Bobbi C. Sternheim
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Client |
102
Very Strong
|
211 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
29
Very Strong
|
34 | |
|
person
CHRISTIAN EVERDELL
|
Business associate |
19
Very Strong
|
19 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Client |
11
Very Strong
|
16 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
70 | |
|
person
ALISON J. NATHAN
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Professional |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
CHRISTIAN EVERDELL
|
Co counsel |
7
|
7 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Laura Menninger
|
Business associate |
6
|
6 | |
|
person
Christian R. Everdell
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
organization
LAW OFFICES OF BOBBI C. STERNHEIM
|
Professional employment |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
ANDREW ROHRBACH
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
John M. Leventhal
|
Professional succession |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
ALISON J. NATHAN
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Unknown |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Laura Menninger
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MARK S. COHEN
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeff Pagliuca
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
government counsel
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Professional opposing counsel |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Christian R. Everdell
|
Co counsel |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Curcio client
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Counsel of record
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Pagliuca
|
Professional |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-06-15 | Legal filing | Attorneys for Ghislaine Maxwell submitted a document to the court arguing for a sentence below th... | U.S. Court (Case 1:20-cr-00... | View |
| 2022-06-15 | N/A | Filing of Sentencing Memorandum on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2022-06-15 | N/A | Original deadline for defense submission; Date Sternheim is out of the country. | Outside the country | View |
| 2022-03-11 | N/A | Filing of Reply Memorandum | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2022-03-11 | Court hearing | A hearing was held regarding the defendant's motion for a new trial, specifically focusing on Jur... | Court (unspecified) | View |
| 2022-03-11 | Court filing | Filing of "GHISLAINE MAXWELL’S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF HER MOTION FOR A NEW TRIAL". | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2022-03-11 | Legal filing | Filing of 'GHISLAINE MAXWELL’S MOTION FOR A NEW TRIAL' with the court. | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2022-03-11 | Legal filing | Filing of Document 642 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | N/A | View |
| 2022-03-08 | Court proceeding/appearance | A court proceeding in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell, with a list of a... | New York, N.Y., Southern Di... | View |
| 2022-03-03 | Court filing | The letter from Bobbi C. Sternheim was electronically filed with the USDC SDNY. | USDC SDNY | View |
| 2022-03-02 | Legal correspondence | Bobbi C. Sternheim wrote a letter to Judge Alison J. Nathan requesting a proffer from Juror 50's ... | N/A | View |
| 2022-02-25 | Court filing | The letter from Bobbi C. Sternheim was electronically filed with the court as Document 618. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2022-02-24 | Legal filing | Filing of a letter by the defense to propose limited redactions to a court's Opinion and Order. | United States District Court | View |
| 2022-02-24 | Legal filing | Document 616 was officially filed with the court in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | N/A | View |
| 2022-02-24 | Legal filing | Ghislaine Maxwell's attorneys filed a reply in support of her motion for a new trial. | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2022-02-24 | Hearing | A list of appearances for a legal hearing, as part of Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | Southern District | View |
| 2022-02-24 | Legal filing | Document 612 was filed in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | Court associated with Case ... | View |
| 2022-02-24 | Legal filing | A motion for a new trial was filed on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell. | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2022-02-24 | Legal filing | Document 613-1 was filed in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | N/A | View |
| 2022-02-21 | N/A | Filing of Document 606 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE | New York, NY | View |
| 2022-02-16 | Legal filing | Filing of a letter and annexed documents with proposed redactions pertaining to Ghislaine Maxwell... | United States District Court | View |
| 2022-02-11 | N/A | Filing of legal motion seeking to vacate conviction and enter judgment of acquittal | New York, New York | View |
| 2022-02-11 | Legal filing | Filing of an Omnibus Memorandum in Support of Her Post-Trial Motions by Ghislaine Maxwell's attor... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2022-02-09 | Legal filing submission | A legal document was dated and submitted, requesting a new trial or an evidentiary hearing to exa... | N/A | View |
| 2022-01-19 | Legal filing | Counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell filed a Motion for a New Trial and accompanying exhibits under seal. | United States Courthouse | View |
EFTA00022320.pdf
This document is an email thread from December 2020 between Ghislaine Maxwell's attorney, Bobbi Sternheim, and a Staff Attorney at the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) Brooklyn. Sternheim complains that Maxwell was deprived of blankets and food, leaving her cold and hungry, while the MDC attorney refutes these claims, stating Maxwell had three blankets, received meals, and the cell temperature was 76.5 degrees.
EFTA00022316.pdf
This document is an email thread from December 2020 between Ghislaine Maxwell's attorney, Bobbi Sternheim, and officials at the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) Brooklyn/BOP. Sternheim complains on Dec 26 that Maxwell is freezing, her cell is uninsulated during 32-degree weather, and she was denied a holiday meal and blankets. On Dec 28, a BOP Staff Attorney responds, disputing these claims, stating Maxwell has three blankets, received her meals, and that the cell temperature was measured at 76.5 degrees.
EFTA00022023.pdf
This document is an email dated June 15, 2021, from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to redacted recipients and copied to Christian Everdell, Laura Menninger, and Jeff Pagliuca. The subject concerns 'US v. Maxwell' and an update on conditions at the MDC (Metropolitan Detention Center). The email attaches a letter with requested redactions highlighted regarding these conditions.
EFTA00021944.pdf
This document is a motion filed by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team on October 18, 2021, requesting the court to preclude the introduction of Government Exhibits 251, 288, 294, 313, and 606. The defense argues these items—including specific photographs, sex toys ('Twin Torpedos') seized in 2005, and a 'Household Manual'—are irrelevant, lack proper evidentiary foundation, or are unfairly prejudicial under Federal Rules of Evidence 401 and 403. The motion contends that these items do not prove any material fact regarding the charges against Maxwell and serve only to confuse issues or introduce character flaws of Jeffrey Epstein.
EFTA00021732.pdf
This document contains a chain of emails from January 15, 2021, involving defense attorney Bobbi Sternheim regarding the refusal of MDC staff to comply with a court order granting Ghislaine Maxwell access to a laptop for discovery review. Despite Judge Nathan's order issued that same day, an Officer Regan allegedly told Maxwell he 'didn't care' and refused access. Sternheim threatens to notify the Judge of this violation and potential contempt of court.
EFTA00021729.pdf
This document is an email from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim dated January 15, 2021, communicating a court order to an unidentified recipient (likely prison officials). The email contains the text of a Memo Endorsement signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan, which orders the Bureau of Prisons to grant Ghislaine Maxwell access to her laptop on weekends and holidays for reviewing discovery materials.
EFTA00021713.pdf
This document is an email chain between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense attorney, Bobbi Sternheim, and prison officials (likely BOP) regarding the conditions of Maxwell's confinement in January 2021. Sternheim complains about Maxwell being delivered late to legal calls (VTCs), being ordered to clean toilets without gloves, petty inspections for 'crumbs' on her bed, and intrusive physical searches that increase COVID risks. The prison official responds that delays were due to institutional emergencies and asserts that searches comply with BOP Program Statements.
EFTA00021019.pdf
This document is a Notice of Motion filed on January 25, 2021, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (20 Cr. 330). The defense team, consisting of attorneys from three separate law firms, formally requests a severance and separate trial for Counts Five and Six of the Superseding Indictment. The filing includes the attorneys' contact information and signatures.
EFTA00021015.pdf
This document is a letter from defense attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the conditions of Ghislaine Maxwell's detention at the MDC. Sternheim argues that Maxwell requires access to a laptop on weekends and holidays to review millions of pages of discovery materials because the standard prison computers are technically inadequate, slow, and prone to crashing. The letter also alleges mistreatment of Maxwell by MDC guards, including psychological and physical abuse, and highlights that Maxwell is isolated with no human contact other than guards.
EFTA00020972.pdf
This document is an automated email notification from the US Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit, dated January 26, 2021. It confirms the filing of a 'Notice of Appearance for Additional or Substitute Counsel' in the case of United States of America v. Maxwell (Case Number 21-58) on January 25, 2021. The notice lists attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim as a recipient.
EFTA00020425.pdf
This document is an automated Notice of Docket Activity from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit, dated March 29, 2021. It notifies recipients, including attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim and the firm Cohen Gresser, that a new case (21-770) has been filed on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell in relation to case 21-58 (United States of America v. Maxwell).
EFTA00020322.pdf
This document is a chain of emails between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense counsel, Laura Menninger, and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding the logistics of reviewing physical and electronic evidence. The discussion focuses on arranging a secure location (500 Pearl Street) for Maxwell and her team to review 'highly confidential' materials, including thousands of images seized from Jeffrey Epstein's devices and residences, as well as physical evidence stored in an FBI warehouse. The defense raises concerns about access to laptops, the ability to compare physical and electronic evidence, and the specific handling of sensitive materials.
EFTA00019933.pdf
An email chain from June 2021 between Ghislaine Maxwell's attorney, Bobbi Sternheim, and prison officials (likely MDC/BOP). Sternheim complains about the conditions of Maxwell's confinement, specifically alleging that guards repeatedly woke Maxwell due to shivering from cold temperatures only to subsequently confiscate her blankets. The correspondence also addresses technical failures with Video Teleconferencing (VTC) equipment hindering attorney-client preparation and alleges unprofessional behavior by guards.
EFTA00019923.pdf
This document is an email chain from April 29, 2021, regarding the criminal case U.S. v. Maxwell. Defense attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim sent a courtesy copy of an ECF filing—specifically a letter regarding sleep deprivation—to US Attorneys and her co-counsel (Everdell, Menninger, Pagliuca). The email was subsequently forwarded internally within the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS).
EFTA00019291.pdf
This document is a Reply Memorandum filed by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team on December 18, 2020, in support of her renewed motion for bail. The defense argues that the government lacks significant documentary evidence, relies solely on witness testimony from decades ago, and that Maxwell has strong ties to the U.S. through her spouse (whose name is redacted) and friends who have pledged assets. The document also addresses flight risk concerns, arguing that extradition from France or the UK is possible or unlikely to be needed due to waivers, and cites a COVID-19 surge at the detention center as further justification for release.
EFTA00019140.pdf
An email from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim dated November 1, 2020, addressing the harsh confinement conditions of Ghislaine Maxwell at the MDC. Sternheim describes the conditions as including cold, moisture, and sewage stench, and notes that Maxwell has been denied a blanket and a cup for water. She compares this treatment unfavorably to her experience with terrorism and capital murder suspects in supermax facilities.
EFTA00019115.pdf
This document is an email chain from November 5, 2020, involving Ghislaine Maxwell's attorney, Bobbi C. Sternheim, and BOP officials. Sternheim acknowledges that Maxwell is now allowed a water mug and snacks but requests she be moved to an interior cell at MDC Brooklyn due to moisture and cold air degrading her legal paperwork and affecting her health. BOP officials circulate the request internally to schedule a discussion.
EFTA00018992.pdf
This document is an email thread from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim dated March 16, 2021. It serves as a transmittal for an unredacted Reply Memorandum in support of Ghislaine Maxwell's pending bail application, submitted to the Court and government pursuant to legal rules. The email includes Sternheim's contact information and standard confidentiality disclaimers.
EFTA00018879.pdf
An email chain from November 3, 2021, regarding the U.S. v. Maxwell case (S2 20 Cr. 330). Attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim circulates a courtesy copy of an ECF filing related to the disclosure of juror names to counsel. The email also serves to notify recipients of Sternheim's new office address.
EFTA00018709.pdf
This document is a legal memorandum submitted on February 23, 2021, supporting Ghislaine Maxwell's third motion for release on bail in the SDNY. Maxwell proposes two new conditions to assure her appearance: formally renouncing her French and British citizenships to prevent flight to those countries, and placing all assets (except legal fees and living expenses) into a new account monitored by retired Judge William S. Duffey, Jr. The defense argues these unprecedented conditions, combined with her strong ties to the US, negate flight risk and claims she is being unfairly treated as a substitute for Jeffrey Epstein.
EFTA00018708.pdf
This document is an email chain dated February 23, 2021, regarding the case 'U.S. v. Maxwell 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)'. Defense attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim sends a courtesy copy of a bail application filing (attached as 'MAXWELL_BAIL_APPLICATION_with_EXHIBIT_2-23-17.pdf') to USANYS prosecutors, copying co-counsel Christian Everdell, Laura Menninger, and Jeff Pagliuca. The email was subsequently forwarded internally within the US Attorney's office with the comment 'FYI'.
EFTA00018560.pdf
This document is an email chain from October 2021 between attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim and likely Bureau of Prisons staff regarding Ghislaine Maxwell (Inmate 02879-506). Sternheim requests confirmation that arrangements are in place for Maxwell's participation in a telephonic court conference scheduled for October 21 at noon. The recipient confirms that staff has been notified and they are prepared.
EFTA00018373.pdf
Defense counsel Bobbi Sternheim requests Judge Nathan to release the names of 600 potential jurors to attorneys only, prior to voir dire, to facilitate background research and ensure a fair trial. The letter cites precedent involving juror misconduct (US v. Parse) and a recent order from the Charlottesville 'Unite the Right' civil case (Sines v. Kessler) where juror names were released to counsel despite high publicity and security concerns. The document includes the cited order from the Western District of Virginia as Exhibit A.
EFTA00018085.pdf
This document is an email chain from November 1-2, 2020, detailing a complaint from Ghislaine Maxwell's attorney, Bobbi Sternheim, regarding prison conditions at the MDC. Sternheim alleges the cell is cold, smells of sewage, has moisture issues, and that Maxwell was denied basic items like a water mug and extra blanket. Government officials investigated and responded internally that temperature checks showed the cell was 71-74 degrees (warmer than the 68-degree target), no moisture or smell was found, and she was provided an extra blanket.
EFTA00017821.pdf
This document is a letter from Ghislaine Maxwell's attorney, Bobbi Sternheim, to Judge Alison Nathan, dated November 24, 2020. It details complaints about Maxwell's detention conditions at the MDC, including harsh quarantine measures after COVID-19 exposure, lack of basic hygiene items like soap and a toothbrush, deletion of legal emails, and sleep deprivation due to flashlight checks every 15 minutes. The letter concludes with a request to summon Warden Heriberto Tellez, followed by a court order from Judge Nathan requiring the parties to meet and confer on the matter.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-07-07 | Paid | Bobbi C. Sternheim | U.S. District Cou... | $505.00 | Notice of Appeal/Docketing Fee for Case 20CR330... | View |
Unknown
Standard legal disclaimer and Covid-19 office closure notice found in an email signature/footer.
Foregoing motion with exhibit
Bobbi C. Sternheim served a legal motion via email to Maurene Comey (maurene.comey@usdoj.gov) and Andrew Rohrbach (andrew.rohrbach@usdoj.gov).
Foregoing motion with exhibit
Bobbi C. Sternheim served a legal motion via U.S. mail (postage prepaid) to Ghislaine Maxwell at the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn.
Foregoing motion with exhibit
Bobbi C. Sternheim served a legal motion via email to Hon. John M. Leventhal (judgeleventhal@aidalalaw.com).
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
A letter opposing the motion filed by counsel for Sarah Ransome and Elizabeth Stein to give oral victim impact statements at Ghislaine Maxwell's sentencing hearing. The letter argues that neither individual qualifies as a statutory crime victim under the CVRA.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim informs Judge Nathan that her client, Ghislaine Maxwell, has been unjustifiably placed on suicide watch by the MDC, preventing her from preparing for her sentencing. Sternheim states Maxwell is not suicidal and warns that she will move for an adjournment if the situation persists.
No Subject
This is the signature page of a letter or legal filing from Bobbi C. Sternheim, indicating that attachments are included and that Counsel of Record have been copied.
Challenge to standing under CVRA
No preview available
Sentencing Procedures / Victim Statements
Request regarding the manner of sentencing and opposition to impact statements from individuals not identified as victims in the charged offenses.
Defense counsel letter regarding sealing of certain docum...
No preview available
Defense counsel writes regarding sealing of certain docum...
Letter dated 6/17/2022 entered on 6/21/2022.
2-day extension to file sentencing submission
Request for extension (Denied by court on 05/11/2022).
Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Request for a two-day extension to file sentencing submission due to attorney travel.
Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Requesting a stay of ruling pending review of a new interview given by Juror 50 to Paramount Plus.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
A letter arguing for a new trial for Ghislaine Maxwell based on the assertion that Juror 50 gave false answers on a juror questionnaire regarding his own past sexual abuse, which should have disqualified him from the jury.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
A letter from Ghislaine Maxwell's counsel requesting a proffer from Juror 50's counsel to explain the basis for the juror's assertion of the Fifth Amendment, in light of the juror's public statements and the government's consideration of immunity.
Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Request regarding Juror 50's assertion of Fifth Amendment privilege and government immunity.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
A letter from the defense proposing limited redactions to an attached Opinion and Order, in response to a Court Order (Dkt. 610) from the same day.
Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
A letter from the defense proposing limited redactions to an attached Opinion and Order in response to a Court Order (Dkt. 610).
Response to Dkt. 605
Letter in response to Order 605.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Discussion regarding proposed redactions to documents related to Juror 50's conduct and motion for a new trial.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
A letter submitting documents under seal with proposed redactions concerning Ghislaine Maxwell's motion for a new trial. The redactions are intended to protect the integrity of an inquiry into the conduct of Juror 50 during the voir dire process.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
A letter submitting documents under seal with proposed redactions concerning Ghislaine Maxwell's motion for a new trial. The redactions are intended to protect the integrity of an inquiry into the conduct of Juror 50 during the voir dire process.
Letter in Response to Dkt. 596
Letter in Response to Dkt. 596
Response to Dkt. 596
Letter in response to a previous docket entry.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity