Martha Stewart
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
Citibank
|
Employee |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Citibank
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Narrator
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Martha Stewart's conviction and sentencing. | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Law School | Law School | View |
| 2004-01-01 | Legal proceeding | Martha Stewart trial | N/A | View |
| 2003-01-01 | Legal proceeding | Martha Stewart indictment | N/A | View |
025.pdf
This document is a Memorandum of Law in Support of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in the derivative litigation against JP Morgan Chase & Co. It outlines arguments regarding pleading standards, demand futility, and failure to state claims against the defendants, including specific points related to JPMorgan's termination of Epstein as a client and the oversight of internal controls by the board of directors. The document includes a table of authorities citing numerous legal cases.
EFTA00032650.pdf
An email chain from July and August 2021 regarding the hiring of Paulette Taylor (Taylor'd Trial Consulting) by the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) for the USA v. Maxwell trial. The correspondence approves the engagement for focus groups, juror questionnaires, and trial statement feedback. Specific discussions include a cost estimate of $8,000 per 100 questionnaires for grading and references to previous high-profile cases like Martha Stewart.
EFTA00032620.pdf
This document is an email chain from July and August 2021 detailing the hiring of Paulette Taylor (Taylor'd Trial Consulting) by the US Attorney's Office (USANYS) for the 'USA v. Maxwell' trial. The correspondence covers the approval process, necessary forms (USA47, SOW), and a budget proposal which cites a cost of $8,000 per 100 juror questionnaires. A focus group for the trial was proposed for October 1, 2021.
DOJ-OGR-00009160.jpg
This document is page 41 of a legal brief filed on February 24, 2022, in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The text argues against granting an evidentiary hearing regarding juror misconduct allegations, citing precedents from cases involving El Chapo (Guzman Loera), Bin Laden, and Martha Stewart. The argument asserts that unsworn newspaper reports or anonymous claims are insufficient evidence to warrant a juror inquiry.
DOJ-OGR-00010153.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing (Case 1:09-cr-00581-WHP) dated April 6, 2012, which lists publications by Stephen Gillers from 2003 to 2006. The articles, published in various newspapers and legal journals, cover topics such as judicial ethics, the Martha Stewart trial, and judicial nominations including those of Miers and Alito. Several publications were co-authored with D. Luban, S. Lubet, and Deborah Rhode.
DOJ-OGR-00009839.jpg
This document is page 41 of a legal filing (Document 643, filed March 11, 2022) in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The text presents legal arguments citing precedents (Guzman Loera, Bin Laden, Martha Stewart) to oppose an evidentiary hearing regarding juror misconduct allegations based solely on unsworn media reports. The filing argues that newspaper articles and hearsay do not constitute 'incontrovertible evidence' required to justify post-trial juror inquiries.
DOJ-OGR-00009823.jpg
This page from a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) argues against a defense motion claiming Juror 50 was biased. The Government asserts that Juror 50's post-trial statements and negative attitude toward the defendant reflect the evidence presented during the trial, not pre-existing bias. It cites legal precedents including *United States v. Stewart* to support the argument that jurors bring subjective lived experiences to deliberations.
DOJ-OGR-00009474.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a Curriculum Vitae or expert report bibliography for legal scholar Stephen Gillers. It lists his publications (items 122-139) between 2003 and 2006, covering topics such as legal ethics, judicial selection, and high-profile cases like Martha Stewart's trial and Supreme Court nominations. The document bears a header indicating it was filed in 2022 as part of the Ghislaine Maxwell case (Case 1:20-cr-00330), likely as an exhibit related to expert testimony or legal arguments.
DOJ-OGR-00009353.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Exhibit A-5749) filed on February 24, 2022. It features the direct examination of a witness named Brune (likely an attorney), who admits to regretting a legal brief she filed under her signature which contained inaccurate or incomplete facts. She discusses the legal strategy at the time involving 'Mr. Parse' and references the 'Martha Stewart' case as a comparison for avoiding dismissal.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018597.jpg
This document appears to be a printed page from a personal blog or article discussing arguments for veganism. The author argues that veganism is easier than perceived and refutes health arguments against it. It references specific cookbooks, Chicago restaurants, and activist dynamics. Despite the 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' footer suggesting it is part of a larger legal production, the content itself contains no references to Jeffrey Epstein, financial crimes, or illicit activities.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017459.jpg
A document dated April 2, 2012, appearing to be a draft excerpt from a manuscript (possibly by Alan Dershowitz, given the biographical context). The author reflects on Martha Stewart's legal battles, criticizing her trial lawyer Robert Murcalo (sic) for doing a 'terrible job,' mentioning that she contacted the author too late for him to help significantly, and praising her subsequent rebound after prison.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018142.jpg
This document appears to be a corporate news digest or newsletter from June 2009 focusing on GTX Corp and its subsidiary Code Amber. It highlights a partnership with Syn-Apps to distribute missing person alerts through Cisco systems to clients like NASA and Martha Stewart Living, as well as CNN coverage of GPS tracking shoes. The document is stamped with a House Oversight Committee file number.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032091.jpg
This document, stamped with a House Oversight footer, is a compilation of press releases and news snippets from May and June 2009 related to GTX Corp. The content focuses on GPS tracking technology, specifically for missing persons (Code Amber) and Alzheimer's patients, and mentions partnerships with Syn-Apps and coverage by CNN and Sports Intelligence Magazine. It lists high-profile corporate clients using the alert system, including NASA, Tiffany & Co, and Martha Stewart Living.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029421.jpg
This page from a court filing describes the police investigation into allegations of sexual misconduct with minors against Mr. Epstein, detailing specific accusations from a 14-year-old girl and testimony from Haley Robson. It includes defense statements from attorney Mr. Lefcourt disputing the claims and mentioning a passed lie-detector test, as well as procedural actions taken by the Palm Beach police.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029410.jpg
This document is a filing from Case 1:17-cv-03956-PGG, containing an excerpt of a news article detailing the initial Palm Beach police investigation into Jeffrey Epstein starting in March 2005. It details allegations from a 14-year-old girl who was recruited by Haley Robson, describes specific sexual acts and payments ($300), and notes that Robson admitted to police that she was paid to bring teenage girls to Epstein. The document also includes defense statements from Epstein's lawyer, Mr. Lefcourt, denying the allegations.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029331.jpg
This document is a professional biography for event planner Bryan Rafanelli, detailing his company's philosophy, media accolades, and high-profile clientele, including Chelsea Clinton and the Obamas. It highlights his awards from 2010 and 2011, noting his offices in Boston, New York, Washington DC, and Palm Beach. The document bears a House Oversight bates stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021784.jpg
This document, likely a page from a news article filed in House Oversight records, summarizes the conflict between Palm Beach police and the State Attorney regarding the indictment of Jeffrey Epstein. It details how Police Chief Reiter accused State Attorney Krischer of preferential treatment for Epstein. The text outlines Epstein's high-profile connections (Clinton, Harvard), his legal defense strategy led by Gerald Lefcourt and Alan Dershowitz, and provides specific graphic details of the allegations made by a 14-year-old victim who was recruited by Haley Robson.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021772.jpg
This document appears to be a news article or report summary detailing the 2006 investigation into Jeffrey Epstein in Palm Beach. It highlights the conflict between the police (who sought serious molestation charges) and the State Attorney (who pursued lesser solicitation charges), allegations of preferential treatment due to Epstein's wealth and connections, and the political fallout involving returned donations. It also outlines Epstein's defense strategy led by Gerald Lefcourt and Alan Dershowitz.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030476.jpg
This document is a personal account from journalist Vicky Ward, reflecting on her interactions with Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell after her 2003 Vanity Fair article. Ward describes Epstein as intelligent but socially awkward and Ghislaine as a charismatic, well-connected figure who became deeply loyal to Epstein after he 'saved her' following the death of her father, Robert Maxwell. The text provides anecdotal insights into their personalities, social circles (including Prince Andrew and Bill Clinton), and the nature of their complex relationship.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030473.jpg
This document is a first-person opinion piece defending Ghislaine Maxwell, written by an unnamed author who knows her. The author portrays Maxwell as a charismatic, intelligent, and loyal friend, contextualizing her deep bond with Jeffrey Epstein as a result of him 'saving' her after the death and disgrace of her father, Robert Maxwell. The piece suggests that despite the 'current fuss,' Ghislaine's social standing in New York will remain intact because, in that city, wealth and connections often overshadow moral failings.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030471.jpg
This document is an opinion piece defending Ghislaine Maxwell and analyzing her relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. The author, who claims to like Ghislaine, portrays her as a charismatic and intelligent socialite whose loyalty to Epstein stems from him having 'saved' her after the death of her criminal father, Robert Maxwell. The piece attempts to normalize the behavior of the very rich by comparing Epstein's 'sexual pecadillos' to the known oddities and legal troubles of other successful figures.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030468.jpg
This document is a first-person account from an author, identified as 'Vicky', describing her personal impressions of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. Epstein is portrayed as intelligent but socially awkward, while Maxwell is described as vivacious, well-connected, and deeply loyal to Epstein, whom she credits with 'saving her' after the death of her father, Robert Maxwell. The author notes the powerful connections of both individuals, including Prince Andrew and Bill Clinton, and reflects on the nature of wealth and success.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030466.jpg
This document is an email or communication, identified as the property of Jeffrey Epstein. The unidentified author speculates about a 'current fuss over Ghislaine' (presumably Maxwell), predicting her loyalty to friends like Bill Clinton and the power of money will allow her to weather the scandal. The author compares the situation to other wealthy individuals like Sam Waksal and Martha Stewart, suggesting the very rich often have strange habits or break the law.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030463.jpg
This undated memo, property of Jeffrey Epstein, is a personal analysis of Ghislaine Maxwell's character and her relationship with Epstein. The author, an acquaintance of Maxwell, posits that Epstein became a father figure who 'saved' her after the death of her criminal father, Robert Maxwell. The document speculates that Maxwell's charisma and powerful connections, such as her close friendship with Bill Clinton, will ensure she weathers any 'current fuss' or scandal.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030461.jpg
This document is a personal account from an unnamed author who knows and likes Ghislaine Maxwell, describing her as a charismatic and complex individual. The author posits that Ghislaine's unwavering loyalty to Jeffrey Epstein stems from him 'saving' her after the death of her criminal father, Robert Maxwell, positioning Epstein as a 'replacement' father figure. The piece contextualizes the behavior of the very rich, suggesting their flaws are often overlooked, especially when they have money.
Juror Employment History
Allegations regarding juror being fired from Citibank.
Legal situation
Discussed her situation after she got in trouble.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity