The Independent
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Juror 50
|
Interviewee interviewer |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
David
|
Interviewee interviewer |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Scotty David
|
Source news outlet |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-04 | Publication | The Independent published an article based on the interview with Juror No. 50. | N/A | View |
EFTA00022351.pdf
This document is an internal email from the U.S. Embassy in London, dated June 9, 2020, containing a daily press roundup titled 'The SW11'. The primary story highlights the conflict between Prince Andrew's legal team and the U.S. Department of Justice regarding the Epstein sex-trafficking inquiry, with the DOJ accusing the Prince of refusing to cooperate. Other stories cover the toppling of the Colston statue in Bristol, UK government discussions on COVID-19 social distancing, Huawei's relations with the UK, and Hong Kong immigration rights.
DOJ-OGR-00020907.jpg
This document is a transcript from a court proceeding (dated Feb 28, 2023, Case 22-1426) involving a debate between defense attorney Mr. Everdell and prosecutor Ms. Moe before the Judge. The discussion centers on the credibility of a male witness/victim who gave an interview to a journalist named Lucia from 'The Independent' about sexual abuse. Everdell argues the witness is inconsistent regarding whether he understood that speaking to the press would make his identity and abuse public.
DOJ-OGR-00020887.jpg
This Reuters article, dated January 5, 2022, reports on the jury deliberations in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. A juror, Scotty David, revealed that some jurors initially doubted the credibility of two accusers' memories. David, a survivor of childhood sexual abuse himself, shared his personal experience with the jury, which helped them understand trauma's effect on memory and ultimately led to a unanimous guilty verdict against Maxwell on December 29, 2021.
DOJ-OGR-00020878.jpg
This document, appearing to be a court document or news article, discusses observations made by a juror named Scotty David during the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. It highlights the potential for Maxwell to claim a mistrial because Scotty David, who was a victim of child sex abuse, shared his experiences with other jurors, which may not have been fully disclosed during jury selection. Legal experts weigh in on the implications of this revelation for Maxwell's conviction.
DOJ-OGR-00020872.jpg
This legal document excerpt details a juror's, named David, perspective on the acquittal of Maxwell on a specific charge ('count two') involving an accuser named Jane. David explains that while Jane's story was corroborated by flight logs and Epstein's 'little black book', the jury ultimately found insufficient direct evidence to prove Maxwell had 'enticed' Jane to travel, which was required for a conviction on that charge. The decision was based on a lack of evidence for that specific action, not on a disbelief of the victim.
DOJ-OGR-00020871.jpg
This document appears to be a court exhibit containing excerpts from media interviews (MailOnline, The Independent) with a juror named 'David' following the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. David explains that the jury was swayed by the 'pattern' of grooming established by multiple accusers (Kate, Jane, Annie Farmer, Carolyn), despite the defense's attempts to challenge memories via expert Loftus. He specifically notes that while accuser Kate's testimony could not be used for charges due to UK laws, it was crucial for establishing the grooming methodology.
DOJ-OGR-00020870.jpg
This document is a legal exhibit containing an excerpt from an article in The Independent featuring an interview with a juror named David following the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. David explains that the jury found the victims credible despite defense attempts to attack them and use memory expert Elizabeth Loftus to cast doubt on their recollections. He highlights a specific moment where a victim named 'Carolyn' became distressed on the stand, noting that such incidents increased his compassion rather than creating doubt.
DOJ-OGR-00020869.jpg
This document is a court exhibit (A-243) containing an excerpt from an article in The Independent. It features an interview with Scotty David, a juror in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial, who discusses why the jury found the victims credible and the verdict justified. David reveals his own history as a sexual abuse survivor, explaining how his personal experience helped him understand how victims process traumatic memories.
DOJ-OGR-00020868.jpg
This document is a news article from The Independent, dated January 5, 2022, presented as an exhibit in a legal case. The article features an interview with an anonymous juror from the Ghislaine Maxwell sex-trafficking trial. The juror states they voted to convict Maxwell because they believed the victims' testimonies and the pattern of abuse they described, adding that the 'verdict is for all the victims'.
DOJ-OGR-00021532.jpg
This legal document discusses a discrepancy between a juror's (Juror 50) responses on a questionnaire and subsequent public statements. Juror 50 denied being a victim of a crime on the questionnaire but later told media outlets, including The Independent and The Daily Mail, on January 5, 2022, that he had been sexually abused as a minor. Based on these contradictory statements, the Court has decided to hold an evidentiary hearing to investigate the matter.
DOJ-OGR-00021133.jpg
This page from a legal filing (dated Feb 28, 2023) argues that the District Court erred regarding 'Juror 50,' claiming the juror was biased and concealed information during voir dire to act as an 'unsworn expert' on traumatic memory. It cites Rule 606(b) exceptions and references a footnote contrasting expert testimony by Dr. Elizabeth Loftus (stating memory is constructed) with Juror 50's statements to The Independent (Jan 4, 2022) that abuse memories are 'replayed like a video.'
DOJ-OGR-00009188.jpg
This document is a court filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) containing a printout of a Reuters article dated January 5, 2022. The article details how juror Scotty David swayed fellow jurors during the Ghislaine Maxwell trial by sharing his own history of childhood sexual abuse to validate the imperfect memories of accusers 'Jane' and 'Carolyn.' The document highlights the internal deliberations of the jury that led to Maxwell's conviction on December 29, 2021.
DOJ-OGR-00009179.jpg
This document details a potential mistrial claim for Ghislaine Maxwell based on revelations from juror Scotty David, who was a victim of child sex abuse and shared his experience with fellow jurors. Legal experts discuss the implications of David's disclosure and the possibility of Maxwell's convictions being quashed if proper disclosure protocols were not followed during jury selection.
DOJ-OGR-00009174.jpg
This document is the final page of a court exhibit filed on February 24, 2022, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It contains the end of a news article (likely from The Independent) quoting an unidentified man stating Maxwell knew what was happening, and notes that her sentencing schedule had not yet been set.
DOJ-OGR-00009173.jpg
This legal document is a page from a court filing detailing a juror's (David's) explanation for Ghislaine Maxwell's acquittal on a specific charge (count two) involving the accuser 'Jane'. David clarifies to 'The Independent' that the jury's decision was based on a lack of direct evidence that Maxwell 'enticed' Jane to travel, not on a disbelief of Jane's testimony. The document also mentions corroborating evidence such as flight logs and Maxwell's 'little black book', which listed names of 'masseuses' and Palm Beach police officers.
DOJ-OGR-00009172.jpg
This document contains excerpts from an interview with a juror named David following the Ghislaine Maxwell trial, filed as a court exhibit. David explains that while the jury could not convict based on accuser 'Kate's' testimony due to UK age of consent laws, her testimony was crucial in establishing Maxwell's grooming 'pattern' involving boundary confusion and massage. David also defends his own responses to the pre-trial questionnaire regarding sexual abuse history.
DOJ-OGR-00009171.jpg
This document is a page from a court filing, detailing the perspective of a juror named David. David explains to The Independent why he and the jury found the victims credible, despite defense arguments about their behavior and the fallibility of memory. He emphasizes that the jury's role was to judge the stories, not the victims' decisions, and notes that the defense's memory expert, Professor Elizabeth Loftus, did not sway their verdict.
DOJ-OGR-00009130.jpg
This legal document, part of case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE filed on February 24, 2022, analyzes post-trial interviews given by 'Juror 50' in the Maxwell case. The document recounts the juror's statements to media outlets like Reuters and The Independent, where he discussed his initial impartiality, his handling of the juror questionnaire regarding his own experience of sexual abuse, and the jury's reasoning for their verdict. The filing argues that a full review of the juror's interviews demonstrates his impartiality and the care taken during deliberations, countering the defendant's claims of bias.
DOJ-OGR-00009020.jpg
This document details statements made by Juror No. 50, identified as Scotty David, to The Independent journalist Lucia Osborne-Crowley, published on January 4, 2022. Juror No. 50, a victim of sexual assault, revealed how his personal experience and vivid traumatic memories influenced the jury's belief in Ms. Maxwell's accusers and led him to discredit the testimony of Ms. Maxwell's expert witness, Dr. Elizabeth Loftus.
DOJ-OGR-00009003.jpg
This document is the table of contents for a legal filing in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on February 24, 2022. The filing argues that the defendant, Ms. Maxwell, was deprived of a fair trial due to juror misconduct, focusing on "Juror No. 50," who allegedly was untruthful during jury selection and later gave interviews to media outlets like The Independent, Daily Mail, and Reuters. The document also notes that a second juror disclosed during deliberations that they had been a victim of sexual assault.
DOJ-OGR-00010251.jpg
This document is page 36 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on March 11, 2022. The text captures a legal argument regarding the cross-examination of a male witness who is a victim of sexual abuse. The defense (implied) questions the witness about an interview with a reporter named Lucia from The Independent and whether he understood the public consequences of that interview. Prosecutor Ms. Moe objects to the phrasing of the question regarding 'consequences' as confusing, while conceding no objection to limited follow-up on the witness's understanding of public exposure.
DOJ-OGR-00010250.jpg
This document is page 35 of a court transcript from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on March 11, 2022. Attorney Mr. Everdell argues before the Court that a male subject (likely a juror or witness) lacks credibility because his statements about not expecting to be known contradict his lengthy discussions with a journalist named Lucia from The Independent about the consequences of coming forward. The defense contends the subject is 'talking out of both sides of his mouth' regarding his anonymity.
DOJ-OGR-00010230.jpg
This document is a transcript of legal testimony where an unnamed witness is being questioned about a questionnaire they previously filled out. The witness states they became aware of an inaccurate answer they provided only after an article was published in The Independent. They also specify that they first learned the questionnaire contained a question about sexual abuse history during a separate interview with Daily Mail reporter Laura Collins.
DOJ-OGR-00009867.jpg
This Reuters news article, dated January 5, 2022, reports on the jury deliberations in the Ghislaine Maxwell sex abuse trial. A juror, Scotty David, revealed that some jurors initially doubted the credibility of two accusers, Jane and Carolyn. David explained that he shared his own experience of childhood sexual abuse to help the other jurors understand the nature of memory and trauma, which ultimately swayed them and led to a unanimous guilty verdict on December 29, 2021.
DOJ-OGR-00009858.jpg
This document is a news article, filed as part of a legal case, detailing an interview with 'Scotty David,' a juror from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. The juror describes his observations of Maxwell's demeanor in court, the jury's deliberations, and reveals that he is a victim of child sex abuse, an experience he shared with other jurors. This disclosure, if not previously revealed on his juror questionnaire, could provide grounds for Maxwell to claim a mistrial, according to legal expert Moira Penza.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity