MR. PAGLIUCA

Person
Mentions
1022
Relationships
104
Events
442
Documents
497

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.
104 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person Ms. Comey
Opposing counsel
15 Very Strong
17
View
person CAROLYN
Legal representative
14 Very Strong
23
View
organization The Court
Legal representative
13 Very Strong
20
View
person MS. POMERANTZ
Opposing counsel
11 Very Strong
7
View
person Ms. Moe
Opposing counsel
11 Very Strong
13
View
person Mr. Alessi
Professional
10 Very Strong
6
View
person Ms. Comey
Professional
10 Very Strong
37
View
person Alessi
Professional
10 Very Strong
6
View
person CAROLYN
Professional
10 Very Strong
27
View
person Dr. Dubin
Professional
10 Very Strong
8
View
person Alessi
Legal representative
10 Very Strong
5
View
person Dr. Rocchio
Professional
10 Very Strong
4
View
organization The Court
Professional
10 Very Strong
136
View
person Ms. Comey
Professional adversarial
10 Very Strong
6
View
person Ms. Moe
Professional
10 Very Strong
11
View
person MS. POMERANTZ
Professional
10 Very Strong
5
View
person Ms. Sternheim
Professional
10 Very Strong
5
View
person Rocchio
Professional
9 Strong
5
View
person Rocchio
Legal representative
9 Strong
4
View
person the witness
Professional
9 Strong
4
View
person your Honor
Professional
8 Strong
3
View
person Dr. Rocchio
Legal representative
8 Strong
4
View
person CAROLYN
Adversarial
7
3
View
person Mr. Alessi
Legal representative
7
3
View
person Ms. Maxwell
Legal representative
7
3
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
N/A N/A Court Recess pending verdict Courtroom View
N/A N/A Discussion regarding Exhibit 3505-005 Courtroom View
N/A N/A Legal sidebar/conference regarding a response to a jury question concerning witness Carolyn and a... Courtroom (Southern Distric... View
N/A N/A Deposition of Ghislaine Maxwell where she is questioned about computer files and a contact list. Unknown View
N/A N/A Deposition of Ghislaine Maxwell regarding lists of names associated with Jeffrey Epstein. Unknown View
N/A N/A Direct examination of witness Dubin regarding media reports of Epstein's flight logs Courtroom View
N/A N/A Cross-examination of Mrs. Hesse Courtroom View
N/A N/A Examination of Shawn Courtroom View
N/A N/A Examination of Nicole Hesse Courtroom View
N/A N/A Testimony of Carolyn Courtroom View
N/A N/A Admission of Government Exhibit 5 into evidence. Courtroom View
N/A N/A Cross Examination of Lisa Rocchio by Mr. Pagliuca Courtroom View
N/A N/A Redirect examination of witness Carolyn. Courtroom View
N/A N/A Conclusion of Shawn's testimony and calling of Nicole Hesse to the stand. Courtroom (Southern Distric... View
N/A N/A Cross-examination of witness Rocchio regarding the 'Craven article' and the definition of grooming. Courtroom View
N/A N/A Court recess taken after discussion between counsel and judge. Courtroom View
N/A N/A Legal argument regarding the admissibility of Exhibit 52 (a book) to the jury. Courtroom View
N/A N/A Direct examination of witness Dubin regarding sexualized massages and relationship timeline. Courtroom View
N/A N/A Review of evidentiary exhibits (1J, 1K, 1M) during trial testimony. Courtroom View
N/A N/A Direct Examination of Carolyn Courtroom View
N/A N/A Cross-examination of Juan Patricio Alessi Courtroom View
N/A N/A Afternoon Court Session during Jury Deliberations Courtroom View
N/A N/A Legal argument regarding the 'business record exception' and admissibility of phone logs/notes. Courtroom View
N/A Testimony Mr. Pagliuca summarizes testimony from four witnesses (Carolyn, Jane, Kate, Mr. Alessi) regarding... Courtroom View
N/A Testimony A witness is being questioned about Jeffrey Epstein's use of masseuses. N/A View

EFTA00029847.pdf

This document is a legal filing by the Government opposing defense motions in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It primarily addresses Count Six (perjury), arguing that Maxwell's answers in a July 2016 deposition regarding 'sexual activities,' 'sex toys,' and 'massages' were false and not fundamentally ambiguous. The document also addresses and rejects defense requests for discovery regarding a victim's personal diary from 1996 and broad subpoenas for defendant's records.

Legal filing / government memorandum of law (opposition to defense motions)
2025-12-25

EFTA00008716.pdf

This document is a Grand Jury Presentation from June 2020 in the case US v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It compiles evidence including photographs of Epstein's properties, flight logs from 1994-1998 showing Maxwell and others traveling with Epstein, records of a donation to Interlochen Arts Camp, and excerpts from Maxwell's 2016 deposition where she denies knowledge of underage recruitment or sexual misconduct. The flight logs notably list prominent figures such as Senator George Mitchell and Bill Richardson.

Grand jury presentation (exhibit)
2025-12-25

DOJ-OGR-00018336.jpg

This document is page 235 of a court transcript index from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 10, 2022. It lists the examination details (Direct and Cross) for witnesses Juan Patricio Alessi, Gregory Parkinson, and Michael Dawson by attorneys Pagliuca, Comey, and Everdell. It also tracks the receipt of numerous Government Exhibits (numbered between 201 and 721) into the court record.

Court transcript index / index of examination
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00018309.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness, Mr. Parkinson. An attorney questions Parkinson about Government Exhibits 235 and 292, establishing that photographs of a "windy staircase" do not show any pictures on the adjacent wall. The proceedings also involve a discussion among attorneys and the judge about another piece of evidence, Government Exhibit 234, which is confirmed to be sealed.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00018269.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It captures a discussion between attorneys Mr. Pagliuca and Ms. Comey and the judge regarding the proper procedure for redacting video evidence to protect witness anonymity and third-party privacy. Ms. Comey also raises a technical concern that the timestamps on the redacted video will not align with the official transcripts.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00018260.jpg

This document is a court transcript from a legal case filed on August 10, 2022. It captures the direct examination of a witness, Mr. Parkinson, by an attorney, Ms. Comey, regarding three pieces of evidence labeled Government Exhibits 238, 239, and 240. Mr. Parkinson identifies the exhibits as depicting the first floor and north side of a building.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00018207.jpg

This is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell) dated August 10, 2022. Defense attorney Mr. Pagliuca cross-examines witness Mr. Alessi, who confirms he believed the people providing massages to Epstein were of age. Alessi also testifies that he saw 'hundreds of guests' at Epstein's house but does not recall a specific person named Carolyn. Following the cross-examination, Ms. Comey declines redirect, and Alessi is excused.

Court transcript
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00018206.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness, Mr. Alessi, regarding his time working for Mr. Epstein. The questioning focuses on the number and age of women present at a house, with the questioner suggesting they were hired for massages and the witness insisting they were guests. The witness confirms his belief that the women were over 20, and an objection is sustained regarding a question about their "proper age."

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00018193.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Alessi. Alessi testifies that his job was to make phone calls to arrange appointments for Mr. Epstein based on direct instructions from Epstein, Ms. Maxwell, or office secretaries, and that he never sought out massage therapists on his own. He also confirms that most of the massage therapists came from spas or clubs.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00018192.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022. It captures a portion of the cross-examination of a witness, Mr. Alessi, by an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca, regarding a statement Mr. Alessi made under oath in 2016. The questioning centers on whether Mr. Alessi had previously testified that friends of a Mr. Epstein would recommend women for massages and provide their contact information.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00018191.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness, Mr. Alessi, by an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca. Alessi admits to having a list of massage therapists for Mr. Epstein but denies ever personally calling one to come to the house. The transcript also records procedural interactions between the attorneys (Pagliuca and Ms. Comey) and the judge.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00018190.jpg

This page contains the cross-examination of Juan Alessi during the trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). Defense attorney Pagliuca asks Alessi if he ever called The Breakers, Mar-a-Lago, or Boca Raton resort to find massage therapists for Jeffrey Epstein, to which Alessi replies 'Never.' The rest of the page involves procedural discussions regarding the admissibility of prior deposition testimony for impeachment purposes.

Court transcript (cross-examination)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00018189.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Alessi by an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca. The discussion involves procedural arguments with the judge and another attorney, Ms. Comey, about referencing prior testimony. The page ends with Mr. Pagliuca asking Mr. Alessi if he would call resorts like The Breakers or Mar-a-Lago to find someone to deliver a message to Jeffrey Epstein.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00018188.jpg

This is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the cross-examination of witness Alessi (Juan Alessi). The testimony focuses on Alessi driving a woman (implied to be Ghislaine Maxwell) to exclusive spas and country clubs in Palm Beach, including The Breakers, allegedly for the purpose of 'recruiting.' Alessi admits to keeping a Rolodex containing the names of 'repeat woman' and 'massage therapists' who visited the house.

Court transcript (cross-examination)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00018186.jpg

This document is a page from the cross-examination of Juan Alessi in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). Attorney Pagliuca questions Alessi about previous deposition testimony regarding whether a specific woman was considered a massage therapist and whether Jeffrey Epstein instructed Alessi to hire licensed therapists from clubs and spas—an allegation Alessi denies. Prosecutor Ms. Comey intervenes to ensure the full context of the deposition questions is read into the record.

Court transcript (cross-examination)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00018184.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, showing the cross-examination of a witness named Alessi by Mr. Pagliuca. The questioning centers on establishing the date of a summer day when the witness was waiting for Ms. Maxwell. The witness's testimony shows significant uncertainty about the year, with their recollection shifting from 2001 to 2000 (a year they associate with working for 'Jeffrey' and meeting 'Virginia') and then to 2002.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00018183.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, showing a lawyer, Mr. Pagliuca, cross-examining a witness named Alessi. Mr. Pagliuca reads from a prior deposition where the witness was questioned by Mr. Edwards, Virginia Roberts' lawyer, about a trip to Mar-a-Lago. The testimony reveals the witness gave conflicting dates (2000 and summer 2002) for when they went to pick up Virginia Roberts from the location.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00018182.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Alessi. An attorney, Mr. Pagliuca, questions Alessi about a meeting with a Ms. Roberts at Mar-a-Lago in 2001 or 2002. Another attorney, Ms. Comey, objects to the questioning method, leading to a procedural discussion before the court.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00018181.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, featuring the cross-examination of a witness named Alessi by attorney Mr. Pagliuca. The testimony focuses on Alessi confirming observing Ms. Maxwell engaging in conversation with Virginia Roberts after Maxwell received a 'treatment.' There is a brief legal dispute where Ms. Comey objects to Mr. Pagliuca misreading a line from a prior deposition, which Pagliuca then corrects.

Court transcript
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00018178.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, from the cross-examination of a witness named Alessi. The judge confirms with counsel, Ms. Comey for the government and Mr. Pagliuca, that there are no preliminary matters to discuss. The judge then instructs court staff, Ms. Williams, to bring the witness back to the stand and to bring in the jury to resume the proceedings.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00018176.jpg

Page 75 of a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed 08/10/22) documenting the cross-examination of Mr. Alessi. Attorney Ms. Comey requests a full Q&A be read for the record, but cross-examining attorney Mr. Pagliuca realizes he is on the wrong page and requests a break, which the Court grants.

Court transcript
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00018175.jpg

In this transcript from the trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330), witness Mr. Alessi is cross-examined by defense attorney Mr. Pagliuca. Alessi admits he did not follow the specific household manual or use its checkmarks, though he asserts he did his work. Pagliuca attempts to establish that a 'countess' was hired to write this manual, which Alessi claims not to know.

Court transcript (cross-examination)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00018174.jpg

In this court transcript page from the cross-examination of Mr. Alessi, the witness confirms that Jeffrey Epstein was considered 'the boss' and owner. The defense questions Alessi on whether Ghislaine Maxwell's instructions were understood to come directly from Epstein, to which Alessi replies he does not know. The testimony also discusses a 'household manual' and Epstein's hiring of a 'countess' to purportedly create it.

Court transcript (cross-examination)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00018173.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, showing the cross-examination of a witness named Alessi by an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca. The questioning focuses on confirming Alessi's prior sworn testimony about his chain of command, where he identified Mr. Epstein as his direct supervisor and Ms. Maxwell as the secondary contact.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00018172.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Alessi by an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca. The questioning focuses on the witness's relationship and communication protocols with Mr. Epstein and Ms. Maxwell, particularly concerning who was in charge at a Palm Beach property. The transcript also records a procedural exchange where another attorney, Ms. Comey, makes an objection that is overruled by the judge.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
73
As Recipient
6
Total
79

Scheduling and Privilege Waiver

From: MR. PAGLIUCA
To: THE COURT

Discussion regarding when to address the waiver theory concerning 'Jane', scheduling for Friday vs Monday, and the timeline for the government to rest its case.

Meeting
2022-08-10

Expert Witness Testimony

From: MR. PAGLIUCA
To: THE COURT

Pagliuca argues it is unlikely experts LaPorte and Naso will testify.

Meeting
2022-08-10

New Witness Disclosure

From: MR. PAGLIUCA
To: THE COURT

Discussion of newly disclosed witness William Brown.

Meeting
2022-08-10

Defense strategy and calling attorneys as witnesses

From: MR. PAGLIUCA
To: THE COURT

Pagliuca argues it is inappropriate to discuss defense strategy; Court rules he cannot call an attorney as a witness without briefing.

Court proceeding
2022-08-10

Cross-examination

From: MR. PAGLIUCA
To: CAROLYN

Questioning regarding signature on Exhibit C8.

Meeting
2022-08-10

Admissibility of Interrogatory Questions

From: MR. PAGLIUCA
To: THE COURT

Discussion regarding the admission of questions 16 and 17 from a prior document concerning Carolyn's visits to Epstein's home and payments received.

Court proceeding
2022-08-10

Scope of Cross-Examination

From: MR. PAGLIUCA
To: THE COURT

Argument regarding the admissibility of questions about memory, confabulation, and alcohol effects during cross-examination of Dr. Rocchio.

Meeting
2022-08-10

Witness Testimony vs Stipulation

From: MR. PAGLIUCA
To: THE COURT

Discussion regarding whether to use a live witness or a stipulation for a 302 report.

Court proceeding
2022-08-10

Adherence to household manual

From: MR. PAGLIUCA
To: Mr. Alessi

Questioning regarding whether Alessi followed a specific manual and knowledge of 'the countess'.

Court proceeding
2022-08-10

Cross-examination regarding substance abuse

From: MR. PAGLIUCA
To: CAROLYN

Attorney questions witness about drug use in 2002-2003 and at age 13.

Court proceeding
2022-08-10

Witness Preclusion

From: MR. PAGLIUCA
To: THE COURT

Clarifying that Mr. Scarola and Mr. Edwards are precluded so they can be released.

Court proceeding
2022-08-10

Admissibility of Evidence (Exhibit 52)

From: THE COURT
To: MR. PAGLIUCA

Discussion regarding whether Exhibit 52 will be admitted in redacted form and if the defense will stipulate that sub-exhibits are true copies.

Meeting
2022-08-10

Witness Anonymity and Courtroom Logistics

From: THE COURT
To: MR. PAGLIUCA

Discussion regarding how to handle document display screens to prevent public disclosure of anonymous witness identities while maintaining efficiency.

Court proceeding
2022-08-10

Witness Binder / Cross-Examination

From: MR. PAGLIUCA
To: The Court / Ms. Pomerantz

Discussion regarding the contents of a binder for the witness (containing Daubert hearing testimony and 3500 material) prior to the jury entering.

Court dialogue
2022-08-10

Relevance of Dr. Rocchio's testimony

From: MR. PAGLIUCA
To: THE COURT

Discussion regarding 'grooming the environment,' perpetrator deception, and hindsight bias effect.

Meeting
2022-08-10

Admissibility and Procedural Status

From: MR. PAGLIUCA
To: THE COURT

Discussion regarding not admitting a specific item and determining where questioning left off (around '33') to be handled at sidebar.

Meeting
2022-08-10

Direct Examination

From: MR. PAGLIUCA
To: Dr. Dubin

Questioning regarding observations of inappropriate conduct between Epstein and teenage females.

Court testimony
2022-08-10

Direct Examination / Exhibit Admission

From: MR. PAGLIUCA
To: THE COURT

Mr. Pagliuca resumes direct examination of Dr. Dubin and offers Exhibit 662-RR into evidence.

Courtroom dialogue
2022-08-10

Discrepancies in Epstein Victim Compensation Fund submission

From: MR. PAGLIUCA
To: CAROLYN

Mr. Pagliuca questions the witness, Carolyn, about the start date of alleged abuse (May 1, 2001) and additional claims of specific sexual acts in her submission to the Epstein Victim Compensation Fund, which she denies making.

Court testimony / cross-examination
2022-08-10

Scope of cross-examination regarding a study on grooming ...

From: MR. PAGLIUCA
To: ["The Court"]

Mr. Pagliuca previews his intent to cross-examine a witness about a study (disclosure 3502-018) which concluded that five factors cannot be used to prospectively predict grooming behavior. The Court grants permission, noting it is consistent with the witness's testimony.

Court dialogue
2022-08-10

Acknowledgment of ruling

From: MR. PAGLIUCA
To: your Honor

Mr. Pagliuca thanks the judge after the ruling is made.

Court testimony
2022-08-10

Compensation fund payment and prior claims

From: MR. PAGLIUCA
To: ["Carolyn"]

Mr. Pagliuca cross-examines the witness, Carolyn, about a $2,804,000 compensation payment she received, a $446,000 deduction related to prior claims against Mr. Epstein and Ms. Kellen, and the consequences of submitting false information to the fund.

Court testimony
2022-08-10

Working conditions at Mr. Epstein's residence

From: MR. PAGLIUCA
To: ["Alessi"]

Mr. Pagliuca questions the witness, Alessi, about the differences in his duties and living arrangements depending on whether Mr. Epstein was present at the residence. The testimony covers access to the house, working hours, and the presence of other staff.

Deposition testimony
2022-08-10

Objection during cross-examination

From: MR. PAGLIUCA
To: ["The Court"]

Mr. Pagliuca objects to questioning Dr. Loftus about a single study, arguing it's prejudicial and similar to a previous objection the Court sustained when he tried to cross-examine Dr. Rocchio. The Court questions his intent, and he clarifies he was trying to impeach the witness.

Courtroom dialogue
2022-08-10

Prior deposition testimony regarding Jane, Jeffrey Epstei...

From: MR. PAGLIUCA
To: ["Alessi"]

Mr. Pagliuca questions Mr. Alessi about his previous deposition answer regarding the year Jane met Jeffrey Epstein and Glen Maxwell. Alessi clarifies his answer, stating he confused two different girls he met.

Court testimony
2022-08-10

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity