This document is a 'Relativity Searches' report dated November 18, 2021, listing document control numbers relevant to four redacted search targets. The results include references to Epstein's 'black book', lists of girls' names, masseuses, phone records, bill logs, and interview transcripts from 2007 and 2018. It serves as an index of evidence rather than a primary source of the evidence itself.
This document is an email dated November 18, 2021, regarding the query of phone numbers in the Relativity e-discovery platform. The sender updates the recipient on the progress of checking numbers against 'US vs Epstein' case files (labeled 'JE') and search warrants (labeled 'JE SW').
An email thread dated April 20, 2021, discussing technical issues encountered during a document review process related to Epstein (likely the legal discovery phase). A reviewer asks how to tag documents that appear blank (USPV00341820-26) or have multimedia format errors (USPV00341831-51) within the Relativity software, and a supervisor confirms they should be marked 'For Further Review'.
This document is a chain of emails between the FBI (NY Field Office/CART) and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding the chaotic processing of digital evidence seized from Jeffrey Epstein. The US Attorney's office complains that over 1.3 million documents were provided in a disorganized manner, with emails unlinked from attachments (specifically citing flight records as an example of unlinked data), making review impossible. The FBI cites technical issues, including a network replacement where they were mandated to delete 400TB of old data, and clarifies that some evidence originated from a July 2007 search.
This document is a lengthy email chain between the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) and the FBI's NY CART team regarding the forensic processing of digital evidence seized from Jeffrey Epstein's properties in New York and the Virgin Islands. The correspondence highlights significant technical difficulties, including issues with Mac APFS formatting, the volume of data (one item with 500k emails), and friction between the agencies regarding the format of data for the 'Relativity' e-discovery platform. The USANYS expresses frustration with FBI delays and errors, eventually seeking budget approval ($85k-135k) to hire an outside vendor (BRG) to process the data instead of the FBI. The documents also mention a previous 2007 search and the deletion of 400TB of old FBI network data during a system upgrade in Feb 2020.
This document is an email thread between the FBI's NY Computer Analysis Response Team (CART) and the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding the processing of massive amounts of digital evidence seized from Jeffrey Epstein's properties in New York and the Virgin Islands. The discussion highlights technical difficulties in transferring terabytes of data, issues with file compatibility between forensic tools and the 'Relativity' review platform, and delays caused by FBI network upgrades. It lists specific hardware seized, including servers, laptops, and hard drives (some dating back to a 2007 search), but does not contain actual flight logs or passenger manifests.
This document is an email chain from March 17, 2021, discussing access permissions for legal databases related to the 'US v Epstein' case. A requester asks for a colleague to be granted access to 'US v Epstein' and 'US v Epstein (SW Returns)' databases on the Relativity platform. The administrator responds requiring a signed 'Rules of Behavior' form before access can be granted.
This document is an automatic email reply dated March 12, 2021, from a USANYS contractor. The subject line references a 'Question re Epstein Relativity,' suggesting an inquiry related to the Relativity e-discovery database used in the Epstein investigation. The sender provides out-of-office dates and alternative contacts.
This document is a chain of emails from July and August 2020 between legal teams (likely prosecution and defense) regarding the status of evidence in the Ghislaine Maxwell case. It details the transfer of digital forensic materials, including thumb drives containing specific device extractions identified by 'NYC' numbers. Significant technical issues are discussed, including 71,000 'zero byte' (empty) files and two servers with physically failed drives requiring specialist recovery at HQ.
This document is an email chain from July and August 2020 between legal or investigative teams regarding the status of digital evidence related to the Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell cases. The correspondence details the transfer of specific hard drives and thumb drives (identified by NYC numbers), addresses missing files (specifically NYC027913), and discusses technical issues including 71,000 zero-byte files and physically broken server drives requiring specialist recovery. The emails coordinate the delivery of these materials to a contractor (PAE) for upload to the Relativity e-discovery platform.
An email exchange from October 2020 between a USANYS contractor and another party coordinating a phone call. The purpose of the call is to discuss the 'responsiveness review' of 'Epstein SW returns' (likely Search Warrant returns) hosted on the Relativity e-discovery platform. The document indicates ongoing legal processing of evidence related to the Epstein case in late 2020.
This document is an email header dated October 21, 2020, originating from the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). The subject matter concerns an e-discovery 'Relativity batch request & recap' regarding the Maxwell/Epstein case. The document serves as an administrative record of internal communications regarding evidence processing.
This document is an email chain from November 12, 2019, regarding the legal case 'US v. Epstein'. It discusses the processing of digital evidence, specifically '56 DVD files' that a vendor has finished coding. The correspondence coordinates the physical storage of these DVDs and the review of the data before it is uploaded to the Relativity e-discovery platform, noting that the legal team will be traveling later that week.
This document is an email thread from October and November 2020 between USANYS staff and a contractor regarding document production for the 'Maxwell case' (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The discussion involves running specific search terms and email addresses against the 'US v. Epstein (SW Returns)' database on the Relativity platform. Specific folder numbers (NYC024348, NYC024349, NYC024350) and document counts (totaling 5,283) are detailed for production.
This document is an email chain between the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) and technical support staff regarding the processing of digital evidence seized from Jeffrey Epstein's New York mansion and Virgin Islands property. The correspondence details significant technical challenges in reviewing over 1 million documents, including issues with linking emails to attachments, incompatible load files, and disorganized data dumps. It confirms the seizure of approximately 40 devices and 60+ CDs from NY, over 25 devices (including servers) from the Virgin Islands, and hard drives dating back to a 2007 search.
This document is an email read receipt dated March 15, 2021. The subject line 'Read: Question re Epstein Relativity' suggests administrative correspondence regarding the management of Epstein-related files or data, likely within the 'Relativity' e-discovery legal software platform. The sender and recipient identities are fully redacted.
This document is an email chain from January and February 2020 regarding the processing and upload of digital evidence seized in the Epstein case. The correspondence details the receipt of hard drives from FBI CART, the upload of this data to the Relativity platform for privilege review, and the segregation of privileged (PP) hits. The emails indicate a large volume of data and mention that the FBI has additional batches of evidence to transmit.
This document is an email chain from January and February 2020 discussing the logistical handling of digital evidence related to the Jeffrey Epstein case. The correspondence details the receipt of a hard drive from FBI CART containing data from seized devices, instructing that the data be uploaded to the Relativity platform for privilege review. It also mentions that the FBI has additional batches of evidence to transmit shortly.
This document is an email chain from January to March 2020 involving the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) and support staff regarding the processing of digital evidence in the Epstein case. The emails detail the receipt of hard drives from FBI CART containing data from seized devices, the upload of this data to the Relativity platform for privilege review, and technical challenges regarding the massive volume of duplicate documents. Specific mentions are made of segregating privilege hits, organizing files under 'Search Warrant Returns' versus 'Subpoena Returns', and the involvement of a vendor named PAE.
An email chain from January and February 2020 discussing the technical handling of digital evidence seized in the Jeffrey Epstein case. The correspondence details the receipt of a hard drive from FBI CART containing processed data from seized devices, the upload of this data to the Relativity e-discovery platform, and the segregation of materials for privilege review. Participants troubleshoot locating specific folders ('Subpoena Returns' vs 'Search Warrant Returns') within the database.
This document is an email chain from January and February 2020 discussing the processing of digital evidence seized in the Jeffrey Epstein case. The legal team received a hard drive from FBI CART containing processed data from seized devices and coordinated its upload to the Relativity platform for privilege review. The emails mention that the FBI had another batch of data to transmit shortly and outline instructions for 'PAE' to run privilege terms on the data.
This document is an email thread from October 2020 between redacted individuals discussing search terms to be applied to Epstein's electronic devices using Relativity software. The conversation involves refining the keyword list, with specific suggestions to add 'massage', 'masseuse', and 'passenger'. The thread references an attached search warrant (20 mag 6719) dated June 26, 2020.
This document is an internal US Attorney's Office (SDNY) email chain dated October 30, 2020, discussing a critical delay in discovery production for the 'US v. Epstein' case. Nicholas Koontz, a lead analyst at contractor PAE, informs the team that 1.2 million records are still being imaged and won't be available until November 2. USANYS staff express frustration that requests made in September are only just arriving, concluding they will likely miss a November 9 deadline set by Judge Nathan.
An email thread from November 2020 regarding the 'US v. Maxwell' case. A member of the Maxwell legal team requests a USANYS contractor named Chris to organize documents from the 'USAO-SDFL Files' (Southern District of Florida) within the 'US v Epstein' Relativity database into batches for review. They also request the creation of a specific tag labeled 'Relevant to NPA' (Non-Prosecution Agreement), indicating the team was reviewing historical files related to the Florida investigation.
An email dated November 16, 2020, regarding the 'US v. Maxwell' case. The sender requests technical assistance to batch documents from the 'USAO-SDFL Files' (United States Attorney's Office - Southern District of Florida) within the 'US v Epstein' database on the Relativity platform for review. They also request a specific tag be created for documents 'Relevant to NPA' (Non-Prosecution Agreement).
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity