Bobbi C. Sternheim
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Client |
102
Very Strong
|
211 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
29
Very Strong
|
34 | |
|
person
CHRISTIAN EVERDELL
|
Business associate |
19
Very Strong
|
19 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Client |
11
Very Strong
|
16 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
70 | |
|
person
ALISON J. NATHAN
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Professional |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
CHRISTIAN EVERDELL
|
Co counsel |
7
|
7 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Laura Menninger
|
Business associate |
6
|
6 | |
|
person
Christian R. Everdell
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
organization
LAW OFFICES OF BOBBI C. STERNHEIM
|
Professional employment |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
ANDREW ROHRBACH
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
John M. Leventhal
|
Professional succession |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
ALISON J. NATHAN
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Unknown |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Laura Menninger
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MARK S. COHEN
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeff Pagliuca
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
government counsel
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Professional opposing counsel |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Christian R. Everdell
|
Co counsel |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Curcio client
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Counsel of record
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Pagliuca
|
Professional |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Pretrial conference | A pretrial conference was held where counsel for the government and defendant made their appearan... | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | Pretrial conference | A final pretrial conference was held to discuss outstanding issues and the plan for jury selection. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | Detention | Ms. Maxwell is being held at the MDC under problematic conditions, including over-management and ... | MDC | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | An ongoing legal case involving Ms. Maxwell, where her conditions of confinement are a point of c... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | The ongoing criminal case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. | United States Courthouse, 4... | View |
| 2022-08-22 | N/A | Sentencing Hearing in United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-07-15 | Legal document service | Bobbi C. Sternheim certified the service of a legal motion with an exhibit to multiple parties in... | N/A | View |
| 2022-07-15 | Legal filing | Bobbi C. Sternheim executed a declaration requesting to be relieved as counsel for Ghislaine Maxw... | N/A | View |
| 2022-07-15 | Legal filing | Attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim filed a Motion Information Statement to be relieved as continued coun... | UNITED STATES COURT OF APPE... | View |
| 2022-07-15 | Legal filing | Attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim filed a declaration in support of a motion to be relieved from repres... | UNITED STATES COURT OF APPE... | View |
| 2022-07-15 | N/A | Court Order issued granting Bobbi C. Sternheim's motion to be relieved as counsel for Ghislaine M... | Thurgood Marshall United St... | View |
| 2022-07-07 | Legal filing | Bobbi C. Sternheim filed a Notice of Appeal for Ghislaine Maxwell. | N/A | View |
| 2022-07-07 | Legal filing payment | Payment of a $505.00 fee for a 'Notice of Appeal/Docketing Fee' for case 20CR330-1 AJN. | U.S. District Court, New Yo... | View |
| 2022-07-07 | Legal filing | Payment of a $505.00 fee for a 'Notice of Appeal/Docketing Fee' in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN. | U.S. District Court, New Yo... | View |
| 2022-07-07 | Legal filing | A Notice of Appeal was filed on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2022-07-07 | N/A | Payment of Notice of Appeal/Docketing Fee | U.S. District Court, Manhattan | View |
| 2022-07-07 | N/A | Notice of Appeal Filed | SDNY | View |
| 2022-06-28 | Sentencing | Sentencing hearing for the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2022-06-28 | Legal proceeding | A sentencing proceeding for Ghislaine Maxwell is scheduled for Tuesday, which may need to be post... | United States District Court | View |
| 2022-06-25 | Meeting | Bobbi C. Sternheim met with her client, Ghislaine Maxwell, at the detention facility. | MDC | View |
| 2022-06-24 | N/A | Filing of Document 672 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE | Court Record | View |
| 2022-06-24 | N/A | Filing of Document 672 (Submission Under Seal) in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2022-06-24 | Legal filing | Document 672 was filed in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | N/A | View |
| 2022-06-21 | N/A | Filing of legal document regarding sentencing procedures. | Court Docket | View |
| 2022-06-15 | Legal filing | Document 662 was filed in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | N/A | View |
DOJ-OGR-00016217.jpg
Cover page for a court transcript of the jury trial United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, dated December 10, 2021. It lists Judge Alison J. Nathan as presiding and details the appearances of the prosecution team (U.S. Attorney's Office) and the defense team (Haddon Morgan and Foreman, Cohen & Gresser). Law enforcement representatives from the FBI and NYPD were also noted as present.
DOJ-OGR-00016111.jpg
This document is the cover page of a court transcript for the jury trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, held on November 29, 2021, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. It identifies the case number, the presiding judge (Hon. Alison J. Nathan), and lists the legal counsel for both the prosecution (United States of America) and the defense, as well as other individuals present from the FBI and NYPD.
DOJ-OGR-00002410.jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal motion filed on February 4, 2021, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York for the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The motion, submitted by Maxwell's legal team, seeks to dismiss counts five and six of the superseding indictment. The grounds for dismissal are that the alleged misstatements are not perjurious as a matter of law.
DOJ-OGR-00002409.jpg
This document is the signature page of a legal filing (Document 135) from case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, filed on February 4, 2021. It lists the names, law firms, and contact information for the legal counsel representing Ghislaine Maxwell. The attorneys are from three separate law firms located in Denver, Colorado and New York, New York.
DOJ-OGR-00002369(1).jpg
This document is a signature page (page 22 of 23) from a court filing in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, filed on February 4, 2021. It lists the legal defense team representing Ghislaine Maxwell, including attorneys from Haddon, Morgan & Foreman P.C., Cohen & Gresser LLP, and the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim.
DOJ-OGR-00002347(1).jpg
This document is the signature page from a court filing (Document 133) in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, filed on February 4, 2021. It lists the legal counsel representing Ghislaine Maxwell, including attorneys from the law firms HADDON, MORGAN & FOREMAN P.C.; COHEN & GRESSER LLP; and the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim.
DOJ-OGR-00002341.jpg
This legal document, filed on February 1, 2021, is a letter from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim regarding her client, pretrial detainee Ms. Maxwell. Sternheim argues that allowing Maxwell to use a laptop on weekends and holidays is a necessary and reasonable accommodation for reviewing extensive electronic discovery for her trial. The letter asserts this poses no burden to the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) or the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) and requests the court's existing order for access remain in effect.
DOJ-OGR-00002341(1).jpg
This legal document, filed on February 1, 2021, is a letter from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim arguing that her client, pretrial detainee Ms. Maxwell, should continue to be allowed laptop access on weekends and holidays. Sternheim contends this is a reasonable accommodation necessary for reviewing extensive electronic discovery for trial preparation and that it imposes no burden or security risk on the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) or the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC).
DOJ-OGR-00002340.jpg
This document is page 2 of a legal filing by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense counsel, Bobbi C. Sternheim, filed on February 1, 2021. It details severe technical difficulties Maxwell faces in reviewing terabytes of discovery material at the MDC, including frequent computer crashes, slow processing, and damaged hard drives allegedly mishandled by staff. The filing also alleges that Maxwell is subjected to stricter isolation than other inmates, physical and psychological abuse by guards, and reprisals for reporting mistreatment.
DOJ-OGR-00002339.jpg
This document is a letter dated February 1, 2021, from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Sternheim argues against the Metropolitan Detention Center's (MDC) objection to allowing Maxwell laptop access on weekends and holidays to review millions of pages of discovery documents. The letter asserts that the MDC's proposed alternative, a prison computer, is inadequate for the task and that the MDC has failed to provide a valid security or staffing reason for restricting laptop access, thereby impeding Maxwell's ability to prepare her defense.
DOJ-OGR-00002332(1).jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, filed on January 25, 2021. It identifies Bobbi C. Sternheim and her law firm as the attorneys for Ghislaine Maxwell, providing contact addresses and phone numbers in Denver, Colorado, and New York, New York.
DOJ-OGR-00002321.jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal memorandum filed on January 25, 2021, in the Southern District of New York (Case 20 Cr. 330). It is a filing by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team supporting a motion to dismiss a superseding indictment based on alleged Sixth Amendment violations. The page lists the defense attorneys from three different law firms representing Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00002321(1).jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal memorandum filed on January 25, 2021, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. The filing is made by the attorneys for defendant Ghislaine Maxwell in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The memorandum supports a motion to dismiss the superseding indictment against Maxwell, arguing it was obtained in violation of the Sixth Amendment.
DOJ-OGR-00002320.jpg
This document is the second page of a legal filing (Document 125) from the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN), filed on January 25, 2021. It serves as the signature or counsel identification page, listing Haddon, Morgan & Foreman P.C. and Bobbi C. Sternheim as the attorneys representing Ghislaine Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00002320(1).jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing, dated January 25, 2021, for Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN. It lists contact information for two law firms, HADDON, MORGAN & FOREMAN P.C. and Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim, identifying them as attorneys for Ghislaine Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00002317.jpg
This document is the conclusion of a legal filing dated January 25, 2021, submitted by the attorneys for Ghislaine Maxwell. The attorneys argue that the indictment lacks the necessary specificity for Maxwell to prepare an adequate defense for Counts One through Four, violating her Fifth and Sixth Amendment rights. They request that the court either dismiss these counts or compel the government to provide a Bill of Particulars and further discovery.
DOJ-OGR-00002317(1).jpg
This legal document, dated January 25, 2021, is a memorandum filed in support of a motion for a Bill of Particulars and Pretrial Disclosures in the case against Ms. Maxwell. It argues that the indictment lacks specificity regarding alleged 'grooming' acts, violating her constitutional rights, and requests either the dismissal of certain counts or that the government provide more detailed information for her defense. The document is signed by several attorneys representing Ghislaine Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00002311(1).jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal memorandum filed on January 25, 2021, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York for the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The memorandum, submitted by Maxwell's legal team, supports a motion to dismiss four counts of the superseding indictment against her, arguing a lack of specificity. The document identifies Maxwell as the defendant and lists her attorneys from three different law firms.
DOJ-OGR-00002310.jpg
This document is the signature page of a legal filing in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, dated January 25, 2021. It lists the legal counsel representing Ghislaine Maxwell, including attorneys from three different law firms: HADDON, MORGAN & FOREMAN P.C. in Denver, and COHEN & GRESSER LLP and the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim in New York. The document is signed by Jeffrey S. Pagliuca on behalf of the legal team.
DOJ-OGR-00002310(1).jpg
This document is the signature page (page 2 of 2) of a court filing, Document 123, in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, filed on January 25, 2021. It lists the legal counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell, including attorneys Jeffrey S. Pagliuca, Laura A. Menninger, Mark S. Cohen, Christian R. Everdell, and Bobbi C. Sternheim, along with their respective law firms and contact information in Denver and New York.
DOJ-OGR-00002307.jpg
This document is the signature page of a legal filing from January 25, 2021, in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN. It lists the names, law firms, and contact information for the legal counsel representing Ghislaine Maxwell. The attorneys listed are Jeffrey S. Pagliuca, Laura A. Menninger, Mark S. Cohen, Christian R. Everdell, and Bobbi C. Sternheim.
DOJ-OGR-00002307(1).jpg
This document is the signature page for a legal filing (Document 122) in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, dated January 25, 2021. It identifies the legal team representing Ghislaine Maxwell, including attorneys from three separate law firms: HADDON, MORGAN & FOREMAN P.C. in Denver, and COHEN & GRESSER LLP and the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim in New York.
DOJ-OGR-00002300.jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal filing in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on January 25, 2021, in the Southern District of New York. It is a memorandum in support of Maxwell's motion to dismiss either Count One or Count Three of the superseding indictment on the grounds that they are multiplicitous. The document identifies Ghislaine Maxwell as the defendant and lists her legal counsel from three different law firms.
DOJ-OGR-00002300(1).jpg
This is the cover page for a legal memorandum filed on January 25, 2021, in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). The document is a motion filed by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team to dismiss either Count One or Count Three of the superseding indictment on the grounds that they are multiplicitous. The page lists the defendant's legal representation from three different law firms.
DOJ-OGR-00002299.jpg
This document is the signature page from a court filing (Document 121 in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN), dated January 25, 2021. It lists the legal counsel representing Ghislaine Maxwell, including attorneys from three law firms: HADDON, MORGAN & FOREMAN P.C. in Denver, CO, and COHEN & GRESSER LLP and the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim, both in New York, NY.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-07-07 | Paid | Bobbi C. Sternheim | U.S. District Cou... | $505.00 | Notice of Appeal/Docketing Fee for Case 20CR330... | View |
[EXTERNAL] Ghislaine Maxwell- 02879-509
Notification that the government sent a hard drive to MDC for Maxwell via FedEx and request for immediate delivery to her upon arrival.
Re: Ghislaine Maxwell 02879-509
Complaint about 'foul play' regarding legal mail found with USPS sticker, cramped meeting room conditions violating COVID protocols, and dietary issues (bologna sandwich).
[EXTERNAL] Re: Ghislaine Maxwell 02879-509
Detailed complaint about missing legal mail reappearing with USPS stickers (alleging foul play), cramped legal visit conditions, denial of larger room, and dietary/utility issues.
Re: Ghislaine Maxwell 02879-509
Ultimatum: If mail is not received by 9:30 AM, an order to show cause will be filed.
Re: Ghislaine Maxwell 02879-509
Ultimatum threatening to file an order to show cause if mail is not received by 9:30 AM.
Re: Ghislaine Maxwell 02879-509
I will follow up with the appropriate departments.
Re: Ghislaine Maxwell 02879-509
Notification that Maxwell still has not received the legal mail deposited on 10/2.
Re: Ghislaine Maxwell 02879-509
Follow-up noting mail still not received.
Initial Complaint
Initial report of missing legal mail deposited on 10/2. Notes that another client in the West Building received theirs.
Re: Ghislaine Maxwell 02879-509
Initial complaint that legal mail deposited on Oct 2 in the East Building mailbox had not been delivered to Maxwell, unlike mail for another client in the West Building.
Ghislaine Maxwell 02879-509
Notification of third-party interference with secure Webex line during legal call; witnessed by Case Manager.
MDC ongoing interference with attorney-client communication
An endorsed letter from Maxwell's counsel updating the court on interference with attorney-client communication. The endorsement orders the Government to confer with BOP and MDC Legal and file a response.
Disruption of MDC attorney-client video teleconferences
A letter from Ghislaine Maxwell's counsel, Bobbi C. Sternheim, to Judge Nathan regarding the disruption of attorney-client video calls at the MDC.
Re: Ghislaine Maxwell 02879-509
Denial of security breach; explanation that the line was already in use; creating new secure line for 9:30 call.
Unknown (Reply context)
Reporting that third parties accessed the Zoom room during privileged communication with Maxwell; requesting switch to WebEx.
Unknown (Reply context)
Initial concern that MDC Zoom platform does not preclude third party interference.
Ghislaine Maxwell 02879-509
Report of specific incidents: guards waking Maxwell at 1am and 3am due to shivering, then removing blankets claiming they are unauthorized. Also reiterates VTC issues.
Ghislaine Maxwell 02879-509
Complaint regarding guards waking Maxwell due to shivering, removing her blankets, and ongoing VTC technical issues.
Ghislaine Maxwell 02879-509
Complaint regarding modifications to the VTC room causing audio/video issues and inappropriate behavior by guards towards Ms. Maxwell.
Ghislaine Maxwell 02879-509
Initial complaint about VTC room modifications (blurry video/audio noise) and guard behavior (threatening discipline, barking orders, laughing).
Re: Ghislaine Maxwell 02879-509
Response regarding VTC unit storage (protective barrier), offer of medical care (declined by Maxwell), and request for photo of ear buds.
Ghislaine Maxwell 02879-509
Complaint about erratic enforcement of rules by guards and assertion that Maxwell is a compliant detainee.
Re: Ghislaine Maxwell 02879-509
Complaint about VTC room modifications causing blurry video and distorted audio. Complaint about guard behavior towards Maxwell (threatening discipline, barking orders, laughing).
Ghislaine Maxwell 02879-509
Complaint regarding VTC room technical issues (blurry video, audio distortion) and inappropriate behavior by guards towards Ms. Maxwell (threatening discipline, barking orders, laughing).
Re: Ghislaine Maxwell 02879-509
Initial complaint about VTC audio/video quality and inappropriate guard behavior (mocking, threatening discipline).
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity