Investigators

Person
Mentions
26
Relationships
3
Events
30
Documents
10
Also known as:
FBI Investigators SEC Investigators NSA Investigators Dershowitz's investigators

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.
3 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person Mr. Dershowitz
Legal representative
5
1
View
person Jeffrey Epstein
Subject of investigation
5
1
View
person Jeffrey Epstein
Employer
1
1
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
N/A N/A The ODYSSEY clinical trial program was conducted for the drug Praluent. worldwide View
N/A N/A Cohen is under investigation for bank fraud and violating campaign-finance law. U.S. View
N/A N/A Discovery of hidden cameras Epstein's New York Residence View
N/A N/A Defense team investigators compiled dossiers on victims. Not specified View
N/A Investigation An attempted interview of a female subject by Alan Dershowitz's investigators. N/A View
N/A Investigation The document refers to government investigations into Ms. Maxwell, which the defense argues were ... two different states View
N/A N/A Provision of Dave Rogers's flight logs Unknown View
N/A N/A Investigation analysis of Sarah Kellen's phone records Unknown View
N/A N/A Investigations/Questioning by BOP, OIA, OIG, FBI The institution View
N/A N/A Interview with client. London View
N/A N/A Discovery of a phone number on a message pad listed under a specific name. Epstein's Florida residence View
N/A N/A Attempted interview of a witness (redacted) by Dershowitz's investigators which resulted in a 'ba... Unknown View
2025-12-01 N/A ODYSSEY clinical trial program. N/A View
2025-07-01 N/A NSA investigators made initial assessment of the theft. NSA View
2021-11-19 N/A WebEx Meeting interviewing a former staff member regarding Jeffrey Epstein. Virtual (WebEx) View
2021-06-23 N/A Completion of interviews with Noel and Thomas regarding their Deferred Prosecution Agreements. Unknown View
2020-07-26 N/A Interviews of MCC employees by investigators (FBI/OIG/USANYS). MCC New York View
2020-01-01 N/A Investigators were in touch with 'Mr. [Redacted]' (attorney) several times regarding nine potenti... Unknown View
2019-10-15 N/A FBI victim services hosting a victim conference for Epstein victims. Miami, Florida View
2019-09-03 N/A Attempted interview of two inmates across from Epstein's cell. MCC View
2019-09-03 N/A Witness Interviews for U.S. v. Epstein West Palm Beach, FL, United... View
2019-09-03 N/A Planned interviews in Florida postponed due to weather. Florida View
2019-08-26 N/A Three proffers scheduled with inmates present in MCC at time of incident. View
2019-08-26 N/A Scheduled proffers of three inmates who were in MCC at the time of the incident. Unknown View
2013-01-01 N/A Investigation status update regarding Snowden's culpability and data theft. USA View

066-02.pdf

A declaration by Jane Doe No. 4 filed on July 29, 2009, stating that three investigators working for Jeffrey Epstein had recently contacted her former employer, Florida Realty. She alleges these investigators harassed her former employer, a co-worker, and her ex-boyfriend with personal questions, threatening her anonymity in the sexual abuse lawsuit.

Legal declaration / affidavit (exhibit b)
2025-12-26

DOJ-OGR-00001693.jpg

This document is page 4 of a court-filed Protective Order from case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, dated July 30, 2020. It establishes strict rules for handling sensitive 'Discovery' materials, requiring Defense Counsel to encrypt information shared through non-email channels. The order explicitly prohibits all parties, including the Government, the Defendant, and their entire legal teams, from posting any Discovery information on the Internet or social media.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00001674.jpg

This document is page 4 of a court-filed Protective Order from July 28, 2020, in a criminal case. It outlines the rules for handling discovery materials, stating that all members of the defense team are bound by the order even without individual signatures. The order mandates that Defense Counsel must encrypt discovery shared through non-electronic means and strictly prohibits all parties from posting any discovery information on the internet or social media.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00001651.jpg

This document is a page from a Protective Order in criminal case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, filed on July 27, 2020. It establishes strict rules for handling 'Discovery' materials, limiting their use by both government and defense witnesses and counsel solely for preparation for the criminal trial. The order explicitly prohibits using the information for civil proceedings and forbids any party, including the Defendant and defense team, from posting the Discovery or its contents on the Internet.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00000601.jpg

This document is page 7 of a Protective Order from a legal case (1:19-cr-00490-RMB), filed on July 25, 2019. It details the rules for handling confidential information by the Defendant and Defense Counsel, including restrictions on possession, inspection under law enforcement protection, and a prohibition on duplication. The order also specifies the procedure for sharing information with 'Designated Persons' and requires the eventual return or destruction of all discovery materials to the Government.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00021974.jpg

This document is page 3 of a court order (Case 1:19-cr-00830-AT) filed on December 16, 2019. It outlines protocols for handling 'Protected Materials' during discovery, specifically defining authorized personnel (legal staff, experts, jury consultants) who may access the data. It also establishes rules for showing materials to 'Fact Witnesses' without providing them copies, and mandates the destruction or return of materials to the Government upon the case's conclusion.

Court order / legal filing (discovery protective order)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00019525.jpg

This document is page 4 of a Protective Order from a legal case (1:20-cr-00330-AJN), filed on July 28, 2020. It establishes strict rules for the handling of discovery materials by the defendant, her counsel, and the entire defense team. The order mandates encryption for disseminated discovery and explicitly prohibits all parties, including the Government, from posting any discovery information on the internet, social media, or any other public medium.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00019506.jpg

This document is a page from a Protective Order in a criminal case (Case 20-cr-00330-AJN), filed on July 27, 2020. It outlines strict rules for handling discovery materials, specifying that they can only be used by authorized individuals (such as the defense team and potential witnesses) for the sole purpose of preparing for the trial. The order explicitly prohibits all parties from posting any discovery information on the Internet and requires encryption for materials shared via non-electronic mail methods.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00019306.jpg

This document is a page from a court's Protective Order, filed on July 30, 2020, in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN. It outlines the rules for handling sensitive case information ('Discovery'), specifying that the entire defense team is bound by the order and that any dissemination of materials must be secure. The order strictly prohibits all parties, including the Government and the Defendant's team, from posting any Discovery information on the internet or social media.

Legal document
2025-11-20

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012375.jpg

This document is a Department of Justice (DOJ) analysis of proposed legislative changes related to human trafficking. The DOJ opposes certain sections, such as naming specific hotlines (Section 110) and granting the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) sole authority over 'extreme hardship' determinations (Section 201). While deferring to DHS on some T-visa eligibility changes, the DOJ argues for its own inclusion in key decisions and provides a more accurate description of the nature of threats made by traffickers against victims.

Government legislative analysis / memo
2025-11-17
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
5
As Recipient
4
Total
9

Photographs

From: Interviewee
To: Investigators

Interviewee emailed additional photographs to investigators.

Email
N/A

Inmate Communications

From: System
To: Investigators

Phone Lists; Calls; Email Lists; Messages

Report
N/A

Interview regarding JE

From: Investigators
To: [REDACTED] Interviewee

WebEx meeting discussing observations at Palm Beach house

Meeting
2021-11-19

Records Request / Subpoena

From: Investigators
To: Mr. Dershowitz

Subpoena without deposition for documents; no documents were provided.

Legal request
2013-01-01

Request for information

From: Investigators
To: Mr. Dershowitz

Attempt to get information.

Inquiry
2011-01-01

Request for information

From: Investigators
To: Mr. Dershowitz

Attempt to get information.

Inquiry
2009-01-01

Additional Information

From: Interviewee
To: Investigators

Interviewee called to report the student mentioned a wealthy man in Palm Beach who was going to fund her college education.

Call
2007-06-08

Account of being approached and meeting Jeff

From: [Redacted] (16-year-old)
To: Investigators

The 16-year-old girl stated she was approached at age sixteen to make money, was friends with Jeff's friends, was told what Jeff did, and scheduled an appointment. She was driven to Jeff's house, gave him a massage, and was paid $200.

Sworn taped statement
2004-09-01

SEC Testimony

From: Investigators
To: Jeffrey Epstein

Epstein testifying about his resignation from Bear Stearns, denying pressure to hide information about St. Joe Minerals, and claiming rumors of an affair.

Meeting
1981-04-01

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity