Trove
Sign In Sign Up

[Redacted] (Government)

Person
Mentions
0
Relationships
0
Events
0
Documents
0
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.
No relationships found for this entity.
No events found for this entity.
No documents found for this entity.
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
10
As Recipient
9
Total
19

RE: US v. Maxwell -Trial Start Date

From: [Redacted] (Government)
To: Bobbi C. Sternheim

Confirming the letter regarding the trial date was filed on ECF.

Email
2021-05-11
Communication Source

US v. Maxwell -Trial Start Date

From: Bobbi C. Sternheim
To: [Redacted] (Government)

Following up on status of conferral emails as joint letter is due.

Email
2021-05-10
Communication Source

Re: US v. Maxwell -Trial Start Date

From: Bobbi C. Sternheim
To: [Redacted] (Government)

Asking for an ETA on the letter.

Email
2021-05-10
Communication Source

Re: US v. Maxwell -Trial Start Date

From: [Redacted] (Government)
To: Bobbi C. Sternheim

Stating parties agree on Nov 2021 but disagree on the week. Government refuses Nov 8th due to counsel continuity and witness availability.

Email
2021-05-10
Communication Source

Re: US v. Maxwell -Trial Start Date

From: Bobbi C. Sternheim
To: [Redacted] (Government)

Arguing against Nov 29 date due to holiday interference and negative impact on defense. Proposing Nov 15 as accommodation but preferring Nov 8. Refusing speedy trial exclusion beyond 11/8.

Email
2021-05-09
Communication Source

Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)

From: Bobbi C. Sternheim
To: [Redacted] (Government)

Stating availability to begin Nov 8. Noting Laura Menninger has a civil trial Dec 13.

Email
2021-05-07
Communication Source

Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)

From: [Redacted] (Government)
To: Bobbi C. Sternheim

Proposing Nov 29, 2021 trial date based on witness/counsel availability. Proposing deadline for victim identity disclosure (3 months prior) and expert disclosures (2 months prior).

Email
2021-05-07
Communication Source

Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)

From: [Redacted] (Government)
To: Bobbi C. Sternheim

Requesting complete picture of available dates for balance of 2021.

Email
2021-05-07
Communication Source

Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)

From: Bobbi C. Sternheim
To: [Redacted] (Government)

Stating preferred date is 11/8 due to Maxwell's detention conditions. Offering flexibility if she is released on bail.

Email
2021-05-07
Communication Source

Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)

From: [Redacted] (Government)
To: Bobbi C. Sternheim

Clarifying they need scheduling availability separate from preferences.

Email
2021-05-07
Communication Source

Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)

From: [Redacted] (Government)
To: Bobbi C. Sternheim

Initial inquiry to confer about trial dates from Sept 2021 through end of year.

Email
2021-05-06
Communication Source

Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)

From: Bobbi C. Sternheim
To: [Redacted] (Government)

Asking for Government availability for 11/8.

Email
2021-05-06
Communication Source

United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)

From: [Redacted] (Government)
To: Nathan NYSD Chambers

Government informing the court about victim attendance for the upcoming arraignment. Victim-2 attending by phone; Boies and McCawley attending in person.

Email
2021-04-21
Communication Source

Re: [Redacted]/Epstein

From: [Redacted] (Government)
To: Andrew Patel

Discussing three issues regarding the wording of a letter to the Court about producing redacted notes to the defense and AEO designations.

Email
2019-12-26
Communication Source

Re: [Redacted]/Epstein

From: Andrew Patel
To: [Redacted] (Government)

Sending a draft letter for Judge Torres and asking for thoughts.

Email
2019-12-25
Communication Source

RE: [Redacted]/Epstein

From: [Redacted] (Government)
To: Andrew Patel

Sending unredacted and redacted copies of notes; stating intention to produce redacted notes to defense and client name on AEO basis.

Email
2019-12-20
Communication Source

RE: [Redacted]/Epstein

From: [Redacted] (Government)
To: Andrew Patel

Rejecting proposed redactions and suggesting Patel file a motion under seal before Judge Torres.

Email
2019-12-20
Communication Source

RE: [Redacted]/Epstein

From: Andrew Patel
To: [Redacted] (Government)

Proposing a disclosure cover letter modeled on US v. Madonna; arguing the material is not Brady/3500/Rule 16; mentioning surveillance video contradicts client's error.

Email
2019-12-20
Communication Source

[Redacted]/Epstein

From: Andrew Patel
To: [Redacted] (Government)

Requesting a copy of the disclosure being considered for Mr. [Redacted].

Email
2019-12-20
Communication Source

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search