| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Mr. Dershowitz
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Subject of investigation |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Employer |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | The ODYSSEY clinical trial program was conducted for the drug Praluent. | worldwide | View |
| N/A | N/A | Cohen is under investigation for bank fraud and violating campaign-finance law. | U.S. | View |
| N/A | N/A | Discovery of hidden cameras | Epstein's New York Residence | View |
| N/A | N/A | Defense team investigators compiled dossiers on victims. | Not specified | View |
| N/A | Investigation | An attempted interview of a female subject by Alan Dershowitz's investigators. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Investigation | The document refers to government investigations into Ms. Maxwell, which the defense argues were ... | two different states | View |
| N/A | N/A | Provision of Dave Rogers's flight logs | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Investigation analysis of Sarah Kellen's phone records | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Investigations/Questioning by BOP, OIA, OIG, FBI | The institution | View |
| N/A | N/A | Interview with client. | London | View |
| N/A | N/A | Discovery of a phone number on a message pad listed under a specific name. | Epstein's Florida residence | View |
| N/A | N/A | Attempted interview of a witness (redacted) by Dershowitz's investigators which resulted in a 'ba... | Unknown | View |
| 2025-12-01 | N/A | ODYSSEY clinical trial program. | N/A | View |
| 2025-07-01 | N/A | NSA investigators made initial assessment of the theft. | NSA | View |
| 2021-11-19 | N/A | WebEx Meeting interviewing a former staff member regarding Jeffrey Epstein. | Virtual (WebEx) | View |
| 2021-06-23 | N/A | Completion of interviews with Noel and Thomas regarding their Deferred Prosecution Agreements. | Unknown | View |
| 2020-07-26 | N/A | Interviews of MCC employees by investigators (FBI/OIG/USANYS). | MCC New York | View |
| 2020-01-01 | N/A | Investigators were in touch with 'Mr. [Redacted]' (attorney) several times regarding nine potenti... | Unknown | View |
| 2019-10-15 | N/A | FBI victim services hosting a victim conference for Epstein victims. | Miami, Florida | View |
| 2019-09-03 | N/A | Attempted interview of two inmates across from Epstein's cell. | MCC | View |
| 2019-09-03 | N/A | Witness Interviews for U.S. v. Epstein | West Palm Beach, FL, United... | View |
| 2019-09-03 | N/A | Planned interviews in Florida postponed due to weather. | Florida | View |
| 2019-08-26 | N/A | Three proffers scheduled with inmates present in MCC at time of incident. | View | |
| 2019-08-26 | N/A | Scheduled proffers of three inmates who were in MCC at the time of the incident. | Unknown | View |
| 2013-01-01 | N/A | Investigation status update regarding Snowden's culpability and data theft. | USA | View |
A declaration by Jane Doe No. 4 filed on July 29, 2009, stating that three investigators working for Jeffrey Epstein had recently contacted her former employer, Florida Realty. She alleges these investigators harassed her former employer, a co-worker, and her ex-boyfriend with personal questions, threatening her anonymity in the sexual abuse lawsuit.
This document is page 4 of a court-filed Protective Order from case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, dated July 30, 2020. It establishes strict rules for handling sensitive 'Discovery' materials, requiring Defense Counsel to encrypt information shared through non-email channels. The order explicitly prohibits all parties, including the Government, the Defendant, and their entire legal teams, from posting any Discovery information on the Internet or social media.
This document is page 4 of a court-filed Protective Order from July 28, 2020, in a criminal case. It outlines the rules for handling discovery materials, stating that all members of the defense team are bound by the order even without individual signatures. The order mandates that Defense Counsel must encrypt discovery shared through non-electronic means and strictly prohibits all parties from posting any discovery information on the internet or social media.
This document is a page from a Protective Order in criminal case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, filed on July 27, 2020. It establishes strict rules for handling 'Discovery' materials, limiting their use by both government and defense witnesses and counsel solely for preparation for the criminal trial. The order explicitly prohibits using the information for civil proceedings and forbids any party, including the Defendant and defense team, from posting the Discovery or its contents on the Internet.
This document is page 7 of a Protective Order from a legal case (1:19-cr-00490-RMB), filed on July 25, 2019. It details the rules for handling confidential information by the Defendant and Defense Counsel, including restrictions on possession, inspection under law enforcement protection, and a prohibition on duplication. The order also specifies the procedure for sharing information with 'Designated Persons' and requires the eventual return or destruction of all discovery materials to the Government.
This document is page 3 of a court order (Case 1:19-cr-00830-AT) filed on December 16, 2019. It outlines protocols for handling 'Protected Materials' during discovery, specifically defining authorized personnel (legal staff, experts, jury consultants) who may access the data. It also establishes rules for showing materials to 'Fact Witnesses' without providing them copies, and mandates the destruction or return of materials to the Government upon the case's conclusion.
This document is page 4 of a Protective Order from a legal case (1:20-cr-00330-AJN), filed on July 28, 2020. It establishes strict rules for the handling of discovery materials by the defendant, her counsel, and the entire defense team. The order mandates encryption for disseminated discovery and explicitly prohibits all parties, including the Government, from posting any discovery information on the internet, social media, or any other public medium.
This document is a page from a Protective Order in a criminal case (Case 20-cr-00330-AJN), filed on July 27, 2020. It outlines strict rules for handling discovery materials, specifying that they can only be used by authorized individuals (such as the defense team and potential witnesses) for the sole purpose of preparing for the trial. The order explicitly prohibits all parties from posting any discovery information on the Internet and requires encryption for materials shared via non-electronic mail methods.
This document is a page from a court's Protective Order, filed on July 30, 2020, in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN. It outlines the rules for handling sensitive case information ('Discovery'), specifying that the entire defense team is bound by the order and that any dissemination of materials must be secure. The order strictly prohibits all parties, including the Government and the Defendant's team, from posting any Discovery information on the internet or social media.
This document is a Department of Justice (DOJ) analysis of proposed legislative changes related to human trafficking. The DOJ opposes certain sections, such as naming specific hotlines (Section 110) and granting the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) sole authority over 'extreme hardship' determinations (Section 201). While deferring to DHS on some T-visa eligibility changes, the DOJ argues for its own inclusion in key decisions and provides a more accurate description of the nature of threats made by traffickers against victims.
Interviewee emailed additional photographs to investigators.
Phone Lists; Calls; Email Lists; Messages
WebEx meeting discussing observations at Palm Beach house
Subpoena without deposition for documents; no documents were provided.
Attempt to get information.
Attempt to get information.
Interviewee called to report the student mentioned a wealthy man in Palm Beach who was going to fund her college education.
The 16-year-old girl stated she was approached at age sixteen to make money, was friends with Jeff's friends, was told what Jeff did, and scheduled an appointment. She was driven to Jeff's house, gave him a massage, and was paid $200.
Epstein testifying about his resignation from Bear Stearns, denying pressure to hide information about St. Joe Minerals, and claiming rumors of an affair.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity