| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Justices Holmes
|
Business associate |
8
Strong
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1890-01-01 | N/A | Publication of 'The Right to Privacy' in Harvard Law Review. | Harvard Law Review | View |
This document appears to be page 308 of a book manuscript or legal draft (marked with WC: 191694 and dated 4.2.12) produced to the House Oversight Committee. The text presents a harsh critique of Justice Sandra Day O'Connor for writing a letter supporting the notion of the U.S. as a 'Christian nation,' arguing she relied on bigoted historical opinions by Justice David Brewer. The author discusses constitutional history, citing Jefferson, Adams, and various Supreme Court cases to argue against the 'Christian nation' concept.
This document appears to be a page from a manuscript or book draft (dated 4.2.12) written by a legal scholar (likely Alan Dershowitz). The text discusses the tension between privacy rights and the First Amendment, citing personal attacks by Norman Finkelstein and the historical legal framework established by Louis Brandeis. It details the specific legal case of Brooke Shields attempting to stop the publication of nude photos taken of her as a child, noting that the author advised a former student representing Shields that the case would be difficult due to laws against prior restraint.
A page from a manuscript (likely a memoir draft) titled 'My Year of Clerking For Justice Goldberg.' It details the narrator's (historically Alan Dershowitz) experience clerking for Supreme Court Justice Arthur Goldberg starting in the summer of 1963. The text contrasts Goldberg's active past as Secretary of Labor with the solitary nature of the Supreme Court and outlines his agenda to abolish the death penalty.
The author reflects on their time at Brooklyn College, detailing academic successes, conflicts with college President Harry Gideonese regarding political purges, and a rejected Rhodes Scholarship application attributed to bias. The narrative concludes with the author's decision to pursue law school, inspired by famous legal figures, and their attempt to seek advice from a family connection, Judge Berenkoff.
This document is a legal memorandum, identified as 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012387', outlining the constitutional basis for a U.S. President to refuse to enforce a statute believed to be unconstitutional. It details the President's duty to defend executive power and uses the 1926 Supreme Court case Myers v. United States, involving President Wilson, as a key historical precedent. The document contains no information related to Jeffrey Epstein or his associates.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity