Bobbi C. Sternheim
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Client |
102
Very Strong
|
211 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
29
Very Strong
|
34 | |
|
person
CHRISTIAN EVERDELL
|
Business associate |
19
Very Strong
|
19 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Client |
11
Very Strong
|
16 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
70 | |
|
person
ALISON J. NATHAN
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Professional |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
CHRISTIAN EVERDELL
|
Co counsel |
7
|
7 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Laura Menninger
|
Business associate |
6
|
6 | |
|
person
Christian R. Everdell
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
organization
LAW OFFICES OF BOBBI C. STERNHEIM
|
Professional employment |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
ANDREW ROHRBACH
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
John M. Leventhal
|
Professional succession |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
ALISON J. NATHAN
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Unknown |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Laura Menninger
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MARK S. COHEN
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeff Pagliuca
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
government counsel
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Professional opposing counsel |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Christian R. Everdell
|
Co counsel |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Curcio client
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Counsel of record
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Pagliuca
|
Professional |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Pretrial conference | A pretrial conference was held where counsel for the government and defendant made their appearan... | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | Pretrial conference | A final pretrial conference was held to discuss outstanding issues and the plan for jury selection. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | Detention | Ms. Maxwell is being held at the MDC under problematic conditions, including over-management and ... | MDC | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | An ongoing legal case involving Ms. Maxwell, where her conditions of confinement are a point of c... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | The ongoing criminal case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. | United States Courthouse, 4... | View |
| 2022-08-22 | N/A | Sentencing Hearing in United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-07-15 | Legal document service | Bobbi C. Sternheim certified the service of a legal motion with an exhibit to multiple parties in... | N/A | View |
| 2022-07-15 | Legal filing | Bobbi C. Sternheim executed a declaration requesting to be relieved as counsel for Ghislaine Maxw... | N/A | View |
| 2022-07-15 | Legal filing | Attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim filed a Motion Information Statement to be relieved as continued coun... | UNITED STATES COURT OF APPE... | View |
| 2022-07-15 | Legal filing | Attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim filed a declaration in support of a motion to be relieved from repres... | UNITED STATES COURT OF APPE... | View |
| 2022-07-15 | N/A | Court Order issued granting Bobbi C. Sternheim's motion to be relieved as counsel for Ghislaine M... | Thurgood Marshall United St... | View |
| 2022-07-07 | Legal filing | Bobbi C. Sternheim filed a Notice of Appeal for Ghislaine Maxwell. | N/A | View |
| 2022-07-07 | Legal filing payment | Payment of a $505.00 fee for a 'Notice of Appeal/Docketing Fee' for case 20CR330-1 AJN. | U.S. District Court, New Yo... | View |
| 2022-07-07 | Legal filing | Payment of a $505.00 fee for a 'Notice of Appeal/Docketing Fee' in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN. | U.S. District Court, New Yo... | View |
| 2022-07-07 | Legal filing | A Notice of Appeal was filed on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2022-07-07 | N/A | Payment of Notice of Appeal/Docketing Fee | U.S. District Court, Manhattan | View |
| 2022-07-07 | N/A | Notice of Appeal Filed | SDNY | View |
| 2022-06-28 | Sentencing | Sentencing hearing for the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2022-06-28 | Legal proceeding | A sentencing proceeding for Ghislaine Maxwell is scheduled for Tuesday, which may need to be post... | United States District Court | View |
| 2022-06-25 | Meeting | Bobbi C. Sternheim met with her client, Ghislaine Maxwell, at the detention facility. | MDC | View |
| 2022-06-24 | N/A | Filing of Document 672 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE | Court Record | View |
| 2022-06-24 | N/A | Filing of Document 672 (Submission Under Seal) in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2022-06-24 | Legal filing | Document 672 was filed in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | N/A | View |
| 2022-06-21 | N/A | Filing of legal document regarding sentencing procedures. | Court Docket | View |
| 2022-06-15 | Legal filing | Document 662 was filed in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | N/A | View |
DOJ-OGR-00020645.jpg
This document is a court docket report from the SDNY detailing filings in the case of Ghislaine Maxwell between January 25, 2021, and February 4, 2021. It lists numerous motions to dismiss filed by the defense, letters regarding confidentiality redactions, and a dispute regarding the defendant's access to a laptop at the MDC Brooklyn, which the judge resolved by denying the BOP's request to vacate a prior order. The document also notes a motion to suppress evidence obtained via a subpoena to a redacted entity.
DOJ-OGR-00020640.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from the case of Ghislaine Maxwell, detailing filings from December 2020. Key events include a letter from Maxwell's counsel regarding a motion for bail, a subsequent order from Judge Alison J. Nathan denying a request to summon the MDC warden to testify about Maxwell's confinement conditions, and the filing of a conference transcript. The judge ordered the government to provide regular updates on Maxwell's access to legal materials and counsel.
DOJ-OGR-00020592.jpg
This is a court order from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, dated July 15, 2022, regarding the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Docket No. 22-1426). The order grants a motion by attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to be relieved as counsel for Maxwell because Maxwell has retained new counsel for her appeal. The document is signed by the Clerk of Court, Catherine O’Hagan Wolfe.
DOJ-OGR-00020591.jpg
This is a Notice of Appearance filed on July 15, 2022, in the case USA v. Maxwell (Docket No. 22-1426). Attorney John M. Leventhal of the firm Aidala, Bertuna & Kamins, PC is entering an appearance as substitute counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell, replacing attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim.
DOJ-OGR-00020588.jpg
A receipt from the U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, dated July 7, 2022. It documents a payment of $505.00 made by Bobbi C. Sternheim via credit card for a 'Notice of Appeal/Docketing Fee' on behalf of (FBO) Ghislaine Maxwell regarding case 20CR330-1 AJN.
DOJ-OGR-00020587.jpg
This is a Criminal Notice of Appeal (Form A) filed on July 7, 2022, in the Southern District of New York for the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330). Maxwell is appealing her conviction and sentence (judgment entered June 29, 2022) to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals following a guilty verdict at trial. The document identifies Bobbi C. Sternheim as her counsel for the filing of this notice only, noting she is not retained for the appeal itself, and identifies Maurene Comey as the Assistant U.S. Attorney.
DOJ-OGR-00020585.jpg
This document is a Certificate of Service from Case 22-1426, dated July 15, 2022, and signed by Bobbi C. Sternheim. It attests that a legal motion was served to several parties, including AUSAs Maurene Comey and Andrew Rohrbach, Defendant-Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell, and retired Judge John M. Leventhal. The service was conducted via email and U.S. mail to their respective addresses.
DOJ-OGR-00020584.jpg
This legal document is a declaration by attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim, dated July 15, 2022, filed in Case 22-1426. Sternheim states that she represented Ghislaine Maxwell through her district court trial and sentencing but has not been retained for the appeal. She informs the court that new counsel, Hon. John M. Leventhal of Aidala, Bertuna & Kamins, PC, has been retained and formally requests to be relieved as counsel for Maxwell's appeal.
DOJ-OGR-00020579.jpg
This document is a receipt from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, dated July 7, 2022. It confirms a $505.00 credit card payment made by Bobbi C. Sternheim on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell for a 'Notice of Appeal/Docketing Fee'. The transaction is associated with case number 20CR330-1 AJN.
DOJ-OGR-00020575.jpg
This document contains several letters and orders related to the case of Ghislaine Maxwell. The orders concern victim impact statements, redactions, and contact information, while the letters are from Ghislaine Maxwell, her defense counsel, and the USA to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding various aspects of the case, including sentencing and challenges to standing under the CVRA.
DOJ-OGR-00020567.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet for Case 22-1426 involving Ghislaine Maxwell, covering dates from February 4 to February 16, 2022. It details legal maneuvers surrounding Maxwell's motion for a new trial, including disputes over sealing documents, the intervention of 'Juror 50,' and an amicus brief request by the NACDL. Judge Alison J. Nathan issued orders denying the blanket sealing of new trial documents and setting deadlines for amicus briefs.
DOJ-OGR-00020556.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from the trial of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering proceedings from November 24, 2021, to November 30, 2021. It details the start of the jury trial on November 29, 2021, various filings regarding jury instructions and expert testimony (Dr. Ryan Hall), and orders related to materials from the Epstein Victims Compensation Program. The document also notes a court order granting a government request to seal filings to protect the privacy of anticipated witnesses.
DOJ-OGR-00020549.jpg
This document is a court docket entry log from Case 22-1426 in the Southern District of New York, dated July 8, 2022, detailing events from November 15, 2021, related to defendant Ghislaine Maxwell. It records an order by Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding courtroom access, the filing of transcripts from prior conferences, a letter from Maxwell's defense about delayed disclosures, and the minutes from a pretrial conference held that day, listing all attending counsel for both the defense and the government.
DOJ-OGR-00020544.jpg
This document is a page from the court docket for *United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell* (dated November 9, 2021). It contains orders from Judge Alison Nathan regarding the logistics of *voir dire* (jury selection), including the use of pseudonyms for witnesses, and schedules a sealed *in camera* hearing regarding Federal Rule of Evidence 412 (sexual behavior evidence). Additionally, it logs letters from the defense regarding bond release and from the prosecution regarding victim notification.
DOJ-OGR-00020543.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering entries on November 8 and 9, 2021. It details various pre-trial motions and orders, including the denial of a renewed bail request, the scheduling of a conference regarding Rule 412 (evidence of sexual behavior) and expert witnesses (Dr. Dietz and Dr. Loftus), and orders regarding the humane transport of the defendant and delivery of legal mail. The document lists correspondence between the prosecution (AUSAs) and the Judge, as well as filings by the defense counsel.
DOJ-OGR-00020538.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering entries from October 27 to October 29, 2021. It details numerous 'motions in limine' filed by Maxwell's defense team (Pagliuca, Everdell) attempting to exclude specific evidence, including items seized from Epstein's Palm Beach home (358 El Brillo Way) in 2005, evidence related to 'Accuser-3', and an alleged flight. The document also records an order from Judge Nathan scheduling an in-person pretrial conference for November 1, 2021.
DOJ-OGR-00020532.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket related to the case of Ghislaine Maxwell, listing entries from August 23, 2021, to August 30, 2021. It details various orders and letters, including the scheduling of a jury trial for November 29, 2021, and the resolution of issues regarding attorney-client video teleconferences.
DOJ-OGR-00020530.jpg
This document is a docket sheet from July to August 2021 detailing legal maneuvers in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. Significant entries involve a dispute over an Op-Ed written by attorney David Oscar Markus, leading to a court order enforcing Local Criminal Rule 23.1 regarding extrajudicial statements to protect the integrity of the trial. Additionally, the defense filed motions referencing the 'Cosby Opinion' and sought to suppress evidence obtained from a subpoena to the law firm Boies Schiller.
DOJ-OGR-00020528.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet covering the period from May 25, 2021, to June 15, 2021, detailing legal proceedings in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It includes orders setting trial disclosure schedules (including victim identities and Jencks Act material), a denial of a subpoena motion, and a mandate from the US Court of Appeals affirming the denial of Maxwell's bail and addressing complaints about sleep deprivation in custody. The document also references correspondence between defense attorneys (Everdell, Sternheim) and Judge Nathan regarding pretrial motions and confinement conditions at the MDC.
DOJ-OGR-00020524.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket sheet regarding the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, covering filings from May 3 to May 7, 2021. Key entries include Judge Nathan granting a trial continuance to Fall 2021 to allow the defense to prepare for new charges, orders ensuring Maxwell's access to discovery hard drives at the MDC, and various correspondences regarding subpoena requests and 'flashlight security checks' at the detention center. It also notes a deleted document that was filed incorrectly.
DOJ-OGR-00020521.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from April 2021 detailing proceedings in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It records her arraignment where she pleaded not guilty to a superseding indictment, various motions regarding subpoenas and trial scheduling, and a specific incident where Maxwell's defense claimed MDC guards wrongfully seized her confidential legal documents. Judge Nathan issued scheduling orders for pretrial motions and ordered MDC counsel to explain the seizure of documents.
DOJ-OGR-00020514.jpg
This document is a page from the court docket for the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering entries from March 31, 2021, to April 14, 2021. It details procedural events including the scheduling and rescheduling of an arraignment on a Second Superseding Indictment, the granting of Pro Hac Vice status to attorney Sigrid McCawley, and various letter motions regarding MDC conditions and subpoenas. It also includes a specific denial by Judge Nathan regarding a request for Maxwell to possess materials in courthouse cellblocks, citing US Marshal policy.
DOJ-OGR-00020511.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from March 2021 detailing proceedings in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. Key events include the denial of Maxwell's third motion for bail on March 22, 2021, and various orders regarding the redaction and sealing of documents, specifically referencing Exhibit 11 and transcripts from the civil case 'Giuffre v. Maxwell'. The docket also records a subpoena request directed at a law firm representing alleged victims, with the court requiring notice be given to those victims.
DOJ-OGR-00020510.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, covering filings between February 4, 2021, and March 1, 2021. It details various legal maneuvers, including Maxwell's third motion for bond, motions for a bill of particulars, and disputes regarding her confinement conditions at the MDC. The docket also records correspondence between the defense (Cohen, Sternheim, Everdell) and the prosecution (Comey, Moe, Pomerantz) addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan, as well as the sealing of multiple documents.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-07-07 | Paid | Bobbi C. Sternheim | U.S. District Cou... | $505.00 | Notice of Appeal/Docketing Fee for Case 20CR330... | View |
Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Reiterating Nov 8 preference due to Maxwell's health/detention. Suggests release pending trial would offer flexibility.
Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Stating availability to begin Nov 8. Noting Laura Menninger has a civil trial Dec 13.
Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Asking for full picture of available dates after Nov 8.
MDC flashlight security checks
Letter regarding MDC flashlight security checks
Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Proposing Nov 29, 2021 trial date based on witness/counsel availability. Proposing deadline for victim identity disclosure (3 months prior) and expert disclosures (2 months prior).
U.S. v. Maxwell, S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Sending a courtesy copy of today's ECF filing (Reply_to_Dkt_270.pdf).
Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Referring to 4/22 letter and asking for government availability for Nov 8.
Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Asking for Government availability for 11/8.
Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Initial inquiry to confer about trial dates from Sept 2021 through end of year.
Initial Inquiry
Writing to confer about trial date preferences/availability from Sept 2021 through end of year.
Sleep Deprivation in MDC
Complaint regarding sleep deprivation conditions.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Complaint regarding Maxwell's conditions of confinement, specifically sleep deprivation, use of flashlights by guards, and an incident involving a black eye.
Conditions of confinement for Ms. Maxwell
Attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim writes to the Court to address Ms. Maxwell's sleeping conditions, requesting that the MDC be directed to cease the 'disruptive flashlight surveillance' or justify it. The letter also argues against the MDC's threat to place Ms. Maxwell in the SHU.
U.S. v. Maxwell S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Good afternoon- Attached is a courtesy copy of today’s ECF fling. Regards- Bobbi
Request to address Ms. Maxwell's sleeping conditions and ...
Attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim writes to the Court on behalf of her client, Ms. Maxwell. She argues against the MDC's threat to place Ms. Maxwell in the SHU, stating it's ironic as she needs protection from staff, not other inmates. The letter also asks the Court to direct the MDC to cease the 'disruptive' 15-minute flashlight surveillance during sleeping hours.
Sleep Deprivation in MDC
Complaint regarding sleep conditions.
Reply to MDC letter re: order to show cause
Follow up regarding confiscation of legal documents.
Confiscation of legal documents
Reply to MDC letter regarding order to show cause re: confiscation of legal documents
Confiscation of Legal Documents
Complaint regarding confiscation of legal documents.
Confiscation of Legal Documents
Reported incident regarding guards seizing documents.
Conclusion (Request for continuance)
Requesting a trial continuance in advance of the April 23rd arraignment.
Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Defense requesting a trial continuance due to a superseding indictment that expands the scope of charges.
Proposed Order to Marshal
Request regarding an order directed at the US Marshal.
Proposed Order to Marshal
No preview available
Proposed Order to Marshal
Request regarding U.S. Marshal procedures.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity