federal prosecutor
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
GOVERNMENT
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
people of the United States
|
Professional |
5
|
1 |
DOJ-OGR-00023159.tif
This document outlines guidelines from the USAM (§ 9-27.220, § 9-27.230, § 9-27.240) for federal prosecutors on making decisions to commence or decline prosecution. It details factors to consider, such as federal law enforcement priorities, the nature of the offense, the deterrent effect, the offender's culpability, criminal history, willingness to cooperate, and probable sentence, as well as considerations when deferring to prosecution in another jurisdiction. Footnotes provide additional context on federal prosecutorial priorities and the impact of an offense on the victim, cautioning against the perception that restitution alone can prevent prosecution.
DOJ-OGR-00000487.jpg
This page from a court filing details allegations that Jeffrey Epstein's associates used intimidation tactics, such as aggressive driving, against victims' parents to silence them. It also outlines 2007 plea discussions where federal prosecutors and Epstein's counsel considered charges of witness tampering and obstruction of justice, specifically referencing statutes 18 U.S.C. § 1512(d) and 18 U.S.C. § 403.
DOJ-OGR-00002366(1).jpg
This legal document, filed on February 4, 2021, argues that the government violated due process by materially misrepresenting facts to a court. It cites several legal precedents to assert that a prosecutor's primary duty is to seek justice, not just convictions, and that the prosecutor is presumed to have full knowledge of their case file, with their actions being attributable to the government as a whole. The document concludes that the Assistant U.S. Attorney failed in their basic duty to ensure their representations to a federal judge were true and complete.
DOJ-OGR-00021330.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing, specifically from case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, filed on April 16, 2021. It outlines several of the Florida Bar’s Rules of Professional Conduct (FRPC) that are applicable to attorneys practicing before the court. The page details the rules for Competence (FRPC 4-1.1), Diligence (FRPC 4-1.3), and Candor in Dealing with Others (FRPC 4-4.1), providing explanations and context from the official comments to these rules.
DOJ-OGR-00021321.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing that outlines the guidelines from the United States Attorneys' Manual (USAM) for federal prosecutors. It specifies the conditions under which a prosecutor should commence or decline prosecution, listing seven key factors to consider when determining if a substantial federal interest is served. The document also addresses deferring to state prosecution and evaluating the effectiveness of prosecution in other jurisdictions.
Factual proffer discussion
Stated that if Epstein pled guilty to obstruction, the factual proffer could rely on the incident where investigators forced a victim's father off the road.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity