX254, GX241), with one exhibit being admitted under seal. The document captures a segment of Mr. Parkinson's direct examination.
DOJ-OGR-00018256.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) dated August 10, 2022. It records the direct examination of a witness named Parkinson, during which Ms. Comey (Government) moves to admit Government Exhibits 243 through 250 under seal. The Court admits the evidence without objection from defense attorney Mr. Everdell, and the jurors are instructed to review Exhibits 243, 244, 245, and 246 in their binders.
DOJ-OGR-00018249.jpg
This document is page 148 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (the Ghislaine Maxwell trial), filed on August 10, 2022. It details the direct examination of a witness named Mr. Parkinson by prosecutor Ms. Comey, specifically focusing on the admission and presentation of Government Exhibits 223, 224, and 225 to the jury without objection from defense attorney Mr. Everdell. The page concludes with Ms. Comey preparing to show the witness Exhibits 226 through 241.
DOJ-OGR-00008628.jpg
This document is Page 90 of 167 from a court filing in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on December 18, 2021. It contains 'Instruction No. 3', which strictly prohibits jurors from communicating about the case via any electronic means or social media (listing specific platforms like Facebook and Twitter) and bans outside research. The instruction emphasizes that deliberations must occur only within the jury room and verdicts must be based solely on evidence presented in court.
DOJ-OGR-00008618.jpg
This document is page 80 of 167 from a court filing dated December 18, 2021, containing Jury Instruction No. 58 for the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. The judge instructs the jurors that they must not consider potential punishment when determining guilt, emphasizing that sentencing is the sole responsibility of the judge. The instruction clarifies the jury's role is strictly to weigh evidence regarding whether the Government has proved guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
DOJ-OGR-00008602.jpg
This document is page 64 of 167 from a court filing dated December 18, 2021, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It contains 'Instruction No. 44: Credibility of Witnesses,' which guides the jury on how to evaluate witness testimony based on demeanor, consistency, honesty, and potential interest in the case's outcome. The text outlines the jurors' right to accept or reject testimony in whole or in part based on their assessment of truthfulness.
DOJ-OGR-00008548.jpg
This document is page 10 of 167 from a court filing dated December 18, 2021, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It contains Jury Instruction No. 3, which strictly prohibits jurors from using social media, the internet, or electronic devices to communicate about the case or conduct outside research during deliberations. The instruction emphasizes that the verdict must be based solely on evidence presented in the courtroom.
DOJ-OGR-00008536.jpg
This document page contains the final jury instructions from the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330), filed on December 17, 2021. The judge instructs the jury that their verdict must be unanimous, explains the role of the foreperson in filling out the verdict form and notifying the marshal, and urges courtesy during deliberations. The transcript concludes with the judge pausing proceedings for a brief sidebar conference with counsel and the court reporter before officially submitting the case to the jury.
DOJ-OGR-00008533.jpg
This document is Page 77 (marked 76 internally) of a court filing dated December 17, 2021, containing Jury Instruction No. 58 for the trial of Ms. Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The instruction directs jurors to determine guilt based solely on evidence and explicitly prohibits them from considering potential punishment during deliberations, noting that sentencing is the sole responsibility of the judge.
DOJ-OGR-00008529.jpg
This document is page 73 of 82 from a court filing in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on December 17, 2021. It contains Jury Instruction No. 54, titled 'Persons Not on Trial,' which explicitly instructs the jury not to speculate why other individuals are not on trial or draw inferences from their absence. The document is stamped with Bates number DOJ-OGR-00008529.
DOJ-OGR-00008518.jpg
This document is page 62 of a court filing (Document 562) from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on December 17, 2021. It contains Jury Instruction No. 44 regarding the 'Credibility of Witnesses,' advising jurors on how to evaluate testimony based on demeanor, consistency, potential bias, and common sense. The text outlines the jurors' right to accept or reject testimony if they believe a witness has lied or is mistaken.
DOJ-OGR-00008441.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing, outlines a joint proposal from the prosecution and defense regarding the presentation of closing arguments. The parties argue that alternatives like toggling monitors or using printed binders for the jury are unworkable due to potential interruptions, logistical difficulties, and the risk of inadvertently exposing sealed material, which would violate the privacy of victims and third parties. They propose instead to provide redacted copies of their presentation slides to the public on the following day.
DOJ-OGR-00008349.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on December 10, 2021, for Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The speaker (the Judge) is outlining logistics for the following Monday regarding jury management. The plan involves assembling jurors in two separate courtrooms connected by video feed, asking them two specific questions regarding their exposure to media about the case and their ability to remain impartial, and subsequently exercising peremptory challenges.
DOJ-OGR-00008341.jpg
This is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) filed on December 10, 2021. The Judge ('The Court') is discussing jury instructions regarding a specific witness involved in sexual conduct in New Mexico. The Judge notes that while the witness was above the age of consent in New Mexico, the government is using the evidence to prove enticement for illegal acts in New York, and the jury instructions must accurately reflect this legal distinction without favoring the government's arguments.
DOJ-OGR-00008321.jpg
This document is page 11 of a court transcript from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330) dated December 10, 2021. The dialogue is between Ms. Moe (Prosecution) and the Court regarding the logistics of presenting evidence; specifically, they agree that while electronic display is standard, sensitive documents containing identifying information of victims should be provided to jurors in paper binders to prevent them from being seen on public courtroom screens.
DOJ-OGR-00008251.jpg
This document is a court transcript from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on December 8, 2021. In it, a speaker, presumably the judge, details the procedure for voir dire, explaining how a list of witnesses and entities will be presented to prospective jurors. The judge outlines special measures for witnesses testifying under pseudonyms, including discussing them at sidebar and preventing a specific employer's name from being mentioned in open court to protect a witness's identity.
DOJ-OGR-00020860.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (likely from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial appeal, given the case number 22-1426 and attorney Mr. Everdell). The Judge is explaining a decision to extend jury deliberations by one hour each day due to an 'astronomical spike' in COVID-19 (Omicron variant) cases in New York City, aiming to complete the trial before jurors or participants are forced to quarantine. Mr. Everdell acknowledges the ruling and declines to argue the point at that moment.
DOJ-OGR-00020835.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 22-1426, likely the Ghislaine Maxwell appeal) dated February 28, 2023. Defense attorney Mr. Everdell is discussing a note from the jury with the Judge, arguing that the jurors are distinguishing between a flight *to* New Mexico and a flight *from* New Mexico regarding 'illicit sexual activity.' Everdell states there is no record of a flight from New Mexico and argues about the necessary 'significant or motivating purpose' of the travel required for a guilty verdict.
DOJ-OGR-00018492.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022, featuring the direct testimony of a witness named McHugh. The testimony details a financial transaction occurring on June 18th involving an internal transfer of $7,400,000 from DDA account 6312 to DDA account 4324. The proceedings also introduce Government Exhibit 506, identified as a 'Morgan account signature card.'
DOJ-OGR-00016229.jpg
This document is page 13 of a court transcript from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on August 10, 2022. It records a dispute between prosecutor Ms. Moe and defense attorney Mr. Pagliuca regarding Government Exhibit 52G; the defense successfully objects to the prosecution directing jurors specifically to entries labeled 'massage, Florida.' The court also admits Government Exhibit 1009 as a public stipulation.
DOJ-OGR-00016131.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022, in which a judge is instructing the jury on their conduct. The judge strictly prohibits jurors from discussing the case with anyone, including each other, until deliberations, and forbids the use of any electronic devices or social media for communication or research related to the case. The instructions emphasize the need to keep an open mind and base their verdict solely on the evidence presented in court.
DOJ-OGR-00016125.jpg
This page is a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It depicts the beginning of the trial proceedings where the Judge welcomes the jury, Ms. Williams swears in a jury of 12 and six alternates, and the Judge begins explaining the trial process, specifically noting that opening statements by the government and defense will follow.
DOJ-OGR-00016124.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) involving the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. The dialogue captures a procedural delay where the Judge (The Court) informs counsel (Ms. Sternheim and Ms. Comey) that three jurors are missing and unaccounted for at the security line. The Judge proposes moving a juror from the first floor to the fifth floor to manage the situation while confirming that attempts are being made to call the missing jurors.
DOJ-OGR-00016113.jpg
This document is page 3 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 10, 2022. The text details the presiding judge's instructions to counsel regarding the final phase of jury selection, specifically managing 58 remaining jurors. The judge outlines the process for asking jurors about bias ('fair and impartial'), questioning those who raise concerns in the witness box, and the logistical procedure for exercising peremptory strikes at sidebar to select primary and alternate jurors.
DOJ-OGR-00019143.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022. Attorneys Rohrbach and Pagliuca discuss procedural matters with the Judge regarding the redaction and docketing of a letter and an 'Exhibit A'. The proceedings appear to be paused briefly while waiting for missing jurors to arrive.
Clarification on Count Four
Asked about the 'second element' of 'count four' and whether sexual activity needed to occur in New York.
Clarification on Count Four conviction requirements
The jury sent a note indicating a mistaken impression that they could convict Ms. Maxwell based on her intent for Jane to engage in sexual activity in New Mexico, even if that activity did not violate New York Penal Law, which was a requirement of the charge.
Schedule
We would like to end today at 5 p.m., deliberate from
Basis for a guilty verdict
The jurors sent a note asking if a defendant could be found guilty solely for aiding and abetting the flight from New Mexico, separate from the flight to New Mexico.
Basis for conviction on Count Four
A note (Court Exhibit #15) sent by the jury during deliberations indicated they were considering convicting Ms. Maxwell on Count Four based solely on conduct that occurred in New Mexico.
Reporting juror misconduct
Jurors are instructed to immediately inform the judge, through Ms. Williams, if they become aware of another juror violating the court's instructions.
Reporting juror misconduct
Jurors are instructed to immediately inform the judge, through Ms. Williams, if they become aware of another juror violating the court's instructions.
Jury matters
Request 1(b) calls for communications between jurors.
Jury matters
Request 1(b) calls for communications between jurors.
Question 48 and 48a
Questions regarding details of victim's sexual abuse.
Clarification on charges regarding flights
Jurors asking if the defendant can be found guilty solely based on aiding and abetting a flight back from New Mexico.
Scheduling
"No, thank you." Asterisk, "Jurors have made plans for tomorrow."
Jury selection screening questions
The speaker plans to address the assembled jurors via video feed to ask two screening questions regarding their exposure to case information and their ability to be impartial.
Verdict Polling
The Court asks individual jurors if the read verdict is their verdict; jurors respond 'Yes'.
Jury Polling
The Court asks individual jurors if the read verdict is their verdict; jurors respond affirmatively.
Rules and principles for juror conduct
The court instructs the jury not to talk to each other or anyone else about the case, and not to use any form of electronic communication (cell phones, social media, email, etc.) regarding the case until the trial has concluded and they have been discharged.
Rules and principles for juror conduct
The court instructs the jury not to talk to each other or anyone else about the case, and not to use any form of electronic communication (cell phones, social media, email, etc.) regarding the case until the trial has concluded and they have been discharged.
Voir Dire / Jury Selection
Questioning regarding exposure to media about Epstein/Defendant and ability to be impartial.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity