Bobbi C. Sternheim
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Client |
102
Very Strong
|
211 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
29
Very Strong
|
34 | |
|
person
CHRISTIAN EVERDELL
|
Business associate |
19
Very Strong
|
19 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Client |
11
Very Strong
|
16 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
70 | |
|
person
ALISON J. NATHAN
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Professional |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
CHRISTIAN EVERDELL
|
Co counsel |
7
|
7 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Laura Menninger
|
Business associate |
6
|
6 | |
|
person
Christian R. Everdell
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
organization
LAW OFFICES OF BOBBI C. STERNHEIM
|
Professional employment |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
ANDREW ROHRBACH
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
John M. Leventhal
|
Professional succession |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
ALISON J. NATHAN
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Unknown |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Laura Menninger
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MARK S. COHEN
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeff Pagliuca
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
government counsel
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Professional opposing counsel |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Christian R. Everdell
|
Co counsel |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Curcio client
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Counsel of record
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Pagliuca
|
Professional |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Pretrial conference | A pretrial conference was held where counsel for the government and defendant made their appearan... | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | Pretrial conference | A final pretrial conference was held to discuss outstanding issues and the plan for jury selection. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | Detention | Ms. Maxwell is being held at the MDC under problematic conditions, including over-management and ... | MDC | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | An ongoing legal case involving Ms. Maxwell, where her conditions of confinement are a point of c... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | The ongoing criminal case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. | United States Courthouse, 4... | View |
| 2022-08-22 | N/A | Sentencing Hearing in United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-07-15 | Legal document service | Bobbi C. Sternheim certified the service of a legal motion with an exhibit to multiple parties in... | N/A | View |
| 2022-07-15 | Legal filing | Bobbi C. Sternheim executed a declaration requesting to be relieved as counsel for Ghislaine Maxw... | N/A | View |
| 2022-07-15 | Legal filing | Attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim filed a Motion Information Statement to be relieved as continued coun... | UNITED STATES COURT OF APPE... | View |
| 2022-07-15 | Legal filing | Attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim filed a declaration in support of a motion to be relieved from repres... | UNITED STATES COURT OF APPE... | View |
| 2022-07-15 | N/A | Court Order issued granting Bobbi C. Sternheim's motion to be relieved as counsel for Ghislaine M... | Thurgood Marshall United St... | View |
| 2022-07-07 | Legal filing | Bobbi C. Sternheim filed a Notice of Appeal for Ghislaine Maxwell. | N/A | View |
| 2022-07-07 | Legal filing payment | Payment of a $505.00 fee for a 'Notice of Appeal/Docketing Fee' for case 20CR330-1 AJN. | U.S. District Court, New Yo... | View |
| 2022-07-07 | Legal filing | Payment of a $505.00 fee for a 'Notice of Appeal/Docketing Fee' in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN. | U.S. District Court, New Yo... | View |
| 2022-07-07 | Legal filing | A Notice of Appeal was filed on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2022-07-07 | N/A | Payment of Notice of Appeal/Docketing Fee | U.S. District Court, Manhattan | View |
| 2022-07-07 | N/A | Notice of Appeal Filed | SDNY | View |
| 2022-06-28 | Sentencing | Sentencing hearing for the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2022-06-28 | Legal proceeding | A sentencing proceeding for Ghislaine Maxwell is scheduled for Tuesday, which may need to be post... | United States District Court | View |
| 2022-06-25 | Meeting | Bobbi C. Sternheim met with her client, Ghislaine Maxwell, at the detention facility. | MDC | View |
| 2022-06-24 | N/A | Filing of Document 672 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE | Court Record | View |
| 2022-06-24 | N/A | Filing of Document 672 (Submission Under Seal) in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2022-06-24 | Legal filing | Document 672 was filed in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | N/A | View |
| 2022-06-21 | N/A | Filing of legal document regarding sentencing procedures. | Court Docket | View |
| 2022-06-15 | Legal filing | Document 662 was filed in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | N/A | View |
DOJ-OGR-00020508.jpg
This document is a page from the court docket for the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering filings from January 25, 2021, to February 2, 2021. It lists numerous pretrial motions filed by the defense, including motions to dismiss specific counts and requests for separate trials, as well as government correspondence regarding redactions and prison access. The document also includes judicial orders from Judge Alison J. Nathan, including a denial of a request by the Bureau of Prisons regarding a previous court order.
DOJ-OGR-00020504.jpg
This court docket sheet from Case 22-1426 details several filings and orders related to Ghislaine Maxwell between December 7 and December 14, 2020. The entries concern Maxwell's renewed motion for bail, which the court allowed to be filed with redactions, and her ongoing complaints about her conditions of confinement at the MDC. The court denied her request to have the warden testify but ordered the government to provide regular updates on her status and access to legal counsel.
DOJ-OGR-00020478.jpg
This document is a Judgment in a Criminal Case from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, filed on June 29, 2022. It states that the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell, was found guilty on counts 1, 3, 4, 5, and 6, including conspiracy to transport minors for criminal sexual activity, an offense which ended on July 30, 2004. The judgment was signed by U.S. Circuit Judge Alison J. Nathan.
DOJ-OGR-00020474.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from June 2022 detailing procedural filings related to the sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell. It includes orders from Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the submission and deadline protocols for victim impact statements under the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). Submissions from both the defense (Bobbi Sternheim) and the prosecution (AUSAs Comey, Moe, et al.) are logged, primarily concerning victim notifications and objections to statements.
DOJ-OGR-00020473.jpg
This document is a page from the court docket for United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering filings and orders between May 10, 2022, and June 21, 2022. It details pre-sentencing motions, including a denied request for an extension by the defense and granted motions regarding Speedy Trial Exclusion. Significant entries include logistical orders for the June 28, 2022 sentencing hearing and strict protocols for victim impact statements under the Crime Victims Rights Act.
DOJ-OGR-00020466.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket (Case 22-1426) related to the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, covering filings from February 4, 2022, to February 16, 2022. It details various legal proceedings including orders on sealing documents, motions for a new trial, letters from both the prosecution and defense, and issues concerning the intervention of "Juror 50" and amicus briefs.
DOJ-OGR-00020459.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering entries from December 12 to December 16, 2021. It details various legal filings including letters regarding witness lists, privilege stipulations, and expert testimony, as well as orders from Judge Alison J. Nathan denying defense motions for witness anonymity and setting deadlines for responses regarding witnesses Dr. Loftus and Alexander Hamilton. The document also references the placement of sealed documents in a vault.
DOJ-OGR-00020455.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket covering filings and orders from November 24, 2021, to November 30, 2021, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It includes motions regarding expert testimony and jury instructions, orders concerning the production of materials from the Epstein Victims Compensation Program, and a minute entry noting the beginning of jury selection and the trial.
DOJ-OGR-00020448.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket (Case 22-1426) regarding the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell in the Southern District of New York. It details entries from November 15, 2021, including logistics for public/press access to the courtroom, the filing of transcripts for previous conferences, and a dispute regarding the late receipt of government disclosures at the MDC. It concludes with a minute entry for a pretrial conference where Maxwell was present with her defense team and the government prosecutors.
DOJ-OGR-00020443.jpg
This document contains a court docket log from November 9, 2021, related to the case of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 22-1426 on appeal). It details orders signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding jury selection (voir dire) questions, the use of pseudonyms for witnesses, and preparations for an in-person hearing on November 10 regarding Rule 412 (victim privacy evidence). It also notes correspondence from defense attorney Bobbi Sternheim regarding bond release and from prosecutors regarding victim notification.
DOJ-OGR-00020442.jpg
This document is a page from the court docket for the case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 22-1426), covering filings and orders on November 8 and 9, 2021. Key events include the denial of Maxwell's renewed request for bail, motions to preclude expert testimony from Dr. Dietz and Dr. Loftus, and the scheduling of a conference regarding Rule 412 (sexual behavior evidence) motions. The document also addresses logistical issues such as the delivery of legal mail to the MDC and humane transport protocols for the defendant.
DOJ-OGR-00020436.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket (Case 22-1426) listing entries from late October 2021 regarding the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The entries detail various orders and letters concerning jury selection, questionnaires, voir dire procedures, and scheduling for motions in limine and jury charges. It documents communications between the defense (Maxwell's counsel) and the prosecution (USA) addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan.
DOJ-OGR-00020433.jpg
This document is a docket sheet from the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell covering October 13-15, 2021. It details procedural motions regarding juror selection (voir dire), the attendance of alleged victims at the trial, and disputes over the delivery speed of Maxwell's legal mail at the MDC. The document also references filings related to Federal Rule of Evidence 412 (the 'Rape Shield Law') and includes orders signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan.
DOJ-OGR-00020431.jpg
This document contains a series of court docket entries from August 2021 related to the case of Ghislaine Maxwell. It includes orders from Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding unsealing documents, scheduling a jury trial for November 29, 2021, and addressing attorney-client communication issues at the MDC. It also logs various letters exchanged between the defense counsel and the prosecution.
DOJ-OGR-00020429.jpg
This document is a court docket summary from July and August 2021 for the case of Ghislaine Maxwell, presided over by Judge Alison J. Nathan. It details a series of filings, including letters from Maxwell's counsel and motions from the U.S. government. A significant event is the court's order addressing an op-ed written by attorney David Markus, which led to him being ordered to comply with local rules regarding extrajudicial statements that could prejudice a trial.
DOJ-OGR-00020427.jpg
This document is a page from the court docket for the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, covering entries from May 25, 2021, to June 15, 2021. It details procedural events including the denial of bail appeal by the USCA, scheduling orders for disclosures and motions in limine set by Judge Alison J. Nathan, and correspondence regarding the defendant's confinement conditions. The document logs filings by both the prosecution (USA) and the defense.
DOJ-OGR-00020424.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, covering entries from May 7, 2021, to May 13, 2021. It details correspondence regarding pretrial motions and scheduling, including a significant order setting the trial start date for November 29, 2021, and outlining the schedule for jury selection and motions in limine. The document also includes orders related to redactions and sealing of documents.
DOJ-OGR-00020423.jpg
This document is a court docket log from May 2021 regarding the case of U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It details several orders by Judge Alison J. Nathan, including granting a trial continuance to Fall 2021 and ensuring Maxwell's access to discovery hard drives and attorney-client communications at the MDC. The log also records various letters filed by both the prosecution (USA) regarding subpoenas and prison conditions (flashlights), and the defense regarding witness disclosures.
DOJ-OGR-00020421.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from April 2021 detailing legal disputes regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's detention conditions at the MDC Brooklyn. Key issues include the seizure/confiscation of her legal materials by prison staff on April 24, 2021, and complaints regarding sleep deprivation caused by 15-minute flashlight surveillance checks. Judge Alison J. Nathan issued orders requiring the MDC to account for the seized items, ensure confidentiality of attorney-client materials, and justify the frequency of flashlight checks.
DOJ-OGR-00020413.jpg
This document is a page from the court docket for United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering filings between March 31, 2021, and April 14, 2021. Key events include the scheduling and rescheduling of an arraignment on a Second Superseding Indictment to April 23, 2021, at the Daniel Patrick Moynihan Courthouse. The document also details a denial by Judge Nathan of a defense request to allow Maxwell to possess materials in courthouse cellblocks, citing U.S. Marshal policy.
DOJ-OGR-00020410.jpg
This document is a court docket summary from Case 22-1426, detailing legal filings and orders in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell between March 9 and March 24, 2021. Key events include Judge Alison J. Nathan's denial of Maxwell's third motion for bail and several orders concerning the redaction and sealing of court documents. The docket also describes an order related to Maxwell's attempt to subpoena a law firm representing her alleged victims, outlining the legal procedure for such an action.
DOJ-OGR-00020407.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering filings between January 25, 2021, and February 2, 2021. It details the defense filing twelve pre-trial motions, including requests for separate trials, dismissal of counts due to multiplicity and lack of specificity, and dismissal based on Sixth Amendment violations. The document also records a dispute involving the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) and MDC Brooklyn regarding laptop access for the defendant, resulting in the Judge denying the BOP's request to vacate a previous order.
DOJ-OGR-00020387.jpg
This document is a formal Notice of Appeal filed on July 7, 2022, on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell. Filed by her attorney, Bobbi C. Sternheim, it declares Maxwell's intent to appeal the judgment, conviction, and sentence entered on June 29, 2022, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The appeal is directed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
DOJ-OGR-00018863.jpg
This document is the cover page of a court transcript for the jury trial of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell, held on December 8, 2021, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. It lists the presiding judge, Hon. Alison J. Nathan, and identifies the legal counsel for both the prosecution and the defense, as well as other individuals present from agencies like the FBI and NYPD.
DOJ-OGR-00018599.jpg
This document is the cover page for the court transcript of the jury trial in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The trial took place on December 7, 2021, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, with Judge Alison J. Nathan presiding. The document lists the appearances of the legal counsel for both the prosecution and the defense, as well as other individuals present.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-07-07 | Paid | Bobbi C. Sternheim | U.S. District Cou... | $505.00 | Notice of Appeal/Docketing Fee for Case 20CR330... | View |
Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Proposing Nov 29, 2021 trial date based on witness/counsel availability. Proposing deadline for victim identity disclosure (3 months prior) and expert disclosures (2 months prior).
U.S. v. Maxwell, S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Attached is a courtesy copy of today's ECF filing.
Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Stating availability to begin Nov 8 and conclude by end of year. Notes Laura Menninger has civil trial Dec 13.
Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Proposing trial date of Nov 29, 2021. Discussing deadlines for victim identity disclosure (3 months prior) and expert disclosures (2 months prior).
Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Asking for full picture of available dates after Nov 8.
U.S. v. Maxwell, S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Sending a courtesy copy of today's ECF filing (Reply_to_Dkt_270.pdf).
Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Initial inquiry to confer about trial dates from Sept 2021 through end of year.
Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Referring to 4/22 letter and asking for government availability for Nov 8.
Initial Inquiry
Writing to confer about trial date preferences/availability from Sept 2021 through end of year.
Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Asking for Government availability for 11/8.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Complaint regarding Maxwell's conditions of confinement, specifically sleep deprivation, use of flashlights by guards, and an incident involving a black eye.
Sleep Deprivation in MDC
Complaint regarding sleep deprivation conditions.
Conditions of confinement for Ms. Maxwell
Attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim writes to the Court to address Ms. Maxwell's sleeping conditions, requesting that the MDC be directed to cease the 'disruptive flashlight surveillance' or justify it. The letter also argues against the MDC's threat to place Ms. Maxwell in the SHU.
Sleep Deprivation in MDC
Complaint regarding sleep conditions.
U.S. v. Maxwell S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Good afternoon- Attached is a courtesy copy of today’s ECF fling. Regards- Bobbi
Request to address Ms. Maxwell's sleeping conditions and ...
Attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim writes to the Court on behalf of her client, Ms. Maxwell. She argues against the MDC's threat to place Ms. Maxwell in the SHU, stating it's ironic as she needs protection from staff, not other inmates. The letter also asks the Court to direct the MDC to cease the 'disruptive' 15-minute flashlight surveillance during sleeping hours.
Confiscation of legal documents
Reply to MDC letter regarding order to show cause re: confiscation of legal documents
Reply to MDC letter re: order to show cause
Follow up regarding confiscation of legal documents.
Confiscation of Legal Documents
Complaint regarding confiscation of legal documents.
Confiscation of Legal Documents
Reported incident regarding guards seizing documents.
Conclusion (Request for continuance)
Requesting a trial continuance in advance of the April 23rd arraignment.
Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Defense requesting a trial continuance due to a superseding indictment that expands the scope of charges.
Proposed Order to Marshal
No preview available
Proposed Order to Marshal
Request regarding an order directed at the US Marshal.
Proposed Order to Marshal
Request regarding U.S. Marshal procedures.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity