| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Client |
7
|
3 | |
|
organization
Kirkland & Ellis
|
Employment |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Kirkland & Ellis LLP
|
Employment |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Lee Kun-Hee
|
Father son |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Park Geun-Hye
|
Alleged bribery |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Assistant U.S. Attorney
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Mr. Ocariz
|
Professional |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Sender (AUSA)
|
Adversarial negotiation |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Lefkowitz
|
Identity |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
Kirkland & Ellis
|
Professional |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Sender/Recipient (Redacted)
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Bert
|
Professional |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Lourie forwarded an email with suggestions (Alex's changes) to Villafaña, instructing her to inco... | N/A | View |
| 2017-02-01 | N/A | Arrest of Jay Y. Lee | South Korea | View |
| 2007-10-08 | N/A | Proposed follow-up talk | Unknown | View |
| 2007-10-05 | N/A | Unproductive conversation between AUSA and 'Jay and Guy' | Unknown | View |
This document is an email dated August 14, 2008, from an Assistant U.S. Attorney to Roy Black and 'Jay' (defense attorneys). It summarizes the results of a hearing with Judge Marra, who ordered that the 'Agreement' (likely the Non-Prosecution Agreement) be disclosed to victims and their counsel under a protective order, but further disclosure disputes must be litigated directly with Mr. Epstein in civil suits.
This document is an email from an Assistant U.S. Attorney dated February 1, 2008, discussing a development in the civil lawsuits against Jeffrey Epstein. The email reports that the mother of a minor victim ('[Redacted]') has filed a motion to intervene and stay the proceedings until the victim turns 18, claiming the victim has been estranged from her father (who presumably filed the suit) since Thanksgiving and did not consent to the lawsuit.
This document contains a November 2007 email thread involving the US Attorney's Office (Alex Acosta cc'd) discussing the logistics of Jeffrey Epstein's plea agreement and sentencing. Key topics include the strategic scheduling of the plea/sentencing on December 16th to 'reduce media frenzy,' the legal nuances of his 'sexual predator' designation, and the loophole allowing the Sheriff's Office (rather than State Corrections) to grant him work release. The emails also detail coordination with Epstein's lawyers (Lefkowitz and Goldberger) regarding victim notification and potential conflicts of interest.
This document is an email dated November 13, 2007, from an Assistant U.S. Attorney regarding the Epstein case. The sender is drafting a response to a letter from 'Jay' (likely Jay Lefkowitz) and is inquiring whether 'Judge Davis' has selected a lawyer, asking for the name to be included in the response.
An email dated October 5, 2007, from an Assistant U.S. Attorney regarding the Epstein case. The sender reports an 'unproductive conversation' with defense attorneys 'Jay and Guy' (likely Lefkowitz and Petrillo) and requests an internal discussion over the weekend. The email also inquires if the recipient or 'Alex' (likely U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta) had connected with a redacted individual to gauge their feelings on the matter.
This document is an email chain from December 2007 between likely government prosecutors or officials discussing the Jeffrey Epstein case. The conversation covers the selection of a 'Special Master' (discussing candidates 'Bert' and 'Mr. Ocariz'), communications with Epstein's defense attorney 'Jay' (Lefkowitz) and the firm Kirkland & Ellis. The emails also detail a request for a 'de novo review' of evidence for a proposed indictment, specifically asking for FBI '302s' and state Grand Jury transcripts.
This document is an email chain from October 19, 2007, discussing legal strategy surrounding Jeffrey Epstein. The correspondents discuss a lawsuit filed in New York that has reached national news (Fox and ABC), expressing belief that this lawsuit is delaying Epstein's change of plea. The emails reveal that 'Epstein's camp' allegedly planted false stories to discredit victims and are attempting to resolve the civil lawsuit before the guilty plea to avoid it being used against him. The chain also references communicating with a 'Jay' regarding a proposed letter and asking Judge Davis about the Special Master's selection.
This document is a chain of internal emails from December 2007, likely among prosecutors, discussing strategy in the Epstein case. Key topics include a request for a 'de novo review' of evidence (including FBI 302s and Grand Jury transcripts) following correspondence from Epstein's defense firm Kirkland & Ellis. The emails also discuss the selection process for a 'Special Master' or similar role, debating candidates named Bert and Mr. Ocariz, and mention drafting a letter to Jay Lefkowitz.
An email chain between prosecutors or DOJ officials dated December 11, 2007. The correspondence discusses a 'de novo review' of evidence for a proposed indictment against Jeffrey Epstein, triggered by correspondence from the law firm Kirkland & Ellis. The emails mention gathering FBI 302 reports, State Grand Jury transcripts, and audio/video tapes of interviews, as well as a draft letter to 'Jay' (likely Jay Lefkowitz).
This document contains an email exchange from November 5, 2007, between an Assistant U.S. Attorney in West Palm Beach and an individual named Jeff. The AUSA informs Jeff that another girl has contacted the FBI after being approached by private investigators working for Epstein. Jeff acknowledges the message and notes he has not yet heard from an individual named Jay.
This document details ongoing negotiations and disagreements surrounding a federal plea agreement for Mr. Epstein in September 2007. It highlights the involvement of Assistant State Attorney Villafaña, who communicated with Belohlavek and sent revised agreements to Lefkowitz, and Acosta, who provided feedback on the USAO's 'hybrid' plea agreement to Lourie, emphasizing the trial team's support is crucial. A key point of contention was the change in offense description from solicitation of minors to forcing adults into prostitution, which made the agreement unacceptable to Villafaña.
This legal document details the post-meeting communications and ongoing negotiations between the U.S. Attorney's Office (represented by Acosta and Sloman) and Jeffrey Epstein's defense counsel (Lefkowitz) regarding Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). It highlights a significant dispute over alleged concessions Acosta made during a breakfast meeting, as claimed by Lefkowitz in an October 23, 2007 letter, and a contemporaneous draft response from the USAO refuting those claims.
An email correspondence from an attorney named Jay (associated with Kirkland & Ellis LLP) responding to an inquiry regarding his client, Jeffrey Epstein. The sender claims press coverage has been inaccurate and defamatory, requesting that specific factual questions be submitted for accurate responses. The document includes a redacted phone number and standard legal confidentiality disclaimers.
This document appears to be a page from an academic reading list or syllabus focusing on advanced macroeconomics, specifically speculative exchange rate attacks, bank runs (including the Great Depression), and exchange rate regimes. It lists seminal papers and books by prominent economists such as Ben Bernanke, Jeffrey Sachs, and Douglas Diamond. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' stamp, indicating it was produced as evidence for a Congressional investigation.
This document is page 14 of a 'Global Foresight' report from the Third Quarter of 2017, authored by Mariela M. Vargova of Rockefeller Capital Management (indicated by the @rockco.com email). The article discusses corporate governance reform in South Korea, detailing corruption scandals involving President Park Geun-Hye and major chaebols like Samsung and Hyundai. It bears the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012092', indicating it was part of a document production to the House Oversight Committee, though the text itself contains no direct mention of Jeffrey Epstein.
This document is an email printout dated November 1, 2016, forwarded by Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias 'Jeffrey E.' and email 'jeevacation@gmail.com') to himself. The email subject is 'contacts' and contains a raw, unstructured list of names including prominent scientists (Susskind, Dawkins, Gellman), tech figures (Thiel, Hoffman, Sergey), and political figures (Clinton, Kerry, Schumer, Ehud Barak, Prince Andrew). It also contains a line of apparent medical/personal notes regarding cholesterol medication (Crestor), prostate issues, and diet.
This document is an email sent by Jeffrey Epstein to himself on October 30, 2016, with the subject line 'contacts'. The body of the email contains a list of high-profile names, including prominent scientists (Susskind, Minsky/Edelman context, Gould), tech figures (Hoffman, Sinofsky, Sergey), and politicians (Clinton, Richardson, Mandelson, Ehud, Andrew). It also includes a section seemingly related to health or medication (Crestor, prostatitis, protein, exercise) and obscure codes or abbreviations (LSJ, BBJ).
This document appears to be page 43 of a manuscript or memoir (likely by Alan Dershowitz, given the biographical details regarding Yale, Harvard, and his son Elon) submitted to the House Oversight Committee. The text recounts the author's time at Yale Law School, including a moot court victory against a Taft family member, his role as the first Orthodox Jewish Editor-in-Chief of the Law Journal, and his graduation featuring JFK. It also details his academic development, mentorship under various professors like Joseph Goldstein, and early writings on the 5th Amendment.
This document appears to be a printout of a Quora (or similar Q&A platform) feed featuring three distinct posts. One post involves Howard Freidman of BluechipJets discussing the value of private aviation, another involves a political discussion about Donald Trump and the Mueller Report, and a third concerns Columbia University admissions. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was included in a document production for a congressional investigation.
This document is a fragment of an email from an attorney named Jay, representing Jeffrey Epstein through the law firm Kirkland & Ellis LLP. The sender addresses an unknown recipient regarding inquiries about Epstein, characterizing recent press coverage as inaccurate and defamatory, and invites specific factual questions. The document contains a redacted phone number and a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp.
This document is the body of an email from an attorney named Jay (associated with Kirkland & Ellis LLP) regarding his client, Jeffrey Epstein. The attorney asserts that recent press coverage of Epstein has been inaccurate and defamatory, offering to answer factual questions via email or phone (212-446-4970) to provide accurate responses. The document includes standard legal confidentiality disclaimers and a House Oversight Bates stamp.
Sender requests factual questions regarding client Jeffrey Epstein be sent in writing due to inaccurate press coverage. Offers to speak via phone.
Jay offers to answer 'facutal' questions regarding his client Jeffrey Epstein to correct inaccurate/defamatory press coverage. He provides a phone number.
The sender ('Jay') acknowledges questions regarding his client, Jeffrey Epstein. He claims press coverage has been inaccurate/defamatory and requests factual questions be sent to him for accurate responses.
Referenced as 'Jay's letter of August 18, 2008'.
States that 1000 prosecutors signed a letter about the Mueller Report listing instances of obstruction.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity