Bobbi C. Sternheim
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Client |
102
Very Strong
|
211 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
29
Very Strong
|
34 | |
|
person
CHRISTIAN EVERDELL
|
Business associate |
19
Very Strong
|
19 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Client |
11
Very Strong
|
16 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
70 | |
|
person
ALISON J. NATHAN
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Professional |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
CHRISTIAN EVERDELL
|
Co counsel |
7
|
7 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Laura Menninger
|
Business associate |
6
|
6 | |
|
person
Christian R. Everdell
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
organization
LAW OFFICES OF BOBBI C. STERNHEIM
|
Professional employment |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
ANDREW ROHRBACH
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
John M. Leventhal
|
Professional succession |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
ALISON J. NATHAN
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Unknown |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Laura Menninger
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MARK S. COHEN
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeff Pagliuca
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
government counsel
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Professional opposing counsel |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Christian R. Everdell
|
Co counsel |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Curcio client
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Counsel of record
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Pagliuca
|
Professional |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Pretrial conference | A pretrial conference was held where counsel for the government and defendant made their appearan... | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | Pretrial conference | A final pretrial conference was held to discuss outstanding issues and the plan for jury selection. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | Detention | Ms. Maxwell is being held at the MDC under problematic conditions, including over-management and ... | MDC | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | An ongoing legal case involving Ms. Maxwell, where her conditions of confinement are a point of c... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | The ongoing criminal case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. | United States Courthouse, 4... | View |
| 2022-08-22 | N/A | Sentencing Hearing in United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-07-15 | Legal document service | Bobbi C. Sternheim certified the service of a legal motion with an exhibit to multiple parties in... | N/A | View |
| 2022-07-15 | Legal filing | Bobbi C. Sternheim executed a declaration requesting to be relieved as counsel for Ghislaine Maxw... | N/A | View |
| 2022-07-15 | Legal filing | Attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim filed a Motion Information Statement to be relieved as continued coun... | UNITED STATES COURT OF APPE... | View |
| 2022-07-15 | Legal filing | Attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim filed a declaration in support of a motion to be relieved from repres... | UNITED STATES COURT OF APPE... | View |
| 2022-07-15 | N/A | Court Order issued granting Bobbi C. Sternheim's motion to be relieved as counsel for Ghislaine M... | Thurgood Marshall United St... | View |
| 2022-07-07 | Legal filing | Bobbi C. Sternheim filed a Notice of Appeal for Ghislaine Maxwell. | N/A | View |
| 2022-07-07 | Legal filing payment | Payment of a $505.00 fee for a 'Notice of Appeal/Docketing Fee' for case 20CR330-1 AJN. | U.S. District Court, New Yo... | View |
| 2022-07-07 | Legal filing | Payment of a $505.00 fee for a 'Notice of Appeal/Docketing Fee' in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN. | U.S. District Court, New Yo... | View |
| 2022-07-07 | Legal filing | A Notice of Appeal was filed on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2022-07-07 | N/A | Payment of Notice of Appeal/Docketing Fee | U.S. District Court, Manhattan | View |
| 2022-07-07 | N/A | Notice of Appeal Filed | SDNY | View |
| 2022-06-28 | Sentencing | Sentencing hearing for the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2022-06-28 | Legal proceeding | A sentencing proceeding for Ghislaine Maxwell is scheduled for Tuesday, which may need to be post... | United States District Court | View |
| 2022-06-25 | Meeting | Bobbi C. Sternheim met with her client, Ghislaine Maxwell, at the detention facility. | MDC | View |
| 2022-06-24 | N/A | Filing of Document 672 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE | Court Record | View |
| 2022-06-24 | N/A | Filing of Document 672 (Submission Under Seal) in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2022-06-24 | Legal filing | Document 672 was filed in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | N/A | View |
| 2022-06-21 | N/A | Filing of legal document regarding sentencing procedures. | Court Docket | View |
| 2022-06-15 | Legal filing | Document 662 was filed in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | N/A | View |
DOJ-OGR-00020318.jpg
This document is page 3 of a legal filing by attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim regarding the confinement conditions of Ghislaine Maxwell at the MDC. The letter alleges HIPAA violations regarding the release of Maxwell's medical data and details an incident of physical abuse where a guard shoved Maxwell into an isolation cell. The defense requests the Court order the MDC to stop releasing health info and demands video evidence of the abuse incident, which the government disputes.
DOJ-OGR-00020317.jpg
This document is page 2 of a legal filing by attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim regarding the detention conditions of Ghislaine Maxwell at the MDC East Building. The text details unsanitary conditions involving mold and vermin, inadequate facilities for legal counsel meetings (described as a 'fishbowl' and 'death trap'), and Maxwell's deteriorating health due to lack of fresh air and sunlight over eight months. It also notes that a request for a legal call regarding pretrial motions was denied.
DOJ-OGR-00020316.jpg
A legal letter from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter refutes the government's claims about Maxwell's detention conditions, arguing they are overly restrictive and punitive. It details unsanitary conditions at the MDC, specifically a recent incident involving a severe sewage stench, overflowing toilets from the floor above, and plumbing issues in Maxwell's isolation cell.
DOJ-OGR-00020312.jpg
This document is page 6 of a legal filing by the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell, dated April 19, 2021. The defense is requesting a 90-day continuance (delay) of the trial scheduled for July 12, 2021, citing a recent government disclosure regarding 226 witnesses and scheduling conflicts. The document highlights the defense's need for time to investigate exculpatory information and complains about the government's unilateral expansion of the prosecution.
DOJ-OGR-00020311.jpg
This legal document is a motion filed by the defense counsel for Ms. Maxwell, arguing for a continuance (postponement) of her trial scheduled for July 12, 2021. The defense claims that the challenges of preparing for the case during the COVID-19 pandemic, combined with the need to review voluminous discovery and investigate new allegations, make it impossible to be ready by the scheduled date. The filing refutes the government's assertion of trial readiness and details the extensive work still required for an adequate defense.
DOJ-OGR-00005775.jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal motion filed on October 29, 2021, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The motion, submitted by Maxwell's legal team, seeks to preclude the introduction of specific government exhibits (251, 288, 294, 313, and 606) in her trial. The document lists the names and contact information for her attorneys from three different law firms.
DOJ-OGR-00005773.jpg
This document is the conclusion of a legal filing submitted on October 18, 2021, by the attorneys for Ghislaine Maxwell. The attorneys request that the court issue an order preventing all trial participants from referring to the accusers as "victims" or "minor victims." They argue that using such terms would violate Ms. Maxwell's presumption of innocence and lessen the government's burden of proof.
DOJ-OGR-00005747.jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal motion filed on October 29, 2021, in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The motion, submitted by Maxwell's legal team, seeks to preclude law enforcement witnesses from offering expert opinion testimony. The document lists the names and contact information for the four attorneys and their respective law firms representing the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00005744.jpg
This is a page from a legal motion filed on October 29, 2021, by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The attorneys argue that a redacted individual's identification of Maxwell should be suppressed because the individual never previously identified Maxwell as an abuser in interviews or under oath. The document asserts that the identification procedure was suggestive and occurred too long after the alleged events.
DOJ-OGR-00005738.jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal motion filed on October 29, 2021, in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The filing, titled 'GHISLAINE MAXWELL’S MOTION TO SUPPRESS IDENTIFICATION', lists the defendant's legal counsel from three different law firms. It serves as the formal introduction to a request for the court to exclude certain identification evidence from the trial.
DOJ-OGR-00005735.jpg
This document is the signature page from a legal filing in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, dated October 29, 2021. It lists the attorneys representing Ghislaine Maxwell: Jeffrey S. Pagliuca, Laura A. Menninger, Christian R. Everdell, and Bobbi C. Sternheim. The document also provides the names and addresses of their respective law firms in Denver and New York.
DOJ-OGR-00005726.jpg
This document is the cover page for a 'Motion in Limine' filed on October 29, 2021, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 20 Cr. 330). The motion seeks to exclude evidence allegedly seized during a search of 358 El Brillo Way (Jeffrey Epstein's Palm Beach residence) that occurred on October 20, 2005. It lists the legal defense team representing Maxwell, including attorneys from Haddon, Morgan & Foreman P.C., Cohen & Gresser LLP, and the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim.
DOJ-OGR-00005722.jpg
This document is the signature page (page 10 of 11) of a legal filing in the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), dated October 18, 2021, and filed on October 29, 2021. The visible text concludes a legal argument regarding hearsay evidence, asserting that a specific record does not meet the business records exception. It lists the defense legal team representing Maxwell, including attorneys from Haddon, Morgan & Foreman, Cohen & Gresser, and the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim.
DOJ-OGR-00002911.jpg
This legal document is a letter from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to the court, filed on April 7, 2021, concerning her client, Ms. Maxwell. Sternheim argues that the government's public updates on Maxwell's confinement conditions are detrimental, fueling negative media attention and jeopardizing her right to a fair trial. The letter requests that any future updates be limited in scope and filed under seal to protect Ms. Maxwell's privacy.
DOJ-OGR-00002910.jpg
This document is page 4 of a legal filing by attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim regarding the confinement conditions of Ghislaine Maxwell at the MDC. It details complaints including delayed mail, unreadable discovery discs, moldy food, sleep deprivation due to constant lighting and flashlight checks, and 'de facto solitary confinement.' The filing also argues that inadequate computer equipment is hindering Maxwell's ability to prepare for trial given the massive amount of discovery documents.
DOJ-OGR-00002909.jpg
This is page 3 of a legal filing by defense attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim regarding Ghislaine Maxwell. The document alleges that the MDC violated HIPAA by releasing Maxwell's medical info, describes her deteriorating physical condition (failing eyesight, thinning hair), and details an incident where she was physically abused (shoved) by a guard while being moved to an isolation cell. The defense requests the Court order the MDC to stop releasing health info and demands video evidence of the abuse incident, which the government claims exists but the defense believes was not recorded.
DOJ-OGR-00002907.jpg
This is a letter dated April 7, 2021, from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter strongly objects to the conditions of Ms. Maxwell's pretrial detention at the MDC, describing them as a form of "'pay-it-forward' punishment." It details a recent incident involving a pervasive sewage stench in her unit and argues that the government's portrayal of her confinement as superior is inaccurate and misses the point of her overly restrictive and unwarranted detention.
DOJ-OGR-00002885.jpg
This document is page 2 of a legal filing from the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim, dated March 31, 2021, regarding the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The defense argues that any delay in the trial schedule is the fault of the government for filing a late superseding indictment despite previous assurances (cited from a July 14, 2020 transcript) that they did not anticipate doing so. The defense claims this expansion of the case prejudices Maxwell, prolongs her detention, and transforms the proceedings from a 'two-week' trial into a much longer affair.
DOJ-OGR-00002732.jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal memorandum filed on February 23, 2021, in the Southern District of New York. It supports Ghislaine Maxwell's third motion for release on bail in case 20 Cr. 330 (AJN). The document lists the defense legal team, including attorneys from three different law firms based in New York and Colorado.
DOJ-OGR-00002731.jpg
This legal document, filed on February 16, 2021, is a letter from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim concerning the detention conditions of her client, Ms. Maxwell. Sternheim argues that Maxwell's harsh treatment at the MDC, including constant surveillance and deprivation, is a detrimental overreaction by the Bureau of Prisons following Jeffrey Epstein's death. The letter claims these conditions are severely impacting Maxwell's health and her ability to prepare for her defense, amounting to what Maxwell feels is "Pretrial Punishment."
DOJ-OGR-00002694.jpg
This document is the cover page of a legal memorandum filed on February 4, 2021, in the Southern District of New York (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). It is a filing by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team supporting a motion for a Bill of Particulars and Pretrial Disclosures. The document lists the defense attorneys representing Maxwell, including Mark S. Cohen, Christian R. Everdell, Jeffrey S. Pagliuca, Laura A. Menninger, and Bobbi C. Sternheim.
DOJ-OGR-00002690.jpg
This document is the conclusion of a legal motion filed on January 25, 2021, on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell. Her attorneys request that the Court either strike all references to 'Accuser-3' from specific paragraphs of the indictment or compel the government to provide advance notice before introducing any evidence related to that accuser. The document is signed by her legal team from three different law firms.
DOJ-OGR-00005258.jpg
This document is a signature page (Page 3 of 4) from a court filing (Document 357) dated October 18, 2021, in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It lists the defense legal team submitting the document, including Jeffrey S. Pagliuca, Laura A. Menninger, Christian R. Everdell, and Bobbi C. Sternheim, along with their respective law firms and contact information.
DOJ-OGR-00005255.jpg
This document is a letter dated October 18, 2021, from defense attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Sternheim argues for the necessity of individual, sequestered, and counsel-conducted voir dire (jury selection), citing the extraordinary public exposure of the case, evidenced by millions of Google search results for Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein. The letter contends that this special procedure is required to eliminate biased jurors and ensure a fair trial, countering the government's standard opposition to such methods.
DOJ-OGR-00005241.jpg
This is a letter from Ghislaine Maxwell's attorney, Bobbi C. Sternheim, to Judge Alison J. Nathan, dated October 15, 2021. Sternheim complains that the government's explanation for the severely delayed delivery of Maxwell's legal mail at the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) is inadequate and hinders Maxwell's ability to prepare for trial. The letter argues that the MDC is capable of timely delivery, citing the extensive resources used to monitor Maxwell, and criticizes the government's refusal to facilitate special delivery for evidence.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-07-07 | Paid | Bobbi C. Sternheim | U.S. District Cou... | $505.00 | Notice of Appeal/Docketing Fee for Case 20CR330... | View |
Request for Sealing
Request for Sealing
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
A letter from Ghislaine Maxwell's counsel to Judge Nathan, informing her of the filing of a Motion for a New Trial and requesting that submissions related to Juror No. 50 remain under seal.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
A letter from Ghislaine Maxwell's counsel to Judge Nathan, informing her of the filing of a Motion for a New Trial and requesting that submissions related to Juror No. 50 remain under seal.
Motion for New Trial
Letter to Court re: Motion for New Trial
Jury Charge
Letter re: Jury Charge
Opposition to restriction on expert testimony
Defense opposition to restrictions on expert testimony.
Opposition to restriction on expert testimony
Defense opposition to restrictions.
Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Defense counsel arguing against government limitations on Dr. Loftus's testimony and alleging suggestive questioning of witnesses by the government.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
A letter from the defense to the court regarding the tentative order of defense witnesses, difficulties with travel arrangements, and a request for three witnesses to testify pseudonymously, which the government opposes.
Order of Defense Witnesses
Correspondence regarding the schedule/order of witnesses for the defense.
Order of Defense Witnesses
Letter regarding the order of defense witnesses.
Trial document procedure
Letter regarding trial document procedure
RE: [EXTERNAL] [Redacted]/Boies Articles
AUSA confirms speaking with David Boies and Sigrid McCawley. They stated reporting about their client giving press briefings is incorrect and they intend to comply with SDNY Local Rule 23.1.
[EXTERNAL] [Redacted]/Boies Articles
Sending attached articles referenced during a call earlier that day.
Re: U.S. v. Maxwell, Case No. 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Confirming the government has confirmed all moving parties have been served.
Re: U.S. v. Maxwell...
Update that they are waiting for a response from the government regarding redaction issues.
Re: U.S. v. Maxwell, Case No. 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) [Maxwell's...
Confirming conference with the government regarding redactions and service to moving parties.
Re: U.S. v. Maxwell, Case No. 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Stating they conferred with government who agreed to serve moving parties after redactions; informed EVCP has been served.
Re: U.S. v. Maxwell, Case No. 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Stating they contacted government and are awaiting response on redaction issues.
Late Receipt of Govt Disclosures to MDC
Letter regarding late receipt of government disclosures at the detention center.
Late Receipt of Govt Disclosures to MDC
Defense complaining about late receipt of disclosures
Late Receipt of Govt Disclosures to MDC
Complaint about delayed disclosures; Judge orders government to use FedEx going forward.
Reply to Response to Motion for Reconsideration re: Relea...
Defense attorney correspondence regarding bond motion.
Reply to Response to Motion for Reconsideration re: Relea...
Defense reply regarding bond motion.
[EXTERNAL] Re: U.S. v. Maxwell S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Transmission of a courtesy copy of an ECF filing (Reply_to_Dkt_423.pdf) and notification of new office address.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity