Probation department
OrganizationRelationship Network
DOJ-OGR-00014846.jpg
This court transcript page, filed on August 22, 2022, documents a hearing for Ms. Maxwell. Her counsel, Ms. Sternheim, requests she be designated to the women's prison facility in Danbury and enrolled in the Female Integrated Treatment (FIT) program; the court agrees to recommend this to the Bureau of Prisons. Subsequently, the government's counsel, Ms. Moe, moves to dismiss Counts Seven and Eight and any underlying indictments, a motion which the court grants.
DOJ-OGR-00014843.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 22, 2022, detailing the sentencing of Ms. Maxwell. The judge, citing Ms. Maxwell's lack of remorse, imposes a sentence of 240 months (20 years) imprisonment, followed by five years of supervised release. The total sentence is composed of concurrent terms for Counts Three, Four, and Six.
DOJ-OGR-00014839.jpg
This document is a transcript from a legal proceeding, filed on August 22, 2022, in which a judge explains the reasoning behind the sentence for Ms. Maxwell. The judge states the sentence must reflect the gravity of her offense, her pivotal role, and the harm caused, while also serving as a deterrent to others. The judge explicitly notes that Ms. Maxwell's wealth and high profile are not factors in the punishment, but rather the principle that no one is above the law.
DOJ-OGR-00014837.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 22, 2022, concerning the sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell. The speaker (likely the judge) describes Maxwell's conduct as 'heinous and predatory,' detailing how she recruited and groomed vulnerable minors for Jeffrey Epstein. Specific testimony from a victim named 'Jane' is cited, describing how Maxwell befriended her at age 14, normalized sexual abuse, and instructed her on how to sexually touch Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00014834.jpg
This document is page 87 of the sentencing transcript for Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It captures the conclusion of Maxwell's statement to the court, followed by procedural discussions between the Judge, defense counsel Ms. Sternheim, and prosecutor Ms. Moe regarding supervised release conditions and restitution. The court notes that while Count Six carries mandatory restitution, the government agrees none should be ordered as victims have already been compensated.
DOJ-OGR-00014828.jpg
This document is page 81 of a court transcript from the sentencing hearing of Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on August 22, 2022. Defense attorney Ms. Sternheim argues that the government's requested sentence is disproportionate and notes that the Probation Department recommended a downward variance to 20 years. Sternheim explicitly argues that Jeffrey Epstein was 'far more culpable' than Maxwell, yet would have faced the same sentencing guidelines.
DOJ-OGR-00014794.jpg
This legal document, filed on August 22, 2022, is a transcript of a judge's ruling regarding a sentencing calculation. The judge finds that two minor victims, Virginia Roberts and Melissa, were trafficked and abused by the defendant and Epstein and should be considered for sentencing purposes, even though they were not named in the indictment. Citing precedent from the Second Circuit, the judge overrules the defendant's objection and decides to treat the conduct against these two victims as additional counts of conviction.
DOJ-OGR-00014784.jpg
This legal document is a transcript from a court proceeding, filed on August 22, 2022, discussing the sentencing of a defendant for a conspiracy of sexual abuse. The central issue is determining whether the 2003 or the harsher 2004 sentencing guidelines apply, which hinges on whether the crime continued past November 1, 2004. The government's argument relies on the testimony of a victim named Carolyn, whom the judge and jury found to be a credible witness.
DOJ-OGR-00021038.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (likely United States v. Maxwell given the context and case number 22-1426) filed on February 28, 2023. The text details a judge's analysis of sentencing guidelines (2003 vs 2004) and determines the timeline of a sexual abuse conspiracy, specifically noting that the conspiracy involving a victim named Carolyn ended in early 2005 when she turned 18. The judge explicitly states that they found Carolyn to be a credible witness.
DOJ-OGR-00021644.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 22-1426) regarding the sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell. During the proceeding, Maxwell's attorney, Ms. Sternheim, requests that Maxwell be designated to the BOP women's facility in Danbury and enrolled in the FIT (Female Integrated Treatment) program to address trauma. The Court agrees to make this recommendation and subsequently grants the government's motion, presented by Ms. Moe, to dismiss Counts Seven and Eight.
DOJ-OGR-00021635.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (filed June 2023, Case 22-1426) arguing for strict punishment for Ghislaine Maxwell. The text details her predatory behavior, specifically highlighting her role in grooming a 14-year-old victim named 'Jane' through shopping and movies before normalizing sexual abuse. It describes specific sexual acts involving Epstein and Maxwell, including Maxwell instructing the child on how to touch Epstein's penis and Maxwell touching the victim's breasts.
DOJ-OGR-00021626.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 22-1426) involving the sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell. Defense attorney Ms. Sternheim argues that the government's requested sentence is excessive and notes that the Probation Department recommended a downward variance to 20 years. Sternheim compares Maxwell to Jeffrey Epstein, arguing that Epstein was 'far more culpable' yet would have faced the same sentencing guidelines.
DOJ-OGR-00021592.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 22-1426, likely US v. Maxwell appeal records) containing a judge's ruling during sentencing. The judge overrules the defendant's objection and sustains the government's objection regarding the PSR Guideline calculation, explicitly finding that Virginia Roberts and Melissa were minor victims trafficked and abused by the defendant and Epstein. Consequently, the judge rules that these victims must be included in the sentencing calculation under Section 3D1.4, despite not being named in the indictment.
DOJ-OGR-00021561.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript detailing a judge's rulings on objections to specific paragraphs (82, 83, and 85) in a legal report (likely a pre-sentencing report). The judge overrules objections regarding evidence from a 2005 search of a Palm Beach residence involving Epstein and sexualized massages, addresses the defendant's responsibility for victimizing additional minors, and discusses the inclusion of a victim impact statement by an individual named Kate.
DOJ-OGR-00010448.jpg
This is page 1 (marked as page 2 of the filing) of a sentencing memorandum filed on June 15, 2022, on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell. The defense requests a sentence significantly below the guideline range of 292-365 months and below the Probation Department's recommended 240 months. The text argues that Maxwell is being unfairly treated as a proxy for the deceased Jeffrey Epstein, whom the defense characterizes as the true mastermind and principal abuser.
DOJ-OGR-00010208.jpg
This legal document, filed on March 18, 2013, outlines the background and alleged criminal conduct of a defendant named Parse. It details his educational history at the University of Michigan and his extensive work experience as an investment adviser at firms including Goldman Sachs, Deutsche Bank Alex Brown, and his own company, Union Capital LLC. The document introduces Parse's alleged involvement in a fraudulent tax shelter scheme, where he advised shareholders of the Calphalon cookware company on the disposition of stock acquired from a sale.
DOJ-OGR-00009528.jpg
This legal document, filed on March 18, 2013, outlines the case against an individual named Parse, an investment representative at Deutsche Bank. It details his central role in a massive criminal tax fraud scheme involving fraudulent tax shelters, which resulted in over $7 billion in fraudulent deductions and over $230 million in actual losses to the U.S. Treasury. The document argues that Parse's conduct, for which he earned over $3 million in commissions, warrants a significant prison sentence.
DOJ-OGR-00008812.jpg
This document is page 2 of a court filing from January 10, 2022, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It outlines the defense's position requesting a delay in sentencing due to a motion for a new trial based on misconduct by Juror #50. The defense argues that participating in a presentence investigation would violate Maxwell's Fifth Amendment rights while the motion for a retrial is pending.
DOJ-OGR-00011618.jpg
This document is a court transcript from July 22, 2022, detailing a portion of a legal proceeding involving Ms. Maxwell. Her attorney, Ms. Sternheim, requests that she be placed at the BOP facility in Danbury and enrolled in the Female Integrated Treatment (FIT) program, which the court recommends to the Bureau of Prisons. The court also grants a motion from the government, represented by Ms. Moe, to dismiss Counts Seven and Eight and any underlying indictments against Ms. Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00011615.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated July 22, 2022, detailing the sentencing of Ms. Maxwell. The judge, noting her lack of remorse, imposes a sentence of 240 months (20 years) imprisonment and five years of supervised release. The sentence is broken down by count, with all terms to run concurrently.
DOJ-OGR-00011611.jpg
This document is a page from the sentencing transcript of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330). The judge outlines the rationale for a substantial sentence, citing the gravity of the offense, the harm to victims, and the need for general deterrence against sexual abuse and trafficking of minors. The judge emphasizes that Maxwell's wealth and status do not place her above the law.
DOJ-OGR-00011609.jpg
This document is page 90 of a sentencing transcript filed on July 22, 2022, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The text details the judge or prosecutor's argument regarding the severity of Maxwell's punishment, citing her 'heinous and predatory' conduct described by the Probation Department. Specific details are provided regarding the abuse of a victim named 'Jane' (age 14), including grooming tactics, instruction on how to sexually please Epstein, and direct sexual abuse by both Epstein and Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00011600.jpg
This document is a court transcript from July 22, 2022, capturing a defense attorney's argument during a sentencing hearing. The attorney, Ms. Sternheim, asks the Court for a sentence below the recommended guidelines, arguing the government's request is disproportionate and that the more culpable Jeffrey Epstein would have faced the same sentencing guidelines as her client, Ghislaine Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00011566.jpg
This document is a page from a judicial ruling dated July 22, 2022, concerning a sentencing guideline calculation. The judge finds that two individuals, Virginia Roberts and Melissa, were minor victims trafficked and abused by the defendant and Epstein. The judge overrules a prior decision by the Probation department to exclude them from the calculation and, citing Second Circuit precedent, decides to consider them as additional victims for sentencing purposes.
DOJ-OGR-00011556.jpg
This legal document is a transcript from a court proceeding concerning the sentencing of a defendant named Guerrero for a sex-trafficking conspiracy. The judge is determining whether the 2003 or the harsher 2004 sentencing guidelines apply, which hinges on whether the crime continued after November 1, 2004. This determination relies heavily on the testimony of a victim named Carolyn, whom the judge and jury found to be a credible witness.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity