Trove
Sign In Sign Up

defendant

Person
Mentions
747
Relationships
299
Events
570
Documents
357
Also known as:
The Household / Defendant Defendant (Def.) Oshatz Defendant Defendant Counsel Defendant (Counsel) Government / Defendant Counsel
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.
299 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
organization GOVERNMENT
Legal representative
13 Very Strong
62
View
organization The Court
Legal representative
12 Very Strong
8
View
person Defense counsel
Legal representative
11 Very Strong
21
View
person Juror 50
Legal representative
11 Very Strong
17
View
person Epstein
Co conspirators
11 Very Strong
11
View
person Spouse
Financial
10 Very Strong
7
View
person JANE
Perpetrator victim
10 Very Strong
5
View
person Defense counsel
Client
10 Very Strong
10
View
organization The government
Legal representative
10 Very Strong
18
View
location court
Legal representative
10 Very Strong
16
View
organization GOVERNMENT
Adversarial
10 Very Strong
24
View
person Defense counsel
Professional
10 Very Strong
11
View
person Epstein
Business associate
10 Very Strong
8
View
person Jeffrey Epstein
Business associate
9 Strong
5
View
person ALISON J. NATHAN
Judicial
9 Strong
5
View
person defendant's spouse
Marital
8 Strong
4
View
person JANE
Alleged perpetrator victim
8 Strong
3
View
person Jane
Business associate
8 Strong
2
View
person Defendant's Spouse
Friend
8 Strong
3
View
person Kate
Legal representative
8 Strong
3
View
person Epstein
Co conspirator
8 Strong
4
View
person CAROLYN
Criminal
8 Strong
4
View
person Epstein
Association
8 Strong
3
View
person Epstein
Professional
8 Strong
4
View
person Bureau of Prisons
Custodial
7
3
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
1996-01-01 Property sale A sale agreement was made for the defendant's house in London. 44 Kinnerton Street, London View
1994-01-01 Conspiracy The time span of the conspiracy charged in Count Three, involving transporting minors across stat... N/A View
1994-01-01 Alleged criminal activity A series of events during which the Defendant allegedly enticed or coerced an individual named Ja... N/A View
1994-01-01 Sexual abuse The defendant and Epstein's sexual abuse of Kate started in 1994, when Kate was 17. N/A View
1994-01-01 Criminal conduct Conduct involving certain victims, charged in Counts One through Four. N/A View
1994-01-01 N/A Time frame for Count Three conspiracy. Unknown View
1994-01-01 Criminal offense The period during which the offenses of conviction occurred, spanning from 1994 up to and includi... N/A View
1994-01-01 Crime The defendant allegedly groomed three minor girls to engage in sex acts with Epstein. Florida, New Mexico, New Yo... View
1994-01-01 Conspiracy The Defendant worked with Epstein to groom minor victims and transport them to New York for illeg... New York View
1994-01-01 N/A Period of conspiracy to entice minors to travel for illegal sex acts Unspecified View
1994-01-01 N/A Time period relevant to Count Two regarding Jane Interstate commerce View
1994-01-01 N/A Time period relevant to Count Two relating to Jane. Interstate commerce / New York View
1994-01-01 Conspiracy The conspiracy period for Count Three, which charged the Defendant with conspiring to violate the... N/A View
1994-01-01 Presence at location Jane, the defendant, and Epstein were at Interlochen Interlochen View
1994-01-01 Alleged criminal activity A series of alleged acts where the Defendant enticed an individual named Jane to engage in illega... New York View
1990-01-01 Scheme A period described as an 'earlier phase' where the Defendant and Epstein used the cover of mentor... N/A View
1990-01-01 Abuse scheme operation Defendant and Epstein used the cover of mentoring young girls to introduce massage, which was the... N/A View
1990-01-01 Criminal conduct The time period during which the defendant's alleged criminal conduct, including a scheme to groo... N/A View
1963-06-14 N/A Miller v. US case citation referenced in footnote. US Court System View
0025-01-01 N/A Events of alleged abuse and grooming. Unknown View

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015604.jpg

This document is page 6 of a legal filing arguing against a subpoena issued by the Defendant to a non-party identified as Jane Doe No. 3 in a Florida defamation case. The filing characterizes the subpoena as harassment intended to put the non-party in jail and notes that the Defendant specifically requested documents relating to Bill Clinton and Al Gore. The document argues these requests are irrelevant and violate Florida Rules of Civil Procedure.

Legal filing / motion (opposition to subpoena)
2025-11-19
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015601.jpg

This document is a background section of a legal motion filed by attorneys Paul Cassell and Brad Edwards in a defamation case. It argues that the Defendant (contextually Alan Dershowitz) is abusing subpoena power to harass a non-party victim, Jane Doe No. 3 (Virginia Giuffre), following a defamation campaign where the Defendant called the attorneys 'unethical' on the Today Show. The motion seeks to quash the subpoena to protect Jane Doe No. 3 from further intimidation.

Legal filing (motion background/argument)
2025-11-19
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014109.jpg

This legal document is a response by a Defendant to document requests in the case *Jane Doe No. 1 v. United States* (Case 9:08-cv-80736). The Defendant objects to providing travel records from 1998-2007, limiting the scope to 1999-2002 based on Jane Doe #3's allegations that she was Epstein's 'sex slave' during that period before escaping to Australia. The Defendant also objects to producing communications with Jeffrey Epstein from late 2014 to 2015 regarding the sexual misconduct allegations, claiming attorney-client privilege and lack of relevance.

Legal filing (defendant's response to document requests)
2025-11-19
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014108.jpg

This document is a page from a legal filing filed on March 24, 2015, in the Southern District of Florida (Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM). It contains the Defendant's responses to specific requests for production of documents. The requests seek evidence supporting the Defendant's assertions that attorney Paul G. Cassell acted unethically, corruptly, or in a 'sleazy' manner, and failed to investigate allegations made by Jane Doe #3.

Legal document (defendant's response to request for production)
2025-11-19
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014103.jpg

This document is a legal response filed on March 24, 2015, in the Southern District of Florida, containing a Defendant's responses to discovery requests regarding Jeffrey Epstein. The requests seek documents proving the presence of the Defendant's nephew and Epstein's legal team on Epstein's private plane, as well as flight manifests linking the Defendant to Epstein. The Defendant objects to requests regarding the legal team by citing allegations from 'Jane Doe #3' regarding her abuse between 1999 and 2002, arguing that post-2002 travel records are irrelevant to the specific action.

Legal filing (response to request for production of documents)
2025-11-19
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014102.jpg

This document is a page from a legal discovery response filed in the Southern District of Florida in 2015. The Defendant (likely Alan Dershowitz) agrees to produce documents regarding the presence of his wife and daughter on Little Saint James Island, at Epstein's New Mexico ranch, and on Epstein's private plane. Notably, the Defendant explicitly confirms there was a 'sole occasion' where he was physically present at the New Mexico ranch.

Legal discovery response / court filing
2025-11-19
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014100.jpg

This page contains the 'General Objections' section of a legal filing (Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM) entered in the Southern District of Florida in 2015. The Defendant outlines five standard objections regarding the production of documents, citing relevance, admissibility, timing of discovery, attorney-client privilege, and undue burden. The document bears a House Oversight Committee bates stamp.

Legal filing (response/objections to document requests)
2025-11-19
Analysis Source
Total Received
$3,860,014.00
6 transactions
Total Paid
$162,621,025.00
42 transactions
Net Flow
-$158,761,011.00
48 total transactions
Date Type From To Amount Description Actions
2025-03-01 Paid defendant Marriage Assets $20,000,000.00 Amount brought to the marriage by the defendant... View
2025-03-01 Paid defendant Marriage Assets $20,000,000.00 Amount defendant brought to the marriage (more ... View
2022-06-01 Paid defendant N/A $22,000,000.00 Value of assets defendant claimed to have durin... View
2021-03-22 Received Buyers of Hovensa... defendant $450,000.00 Amount the Defendant would retain for living ex... View
2021-03-22 Received Buyers of Hovensa... defendant $0.00 Jewelry and other chattels potentially worth hu... View
2021-03-09 Paid defendant Monitorship $0.00 Defendant offers to place some assets in a moni... View
2020-12-30 Paid defendant Court $28,500,000.00 Proposed bail package (rejected). View
2020-12-30 Received Lender (implied) defendant $0.00 Significant loans procured on the basis of a ne... View
2020-12-30 Paid defendant Illiquid Hedge Fund $4,000,000.00 Investment argued by defense to be difficult to... View
2020-12-01 Received N/A defendant $3,400,000.00 Approximate worth of assets held in defendant's... View
2020-07-14 Paid defendant Court (Bond) $0.00 Discussions regarding a bond, transparency of f... View
2020-07-01 Paid defendant Self $3,400,000.00 Approximate assets held in defendant's own name... View
2020-07-01 Paid defendant Self $3,400,000.00 Approximate assets held in her own name. View
2019-07-02 Paid defendant United States Gov... $0.00 Legal provision declaring intent to seek forfei... View
2015-01-01 Paid defendant Spouse $0.00 Millions of dollars of assets transferred throu... View
2015-01-01 Paid defendant Spouse $0.00 Millions of dollars of assets transferred throu... View
2009-06-01 Paid defendant plaintiff $150,000.00 Damages sought per violation under 2006 amended... View
2009-06-01 Paid defendant plaintiff $50,000.00 Damages minimum under 2005 statute View
2008-09-18 Paid defendant victims $150,000.00 Minimum damages set by 18 U.S.C. § 2255 referen... View
2008-09-18 Paid defendant Robert Josefsberg... $0.00 Defendant required to pay for services of indep... View
2008-07-17 Paid defendant Code Enforcement ... $150.00 Administrative fee mentioned in previous minutes. View
2008-07-17 Paid defendant Code Enforcement ... $125.00 Daily fine rate discussed. View
2008-07-17 Paid defendant Code Enforcement ... $150.00 Administrative fee ordered in previous motion. View
As Sender
91
As Recipient
10
Total
101

Request no. 24

From: defendant
To: Jane Doe No. 3 (implied)

Demands all documents concerning assertions that the recipient met Bill Clinton, Al Gore, and Tipper Gore on Little Saint James.

Discovery request / subpoena
N/A
Communication Source

Request no. 1

From: defendant
To: Jane Doe No. 3 (implied)

Demands documents referencing Alan M. Dershowitz supporting allegations in a specific Declaration.

Discovery request / subpoena
N/A
Communication Source

Reply

From: defendant
To: Court

Dkt. No. 42; acknowledged BOP changes but requested court order confirming them.

Legal filing
N/A
Communication Source

Def. Mot.

From: defendant
To: Court

Argument regarding waiver of right to appeal extradition.

Legal motion
N/A
Communication Source

Objection/Surprise

From: defendant
To: Court/Government

Referenced by Mr. Rohrbach as receiving the defendant's letter with surprise.

Letter
N/A
Communication Source

Derogatory comments about Jane Doe No. 3

From: defendant
To: Public/Press

Called Jane Doe No. 3 a 'prostitute,' a 'liar,' or a 'bad mother'.

Press statements
N/A
Communication Source

Incoming calls

From: Callers (unidentified)
To: defendant

Contemporaneous messages taken by staff in spiral bound books.

Message pad entries
N/A
Communication Source

Document Requests

From: defendant
To: JANE DOE NO. 3

Included 25 separate document requests, including requests regarding Bill Clinton, Al Gore, and personal diaries.

Subpoena
N/A
Communication Source

Request for documents

From: defendant
To: BSF

Seeking broad categories of victim information and communications with the Government.

Subpoena
N/A
Communication Source

Change of residence / Compliance

From: defendant
To: U.S. Pretrial Services...

Mandatory reporting of residence changes and following instructions.

Reporting
N/A
Communication Source

Employment Activities

From: defendant
To: USAO-SDNY / FBI / DOJ-OIG

Truthful disclosure of all information regarding activities related to BOP employment.

Interview/disclosure
N/A
Communication Source

Contact Restriction

From: defendant
To: Co-defendant

No contact with co-defendant unless in the presence of counsel

Meeting
N/A
Communication Source

Charges

From: Government officials
To: defendant

Charges defendant with conspiracies to arrange for sexual activity and commercial sex acts (Paragraphs 12, 18, 24).

Indictment
N/A
Communication Source

Renewed motion for release on bail

From: defendant
To: Court

Defendant filed a renewed motion for release; Government opposes.

Legal motion
N/A
Communication Source

Motion to vacate/Rule 29

From: defendant
To: Court

Arguments regarding prejudice due to absent witnesses and pre-indictment delay.

Briefing/reply brief
N/A
Communication Source

Litigation Strategy

From: defendant
To: Newsmax Audience

Defendant stated they are considering suing the non-party for defamation and that they found her in Colorado to serve her.

Interview
N/A
Communication Source

Request for Production

From: defendant
To: Jane Doe 3

Requests for diaries (1999-2002), photographs, and videos from when the non-party was a minor.

Subpoena / discovery requests
N/A
Communication Source

Request no. 25

From: defendant
To: JANE DOE NO. 3

Request for documents concerning retention of Boies, Schiller & Flexner LLP

Subpoena request
N/A
Communication Source

N/A

From: defendant
To: Defense counsel

Defendant is able to send and receive emails with defense counsel every day.

Email
N/A
Communication Source

N/A

From: defendant
To: Defense counsel

Regular communication via VTC (Video Teleconferencing).

Call
N/A
Communication Source

Reply to Government response

From: defendant
To: THE COURT

Asked Court to confirm BOP changes in an order and grant same privileges as other detainees (Dkt. No. 42).

Reply
N/A
Communication Source

Sentencing Preparation

From: Probation Office
To: defendant

Defendant refused to provide info on marriage and claimed no assets.

Interview
N/A
Communication Source

Instruction on Carolyn

From: defendant
To: Virginia

Instructed Virginia to show Carolyn 'what to do.'

Instruction
N/A
Communication Source

Communications with the U.S. Attorney and BSF's co-counsel

From: defendant
To: "You" (defined as pers...

The document describes a subpoena seeking broad categories of communications, which the author argues is an impermissible 'fishing expedition' that fails to meet the specificity requirements of Rule 17(c).

Subpoena
N/A
Communication Source

Defendant's Motion (Def. Mot. 1)

From: defendant
To: Court

A motion filed by the defendant arguing that Epstein's NPA should preclude prosecution of co-conspirators in other districts.

Legal motion
N/A
Communication Source

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search